Note: it seems that probably after a reboot, snap resetted the AppArmor
profile to the default, so breaking my dockerd installation. Therefore
there is no really a work around and it requires a proper patch.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Public bug reported:
This is a summary of my 2 posts:
1.
https://forum.snapcraft.io/t/call-for-testing-of-the-docker-snap/7710/31?u=huygens
2.
https://forum.snapcraft.io/t/call-for-testing-of-the-docker-snap/7710/32?u=huygens
In brief, I want to activate User Namespace for Docker. Currently
Public bug reported:
After installing the docker snap, I realised that dockerd has the
following flag --debug.
I would consider that option fine for the candidate channel but not the
stable one.
Trying to setup debug to false in the daemon.json fails (the dockerd
does not start because of
Actually the recommended version is at least 18.09.2 which fixes some
security issues. And there is a more stable 18.09.3 that would be even
better
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
We are experiencing the same behaviour and error messages with a Ryzen5
1600 CPU and an ASUS PRIME A320M-K motherboard.
What we can add is:
1. When no VMs are running, even if there are long idle periods, the machines
can be stable for several days on Ubuntu 16.04.3 using the HWE Kernel 4.10.
Public bug reported:
I am monitoring my machine using telegraf and collectd, and displaying
the information in Grafana.
In the last week, the CPU temperature is a constant 35°C (average). But
after upgrading to Kernel 4.10 the temperature raises to a constant 40°C
(average). That's quite a
Hi Serge,
Sorry for the long delay in replying, I overlooked the email
notification.
Yes that is almost correct, I add previously installed the ppa:ubuntu-
lxc/lxd-stable (so the LXD one not ppa:ubuntu-lxc/stable as you
mentioned) in Vivid. But before doing the upgrade I installed the ppa-
purge
Hi Serge,
Sorry for the long delay in replying, I overlooked the email
notification.
Yes that is almost correct, I add previously installed the ppa:ubuntu-
lxc/lxd-stable (so the LXD one not ppa:ubuntu-lxc/stable as you
mentioned) in Vivid. But before doing the upgrade I installed the ppa-
purge
I had the same problem while upgrading from 15.04 to 15.10 today.
I had 1 ppa installed on this system (ppa:ubuntu-lxc/stable) which I reverted
before doing the upgrade using the ppa-purge tool.
After purging this ppa from my system, I proceeded with the upgrade and it
failed like this bug
I had the same problem while upgrading from 15.04 to 15.10 today.
I had 1 ppa installed on this system (ppa:ubuntu-lxc/stable) which I reverted
before doing the upgrade using the ppa-purge tool.
After purging this ppa from my system, I proceeded with the upgrade and it
failed like this bug
** Also affects: linux-lts-trusty (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1272933
Title:
[Dell Latitude E6440] suspend leads to black
I have still the problem with my Dell Latitude E6440 (but no AMD/Nvidia card,
just the Intel integrated GPU). I have installed the latest BIOS version (A11).
I also have troubles with the wake-up from suspend on this laptop with Windows
7 64bit and with Fedora 21 64bits.
All 3 systems are
Public bug reported:
I booted on Ubuntu 14.04.1 Desktop 64 bit (using the USB), went to ry
Ubuntu and partition the 2 HDD (SATA 320GB) as I wanted, which is:
- 2x 512MB as RAID1 (md) w/ ext4 for /boot
- 2x 6GB as RAID0 (md) for swap
- 2x 64GB as RAID1 (md) + 1 Logical Volume (LVM2) using
I rebooted and was greeted by grub but without any menu, just the grub command
line...
It is late in my local time zone, so this is some more tasks for another day...
Btw, if anyone knows a brainless step-by-step how to install Ubuntu
Desktop using software RAID, he is more than welcome. Sadly
@Matt I only have 1 card with dual-ports, but it is also a i350.
The Broadcom embedded card (on the motherboard of my HP server) has never had
the problem of being wrongly renamed.
Only the Intel one has issue.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
Sorry, but as there was no counter argument why this could have been indeed a
duplicate, I have taken the liberty to revert the change.
Please, if you still think it is a duplicate, first try to argument why. Once
we agree, then we can find the right conclusion for this bug.
:-)
Sincerely yours.
As I stated in my previous comment, I went for the solution to have
/boot on a MD+ext4 RAID (which has the following, non-blocking but
annoying, bug #1274320).
I am half happy with this solution, but at least most of my files are
now under Btrfs.
--
You received this bug notification because
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1293633 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1293633
We are now 2nd of April, and I also think that this bug is not a
duplicate of the other one.
I am totally fine not having eth0 and I personnally prefer the new
naming convention with p1p2 and the sort.
One more information that could hopefully help the investigation.
I have 3 network interfaces (em1, p1p1 and p1p2) but today I only use
one (p1p2) the 2 others do not even have a cable plugged in.
So only p1p2 is configured to be up with a DHCP configuration and some
firewall rules.
And guess
Hi Florian,
The kernel boot parameters are working but are also reverting to the old
scheme for network naming. So my 3 network interfaces are now named eth0, eth1
and eth2 instead of em1, p1p1 and p1p2.
It is a work around which I can use for the time being. But I would like to
switch to the
Here is another different kind of setup which triggers the problem:
/boot ext4 on a md RAID10 (4 HDD) partition
/ btrfs RAID10 (4 HDD) partition
swap on a md RAID0 (4HDD) partition
The boot and kernel are on a MD RAID (software RAID), whereas the rest
of the system is using Btrfs RAID.
--
Public bug reported:
My installation of Ubuntu Server 14.04 is bare metal (no
virtualisation). The hardware box contains 3 network interfaces, one
broadcom (not yet used) and two intel (actually one PCIe network card
with 2 ports, one is currently used).
The MAC address of the intel network card
My bug is related to that one, so I am adding the information as
comment rather than creating a new one. However, if you think it is
enough different let me know and I will create a separate bug.
I wanted to install Ubuntu Server on a system with 3 disks using Btrfs in
RAID5. My first attempt
Actually my patch did not work :-( I got in rescue mode while
rebooting...
I think I will create dedicated /boot partition on top of MD instead
of using Btrfs. This is quite disappointing! I wanted Btrfs because of
its checksum+RAID combination. I will have to rely on plain old
MD+ext4...
--
Hi Clint,
I have installed MySQL from Ubuntu official repos.
I have set the hugepages configuration for the kernel as described in
https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/vm/hugetlbpage.txt
And I have set the hugepages configuration for MySQL as described
Sorry problem solved by setting
/SYSV** rw,
(with 2 ** instead of 1 *)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1011867
Title:
HugeTLB EACCES Permission Denied
To manage notifications
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 844957 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/844957
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 844957
Safely removing external (usb) hdd's can cause a kernel panic or system
freeze
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
However there is no upgrade so to speak for LTS. I'm still using
Ubuntu 10.04 and I don't plan on upgrading before the next LTS.
And as far as I know the issue is not fix for the LTS. So I would
disagree that this bug is marked as Fix Released, it was only partially
released to a few of the
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 728864 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/728864
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 728864
did not find base dn during startup
* You can subscribe to bug 728864 by following this link:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 728864 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/728864
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 728864
did not find base dn during startup
* You can subscribe to bug 728864 by following this link:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 728864 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/728864
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 728864
did not find base dn during startup
* You can subscribe to bug 728864 by following this link:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 728864 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/728864
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 728864
did not find base dn during startup
* You can subscribe to bug 728864 by following this link:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 728864 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/728864
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 728864
did not find base dn during startup
* You can subscribe to bug 728864 by following this link:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 728864 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/728864
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 728864
did not find base dn during startup
* You can subscribe to bug 728864 by following this link:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 728864 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/728864
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 728864
did not find base dn during startup
* You can subscribe to bug 728864 by following this link:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 728864 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/728864
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 728864
did not find base dn during startup
* You can subscribe to bug 728864 by following this link:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 728864 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/728864
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 728864
did not find base dn during startup
* You can subscribe to bug 728864 by following this link:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 728864 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/728864
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 728864
did not find base dn during startup
* You can subscribe to bug 728864 by following this link:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 728864 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/728864
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 728864
did not find base dn during startup
* You can subscribe to bug 728864 by following this link:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 728864 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/728864
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 728864
did not find base dn during startup
* You can subscribe to bug 728864 by following this link:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 728864 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/728864
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 728864
did not find base dn during startup
* You can subscribe to bug 728864 by following this link:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 728864 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/728864
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 728864
did not find base dn during startup
* You can subscribe to bug 728864 by following this link:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 728864 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/728864
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 728864
did not find base dn during startup
* You can subscribe to bug 728864 by following this link:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 728864 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/728864
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 728864
did not find base dn during startup
* You can subscribe to bug 728864 by following this link:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 728864 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/728864
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 728864
did not find base dn during startup
* You can subscribe to bug 728864 by following this link:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 728864 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/728864
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 728864
did not find base dn during startup
* You can subscribe to bug 728864 by following this link:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 728864 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/728864
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 728864
did not find base dn during startup
* You can subscribe to bug 728864 by following this link:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 728864 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/728864
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 728864
did not find base dn during startup
* You can subscribe to bug 728864 by following this link:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 728864 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/728864
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 728864
did not find base dn during startup
* You can subscribe to bug 728864 by following this link:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 728864 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/728864
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 728864
did not find base dn during startup
* You can subscribe to bug 728864 by following this link:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 728864 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/728864
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 728864
did not find base dn during startup
* You can subscribe to bug 728864 by following this link:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 728864 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/728864
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 728864
did not find base dn during startup
* You can subscribe to bug 728864 by following this link:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 728864 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/728864
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 728864
did not find base dn during startup
* You can subscribe to bug 728864 by following this link:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 728864 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/728864
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 728864
did not find base dn during startup
* You can subscribe to bug 728864 by following this link:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 728864 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/728864
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 728864
did not find base dn during startup
* You can subscribe to bug 728864 by following this link:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 728864 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/728864
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 728864
did not find base dn during startup
* You can subscribe to bug 728864 by following this link:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 728864 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/728864
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 728864
did not find base dn during startup
* You can subscribe to bug 728864 by following this link:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 728864 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/728864
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 728864
did not find base dn during startup
* You can subscribe to bug 728864 by following this link:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 728864 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/728864
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 728864
did not find base dn during startup
* You can subscribe to bug 728864 by following this link:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 728864 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/728864
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 728864
did not find base dn during startup
* You can subscribe to bug 728864 by following this link:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 728864 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/728864
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 728864
did not find base dn during startup
* You can subscribe to bug 728864 by following this link:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 728864 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/728864
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 728864
did not find base dn during startup
* You can subscribe to bug 728864 by following this link:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 728864 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/728864
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 728864
did not find base dn during startup
* You can subscribe to bug 728864 by following this link:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 728864 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/728864
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 728864
did not find base dn during startup
* You can subscribe to bug 728864 by following this link:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 728864 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/728864
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 728864
did not find base dn during startup
* You can subscribe to bug 728864 by following this link:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 728864 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/728864
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 728864
did not find base dn during startup
* You can subscribe to bug 728864 by following this link:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 728840 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/728840
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 728840
upgradeprovision crashed with LdbError in connect(): (80, 'Failed to load
modules from: /usr/lib/samba/ldb\n')
* You can subscribe to bug 728840 by
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 728840 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/728840
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 728840
upgradeprovision crashed with LdbError in connect(): (80, 'Failed to load
modules from: /usr/lib/samba/ldb\n')
* You can subscribe to bug 728840 by
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 732071 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/732071
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 771622
package samba4 4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2ubuntu1 failed to
install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha
restituito
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 732071 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/732071
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 771622
package samba4 4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2ubuntu1 failed to
install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha
restituito
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 732071 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/732071
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 771622
package samba4 4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2ubuntu1 failed to
install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha
restituito
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 732071 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/732071
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 771622
package samba4 4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2ubuntu1 failed to
install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha
restituito
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 732071 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/732071
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 771622
package samba4 4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2ubuntu1 failed to
install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha
restituito
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 732071 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/732071
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 771622
package samba4 4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2ubuntu1 failed to
install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha
restituito
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 732071 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/732071
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 771622
package samba4 4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2ubuntu1 failed to
install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha
restituito
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 732071 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/732071
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 771622
package samba4 4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2ubuntu1 failed to
install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha
restituito lo
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 732071 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/732071
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 771622
package samba4 4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2ubuntu1 failed to
install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha
restituito lo
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 732071 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/732071
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 771622
package samba4 4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2ubuntu1 failed to
install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha
restituito lo
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 732071 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/732071
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 771622
package samba4 4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2ubuntu1 failed to
install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha
restituito lo
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 732071 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/732071
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 771622
package samba4 4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2ubuntu1 failed to
install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha
restituito lo
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 732071 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/732071
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 771622
package samba4 4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2ubuntu1 failed to
install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha
restituito lo
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 732071 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/732071
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 771622
package samba4 4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2ubuntu1 failed to
install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha
restituito
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 732071 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/732071
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 771622
package samba4 4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2ubuntu1 failed to
install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha
restituito
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 732071 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/732071
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 771622
package samba4 4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2ubuntu1 failed to
install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha
restituito
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 732071 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/732071
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 771622
package samba4 4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2ubuntu1 failed to
install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha
restituito
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 732071 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/732071
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 732071
samba4: unable to find ldb modules
* You can subscribe to bug 732071 by following this link:
I just got affected by this bug.
I had Firefox, Rythmbox and LibreOffice Writer open. Firefox was idle (I was
not using it directly but there is my gmail, twitter, etc. web apps). Rythmbox
was idle (a song was playing, but I was not interacting with it). However, I
was using heavily Writer. I
The system does freeze less with latest kernel, but the kslowd*** are
still using unnecessary CPU time. It's consuming an average of 1.6% of
the CPU (over a ~20h period).
I have an old Sempron 2800+ (64bit) with and old ATI Radeon 9600XT (no
not HD, just plain ol' radeon on AGP port!!).
--
You
Using Lucid with ntfs-3g 2010.3.6.
Today, I tried to move an Eclipse workspace (2.1 GB and about 20,000 files), it
moved 990 MB and has still to move 11,630 files but it is really hanged!!! It
does do anything any more. I just have 100% of the CPU (one whole core)
consumed by the ntfs-3g
Thanks Alexander!
Your solution improved a lot my situation. I was able to move the directory
now. Will do some more test and see if it solves every problems or not.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
It just state that this bug won't be fix by the Gwibber team. It's not
stating that this bug won't be fixed at all :-)
--
beam.smp uses lots of CPU on desktopcouch contacts lookup
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/458453
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
OK, thanks Jean-Baptiste
--
Eclipse crashes in libpango (karmic)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/531376
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Same thing as with Olivier, the applet is no more using the Automatic
proxy settings, or perhaps the Gnome Proxy Settings are broken because
most application do not see the proxy configuration when using it in
automatic mode. I say most because the only exception that do work are
Firefox and
I can test it on Maverick, if you like, but I'm on Ubuntu 10.04 LTS and do not
wish to upgrade for awhile (that the purpose of an LTS) as I'm using it for
work.
So I can make the test, but then a fix is required to be backported to 10.04
and I would suggest to any supported Ubuntu release
I don't know if my problem is similar or not, but here are the details:
I'm using Ubuntu 10.04 LTS with latest updates.
At work, we use a proxy and we have an automatic script for that. This
is handy so when I'm home, it does not find the script and no proxy is
configured which is what I want.
Same same and no differences on Ubuntu 10.10 :-(
On Ubuntu 10.10
With manual configuration: weather-applet and Firefox work, Empathy and Pidgin
do not work (this is a regression for Pidgin)
With automatic configuration: only Firefox works, weather-applet, Empathy and
Pidgin do not work!
** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = New
--
Proxy auto-config (PAC) not usable by some applications
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/587097
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Did you push the correction upstream? Because i'm using Eclipse Helios
3.6.1 from Eclipse web site and I still encounter the problem. I'm using
Ubuntu 10.04 with latest updates and Sun Java 6 from the repo.
--
Eclipse crashes in libpango (karmic)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/531376
You
OK, sorry about my previous comment, discard it please.
I did a full clean and build and it is working. I probably had some part
compiled by an earlier release of Eclipse which was not corrected.
So now that everything is clean, I don't reproduce the problem.
--
Eclipse crashes in libpango
I have Eclipse 3.5.2-2ubuntu4.2 installed on Ubuntu 10.04 LTS with SUN
Java 6.22-0ubuntu1~10.04 both are from Lucid repositories.
When I do a full clean and build of my application, it starts and is working.
Then if I make a small code modification and restart the application (there is
Eclipse
1 - 100 of 285 matches
Mail list logo
