[Bug 740506]

(In reply to comment #33) OK, NSS with shared DB is what I'll pursue from now on. Thanks everyone for the input. Andre, any update on the status of this? Thanks -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 39890]

I tried patched poppler with the minimal example and I don't get the change of the glyphs anymore under the selection, which is VERY GOOD!! But I can't select the Gamma glyph... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.

[Bug 39890]

For the problem in the minimal example, the culprit seems to be in TextSelectionPainter::visitWord, which assumes that all the chars in a word use the same font. This is demonstrated by adding a space After Word: in the bad line. This also explain why this bug is very common with LaTeX files. --

[Bug 39890]

Created attachment 43360 Patch fixing the issue Actually, All the chars in a TextWord MUST share the same font, so I added a check so we also create a new word when the font changes. The attached patch fixes the bug in the minimal example and many other problems when selecting text in

[Bug 39890]

The last patch does not fix either some problems when selecting ligatures in some fonts, see http://java.sun.com/docs/books/jvms/second_edition/ClassFileFormat- final-draft.pdf, page 54 and look for the word reflective which is rendered as reßective (althought the text select is indeed reflective.

[Bug 39890]

I assumed that the only code that is updating the curFont is TextPage::updateFont. If this is true, from what I understood from the code, the fonts array holds unique FontInfos, so it would be safe to compare pointers instead of FontInfos. So, is this right? If so, and you still want me to rework

[Bug 39890]

Created attachment 43420 alternate patch comparing gfxFont instead of pointers to FontInfos Even if what I say in last comment may be true, I followed your advice and updated the patch to compare the gfxFonts instead of the pointers to the TextInfos. -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 39890]

Created attachment 43421 updated alternate patch I apologize for the spam. Previous patch was clearly wrong. Updated patch. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/39890 Title:

[Bug 39890]

Thanks for the regression. The problem here is that bold: has two fonts since bold is italicised and : not, so before the patch, bold: is a TextWord and pdftotext get the text right, but drawing the selection is bad since the selected : would be drawn italicised. After the patch, bold: gets

[Bug 878262] Re: Latex toolbar does not disappear if editing a non-latex file

Sorry, it's http://bugzilla.gnome.org Product:gedit Component:latex Thanks -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/878262 Title: Latex toolbar does not disappear if editing a non-latex file

[Bug 878262] Re: Latex toolbar does not disappear if editing a non-latex file

This is not the correct tracker for gedit-latex. Please forward the bug upstream (http://bugs.gnome.org) Component: gedit plugin:latex. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/878262 Title:

[Bug 492959] Re: Evince cannot save filled PDF forms

I don't know why this bug has not been reported upstream before. I just reported it , see Gnome Bug #640185 ( I don't know how to link the bug in launchpad) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.