[Bug 1130410] Re: Audio doesn't work after boot from Windows

2013-05-04 Thread Martin Webster
I have experienced this problem since 12.04. Issue occurs with Windows XP or Windows 7. I do have a workaround. Suspend Ubuntu and power on. Sound returns. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs

[Bug 738140] Re: sigsegv when accessing last.fm if winbind installed

2011-03-19 Thread Martin Webster
Related bug for Banshee: #738142. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/738140 Title: sigsegv when accessing last.fm if winbind installed -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubun

[Bug 738140] [NEW] sigsegv when accessing last.fm if winbind installed

2011-03-19 Thread Martin Webster
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: banshee When windbind is installed both Rhythmbox and Banshee media players crash when scrobbling starts. Removing windbind eliminates this problem (but affects Samba browsing.) Issue confirmed on Ubuntu 10.10 and Linux Mint 10 (Ubuntu 10.10 derivative.)

[Bug 738142] [NEW] sigsegv when accessing last.fm if winbind installed

2011-03-19 Thread Martin Webster
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: banshee Binary package hint: banshee When windbind is installed both Rhythmbox and Banshee media players crash when scrobbling starts. Removing windbind eliminates this problem (but affects Samba browsing.) Issue confirmed on Ubuntu 10.10 and Linux Mint

[Bug 281217] Re: evolution calendar does not work on a *x600 resolution

2011-03-01 Thread Martin Webster
Same issue with Linux Mint 10 "Julia" (based on Ubuntu 10.10.) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/281217 Title: evolution calendar does not work on a *x600 resolution -- ubuntu-bugs mai

[Bug 281217] Re: evolution calendar does not work on a *x600 resolution

2011-02-06 Thread Martin Webster
** Attachment added: "Switching back to Mail from Calendar (after changing Switcher appearance to toolbar)" https://bugs.launchpad.net/evolution/+bug/281217/+attachment/1834074/+files/Workspace%201_003.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 281217] Re: evolution calendar does not work on a *x600 resolution

2011-02-06 Thread Martin Webster
** Attachment added: "Evolution Calendar on 1024 x 600 display" https://bugs.launchpad.net/evolution/+bug/281217/+attachment/1834061/+files/Workspace%201_002.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchp

[Bug 281217] Re: evolution calendar does not work on a *x600 resolution

2011-02-06 Thread Martin Webster
** Attachment added: "Evolution Mail on 1024 x 600 display" https://bugs.launchpad.net/evolution/+bug/281217/+attachment/1834045/+files/Workspace%201_001.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.n

[Bug 281217] Re: evolution calendar does not work on a *x600 resolution

2011-02-06 Thread Martin Webster
This bug is present on Ubuntu UNE 10.04 LTS and 10.10 running on a netbook with screen resolution of 1024 x 600 (wide screen.) Problem only evident with GNOME desktop. Both mail and contacts scale correctly. However, when switching to calendar the window is larger that 1024 x 600. Consequently, the

[Bug 648772] Re: update-manager fails during distribution upgrade to 10.10 beta

2010-09-27 Thread Martin Webster
Duplicate entry of https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/648776. Please make 648776 primary as this is report on QA Tracker. Thanks. -- update-manager fails during distribution upgrade to 10.10 beta https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/648772 You received this bug notification because you are a membe

[Bug 648772] Re: update-manager fails during distribution upgrade to 10.10 beta

2010-09-27 Thread Martin Webster
** Attachment added: "lagothrix.tar.gz" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/648772/+attachment/1642983/+files/lagothrix.tar.gz -- update-manager fails during distribution upgrade to 10.10 beta https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/648772 You received this bug notification because you are a member of U

[Bug 648772] [NEW] update-manager fails during distribution upgrade to 10.10 beta

2010-09-27 Thread Martin Webster
Public bug reported: This bug affects the distribution upgrade on Ubuntu 10.04 (UNE) to 10.10 beta (UNE) with Unity. The procedure described in the test case (http://testcases.qa.ubuntu.com/Testing/Cases/DesktopUpgrade) was followed on an up-to-date installation of Ubuntu 10.04 UNE. The process p

[Bug 648776] Re: update-manager fails during distribution upgrade to 10.10 beta

2010-09-27 Thread Martin Webster
** Attachment added: "/var/log/dist-upgrade/" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/648776/+attachment/1643004/+files/lagothrix.tar.gz -- update-manager fails during distribution upgrade to 10.10 beta https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/648776 You received this bug notification because you are a membe

[Bug 648776] [NEW] update-manager fails during distribution upgrade to 10.10 beta

2010-09-27 Thread Martin Webster
Public bug reported: This bug affects the distribution upgrade on Ubuntu 10.04 (UNE) to 10.10 beta (UNE) with Unity. The procedure described in the test case (http://testcases.qa.ubuntu.com/Testing/Cases/DesktopUpgrade) was followed on an up-to-date installation of Ubuntu 10.04 UNE. The process p

[Bug 573195] Re: pinentry window launched by gpg-agent closes prematurely, unable to enter passphrase

2010-05-21 Thread Martin Webster
I've also seen this behaviour. The solution is quite simple: 1. Open Gnome Terminal and type gconf-editor. 2. Select apps->maximus. 3. Double-click exclude-class key. 4. Click Add and type 'pinentry' followed by OK. I've tested this solution with Evolution and GPG, e.g. gpg --clearsign. -- pin

[Bug 438136] Re: palimpsest bad sectors false positive

2009-11-21 Thread Martin Webster
Similar behaviour on HP Compaq nx6125 (Seagate ST9808211A) running 9.10 i386 and x86-64. Checked disk in Windows XP using 3rd party tool and no problems reported. No issue with 9.04 x86-64. Disk has many bad sectors Warning Normalised: 95 Worst: 95 Threshold: 36 Vlaue 215 sectors -- palimpsest