[Bug 1449089] Re: Regression: compiz 1:0.9.11.3+14.04.20150313-0ubuntu1 segfaults on Radeon HD 7470/8470

2015-04-28 Thread Jonathan Reed
After more research, this turns out to be a bizarre interaction of various things. The culprit is the intersection of this version of compiz and running older kernel versions. As soon as we updated to linux-image-3.13.0-49-generic, the problem went away. So I think it's still the case that

[Bug 1449089] [NEW] Regression: compiz 1:0.9.11.3+14.04.20150313-0ubuntu1 segfaults on Radeon HD 7470/8470

2015-04-27 Thread Jonathan Reed
Public bug reported: After taking the 20150313 update of Compiz, compiz segfaults on Dell Optiplex 7010 workstations with a Radeon HD 7470/8470 graphics card. I'm going to get try and get more debugging information, but there was not a stack trace in the kernel.log, only a single segfault mention

[Bug 1449089] Re: Regression: compiz 1:0.9.11.3+14.04.20150313-0ubuntu1 segfaults on Radeon HD 7470/8470

2015-04-27 Thread Jonathan Reed
Unfortunately we disable apport on our public workstations. I will try to reproduce it on a workstation with apport enabled and retrieve a crash file, if there is one. We do not use fglrx; we use the stock radeon (this is on 14.04.2, without the HWE stack), and the problem occurs on machines

[Bug 1303603] Re: bad-distribution-in-changes-file unstable

2014-09-17 Thread Jonathan Reed
OK, the actual problem is that the ubuntu vendor profile (/usr/share/lintian/vendors/ubuntu/main/data/changes-file/known-dists) does not include unstable. That's a bug, it should include it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1355845] [NEW] partman/unmount_active is not preseedable

2014-08-12 Thread Jonathan Reed
Public bug reported: The partman/unmount_active question is not preseedable. This is a problem. Due to some other d-i bug introduced in trusty, the mountmedia command is extremely ... insistent, and when we re-install machines in an unattended mode, it finds /dev/sda1 (a /boot partition) and

[Bug 1355845] Re: partman/unmount_active is not preseedable

2014-08-12 Thread Jonathan Reed
And before someone bothers to point out that partman/filter_mounted is preseedable, that doesn't help. All that does is tell partman not to filter out mounted partitions. So if I set that to false, partman doesn't display the warning, but will attempt to create a partition on a mounted

[Bug 1332729] Re: Broken symlink: /etc/apache2/conf-available/drupal7.conf

2014-08-06 Thread Jonathan Reed
I also see this in Trusty. Any chance of an SRU? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1332729 Title: Broken symlink: /etc/apache2/conf-available/drupal7.conf To manage notifications

[Bug 1303603] Re: bad-distribution-in-changes-file unstable

2014-07-30 Thread Jonathan Reed
I'm also seeing this on Trusty. The text for bad-distribution-in- changes-file explicitly says that unstable is fine to use, and indeed unstable is in /usr/share/lintian/data/changes-file/known-dists, so there's definitely something wrong here. -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 1306991] Re: pip stops with ImportError for request-Modul

2014-07-23 Thread Jonathan Reed
I am also encountering this in 14.04. I do not have a local copy of the 'requests' package (or in fact any packages other than python-usb). python-pip simply appears to be broken out of the box on 14.04. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1339727] [NEW] lightdm xauthority path is wrong

2014-07-09 Thread Jonathan Reed
Public bug reported: The default apparmor 'X' abstraction permits access to /{,var/}run/lightdm/authority/[0-9]*, ostensibly for the xauthority file. Except on Trusty, that's not where the xauthority file is. It is instead in /run/lightdm/$USER, and named xauthority. I have had to udpated my

[Bug 1062531] Re: apparmor prevents evince from accessing /run/user/

2014-07-07 Thread Jonathan Reed
For anyone, like me, who is naive enough to think that it's possible to set XDG_CACHE_HOME or DCONF_PROFILE to values other than the default, note that this fix _only_ allows access to the user profile. If you rename your user profile, you cannot use any apparmor-enabled application that uses

[Bug 1338163] [NEW] unity lock screen provides no way to force-logout a user

2014-07-05 Thread Jonathan Reed
Public bug reported: Let me start by saying that I realize that unity's screen locker is not the same thing as gnome-screensaver. That having been said, there are major regressions in functionality with the advent of Trusty. Virtually every site that uses Linux in any sort of public computing

[Bug 1262022] Re: incorrect multi-arch related meta information.

2014-07-03 Thread Jonathan Reed
I'm also running into this on Trusty. What needs to happen to get someone to look at the bzr branches and merge request linked in this bug? ** Tags added: trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1249515] Re: regression with session-cleanup-script triggering without actual logins

2014-06-24 Thread Jonathan Reed
I'm also seeing this in Trusty (lightdm 1.10.1-0ubuntu1). At our site, we have a custom greeter using the GIR bindings, and calling .cancel_authentication() causes the session-cleanup script to run. As this is designed to, you know, clean up after a session, it is not idempotent and is not

[Bug 995543] Re: [precise] .gvfs fuse mount is not functional after logout and subsequent login

2014-06-20 Thread Jonathan Reed
Regarding comment #4, I don't think it's ecryptfs that's causing it, because I'm seeing it periodically on an AFS home directory. This suggests that's more likely to be the usual culprit of All UI designers assume that $HOME is on a filesystem that supports sockets and FIFOs -- You received

[Bug 1332131] [NEW] avahi-cups-reload Upstart job leads to weird race conditions

2014-06-19 Thread Jonathan Reed
Public bug reported: I'll start out by saying that I cannot _consistently_ reproduce this (it is, after all, a race condition), however the fix is trivial and a no- op, so I'm filing the bug anyway. I ran into the following situation on Ubuntu 14.04: After booting, it was often the case that

[Bug 1328677] [NEW] unity first-run stamp should not be in XDG_CACHE_HOME

2014-06-10 Thread Jonathan Reed
Public bug reported: The unity first_run.stamp file should not be in XDG_CACHE_HOME. As it is a _cache_, it can be ephemeral. Rather, it should be in XDG_CONFIG_HOME. Once the keyboard shortcut list, for example, has been presented, I don't need to be told about it again, even if I need to

[Bug 1327384] [NEW] unity-panel-service --lockscreen-mode does not provide a way to disable Switch User

2014-06-06 Thread Jonathan Reed
Public bug reported: Unity's screen locking mechanism does not respect any existing gsettings having to do with disabling the Switch User functionality, nor does it provide any way to do it natively. Ideally, it would respect org.gnome.desktop.lockdown, but I realize that's probably never going

[Bug 1322260] Re: devscripts-el and emacs cannot be installed in same transaction

2014-05-22 Thread Jonathan Reed
** Attachment added: script(1) of the transaction failure. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1322260/+attachment/4117679/+files/typescript -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1322260] [NEW] devscripts-el and emacs cannot be installed in same transaction

2014-05-22 Thread Jonathan Reed
Public bug reported: In Trusty, you cannot install devscripts-el and emacs in the same apt transaction, because devscripts-el's postinst will fail. If emacs is already installed prior to the transaction, it works fine. Steps to reproduce: 1) Install 14.04 (amd64) from the Desktop CD, accepting

[Bug 1322260] Re: devscripts-el and emacs cannot be installed in same transaction

2014-05-22 Thread Jonathan Reed
** Attachment added: script(1) of the failure, with emacsen-common installed before the transaction https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1322260/+attachment/4117680/+files/typescript.with-emacsen-common -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1322260] Re: devscripts-el and emacs cannot be installed in same transaction

2014-05-22 Thread Jonathan Reed
** Attachment added: elisp compilation log from original transaction failure https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1322260/+attachment/4117681/+files/elc_gp0Amo.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1322260] Re: devscripts-el and emacs cannot be installed in same transaction

2014-05-22 Thread Jonathan Reed
I have attached 3 files: typescript -- a log of the failure as generated by script(1) elc_gp0Amo.log -- the elisp compilation failure that occurred in the aforementioned transaction. typescript.with-emacsen-common -- a log of the failure as generated by script(1), with emacsen-common fully

[Bug 1206387] Re: openafs-modules-dkms 1.6.1-1+ubuntu0.2: module FTBFS on 3.8.0

2013-12-02 Thread Jonathan Reed
Running a 1.6.5 module against a 1.6.1 userspace seems like a worse idea than taking 1.6.5 as an SRU. Would you accept the backport if we provided additional userland test cases? I'm not interested in starting a debate about the HWE process, but from our perspective, the HWE stack broke a

Re: [Bug 1206387] Re: openafs-modules-dkms 1.6.1-1+ubuntu0.2: module FTBFS on 3.8.0

2013-12-02 Thread Jonathan Reed
On Dec 2, 2013, at 6:11 PM, Steve Langasek wrote: Only if you use the new point release media, or explicitly opt in to the new enablement stack, do you get the newer kernels. [...] If you have newer hardware that requires the newer enablement stack, it's better to have it available than

[Bug 873551] Re: dictionaries-common: debconf corruption

2013-05-02 Thread Jonathan Reed
Also, lest this bug get closed when 11.10 is de-supported, I'll note that I can reproduce this with Precise and Quantal. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/873551 Title:

[Bug 873551] Re: dictionaries-common: debconf corruption

2013-04-02 Thread Jonathan Reed
I ran into this and believe I have found the root cause. In update- default-ispell, this logic is wrong: # Question is empty, but $class elements are installed. Two possibilities. if ( -x /usr/bin/apt-extracttemplates ){ # apt-utils is installed. Other possibility is debconf database

[Bug 1155764] [NEW] Lucid cannot upgrade to Precise if ibus-hangul is installed

2013-03-15 Thread Jonathan Reed
Public bug reported: I think this is _related to_, but not necessarily the same as #1010131. Lucid (10.04.4, fully up to date) cannot upgrade to Precise if the ibus- hangul package is installed. Steps to reproduce: - Install 10.04.4 from an ISO (in this case ubuntu-10.04.4-desktop-amd64.iso). -

[Bug 1015925] Re: openafs: Support quantal’s kernel 3.5

2013-03-08 Thread Jonathan Reed
Can this get moved to production any time soon? I understand there's a desire to get openafs 1.6.2 out for security updates, but these are not mutually exclusive. I have a large community of users who can't access their shared file storage if they installed from a CD after Feb 14. -- You

[Bug 1130419] Re: apt resolver doesn't do sensible things when satisfying a cross-dependency on a virtual package (steam, wine)

2013-03-06 Thread Jonathan Reed
I was having a similar problem, in that installing ia32-libs wanted to remove the xorg quantal-lts packages. I just tested with apt 0.8.16~exp12ubuntu10.9 from proposed, and apt-get no longer wants to remove the quantal-lts xorg packages. -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1015925] Re: openafs: Support quantal’s kernel 3.5

2013-03-03 Thread Jonathan Reed
Using openafs-modules-dkm 1.6.1-1+ubuntu0.1 from precise-proposed, the module now builds correctly for 3.5.0-23-generic (and also for -26-generic, which happens to be in -proposed). openafs-modules-dkms: Installed: 1.6.1-1+ubuntu0.1 Candidate: 1.6.1-1+ubuntu0.1 Version table: ***

[Bug 1015925] Re: openafs: Support quantal’s kernel 3.5

2013-03-03 Thread Jonathan Reed
I can also confirm there is no regression, as it works fine on 3.2.0-38-generic. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1015925 Title: openafs: Support quantal’s kernel 3.5 To manage

[Bug 1115424] [NEW] latexmk recommends non-existent package, pulls in KDE on Quantal

2013-02-04 Thread Jonathan Reed
Public bug reported: The latexmk recommends xpdf-reader | pdf-viewer, among other things. However, xpdf-reader has not existed since Lucid, so APT attempts to satisfy the virtual recommendation on pdf-viewer. In Precise, this was not a problem, because evince-gtk was the first choice for a PDF

[Bug 1111537] [NEW] lightdm's post-stop sometimes fails

2013-01-31 Thread Jonathan Reed
Public bug reported: In our somewhat complicated environment, I've managed to trigger a race condition in which shutting down or rebooting the machine from a (custom) lightdm greeter results in the machine popping up the low graphics mode warning, and never shutting down. The greeter is using

[Bug 1111537] Re: lightdm's post-stop sometimes fails

2013-01-31 Thread Jonathan Reed
To clarify, this occurs on both Precise and Quantal. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/537 Title: lightdm's post-stop sometimes fails To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 638211] Re: Thunderbird prefs file references /usr/lib/thunderbird which doesn't exist

2012-10-22 Thread Jonathan Reed
As of Thunderbird 16, Thunderbird is apparently back to looking in /usr/lib/thunderbird/defaults/pref and ignoring /etc/thunderbird/pref. (At least, strace'ing can find no attempts by Thunderbird to look in /etc/thunderbird for anything). No mention of this is made in the changelog. This is

[Bug 887879] Re: ubiquity crashed with ValueError in raw_decode(): No JSON object could be decoded

2012-09-20 Thread Jonathan Reed
I encountered this earlier in the installation, from a 12.04.1 CD install, and the traceback was in /usr/lib/ubiquity/plugins/ubi- timezone.py, line 173. Based on this and some other bugs, it seems like working network is a hard requirement for Ubiquity, not just a for best results as described

[Bug 1046490] [NEW] Saving attachment displays error because of null path

2012-09-05 Thread Jonathan Reed
Public bug reported: When attempting to save an attachment in Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 on a clean install, saving the attachment opens a GtkFileChooser initially browsing the path , which naturally displays an error saying The folder contents could not be displayed: Operation not supported. This

[Bug 927168] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in memmove() from drisw_update_tex_buffer() from dri_set_tex_buffer2() from drisw_bind_tex_image() from __glXBindTexImageEXT() from TfpTexture::enable() fr

2012-08-30 Thread Jonathan Reed
I had the same situation described in comment #12, and changing screen resolution, even down to 1024x768, didn't help much. It did reduce the flashing and black screen, but not enough to make it really usable. So I think that reducing screen resolution makes the problem less bad, not actually

[Bug 1043530] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in TfpTexture::bindTexImage()

2012-08-29 Thread Jonathan Reed
** Visibility changed to: Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1043530 Title: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in TfpTexture::bindTexImage() To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 1043530] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in TfpTexture::bindTexImage()

2012-08-29 Thread Jonathan Reed
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1043505 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1043505 Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Would that I could, except the other bug is private.

[Bug 1040780] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in TfpTexture::enable()

2012-08-23 Thread Jonathan Reed
** Visibility changed to: Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1040780 Title: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in TfpTexture::enable() To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 160311] Re: Resizing windows by grabbing window borders is difficult

2012-08-21 Thread Jonathan Reed
The workaround in the first comment (editing the theme XML) works great. Is there any chance of seeing this in Quantal, or is Metacity considered dead in favor of Compiz as far as Canonical is concerned? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 483506] Re: karmic: /afs should be ready before gdm starts

2012-07-09 Thread Jonathan Reed
Is this still pending Debian Policy? We just got bitten by this in Precise and are debating whether to implement a workaround and which one to implement. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 483506] Re: karmic: /afs should be ready before gdm starts

2012-07-09 Thread Jonathan Reed
Er, to be more specific, we're using LightDM, not gdm, but it's essentially the same bug: The login screen appears before the filesystem is ready. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/483506

[Bug 975793] Re: 'aptitude safe-upgrade -d -y' enters infinite loop

2012-06-26 Thread Jonathan Reed
Can this make it into Qantal and/or get SRU'd for Precise? Or are we unlikely to see this fix until the next import from Debian for 13.04? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/975793

[Bug 990490] Re: GIR interface is not following the documentation of the constructor

2012-06-04 Thread Jonathan Reed
lightdm and its gir bindings in oneiric-proposed (1.0.6-0ubuntu1.7) work fine for me, both with the JavaScript test case above, and my project's own LightDM greeter written in Python. Can this please get pushed to production? ** Tags removed: verification-needed -- You received this bug

[Bug 883112] [NEW] python-cups no longer depends on libcups2

2011-10-28 Thread Jonathan Reed
Public bug reported: Somewhere between Natty and Oneiric, python-cups stopped depending on libcups2. This makes the package kind of useless, since all attempts to use it will result in ImportError: libcups.so.2: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory. Installing libcups2

[Bug 883112] Re: python-cups no longer depends on libcups2

2011-10-28 Thread Jonathan Reed
On Natty: $ apt-cache policy python-cups python-cups: Installed: 1.9.54-0ubuntu1 Candidate: 1.9.54-0ubuntu1 Version table: *** 1.9.54-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://mirrors.mit.edu/ubuntu/ natty/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status $ python Python 2.7.1+ (r271:86832, Apr 11

[Bug 818933] Re: Dell 790 fails to reboot without either reboot=bios or acpi=off

2011-08-30 Thread Jonathan Reed
reboot=pci does work, and is the workaround we're using. However, it's still a bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/818933 Title: Dell 790 fails to reboot without either reboot=bios

[Bug 826958] Re: lpd://user@host:/queue URLs no longer work

2011-08-16 Thread Jonathan Reed
Glad to hear s-c-p has been fixed. However, since CUPS clobbers the URL anyway, I don't think it'll help. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/826958 Title: lpd://user@host:/queue URLs no

[Bug 600390] Re: gdm doesn't display contents of /etc/nologin

2011-08-15 Thread Jonathan Reed
The bug still occurs with gdm 3.0.4-0ubuntu8 in Oneiric. I'll note that _lightdm_ manages to get this right. ** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 826958] [NEW] lpd://user@host:/queue URLs no longer work

2011-08-15 Thread Jonathan Reed
Public bug reported: In Lucid, I could specify a printer with a URI of something like lpd://username@hostname/queuename. This no longer works in Natty (to the point that system-config-printer prevents you from typing the @, and the CUPS web interface just clobbers everything between the protocol

[Bug 804671] Re: linux-firmware missing realtek firmware files

2011-08-03 Thread Jonathan Reed
Can this SRU move forward? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/804671 Title: linux-firmware missing realtek firmware files To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 818933] [NEW] Dell 790 fails to reboot without either reboot=bios or acpi=off

2011-07-31 Thread Jonathan Reed
Public bug reported: This is pretty much the same thing as #488319 (which happened with a Dell 760) or #115011 (with a Dell 745). Basically, every time Dell comes out with a new workstation, rebooting simply doesn't work when ACPI is enabled. The symptom is that it will sit at [ 1234.56789 ]

[Bug 818933] Re: Dell 790 fails to reboot without either reboot=bios or acpi=off

2011-07-31 Thread Jonathan Reed
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/818933 Title: Dell 790 fails to reboot without either reboot=bios or acpi=off To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 818933] Re: Dell 790 fails to reboot without either reboot=bios or acpi=off

2011-07-31 Thread Jonathan Reed
Scratch that, they need acpi=off. reboot=bios doesn't help. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/818933 Title: Dell 790 fails to reboot without either reboot=bios or acpi=off To manage

[Bug 670629] Re: EULA not shown for Microsoft Fonts

2011-07-31 Thread Jonathan Reed
We encountered the same thing Bruno saw in comment #14. It was consistently reproducible on Natty when leaving tasksel blank (that is, only installing standard), but running a postinstall script that, among other things, pulls in fontconfig and ttf-msttcorefonts-installer in the same aptitude

[Bug 724604] Re: gnome-panel 2.32.1-0ubuntu6 forces Unity on gnome-classic session users

2011-04-11 Thread Jonathan Reed
This is apparently fixed as of April 11, in that if I create a new local account and select Ubuntu Classic, I essentially get a Lucid panel. However, for accounts that used the previously-broken Ubuntu Classic, I still get appmenu, presumably because the gconf migration path is broken. -- You

[Bug 436936] Re: gdm upstart job checks /proc/cmdline for single user mode, won't start on post-boot runlevel change

2011-03-17 Thread Jonathan Reed
I tested the new gdm.conf, and confirm that a) GDM doesn't start in recovery mode b) GDM does start if I telinit 2 from a recovery mode shell However, (b) is not particularly helpful, because it still doesn't work if I choose the Resume option from the Recovery Menu. All the Resume option does

[Bug 724604] Re: gnome-panel 2.32.1-0ubuntu6 forces Unity on gnome-classic session users

2011-03-17 Thread Jonathan Reed
This bug is still present as of the latest updates (March 17), and UI freeze is in a week. Can anyone confirm whether this change was by design or not? Because if there's no way to opt-out of Unity on a per- session basis and use the classic (read: Lucid, Maverick) interface, then I have to

[Bug 724604] [NEW] gnome-panel 2.32.1-0ubuntu6 forces Unity on gnome-classic session users

2011-02-24 Thread Jonathan Reed
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-panel The latest release of gnome-panel in Natty seems to have forced the Unity interface on me while ignoring my session type. When I specify Ubuntu Classic at the login screen, I expect to to see a traditional panel. Instead I get a Unity-style

[Bug 724604] Re: gnome-panel 2.32.1-0ubuntu6 forces Unity on gnome-classic session users

2011-02-24 Thread Jonathan Reed
Relevant info: $ lsb_release -sd Ubuntu natty (development branch) $ apt-cache policy gnome-panel gnome-panel: Installed: 1:2.32.1-0ubuntu6 Candidate: 1:2.32.1-0ubuntu6 Version table: *** 1:2.32.1-0ubuntu6 0 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty/main amd64 Packages

[Bug 436936] Re: gdm upstart job checks /proc/cmdline for single user mode, won't start on post-boot runlevel change

2011-01-25 Thread Jonathan Reed
This bug is still present in Lucid. It is exacerbated by the fact that recovery mode offers a resume option which is supposed to return the machine to its normal state. However, since recovery mode is single user mode, gdm never starts. It would be great if this was finally fixed in Natty,

[Bug 336932] Re: New windows cause panels to be raised above fullscreen applications (e.g. screensaver)

2010-09-29 Thread Jonathan Reed
I see that this was declined for Lucid and Maverick. Should I bother nominating it for Natty? -- New windows cause panels to be raised above fullscreen applications (e.g. screensaver) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/336932 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 638211] [NEW] Thunderbird no longer checks /usr/lib/thunderbird for default preferences

2010-09-14 Thread Jonathan Reed
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: thunderbird Thunderbird 3.0.7+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.04.1 fails to look in /usr/lib/thunderbird for configuration files. It now only looks in /usr/lib/thunderbird-3.0.7. This is in direct conflict with /etc/thunderbird/pref/thunderbird.js, which

[Bug 538912] Re: xlinks shouldn't replace Firefox as /etc/alternatives/x-www-browser

2010-08-26 Thread Jonathan Reed
I would claim that that means that Firefox is Ubuntu's default browser Indeed, Ubuntu claims this too. See https://help.ubuntu.com/community/WebBrowsers (Yes, I know it's community documentation, but it's help.ubuntu.com, not the wiki) ** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu) Status: Opinion =

[Bug 484317] Re: GDM allows root logins

2010-07-27 Thread Jonathan Reed
In response to #11, I confirm the bug is still present in Lucid. jdr...@adjective-animal:~$ apt-cache policy gdm gdm: Installed: 2.30.2.is.2.30.0-0ubuntu3 Candidate: 2.30.2.is.2.30.0-0ubuntu3 Version table: *** 2.30.2.is.2.30.0-0ubuntu3 0 500 http://ubuntu.media.mit.edu/ubuntu/

[Bug 336932] Re: New windows cause panels to be raised above fullscreen applications (e.g. screensaver)

2010-07-12 Thread Jonathan Reed
This bug is still present in Lucid. -- New windows cause panels to be raised above fullscreen applications (e.g. screensaver) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/336932 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 600390] [NEW] gdm doesn't display contents of /etc/nologin

2010-06-30 Thread Jonathan Reed
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gdm When logins are disabled by the presence of /etc/nologin, GDM simply responds with Authentication failure after the username is entered. While what it says is technically true, this is a terrible user experience. Ideally, it should display the

[Bug 387536] Re: Zenity should ignore markup with a flag

2010-06-16 Thread Jonathan Reed
Any text with an ampersand will trigger the bug. $ zenity --info --text 'This has an in it' The following is printed to stderr: (zenity:21569): Gtk-WARNING **: Failed to set text from markup due to error parsing markup: Error on line 1: Character ' ' is not valid at the start of an entity

[Bug 387536] Re: Zenity should ignore markup with a flag

2010-06-16 Thread Jonathan Reed
And before anyone asks, yes this is still present in Lucid. -- Zenity should ignore markup with a flag https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/387536 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 569212] [NEW] zephyr-clients manpages have incorrect paths

2010-04-23 Thread Jonathan Reed
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: zephyr-clients The following manpages reference incorrect paths: zwgc(1), zctl(1), zmailnotify(1), xzwrite(1), and zhm(8) zwgc(1) claims that zwgc_resources and zwgc.desc are in /usr/athena/share/zephyr. They are now in /etc/zephyr.

[Bug 569212] Re: zephyr-clients manpages have incorrect paths

2010-04-23 Thread Jonathan Reed
This is reported upstream as https://zephyr.1ts.org/ticket/64. There isn't a corresponding Debian bug, but there probably should be. ** Bug watch added: zephyr.1ts.org/ #64 https://zephyr.1ts.org/ticket/64 -- zephyr-clients manpages have incorrect paths