[Bug 516312] Re: package flashplugin-nonfree 10.0.1.218+really9.0.260.0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: Package is in a very bad inconsistent state - you should reinstall it before attempting a remo

2010-02-07 Thread Julian Hartley
Thank you Jean-Baptiste for taking a look at this. You asked for log files from /var/log/dist-upgrade/ which I hope I can attach. There are 6 files and one folder. The folder name appears to correspond to the time of the error incident. Some names are duplicated so I think I will just send the

[Bug 516312] Re: package flashplugin-nonfree 10.0.1.218+really9.0.260.0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: Package is in a very bad inconsistent state - you should reinstall it before attempting a remo

2010-02-07 Thread Julian Hartley
4th file ** Attachment added: main_pre_req.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38853084/main_pre_req.log -- package flashplugin-nonfree 10.0.1.218+really9.0.260.0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: Package is in a very bad inconsistent state - you should reinstall it before attempting a

[Bug 516312] Re: package flashplugin-nonfree 10.0.1.218+really9.0.260.0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: Package is in a very bad inconsistent state - you should reinstall it before attempting a remo

2010-02-07 Thread Julian Hartley
2nd file from folder apt-term.log has a cross on the icon and I cannot seem to upload. so on to 3rd file ** Attachment added: main.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38853077/main.log -- package flashplugin-nonfree 10.0.1.218+really9.0.260.0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: Package is in a

[Bug 516312] Re: package flashplugin-nonfree 10.0.1.218+really9.0.260.0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: Package is in a very bad inconsistent state - you should reinstall it before attempting a remo

2010-02-07 Thread Julian Hartley
5th file ** Attachment added: term.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38853098/term.log -- package flashplugin-nonfree 10.0.1.218+really9.0.260.0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: Package is in a very bad inconsistent state - you should reinstall it before attempting a removal.

[Bug 516312] Re: package flashplugin-nonfree 10.0.1.218+really9.0.260.0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: Package is in a very bad inconsistent state - you should reinstall it before attempting a remo

2010-02-07 Thread Julian Hartley
Just in case, I will send the files that were not in the folder. ** Attachment added: apt.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38853120/apt.log -- package flashplugin-nonfree 10.0.1.218+really9.0.260.0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: Package is in a very bad inconsistent state - you should

[Bug 516312] Re: package flashplugin-nonfree 10.0.1.218+really9.0.260.0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: Package is in a very bad inconsistent state - you should reinstall it before attempting a remo

2010-02-07 Thread Julian Hartley
2nd file apt-term.log again I cannot send so 3rd file ** Attachment added: history.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38853157/history.log -- package flashplugin-nonfree 10.0.1.218+really9.0.260.0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: Package is in a very bad inconsistent state - you should

[Bug 516312] Re: package flashplugin-nonfree 10.0.1.218+really9.0.260.0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: Package is in a very bad inconsistent state - you should reinstall it before attempting a remo

2010-02-07 Thread Julian Hartley
4th file ** Attachment added: main.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38853170/main.log -- package flashplugin-nonfree 10.0.1.218+really9.0.260.0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: Package is in a very bad inconsistent state - you should reinstall it before attempting a removal.

[Bug 516312] Re: package flashplugin-nonfree 10.0.1.218+really9.0.260.0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: Package is in a very bad inconsistent state - you should reinstall it before attempting a remo

2010-02-07 Thread Julian Hartley
6th file Thank you once again for looking into this bug. ** Attachment added: xorg_fix_intrepid.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38853217/xorg_fix_intrepid.log -- package flashplugin-nonfree 10.0.1.218+really9.0.260.0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: Package is in a very bad inconsistent

[Bug 516312] Re: package flashplugin-nonfree 10.0.1.218+really9.0.260.0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: Package is in a very bad inconsistent state - you should reinstall it before attempting a remo

2010-02-07 Thread Julian Hartley
5th file ** Attachment added: term.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38853182/term.log -- package flashplugin-nonfree 10.0.1.218+really9.0.260.0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: Package is in a very bad inconsistent state - you should reinstall it before attempting a removal.

[Bug 516312] [NEW] package flashplugin-nonfree 10.0.1.218+really9.0.260.0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: Package is in a very bad inconsistent state - you should reinstall it before attempting a re

2010-02-02 Thread Julian Hartley
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: flashplugin-nonfree I upgraded to 10.04 from 6.04 (I think). During this process, the above package created problems. There are broken dependencies. Now I cannot update with update-manager. ProblemType: Package AptOrdering: flashplugin-nonfree: Remove

[Bug 516312] Re: package flashplugin-nonfree 10.0.1.218+really9.0.260.0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: Package is in a very bad inconsistent state - you should reinstall it before attempting a remo

2010-02-02 Thread Julian Hartley
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38680959/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Df.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38680960/Df.txt ** Attachment added: Dmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38680961/Dmesg.txt -- package flashplugin-nonfree