Re: [Bug 1777860] Re: Sssd doesn't clean up PIDfile after crash

2018-06-21 Thread Jurjen Bokma
On 06/21/2018 04:39 PM, Robie Basak wrote: > Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make > Ubuntu better. > > It looks like upstream added a PIDFile entry to the systemd service > definition in 1.16.1, which is included in Bionic and Cosmic. So it's > likely that this bug

[Bug 1777860] [NEW] Sssd doesn't clean up PIDfile after crash

2018-06-20 Thread Jurjen Bokma
Public bug reported: After having crashed, sssd will not start, because the old PIDfile is still present. The fact that the process does not exist any more does not cause the PIDfile to be cleaned up. This bug is already known, but not fixed, upstream: https://pagure.io/SSSD/sssd/issue/3528

Re: [Bug 1397898] [NEW] incorrect PID in initscript

2014-12-03 Thread Jurjen Bokma
On 12/01/2014 10:42 PM, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen wrote: That's a delightfully evil hack. Will using an upstart job work instead, or do you need to keep track of the PID there, as well (something for post-start, then)? Matthaus Owens of Puppet Labs responded that Puppet *does* write its own PID.

Re: [Bug 1397898] Re: incorrect PID in initscript

2014-12-03 Thread Jurjen Bokma
On 12/02/2014 12:21 AM, Matthaus Owens wrote: Sorry, I should have said pidfile is written to $rundir/agent.pid. $rundir defaults to $vardir/run if not specified in puppet.conf. Thank you! Now my config works, and this 'bug' report should never have existed. :) -- You received this bug

Re: [Bug 1397898] [NEW] incorrect PID in initscript

2014-12-03 Thread Jurjen Bokma
On 12/01/2014 10:42 PM, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen wrote: That's a delightfully evil hack. Will using an upstart job work instead, or do you need to keep track of the PID there, as well (something for post-start, then)? Matthaus Owens of Puppet Labs responded that Puppet *does* write its own PID.

Re: [Bug 1397898] Re: incorrect PID in initscript

2014-12-03 Thread Jurjen Bokma
On 12/02/2014 12:21 AM, Matthaus Owens wrote: Sorry, I should have said pidfile is written to $rundir/agent.pid. $rundir defaults to $vardir/run if not specified in puppet.conf. Thank you! Now my config works, and this 'bug' report should never have existed. :) -- You received this bug

[Bug 1397898] [NEW] incorrect PID in initscript

2014-12-01 Thread Jurjen Bokma
Public bug reported: Abstract: Puppet initscript doesn't record the correct PID. WIth this patch, it does. Longer version: When the Puppet agent daemon gets started, /etc/init.d/puppet records a PID in /var/run/puppet/${NAME}.pid, but it is the wrong one. Puppet may fork half a dozen times

[Bug 1397910] [NEW] Puppet daemon dies from SIGUSR1 if no certificate

2014-12-01 Thread Jurjen Bokma
Public bug reported: Abstract: When the Puppet agent daemon is unable to get a certificate, it dies on receiving SIGUSR1. Longer version: Right after boot, the Puppet agent daemon is started. It may be running before hostname resolution is available. If it is, Puppet is unable to receive a

[Bug 1397898] Re: incorrect PID in initscript

2014-12-01 Thread Jurjen Bokma
Version data: Ubuntu Trusty Puppet 3.4.3-1 0 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to puppet in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1397898 Title: incorrect PID in initscript To manage notifications about this bug go to:

Re: [Bug 1397910] Re: Puppet daemon dies from SIGUSR1 if no certificate

2014-12-01 Thread Jurjen Bokma
On 12/01/2014 06:49 PM, Robie Basak wrote: Then isn't something else broken that causes puppet to be started before hostname resolution is available? What is on your system that causes hostname resolution to not be available? Can we fix that instead? Perhaps we can. Puppet runs from a SystemV

Re: [Bug 1397898] Re: incorrect PID in initscript

2014-12-01 Thread Jurjen Bokma
It should go to Debian in the first instance, assuming that Debian is Ok. Then it'll have to wait until I can confirm that Debian is affected as well. Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to puppet in Ubuntu.

Re: [Bug 1397910] Re: Puppet daemon dies from SIGUSR1 if no certificate

2014-12-01 Thread Jurjen Bokma
On 12/01/2014 07:31 PM, Robie Basak wrote: What is it trying to look up? Itself, or something else? I'd expect a self-lookup to always succeed. It tries to look up the Puppet server, to fetch a certificate from. Maybe it also tries to look up itself. But that would succeed, indeed. If for some

[Bug 1397898] [NEW] incorrect PID in initscript

2014-12-01 Thread Jurjen Bokma
Public bug reported: Abstract: Puppet initscript doesn't record the correct PID. WIth this patch, it does. Longer version: When the Puppet agent daemon gets started, /etc/init.d/puppet records a PID in /var/run/puppet/${NAME}.pid, but it is the wrong one. Puppet may fork half a dozen times

[Bug 1397910] [NEW] Puppet daemon dies from SIGUSR1 if no certificate

2014-12-01 Thread Jurjen Bokma
Public bug reported: Abstract: When the Puppet agent daemon is unable to get a certificate, it dies on receiving SIGUSR1. Longer version: Right after boot, the Puppet agent daemon is started. It may be running before hostname resolution is available. If it is, Puppet is unable to receive a

[Bug 1397898] Re: incorrect PID in initscript

2014-12-01 Thread Jurjen Bokma
Version data: Ubuntu Trusty Puppet 3.4.3-1 0 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1397898 Title: incorrect PID in initscript To manage notifications about this bug go to:

Re: [Bug 1397910] Re: Puppet daemon dies from SIGUSR1 if no certificate

2014-12-01 Thread Jurjen Bokma
On 12/01/2014 06:49 PM, Robie Basak wrote: Then isn't something else broken that causes puppet to be started before hostname resolution is available? What is on your system that causes hostname resolution to not be available? Can we fix that instead? Perhaps we can. Puppet runs from a SystemV

Re: [Bug 1397898] Re: incorrect PID in initscript

2014-12-01 Thread Jurjen Bokma
It should go to Debian in the first instance, assuming that Debian is Ok. Then it'll have to wait until I can confirm that Debian is affected as well. Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

Re: [Bug 1397910] Re: Puppet daemon dies from SIGUSR1 if no certificate

2014-12-01 Thread Jurjen Bokma
On 12/01/2014 07:31 PM, Robie Basak wrote: What is it trying to look up? Itself, or something else? I'd expect a self-lookup to always succeed. It tries to look up the Puppet server, to fetch a certificate from. Maybe it also tries to look up itself. But that would succeed, indeed. If for some

[Bug 1353502] Re: NFS4 mount fails with AD Kerberos and long hostnames

2014-08-18 Thread Jurjen Bokma
Please don't bother any more. I offered the patch upstream, and it was committed there. (Plus a line that fixes the memory leak I introduced above.) Regards Jurjen -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1353502] [NEW] NFS4 mount fails with AD Kerberos and long hostnames

2014-08-06 Thread Jurjen Bokma
Public bug reported: Hi, Version info: Using Ubuntu 14.04 LTS 'Trusty', and nfs-utils 1.2.8. Symptoms: Mounting kerberized NFS4 shares fails when the host is joined to an Active Directory domain, but not with the conventional name. Non-kerberized mounts succeed. Hosts joining the domain with

[Bug 1302638] Re: augeas-tools fails to parse krb5.conf (solution provided)

2014-04-09 Thread Jurjen Bokma
I opened a PR on Github as Raphaël requested. One more thing: the Trusty source package depends neither on flex nor on bison. I think it should, but I'm not sure enough to open another bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed

[Bug 1302638] Re: augeas-tools fails to parse krb5.conf (solution provided)

2014-04-09 Thread Jurjen Bokma
Err.. s/depends/build-depends/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to augeas in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1302638 Title: augeas-tools fails to parse krb5.conf (solution provided) To manage notifications about

[Bug 1302638] Re: augeas-tools fails to parse krb5.conf (solution provided)

2014-04-09 Thread Jurjen Bokma
I opened a PR on Github as Raphaël requested. One more thing: the Trusty source package depends neither on flex nor on bison. I think it should, but I'm not sure enough to open another bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1302638] Re: augeas-tools fails to parse krb5.conf (solution provided)

2014-04-09 Thread Jurjen Bokma
Err.. s/depends/build-depends/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1302638 Title: augeas-tools fails to parse krb5.conf (solution provided) To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1302638] Re: augeas-tools fails to parse krb5.conf (solution provided)

2014-04-08 Thread Jurjen Bokma
I'm the one who should do the thanking: I'm using your distro. I have not sent the changes upstream. I'm not very familiar with the jargon of parse tree structure. I'd say it obviously causes changes in the structure of the tree: it adds leaves. But I presume the question is meant: Are there

[Bug 1302638] Re: augeas-tools fails to parse krb5.conf (solution provided)

2014-04-08 Thread Jurjen Bokma
Ok, I cloned the GitHub repository, forked, making changes. As for unit tests, it looks to me like an entire lens is the unit of testing, so I would edit lenses/tests/test_krb5.aug to include some previously unparsed in- and output. Is that what you want me to do? Also, it's not unlikely that

[Bug 1302638] Re: augeas-tools fails to parse krb5.conf (solution provided)

2014-04-08 Thread Jurjen Bokma
I'm the one who should do the thanking: I'm using your distro. I have not sent the changes upstream. I'm not very familiar with the jargon of parse tree structure. I'd say it obviously causes changes in the structure of the tree: it adds leaves. But I presume the question is meant: Are there

[Bug 1302638] Re: augeas-tools fails to parse krb5.conf (solution provided)

2014-04-08 Thread Jurjen Bokma
Ok, I cloned the GitHub repository, forked, making changes. As for unit tests, it looks to me like an entire lens is the unit of testing, so I would edit lenses/tests/test_krb5.aug to include some previously unparsed in- and output. Is that what you want me to do? Also, it's not unlikely that

[Bug 1302638] Re: augeas-tools fails to parse krb5.conf (solution provided)

2014-04-04 Thread Jurjen Bokma
** Patch added: output of diff -u krb5.aug.old /usr/share/augeas/lenses/dist/krb5.aug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/augeas/+bug/1302638/+attachment/4065670/+files/krb5.aug.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is

[Bug 1302638] [NEW] augeas-tools fails to parse krb5.conf (solution provided)

2014-04-04 Thread Jurjen Bokma
Public bug reported: In Trusty, augtool doesn't parse the default /etc/krb5.conf There are multiple issues. The lens cannot handle some keywords, it cannot handle heading digits in realm names, and it cannot handle lowercase realms in the [realms] section. After the following patch, it can, and

[Bug 1302638] Re: augeas-tools fails to parse krb5.conf (solution provided)

2014-04-04 Thread Jurjen Bokma
** Patch added: output of diff -u krb5.aug.old /usr/share/augeas/lenses/dist/krb5.aug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/augeas/+bug/1302638/+attachment/4065670/+files/krb5.aug.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1302638] [NEW] augeas-tools fails to parse krb5.conf (solution provided)

2014-04-04 Thread Jurjen Bokma
Public bug reported: In Trusty, augtool doesn't parse the default /etc/krb5.conf There are multiple issues. The lens cannot handle some keywords, it cannot handle heading digits in realm names, and it cannot handle lowercase realms in the [realms] section. After the following patch, it can, and

[Bug 1274543] Re: sssd-ad uses wrong key to verify tgt at login time

2014-01-31 Thread Jurjen Bokma
Additional information: The account ADJoiner is an ordinary user in that it has no servicePrincipalName, whereas hosts do have one. I believe this is a crucial difference, because I can get a ticket for anything that has a servicePrincipalName, but not for anything that doesn't. And indeed,

[Bug 1274543] [NEW] sssd-ad uses wrong key to verify tgt at login time

2014-01-30 Thread Jurjen Bokma
Public bug reported: I try to log in using sssd with AD authentication. It fails. When I remove the first key from the keytab, logging in succeeds. Restoring the previous keytab brings the failure back. Hence, I believe the closing of https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1871#comment:2 to be