[Bug 80514] Re: Wireless on Asus A9RP not recognized or initialised

2007-01-23 Thread Ketil
** Tags added: 1211rw asus laptop ** Tags added: zd1211rw ** Tags removed: 1211rw -- Wireless on Asus A9RP not recognized or initialised https://launchpad.net/bugs/80514 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 80514] Re: Wireless on Asus A9RP not recognized or initialised

2007-01-23 Thread Ketil
** Changed in: Ubuntu Sourcepackagename: None = zd1211 ** Also affects: linux-source-2.6.17 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- Wireless on Asus A9RP not recognized or initialised https://launchpad.net/bugs/80514 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 80514] Wireless on Asus A9RP not recognized or initialised

2007-01-18 Thread Ketil
Public bug reported: Asus A9RP comes with a version of the USB ZyDAS ZD1211 802.11b/g built in. IT is possible to make it work on the edgy kernel by following the instructions on http://forum.ubuntu-fr.org/viewtopic.php?pid=649014 (IN French- Translation:

[Bug 80526] acpi - Screen never resumes from suspend to ram

2007-01-18 Thread Ketil
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: acpi Asus a9rp (laptop)with edgy or feisty (updated 18th jan. 2007) does not resume from suspend to ram properly. The screen stays black. Hibernate works though. This happens both with the open source drivers and with the ati binary drivers. There was a

[Bug 78361] Request taget TARPIT support in netfilter

2007-01-07 Thread Ketil Malde
Public bug reported: Netfilter provides patch-o-matic patches that adds a target TARPIT that sabotages network connections, which is useful in slowing down attackers of various kinds. It'd be great to have this support in the kernel. And, incidentally, the current iptables shipped with Edgy

[Bug 72100] nfsroot doesn't work

2006-11-16 Thread Ketil Malde
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: linux-image-2.6-386 Okay, maybe I'm not supposed to do this, but I want my workstation to boot diskless, using nfsroot from a server. Since I had everything set up (and working) with LTSP, I thought it'd be easy to justs point pxelinux at the current

[Bug 59272] Re: Boot locks at black screen with last few amd64 kernels.

2006-11-12 Thread Ketil Malde
Did you try to boot without 'quiet' and 'splash' options (hit F6 I think it is, for more boot options, and just remove them). I had to boot with 'acpi=off' as well for my computer not to hang (but it still didn't detect my USB stuff correctly, I'll file a separate issue about that). -k --

[Bug 64474] Re: system pauses

2006-11-12 Thread Ketil Malde
I had something similar, where the computer would consistently hang for a second or two when the frequency was lowered. My fix was just to manually set the 'performance_governor' to 'performance' or 'powersave'. Some old notes: http://www.ii.uib.no/~ketil/ubuntu-prob.log -k -- system

[Bug 69773] Re: via-rhine only allows access to one interface

2006-11-03 Thread Ketil Malde
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 53936 *** ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 53936 Dapper doesn't report iftab MAC address error -- via-rhine only allows access to one interface https://launchpad.net/bugs/69773 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 53936] Re: Dapper doesn't report iftab MAC address error

2006-11-03 Thread Ketil Malde
Just to say 'me too'. (I've marked my bug 69773 a duplicate of this one; I've also listed other possible duplicates in the comments for 69773). This was difficult to track down, and it'd be good if there was a warning if any interface is hidden because of an iftab entry, and/or udev would warn

[Bug 63408] Re: failing to find fonts: dexconf writes bogus FontPaths

2006-11-02 Thread Ketil Malde
Got the same thing with ion3 failing to start. I fixed it by moving the old directory out of the way, and making a symlink from the old (xorg.conf) font dir to the new dir. -- failing to find fonts: dexconf writes bogus FontPaths https://launchpad.net/bugs/63408 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 69773] Re: via-rhine only allows access to one interface

2006-11-02 Thread Ketil Malde
I've been in touch with somebody with the same mainboard, he's using Debian and while the interfaces have been switched around occasionally, they've both been working, for kernels 2.6.1[678]. Any ubuntu-specific patches in there? -- via-rhine only allows access to one interface

[Bug 69773] Re: via-rhine only allows access to one interface

2006-11-02 Thread Ketil Malde
Possible duplicate: https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+bug/47407 I'll check out /etc/iftab later. Less likely, but not impossible duplicates: https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/linux-source-2.6.15/+bug/45295

[Bug 69773] Re: via-rhine only allows access to one interface

2006-11-02 Thread Ketil Malde
/etc/iftab contained a bogus mac address for eth0. Presumably, the systems leaves eth0 unassigned in that case. I entered the interfaces correctly, and everything seems to be back in order. For my purposes this issue is resolved, but perhaps the upgrade process should check that iftab entries

[Bug 69773] via-rhine only allows access to one interface

2006-11-01 Thread Ketil Malde
Public bug reported: I have a VIA mini-ITX with dual network interfaces. After upgrading from Breezy to Edgy, only eth1 was accessible, although dmesg shows the via-rhine driver detecting both eth0 and eth1 (one as Rhine II and the other as Rhine III -- I think the working interface is Rhine

[Bug 69617] Re: totem-mozilla doesn't work on basically anything

2006-10-31 Thread Ketil Malde
...better yet, don't let firefox suggest movie player (i.e. totem) unless there is good reason to believe it can handle the stream type. I typically have installed xine, amarok, and mplayer, all of which could handle mp3s. And while I'm at it, you do realize one has to *browse* through /usr/bin

[Bug 58617] Re: Saying no to MP3 support on fresh install says that Amarok is now ready to support MP3

2006-10-05 Thread Ketil Malde
I'll just add that this happens on Dapper as well. (Amarok 1.4.3/KDE 3.5.2, from amarok Version: 2:1.3.9-0ubuntu4. That is - apt-cache show amarok gives that version, but dpkg -s reports 2:1.4.3-0ubuntu8~dapper1 as installed? How'd that happen? I even removed it, apt-get update'd, and

[Bug 59480] Monitor resolution is only probed on boot

2006-09-08 Thread Ketil Malde
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xorg After moving my computer, I turned it on, plugged in the monitor, and discovered that I got 1024x768 scaled, instead of the previous 1280x1024. Since I hadn't modified my X config, I presumed that X probed the monitor resolution at startup, and

[Bug 55271] Netboot install from Xubuntu alternate install installs Ubuntu desktop, not Xubuntu desktop

2006-08-05 Thread ketil
Public bug reported: Install a standard PXE boot configuration with the pxe package, dhcp3-server, atftpd. I used /tftpboot as root catalog for atftpd (standard). From the xubuntu-6.06-alternate-i386.iso image copy all files and subdirectories from /install/netboot to /tftpboot (Make sure

[Bug 55271] Re: Netboot install from Xubuntu alternate install installs Ubuntu desktop, not Xubuntu desktop

2006-08-05 Thread ketil
Sorry about adding Baltix to the list of affected distributions, that was a mistake. Apparently you can't remove a distribution from the list once it is added. -- Netboot install from Xubuntu alternate install installs Ubuntu desktop, not Xubuntu desktop https://launchpad.net/bugs/55271 --

<    1   2   3   4   5   6