Apparently -moutline-atomics is on by default in gcc 10.1 so perhaps
this problem will just go away over time. Debian seems to be relying on
that rather than shipping a separate libc6-lse.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
If ld.so itself can be built with -moutline-atomics, then yes, it would
fix this for us.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1933879
Title:
libc6-lse does not replace ld.so with LSE
Public bug reported:
When installing libc6-lse on AArch64 (tested on focal and an AWS
Graviton 2) the libc, pthreads, etc used by programs on the system are
replaced with the LSE enabled versions. This is not, however, true of
ld.so, despite an LSE enabled version of ld.so being included in
