[Bug 538417] [NEW] clamav-daemon 0.96~rc1+dfsg-0ubuntu1 uses deprecated option

2010-03-13 Thread John Edwards
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: clamav The /etc/clamav/clamd.conf config file in clamav-daemon 0.96~rc1+dfsg- 0ubuntu1 (Ubuntu 10.04 alpha) contains the deprecated option MailFollowURLs: $ sudo /etc/init.d/clamav-daemon restart * Stopping ClamAV daemon clamd

[Bug 538464] [NEW] clamav-daemon 0.96~rc1+dfsg-0ubuntu1 man page incomplete

2010-03-13 Thread John Edwards
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: clamav The clamd.conf man page in clamav-daemon 0.96~rc1+dfsg-0ubuntu1 (Ubuntu 10.04 alpha) is missing some new options that were introduced in clamav 0.96. The following options are completely missing: OfficialDatabaseOnly ClamukoScannerCount

[Bug 538465] [NEW] clamav-daemon 0.96~rc1+dfsg-0ubuntu1 man page has mistakes

2010-03-13 Thread John Edwards
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: clamav The clamd.conf man page in clamav-daemon 0.96~rc1+dfsg-0ubuntu1 (Ubuntu 10.04 alpha) has a couple of typo mistakes. The LocalSocketGroup and LocalSocketMode options appear without their first letter (eg as ocalSocketGroup and ocalSocketMode),

[Bug 538417] [NEW] clamav-daemon 0.96~rc1+dfsg-0ubuntu1 uses deprecated option

2010-03-13 Thread John Edwards
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: clamav The /etc/clamav/clamd.conf config file in clamav-daemon 0.96~rc1+dfsg- 0ubuntu1 (Ubuntu 10.04 alpha) contains the deprecated option MailFollowURLs: $ sudo /etc/init.d/clamav-daemon restart * Stopping ClamAV daemon clamd

[Bug 538464] [NEW] clamav-daemon 0.96~rc1+dfsg-0ubuntu1 man page incomplete

2010-03-13 Thread John Edwards
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: clamav The clamd.conf man page in clamav-daemon 0.96~rc1+dfsg-0ubuntu1 (Ubuntu 10.04 alpha) is missing some new options that were introduced in clamav 0.96. The following options are completely missing: OfficialDatabaseOnly ClamukoScannerCount

[Bug 538465] [NEW] clamav-daemon 0.96~rc1+dfsg-0ubuntu1 man page has mistakes

2010-03-13 Thread John Edwards
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: clamav The clamd.conf man page in clamav-daemon 0.96~rc1+dfsg-0ubuntu1 (Ubuntu 10.04 alpha) has a couple of typo mistakes. The LocalSocketGroup and LocalSocketMode options appear without their first letter (eg as ocalSocketGroup and ocalSocketMode),

[Bug 535255] [NEW] smbclient -N option does not password given with -U option

2010-03-09 Thread John Edwards
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba smbclient has the ability to give both username and password in the -U as 'username%password' for automated logins. But when the -N (no password prompt) option is used, an anonymous login is used instead. As there has been no change in the man

[Bug 535185] [NEW] Web interface errors because split function deprecated in PHP 5.3

2010-03-09 Thread John Edwards
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: phpsysinfo phpsysinfo 3.0~rc6-1 does not work on Ubuntu 10.04 with PHP 5.3 because the split function has been deprecated. Latest version of phpsysinfo is 3.0.4, which has fixed this and works fine with PHP 5.3. Details: Access using standard URL

[Bug 535255] [NEW] smbclient -N option does not password given with -U option

2010-03-09 Thread John Edwards
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba smbclient has the ability to give both username and password in the -U as 'username%password' for automated logins. But when the -N (no password prompt) option is used, an anonymous login is used instead. As there has been no change in the man

[Bug 530832] [NEW] vsftpd 2.2.2-3ubuntu4 fails to upgrade because no ftp group

2010-03-02 Thread John Edwards
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: vsftpd During an upgrade from Ubuntu 8.04 to Ubuntu 10.04 the vsftpd failed to upgrade cleanly: Installing new version of config file /etc/pam.d/vsftpd ... vsftpd user (ftp) already exists, doing nothing. chown: invalid group: `root:ftp' dpkg:

[Bug 530832] [NEW] vsftpd 2.2.2-3ubuntu4 fails to upgrade because no ftp group

2010-03-02 Thread John Edwards
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: vsftpd During an upgrade from Ubuntu 8.04 to Ubuntu 10.04 the vsftpd failed to upgrade cleanly: Installing new version of config file /etc/pam.d/vsftpd ... vsftpd user (ftp) already exists, doing nothing. chown: invalid group: `root:ftp' dpkg:

[Bug 463355] Re: Postgres 8.4 in karmic does not upgrade 8.3 cluster or include instructions on how to do so

2010-03-02 Thread John Edwards
Upgrade instructions are in /usr/share/doc/postgresql- common/README.Debian.gz. In version 8.4.2-2 of this package both this file and a (poor) summary of the upgrade is displayed during the package upgrade. These instructions could be made clearer. For your particular problem you needed to stop

[Bug 508222] Re: Cannot install the package kvm under Ubuntu 8.04

2010-01-16 Thread John Edwards
The testdrive package is not available for Ubuntu 8.04: $ sudo apt-get install testdrive Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done E: Couldn't find package testdrive It looks like you are installing the testdrive package from

[Bug 508222] Re: Cannot install the package kvm under Ubuntu 8.04

2010-01-16 Thread John Edwards
The testdrive package is not available for Ubuntu 8.04: $ sudo apt-get install testdrive Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done E: Couldn't find package testdrive It looks like you are installing the testdrive package from

[Bug 467542] Re: package libvirt-bin 0.6.1-0ubuntu5.1~hardy1 failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso post-installation script devolvi? el c?digo de salida de error 1

2009-10-31 Thread John Edwards
** Changed in: libvirt (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- package libvirt-bin 0.6.1-0ubuntu5.1~hardy1 failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso post-installation script devolvi? el c?digo de salida de error 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/467542 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 467542] Re: package libvirt-bin 0.6.1-0ubuntu5.1~hardy1 failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso post-installation script devolvi? el c?digo de salida de error 1

2009-10-31 Thread John Edwards
Invalid bug. The error message you report is a problem is with the libapache-mod-auth-kerb package, not libvirt-bin. It is also incomplete and rude. As was your comment on bug 157840: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libapache-mod-auth-kerb/+bug/158740 Please post a NEW bug report

[Bug 467542] Re: package libvirt-bin 0.6.1-0ubuntu5.1~hardy1 failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso post-installation script devolvi? el c?digo de salida de error 1

2009-10-31 Thread John Edwards
** Changed in: libvirt (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- package libvirt-bin 0.6.1-0ubuntu5.1~hardy1 failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso post-installation script devolvi? el c?digo de salida de error 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/467542 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 467542] Re: package libvirt-bin 0.6.1-0ubuntu5.1~hardy1 failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso post-installation script devolvi? el c?digo de salida de error 1

2009-10-31 Thread John Edwards
Invalid bug. The error message you report is a problem is with the libapache-mod-auth-kerb package, not libvirt-bin. It is also incomplete and rude. As was your comment on bug 157840: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libapache-mod-auth-kerb/+bug/158740 Please post a NEW bug report

[Bug 341256] Re: RFE: unattended-upgrades should identify host.

2009-10-19 Thread John Edwards
Thanks Paul. If you need any help with beta testing a deb package then let me know as I have many machines using unattended-upgrades and can release test packages to some servers. -- RFE: unattended-upgrades should identify host. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/341256 You received this bug

[Bug 341256] Re: RFE: unattended-upgrades should identify host.

2009-10-18 Thread John Edwards
The host function just returns os.uname()[1]: def host(): return os.uname()[1] The python docs recommend using socket.gethostname() instead as uname can vary between systems, though I guess that's not a problem for us as we know that we are using the GNU version. -- RFE:

[Bug 403215] Re: 2.6.31 guest vm's unable to use virtio

2009-09-12 Thread John Edwards
Reversing status change by abusive user pavlinux. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = Fix Released -- 2.6.31 guest vm's unable to use virtio https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/403215 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is

[Bug 403215] Re: 2.6.31 guest vm's unable to use virtio

2009-09-12 Thread John Edwards
Reversing status change by abusive user pavlinux. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = Fix Released -- 2.6.31 guest vm's unable to use virtio https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/403215 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 375825] Re: apt-get/aptitude fails to install KVM via recommended update

2009-05-25 Thread John Edwards
Please re-read my previous post. sysv-rc is the package you need to replace, not kvm. Try running: apt-get install --reinstall sysv-rc You then need to check if there are other Debian packages installed on your Ubuntu machine and replace those. If you run 'aptitude' then these will probably

[Bug 375825] Re: apt-get/aptitude fails to install KVM via recommended update

2009-05-24 Thread John Edwards
If you are running version 2.86.ds1-38+etchnhalf.1 of sysv-rc then that is from a Debian 4.0 (aka etch) repository and is not the Ubuntu 8.04 (aka hardy) sysv-rc package. Have you try to move from Debian to Ubuntu via apt-get? If not then try running: grep -i debian /etc/apt/sources.list to

[Bug 375825] Re: apt-get/aptitude fails to install KVM via recommended update

2009-05-24 Thread John Edwards
Problem caused by update-rc.d from Debian Etch being installed. ** Changed in: kvm (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- apt-get/aptitude fails to install KVM via recommended update https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375825 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 375825] Re: apt-get/aptitude fails to install KVM via recommended update

2009-05-24 Thread John Edwards
Your problem is caused by mixing Debian and Ubuntu packages and expecting them to work without any problems. kvm is not the only package that you are having this problem with. If you look at your own output from 'apt-get upgrade' you will see that both the ntp and pulseaudio packages are not

[Bug 375825] Re: apt-get/aptitude fails to install KVM via recommended update

2009-05-22 Thread John Edwards
freakalad, I don't think the problem is in the kvm package, because the help message you get from update-rc.d does not list multiuser as a valid argument. This is output I get from update-rc.d in version 2.86.ds1-14.1ubuntu45.1 of the sysv-rc package. $ /usr/sbin/update-rc.d usage:

[Bug 375937] Re: libvirt error: qemu: unknowm parameter 'boot' after kvm security update

2009-05-22 Thread John Edwards
freakalad, bug 375825 is a different bug about problems with update- rc.d. It is not related to this problem with the boot parameter. -- libvirt error: qemu: unknowm parameter 'boot' after kvm security update https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375937 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 377712] Re: wireless keyboard stops working, unable to type

2009-05-21 Thread John Edwards
This bug was incorrectly assigned to the kvm package, which is the Kernel Virtual Machine, not the Keyboard, Video Mouse hardware device. I am reassigning this bug to the xserver-xorg-input-mouse package, as this problem effects the mouse in X, although it could also be a hardware problem. **

[Bug 375937] Re: libvirt error: qemu: unknowm parameter 'boot' after kvm security update

2009-05-13 Thread John Edwards
Also a problem for me on both AMD X2 and Intel Core2 CPU machines after I upgraded kvm to 1:62+dfsg-0ubuntu8.1 Starting via libvirt: $ virsh start ubuntu804-wiki Connecting to uri: qemu:///system libvir: QEMU error : QEMU quit during console startup qemu: unknowm parameter 'boot' in

[Bug 375937] Re: libvirt error: qemu: unknowm parameter 'boot' after kvm security update

2009-05-13 Thread John Edwards
I can confirm the new build works on AMD X2 and Intel Core2. Thanks very much for the speedy fix to the problem. -- libvirt error: qemu: unknowm parameter 'boot' after kvm security update https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375937 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 372292] [NEW] Dependency problem between havp and clamav

2009-05-05 Thread John Edwards
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: havp New version of havp (0.89-2ubuntu1~hardy2) released today still depends on libclamav3 package (= 0.92~dfsg). But the new version clamav (0.94.dfsg.2-1ubuntu0.3~hardy4) provides libclamav5 not libclamav3, and clamav-freshclam

[Bug 372293] [NEW] Dependency problem between havp and clamav

2009-05-05 Thread John Edwards
~hardy4) conflicts with libclamav3. ** Affects: havp (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: John Edwards (john-cornerstonelinux) Status: Invalid -- Dependency problem between havp and clamav https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/372293 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 372293] Re: Dependency problem between havp and clamav

2009-05-05 Thread John Edwards
on Freenode. Thanks for your patience. ** Changed in: havp (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid ** Changed in: havp (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = John Edwards (john-cornerstonelinux) -- Dependency problem between havp and clamav https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/372293 You received

[Bug 341256] Re: RFE: unattended-upgrades should identify host.

2009-03-11 Thread John Edwards
It would be useful to have the machine name in the subject line or body. But as a temporary fix you can change the GECOS passwd field for the root user to include the hostname with something like: sudo usermod -c root on $(hostname -s) root Then the hostname will be in the From field of the

[Bug 325700] [NEW] apt-key has unannounced dependency on wget

2009-02-05 Thread John Edwards
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: apt On Ubuntu 8.04 the apt-key program in the apt package requires wget, but this is not listed in the package dependencies for apt. This occurs when apt-key is run with the (undocumented) net-update command, including when /etc/cron.daily/apt is run by

[Bug 219231] Re: cfengine editfiles empty string problem

2008-12-15 Thread John Edwards
Ubuntu 8.10 uses cfengine 2.2.7, which still suffers from a serious bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cfengine2/+bug/278092 I've been using the Ubuntu (jaunty) and Debian (lenny) builds of 2.2.8-1 on both Ubuntu 8.04 and 8.10 to avoid this. It would be nice to get that 2.2.8-1

[Bug 278092] Re: Lots of defunct cfagent processes in 2.2.7

2008-11-13 Thread John Edwards
Just a quick note to say that the automatic package sync has built v2.2.8 for jaunty: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/jaunty/i386/cfengine2/2.2.8-1 This should fix this and bug #232450: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cfengine2/+bug/232450 -- Lots of defunct cfagent processes in

[Bug 232450] Re: Test for installed packages in cfengine is broken

2008-11-13 Thread John Edwards
Just a quick note to say that the automatic package sync has built v2.2.8 for jaunty: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/jaunty/i386/cfengine2/2.2.8-1 This should fix this and bug #278092: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cfengine2/+bug/278092 -- Test for installed packages in

[Bug 238549] Re: xen dom0 crashes with BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 11s!

2008-10-13 Thread John Edwards
I have been getting the same crash on a Pentium D machine running kernel 2.6.24-19-xen when I try to start a domU using 'xm create'. I have just stopped AppArmor and 'xm create' no longer causes the crash. It may be worth testing with AppArmor not running on the dom0. -- xen dom0 crashes with

[Bug 278092] Re: Lots of defunct cfagent processes in 2.2.7

2008-10-13 Thread John Edwards
I have been running the 2.2.8 package from Debian on Ubuntu hardy for the past week and it's been working well. -- Lots of defunct cfagent processes in 2.2.7 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278092 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 278092] Re: Lots of defunct cfagent processes in 2.2.7

2008-10-06 Thread John Edwards
this is critical problem. The reason why I was running cfengine 2.2.7 was to try to workaround this bug in cfengine 2.2.3: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cfengine2/+bug/232450 If someone can build an test package of cfengine 2.2.8 then I can test on hardy and intrepid. John Edwards

[Bug 278092] Re: Lots of defunct cfagent processes in 2.2.7

2008-10-06 Thread John Edwards
Confirmed problem in cfengine 2.2.7 when installed on two different releases (hardy intrepid). There is a newer release upstream which has already been compiled for Debian. ** Changed in: cfengine2 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- Lots of defunct cfagent processes in 2.2.7

[Bug 242819] [NEW] unable to install downloads

2008-06-24 Thread john edwards
Public bug reported: Ubuntu downloads the updates etc but when it begins to install any updates i get the following message E:/var/cache/apt/archives/utl-linux_2.13.1-5uruntu_i386deb subprocess new pre-removal script returned error exit status 139 ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided

[Bug 137994] Re: Undeclared dependency on mailx

2008-03-10 Thread John Edwards
Hi Michael Thanks for your work on this package. For most cases the second patch doesn't need any changes to the configuration file as it defaults to port 25 on localhost. Where my patch would need a configuration change is where the mail system does not listen on port 25 and relies on delivery

[Bug 136720] Re: does not send mail despite Unattended-Upgrade::Mail set

2007-10-04 Thread John Edwards
Hi Nathan 1) Which version of Ubuntu and the unattended-upgrades package are you using? I believe the mail option was added in Feisty (Ubuntu 7.04) and is not available in early versions. 2) You say that the version of the /usr/bin/unattended-upgrade script you are using does only import

[Bug 136452] Patch to fix missing space in blacklisted packages

2007-09-13 Thread John Edwards
This patch will fix the missing space in the list of blacklisted packages that is placed in the log file. ** Attachment added: Patch to fix missing space in blacklisted packages http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9273497/unattended-upgrade_blacklist.patch -- No documentation about package

[Bug 136452] Patch to add more comments and examples to config file

2007-09-13 Thread John Edwards
This patch will add some comments and examples to the config file (/etc/apt/apt.conf.d/50unattended-upgrades) as the README and webpages do not show any. ** Attachment added: Patch to add more comments and examples to config file

[Bug 137994] Patch to use smtplib plus a new Mail-Server setting

2007-09-13 Thread John Edwards
This patch adds the above code for smtplib instead of using the mail binary, but also adds a new Unattended-Upgrade::Mail-Server setting for which SMTP server to connect to. This is allows people to use an external SMTP server and not have to run a full mail server on localhost. ** Attachment

[Bug 137994] Patch to config file for new Unattended-Upgrade::Mail-Server setting

2007-09-13 Thread John Edwards
This patch to /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/50unattended-upgrades adds an example of the new Unattended-Upgrade::Mail-Server setting, as well as including the expanded comments and examples from my patch to Bug #136452:

[Bug 137994] Undeclared dependency on mailx

2007-09-07 Thread John Edwards
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: unattended-upgrades When asked to send an email report the unattended-upgrade python script uses the 'mail' command without checking that it is present. There is also no dependency on the mailx package, so it will not be installed automatically. Below

[Bug 137994] Re: Undeclared dependency on mailx

2007-09-07 Thread John Edwards
There is another undeclared dependency here - having a mail server on the localhost. This may not always be wanted. The patch could be changed by adding another configuration variable for the mail server, which would default to localhost if not set. -- Undeclared dependency on mailx

[Bug 136720] Re: does not send mail despite Unattended-Upgrade::Mail set

2007-09-07 Thread John Edwards
Looking at the python code in unattended-upgrade it could be a little difficult to include an info line in the log file because apt_pkg.Config.Find returns the same for an incorrect config as for no config at all. It would have to do an incorrect Perhaps a better method is to add a clear example

[Bug 136720] Re: does not send mail despite Unattended-Upgrade::Mail set

2007-09-05 Thread John Edwards
Also the script uses the mail binary from the mailx package to send the email, but there is no dependency listed so it is not installed automatically. So could you please check that you have the mailx package installed? -- does not send mail despite Unattended-Upgrade::Mail set

[Bug 136720] Re: does not send mail despite Unattended-Upgrade::Mail set

2007-09-05 Thread John Edwards
Have you also imported the python apt module with import apt? Eg: import apt, apt_pkg email = apt_pkg.Config.Find(Unattended-Upgrade::Mail, ) print email You should notice the loading of the apt module as it prints a warning message about the API not being stable yet. If that doesn't work

[Bug 136452] Re: No documentation about package blacklist syntax

2007-09-04 Thread John Edwards
The Unattended-Upgrade::Mail line may also be in the wrong syntax, see bug136720: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unattended-upgrades/+bug/136720 -- No documentation about package blacklist syntax https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/136452 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 136720] Re: does not send mail despite Unattended-Upgrade::Mail set

2007-09-04 Thread John Edwards
I'm not an expert on the unattended-upgrades package or the Python apt module, so some of this could be wrong. How have you defined the mail variable in the /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/ files? It is like this? Unattended-Upgrade::Mail { [EMAIL PROTECTED]; }; If so then I think this problem is

[Bug 136452] No documentation about package blacklist syntax

2007-08-31 Thread John Edwards
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: unattended-upgrades Hi Thanks for your great work on Ubuntu. The unattended-upgrades package is very useful, but there seems to be a lack of documentation From the example I thought the syntax should be like this:

<    1   2