[Bug 985947] Re: Every 10 minutes xorg is loading Atom N450 CPU 50-65% resulting to battery drain and performance drop

2012-05-08 Thread Invalid
I have few more problems with intel video. Every 2-3 hours I have to restart Xorg or laptop because video driver causes screen image to be completely corrupt. After reboots I've noticed that problem with CPU load vanishes for some time. But occassionaly, it returns :( So it is not 100%

[Bug 985947] Re: Every 10 minutes xorg is loading Atom N450 CPU 50-65% resulting to battery drain and performance drop

2012-05-04 Thread Invalid
It seems that not only xkb plugin causes xorg to consume all cpu. for me - any panel icon animation causes same effect. checked with psi, psi-plus (received message indicator) and skype (logging in animation). this issue appeared only after upgrade to 12.04. -- You received this bug

[Bug 917724] Re: iptraf crashes with all functions

2012-01-28 Thread Invalid
Recently iptraf began to crash when any monitoring started. I've captured strace output (due to ncurses tui, console output contains no useful information). Interesting entries are: writev(3, [{*** , 4}, {stack smashing detected, 23}, { ***: , 6}, {iptraf, 6}, { terminated\n, 12}], 5) = 51 and

[Bug 538505] Re: KDE frontend extremely slow reponsiveness / high CPU usage

2011-07-23 Thread Invalid
Problem still exists in 11.04. Right now I am installing kubuntu on notebook from kubuntu-11.04-desktop-amd64.iso image. ubiquity process is using 100% of CPU, and is very slow - installation progress is updating about once per 10 minutes. After installation completed, it still eating 100% CPU.

[Bug 318465] Re: Logitech MX5000 doesn't connect via bluetooth under ubuntu

2010-06-20 Thread greedy invalid
I have removed BT soft from 10.04 and installed BT soft from 9.10. MX5000 works fine now. I must say tho this is quite faux pass. I can`t imagine what i would do not have an old keyboart an mouse... Definitely higher than low btw. -- Logitech MX5000 doesn't connect via bluetooth under ubuntu

[Bug 593025] Re: 2.6.31-10-rt image does not match source

2010-06-12 Thread Invalid Opcode
I agree that this bug should be invalidated. It was caused by two operator errors: 1) Not running the apply-patchset 2) Not having /debian in the linux-rt source tree (while the rest of the source tree was there). Following Alessio's steps above, I do get the debian directory that then allows

[Bug 593025] Re: 2.6.31-10-rt image does not match source

2010-06-12 Thread Invalid Opcode
Just a quick follow up on how the /debian in the linux-rt source tree went missing - it gets cleaned out when your run a 'make distclean'. So I guess the fundamental problem all along is mixing kernel.org style kernel building with debian kernel building. -- 2.6.31-10-rt image does not match

[Bug 593025] [NEW] 2.6.31-10-rt image does not match source

2010-06-12 Thread Invalid Opcode
Public bug reported: In Lucid, I expected that I should be able to download the source code for the linux-rt kernel image and recompile my own version that matches the image supplied in the repository. However, it appears that the source for the linux-image-rt is not the same that is found in