[Bug 1770048] [NEW] package nvidia-340 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/lib/udev/rules.d/71-nvidia.rules', which is also in package nvidia-kernel-common-390 390.48-0ubu

2018-05-08 Thread Kilz
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1767116 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1767116 Public bug reported: I was changing from 390 to 340 when it happened. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04 Package: nvidia-340 (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-15.16-generic

[Bug 1753198] [NEW] package libnvidia-gl-390 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: new libnvidia-gl-390:amd64 package pre-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 2

2018-03-03 Thread Kilz
Public bug reported: The 340 driver also failed. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04 Package: libnvidia-gl-390 (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-10.11-generic 4.15.3 Uname: Linux 4.15.0-10-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.8-0ubuntu10 Architecture: amd64 Date: Sat

[Bug 555571] Re: Network Management disabled

2010-04-12 Thread Kilz
Thank you for the work around Dani! I updated today, rebooted, no internet, not even with a cable. Network manager wont start in the menu. -- Network Management disabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/71 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 546607] Re: KPackageKit gives error after recent upgrade

2010-03-25 Thread Kilz
I found that the error was caused by a misspelled line I added to software sources. -- KPackageKit gives error after recent upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/546607 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 546607] [NEW] KPackageKit gives error after recent upgrade

2010-03-24 Thread Kilz
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: packagekit Here is the error Error Type: Error Value: coercing to Unicode: need string or buffer, exceptions.SystemError found File : /usr/share/PackageKit/helpers/apt/aptBackend.py, line 2216, in main() File :

[Bug 542625] [NEW] ubuntu one would not update

2010-03-20 Thread Kilz
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ubuntuone-client Ubunbtu one said it was connected, but after 2 days it was still stuck. I uninstalled , even purged the application and deleted the files on the local machine, now it crashes. ProblemType: Bug

[Bug 542625] Re: ubuntu one would not update

2010-03-20 Thread Kilz
** Attachment added: .home.jim..cache.ubuntuone.log.oauth.login.log.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41408135/.home.jim..cache.ubuntuone.log.oauth.login.log.txt ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41408136/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added:

[Bug 272928] Re: adobe flash player not working on AMD64 with Firefox 3

2008-09-21 Thread Kilz
The script is not a random one. It is the most used one on the Ubuntu forums in the 64bit section. The script is widely used because of the repeated failure of flash to install to the 64bit version. Had flash installed without the script it would never have been tried. -- adobe flash player not

[Bug 270868] Re: Flash 9 for AMD64 (nspluginwrapper) does not work on Ubuntu Hardy

2008-09-16 Thread Kilz
I think flashplugin-alternative.so is part of swfdec and should be removed when flashplugin-nonfree is installed. If it isnt it is a conflicting flash plugin. -- Flash 9 for AMD64 (nspluginwrapper) does not work on Ubuntu Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/270868 You received this bug

[Bug 236917] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV

2008-06-05 Thread Kilz
I uploaded the requested trace 2 days ago, why is this still listed as Incomplete? -- nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236917 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 236917] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV

2008-06-05 Thread Kilz
Well I think I can save someone some work, gksudo nautilus is not crashing now. Perhaps the updates I installed in the last 2 days fixed the issue. -- nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236917 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 236917] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV

2008-06-03 Thread Kilz
Here is the backtrace. ** Attachment added: gdb-nautilus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14961493/gdb-nautilus.txt -- nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236917 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 236917] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV

2008-06-03 Thread Kilz
What do I have to install to get the debug symbols? -- nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236917 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 236917] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV

2008-06-03 Thread Kilz
After I posted that I took a look into synaptic and installed libglib2.0-0-dbg . Here is a second backtrace after I installed the package. ** Attachment added: gdb-nautilus-2.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14962353/gdb-nautilus-2.txt -- nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV

[Bug 236917] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV

2008-06-02 Thread Kilz
** Attachment added: CoreDump.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14930201/CoreDump.gz ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14930202/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14930203/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added:

[Bug 205773] Re: Nautilus tries to copy a dragged file into Network on hover and freezes

2008-05-06 Thread Kilz
I am running Hardy amd64, getting the same error occasionly. I was dragging a deb file and it froze. Here is all the text from the box. Error while copying swiftdove-2.0.0.12-2_athlon64-64bit_AMD64.deb. There was an error copying the file into network:///. Show more details Operation not

[Bug 225734] [NEW] Hardy release candidate has recieved no releases since the release.

2008-05-02 Thread Kilz
Public bug reported: I am running Hardy Heron 8.04 amd64 installed with the release candidate alternate install cd . So far I have not seen upgrades since the release. On the 20th of April I did a clean install of Hardy to a new drive. I have at least 3 times daily checked the upgrade manager

[Bug 225734] Re: Hardy release candidate has recieved no releases since the release.

2008-05-02 Thread Kilz
I at least dont want pre release packages because of stability concerns. But its been a week since any update/upgrade has been done. Even though some have been released and some of the software is installed and of prior versions. -- Hardy release candidate has recieved no releases since the

[Bug 101845] Re: Automounted Volumes mount points change

2008-04-21 Thread Kilz
I installed the Release Candidate on a new hard drive. The mount points were detected wrong for the cd drives in fstab and the cd's were then mounted to /media/CdTitle. I changed the cd lines in fstab from /dev/scd0 /dev/scd1 to /dev/hdc /dev/hdd and the cd's are now mounted to /media/cdrom

[Bug 136267] Re: flashplayer-nonfree requires manual work on gutsy amd64

2007-08-31 Thread Kilz
The fix for this could be as easy as making flash a prerequisite if it isnt already, then adding the command to move , and the command to make the wrapper to a postinst script in the nspluginwrapper package. -- flashplayer-nonfree requires manual work on gutsy amd64

[Bug 1] Re: Microsoft has a majority market share

2007-07-14 Thread Kilz
With the availability of nspluginwrapper (I wrote a install script that dose it in 30 seconds) Flash is a non issue. Giving me a link to the 64bit section is like giving someone a map to their home. :) I also know that a large amount of Fud, that gets repeated by quite a few people outside of

[Bug 1] Re: Microsoft has a majority market share

2007-07-14 Thread Kilz
Forgot to add a link last time. http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=476924 -- Microsoft has a majority market share https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing

[Bug 1] Re: Microsoft has a majority market share

2007-07-11 Thread Kilz
One has to wonder why, with the first step towards fixing this bug (Dell coming pre installed). Why those 64bit computers come with the 32bit version of Ubuntu installed. Perhaps if the 64bit version was good enough to pre installed it would give buyers another reason to choose Ubuntu over the

[Bug 89704] Re: No backport of Firefox 2.o to Dapper

2007-05-13 Thread Kilz
Another option I just came across is Seiftweasel. Its a free and open source project. It is an optimized build of Firefox with free to use branding. http://sourceforge.net/projects/swiftweasel It has AMD64 and i386 versions of its 2.0.0.3 firefox build avilable as .deb files. They install and work

[Bug 68158] Re: Firefox 2.0

2007-05-13 Thread Kilz
I have recently came across a free and open source project called Swiftweasel http://sourceforge.net/projects/swiftweasel . It is an optimized build of Firefox with free to use branding. It has builds of its 2.0.0.3 version available as deb files for ADM64 and i386. They install and work in

[Bug 89704] Re: No backport of Firefox 2.o to Dapper

2007-04-27 Thread Kilz
hk47, I know its possible to install a 32bit Firefox on the amd64 version. I wrote one of the howto's you have linked to. But that doesnt solve some problems. One is that you cant print a page from the 32bit browser. Another is that in kde the browser doesnt use some of the themes. There are

[Bug 68158] Re: Firefox 2.0

2007-04-25 Thread Kilz
IMHO relying on other distributions to help keep the code base of Firefox 1.5 up to date is a prescription for disaster. When the failure happens, and it will happen (2 years is to long a time) it wont be the other distro's that will look bad, but Ubuntu. It may appear to some people that Ubuntu

[Bug 89704] Re: No backport of Firefox 2.o to Dapper

2007-04-24 Thread Kilz
The lack of a backport is of major concern to amd64 users of Dapper. There is no way to easily replace the 64bit version of Firefox like there is with the 32bit version. I also think the statment that it is complex to get Firefox 2.0 running on Dapper to be a slight bit of an exageration. The

[Bug 1] Re: Microsoft has a majority market share

2007-03-24 Thread Kilz
The gap in market share may get worse. 32bit hardware is no longer being sold or manufactured. The 64bit version of Ubuntu doesn't just work. In fact on large segments of the Ubuntu English Forums people are told to install the 32bit version. Common complaints about the 64bit version are

[Bug 72846] Re: Synaptic and Firefox will not start after updating Dapper

2007-03-12 Thread Kilz
Thanks, but it wasnt as bad as it sounds. I have a web/file server (that runs Ubuntu) that I back up most important files to. Plus the Dapper install was quite old, I think from when Dapper was first released. I had learned a lot since then. So I was able to repartition the drive to make it

[Bug 72846] Re: Synaptic and Firefox will not start after updating Dapper

2007-03-09 Thread Kilz
I would but that install was wiped/deleted after I corupted the whole drive about 3 weeks ago when I tried to resize a partition. -- Synaptic and Firefox will not start after updating Dapper https://launchpad.net/bugs/72846 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 88808] forced 32bit applications cant access the internet on the amd64 version

2007-02-28 Thread Kilz
Public bug reported: Disabling ipv6 allows the applications (frostwire, 32bit firefox)to access the internet. ProblemType: Bug Date: Wed Feb 28 18:53:10 2007 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.04 Uname: Linux jim-desktop 2.6.20-9-generic #2 SMP Sun Feb 25 22:59:06 UTC 2007 x86_64 GNU/Linux ** Affects:

[Bug 87937] Re: [apport] audacity crashed with SIGSEGV in XFreeFont()

2007-02-25 Thread Kilz
** Attachment added: CoreDump.gz http://librarian.launchpad.net/6529793/CoreDump.gz ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://librarian.launchpad.net/6529794/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Disassembly.txt http://librarian.launchpad.net/6529795/Disassembly.txt ** Attachment

[Bug 87937] [apport] audacity crashed with SIGSEGV in XFreeFont()

2007-02-25 Thread Kilz
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: audacity just recording from microphone to mp3 ProblemType: Crash CrashCounter: 1 Date: Sun Feb 25 18:48:50 2007 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/audacity Package: audacity 1.2.6-0ubuntu1 ProcCmdline: audacity ProcCwd: /home/jim

[Bug 72846] Synaptic and Firefox will not start after updating Dapper

2006-11-22 Thread Kilz
Public bug reported: Im running the amd64 version of Dapper Drake. After updating on November 22. Synaptic will not launch when clicking on the menu launcher. Trying to launch it in the terminal gives this error. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ synaptic synaptic: error while loading shared libraries:

[Bug 72846] Re: Synaptic and Firefox will not start after updating Dapper

2006-11-22 Thread Kilz
I was able to do a work around. By making the libstdc++.so.6 symlink point to libstdc++.so.6.0.7 instead of libstdc++.so.6.0.8. A search of Ubuntu packages says that libstdc++.so.6.0.8 is not a file contained in any Dapper packages. -- Synaptic and Firefox will not start after updating Dapper