This is tracked in storyboard:
https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2005349
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1821584
Title:
Compute 'force_service_down' API returns 400 with
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1825020 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1825020
I wrote this functional test https://review.opendev.org/#/c/672067/ and
things seem to be working OK, but even if I revert
https://review.opendev.org/#/c/65/ the test passes so I'm not sure
the test is
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1825020 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1825020
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1825020
resize of instance, that was booted from volume, trigger image size check
then fails resize
--
You received this bug notification because you are
OK I think https://review.opendev.org/#/c/620706/ is the regression
because of this:
https://review.opendev.org/#/c/620706/32/nova/compute/api.py@3598
The resize flow passes root_bdm=None to _validate_flavor_image_nostatus
which makes it take this else block:
Just a clarification, is the problem that you enabled
"os_compute_api:servers:create:zero_disk_flavor" for non-admins and they
are creating servers that are NOT volume-backed and then trying to
resize those fails? You said you only use volume-backed instances so I'm
confused about the recreate
Have you configured the "os_compute_api:servers:create:zero_disk_flavor"
policy rule like Takashi noted in comment 2? I want to be clear about
the recreate scenario on Stein - can you describe that?
I'm assuming something like, you have two flavors, flavor1 and flavor2,
both with disk=0.
1.
Note that bug 1626499 and bug 1640920 seem like older versions of a
similar thing but on different parts of the data model.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1834845
Title:
I've marked this as incomplete for nova since I'm not aware of any
changes being asked to make here. The build failure weigher was added
because of bug 1742102 and in response to operator feedback from the
Boston summit to auto-disable computes if they experienced a build
failure. So the
@James: per comment 2, see bug 1816360 :) Easy fix for that.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1818239
Title:
scheduler: build failure high negative weighting
To manage notifications
** Changed in: sqlalchemy-migrate
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: sqlalchemy-migrate
Assignee: (unassigned) => Corey Bryant (corey.bryant)
** Changed in: sqlalchemy-migrate
Importance: Undecided => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
** Changed in: nova/rocky
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
** Changed in: nova/rocky
Assignee: (unassigned) => Corey Bryant (corey.bryant)
** Changed in: nova/queens
Status: Triaged => In Progress
** Changed in: nova/queens
Assignee: (unassigned) => Corey Bryant
** Changed in: nova
Assignee: Matt Riedemann (mriedem) => Corey Bryant (corey.bryant)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1809454
Title:
[SRU] nova rbd auth fallback uses cinder u
** Tags added: ceph libvirt volumes
** Also affects: nova/queens
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: nova/rocky
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: nova/ocata
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: nova/pike
Importance:
** Changed in: nova/ocata
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
** Changed in: nova/ocata
Assignee: (unassigned) => György Szombathelyi (gyurco)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
This was the nova fix: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/597421/
** Changed in: nova
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1793353
Title:
broken upgrade
This was already fixed in nova, I need to duplicate the bug for that.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1793353
Title:
broken upgrade path q->r requirement for oslo.db
To manage
Umm, I don't see that test in the nova repo upstream:
https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/16.1.0/nova/tests/unit/virt/libvirt/test_driver.py
Do you have some code patched in?
** Changed in: nova
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
** Tags added: aarch64 libvirt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1758060
Title:
16.1.0 test failure UEFI is not supported
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
For anyone keeping track, bug 1750618 was yet another regression
introduced by the first change for this bug.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1664931
Title:
[OSSA-2017-005] nova
I'll push up a change for the docs and I've tagged this with low-
hanging-fruit so someone that wants to work on the suggestion from
comment #1 can do so. It would be similar to how the --until-complete
option works with the nova-manage db archive_deleted_rows command works.
** Tags added:
This is a one time operation when you're upgrading to a cells v2
deployment, so while it's unfortunate it took this long in a large cloud
with several thousand instances, I'd consider this lower priority to
resolve with code at this point unless the change is trivial. Therefore
option 3, better
Alternatively, a --verbose option could be added to the command so you
could at least see it's making progress by printing out each instance
that is being mapped while it's running.
** Changed in: nova
Status: New => Opinion
** Changed in: nova
Importance: Undecided => Low
--
You
@Filippo: your options are (1) use an older version of QEMU or (2)
backport the change to your Ocata-based deployment and run with it out
of tree.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1718295
** Changed in: nova
Status: New => Triaged
** Summary changed:
- Unexpected exception in API method: MigrationError_Remote: Migration error:
Disk info file is invalid: qemu-img failed to execute - Failed to get shared
"write" lock\nIs another process using the image?
+ Live migration
** Also affects: nova/ocata
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: nova/ocata
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: nova
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: nova/ocata
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: nova/ocata
Assignee:
** Changed in: devstack
Importance: Undecided => Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1688397
Title:
VM instance creation in multinode setup failed in baremetal compute
hosts
This likely won't be fixed in devstack since devstack doesn't control
the subnode stacking in a multinode setup. In the upstream CI infra, the
devstack-gate repo does that, and it runs the tools/discover_hosts.sh
script in devstack from the control node once the subnode(s) are setup:
Where was this actually fixed for mitaka UCA because I don't see
anything about this bug in the change log:
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/242454264/libvirt-
python_1.3.1-1ubuntu1~cloud0_source.changes
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
** Also affects: nova/newton
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: nova/newton
Assignee: (unassigned) => Saverio Proto (zioproto)
** Changed in: nova/newton
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: nova/newton
Importance: Undecided => Medium
--
You
(9:46:30 AM) clarkb: jamespage: fwiw we also have
http://status.openstack.org/elastic-recheck/index.html#1643911
http://status.openstack.org/elastic-recheck/index.html#1638982
http://status.openstack.org/elastic-recheck/index.html#1646779 which are
our top failures according to elastic-recheck
--
(9:56:32 AM) mriedem: clarkb: sorry if you guys already talked about this, but
in https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1673483 there are comments from ubuntu
devs that backports have been made to some packages and are available for
testing,
(9:56:34 AM) openstack: Launchpad bug 1673483 in
** Changed in: nova
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: nova/ocata
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: nova/newton
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: nova/newton
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: nova/ocata
Importance: Undecided => High
--
To clarify my understanding of this, per comment 50 and the release note
that went with the change:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/425637/1/releasenotes/notes/libvirt-
script-with-empty-path-2b49caa68b05278d.yaml
We basically want:
if libvirt < 1.3.3:
script.path = '' (as before the
** Also affects: nova/newton
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: nova/newton
Assignee: (unassigned) => Arne Recknagel (arecknag)
** Changed in: nova/newton
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: nova/newton
Importance: Undecided => Medium
--
You
** No longer affects: neutron
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1660317
Title:
NotImplementedError for detach_interface in nova-compute during
instance deletion
To manage
This is separate from the detach_interface API, it's an async event from
neutron that the vif was unplugged, which the compute manager tries to
detach the interface, but the Ironic virt driver doesn't implement that
method since it doesn't attach/detach interfaces (but plugs/unplugs vifs
on server
Is this still an issue? What version of nova was this? Are there errors
in the nova-compute logs from the build failure?
** Tags added: libvirt xen
** Changed in: nova
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
FYI, Matthew Booth is reporting this morning that the patch that landed
in nova in master introduces a bug for RBD, so he's going to propose a
revert of it and a new patch.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Changed in: cinder
Status: In Progress => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1514325
Title:
VersionedObject.__repr__ should return encoded string
To manage
** Changed in: nova/mitaka
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
** Changed in: nova/mitaka
Assignee: (unassigned) => Matt Riedemann (mriedem)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.ne
** Also affects: nova/mitaka
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: nova
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
** Changed in: nova
Assignee: (unassigned) => Dr. Jens Rosenboom (j-rosenboom-j)
** Changed in: nova/mitaka
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in:
We've dropped the ceph job that uses the packages from the distro, we
get them via the ceph mirrors using the devstack ceph plugin now.
** Changed in: cinder
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
What's the status on the trusty package part of this? Is there an ETA on
when that will be released?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to ceph in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1551305
Title:
backup service
What's the status on the trusty package part of this? Is there an ETA on
when that will be released?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1551305
Title:
backup service crashes in ceph job
I don't have a simple reproduce on this, and it's not just the cinder
backup service that was hitting failures according to the logstash query
above, it also randomly hits in other services.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed
I don't have a simple reproduce on this, and it's not just the cinder
backup service that was hitting failures according to the logstash query
above, it also randomly hits in other services.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
** Changed in: nova/liberty
Importance: Undecided => High
** Tags removed: liberty-backport-potential
** Tags added: ceph unified-objects
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1508230
** Changed in: nova/liberty
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Tags removed: kilo-backport-potential liberty-backport-potential
** Tags added: in-stable-liberty
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Changed in: nova/liberty
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Tags removed: kilo-backport-potential liberty-backport-potential
** Tags added: in-stable-liberty
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
** Changed in: nova/liberty
Importance: Undecided => High
** Tags removed: liberty-backport-potential
** Tags added: ceph unified-objects
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
I have a devstack change up to test the ppa:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/288145/
That depends on a project-config change to add the ceph job to the
experimental queue for devstack so we can actually test the ppa.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
I have a devstack change up to test the ppa:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/288145/
That depends on a project-config change to add the ceph job to the
experimental queue for devstack so we can actually test the ppa.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
@Josh, per comment 9, I think you mean Trusty 14.04 LTS packages, since
that's what the OpenStack CI system is using.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1551305
Title:
backup service
@Josh, per comment 9, I think you mean Trusty 14.04 LTS packages, since
that's what the OpenStack CI system is using.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to ceph in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1551305
Title:
For now we're going to make the ceph jobs non-voting so we stop the gate
resets during feature freeze week:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/286642/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to ceph in Ubuntu.
For now we're going to make the ceph jobs non-voting so we stop the gate
resets during feature freeze week:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/286642/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
@james-page, I see in http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/13757 that ceph
won't backport the fix to firefly since that's EOL. So will Ubuntu be
patching the package in the distro?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
@james-page, I see in http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/13757 that ceph
won't backport the fix to firefly since that's EOL. So will Ubuntu be
patching the package in the distro?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to ceph in
** Also affects: nova/liberty
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: nova/liberty
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: nova/liberty
Assignee: (unassigned) => Tony Breeds (o-tony)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
** Also affects: nova/liberty
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: nova/liberty
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: nova/liberty
Assignee: (unassigned) => Tony Breeds (o-tony)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Can this be tried against liberty or mitaka nova when we're using the
os-brick library which had other fixes for multipath issues than did
nova?
** Changed in: cloud-archive/icehouse
Status: New => Invalid
** Changed in: cloud-archive/juno
Status: New => Invalid
** Changed in:
Can this be tried against liberty or mitaka nova when we're using the
os-brick library which had other fixes for multipath issues than did
nova?
** Changed in: cloud-archive/icehouse
Status: New => Invalid
** Changed in: cloud-archive/juno
Status: New => Invalid
** Changed in:
** Tags removed: icehouse-backport-potential
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1349888
Title:
[SRU] Attempting to attach the same volume multiple times can cause
bdm record for
** Tags removed: icehouse-backport-potential
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1349888
Title:
[SRU] Attempting to attach the same volume multiple times can cause
bdm
** Changed in: nova
Importance: Undecided => Low
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1516652
Title:
'lxd' is an unsupported hypervisor type
To manage notifications about this bug go
** Changed in: nova
Importance: Undecided => Low
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1516652
Title:
'lxd' is an unsupported hypervisor type
To manage notifications
Ever since we started picking up the 3.13.0-65 kernel in the openstack
CI system on 9/29 we've been seeing lots of random failures across 3
branches (juno/kilo/master) with ebtables, details are in:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1501558
An example failure:
This was fixed in juno here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/104048/
** Changed in: nova
Status: Incomplete => Fix Committed
** Changed in: nova
Assignee: (unassigned) => Roman Podoliaka (rpodolyaka)
** Changed in: nova
Assignee: Roman Podoliaka (rpodolyaka) => Vladik
This was fixed in juno here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/104048/
** Changed in: nova
Status: Incomplete => Fix Committed
** Changed in: nova
Assignee: (unassigned) => Roman Podoliaka (rpodolyaka)
** Changed in: nova
Assignee: Roman Podoliaka (rpodolyaka) => Vladik
** Changed in: nova
Assignee: (unassigned) => George Shuklin (george-shuklin)
** Changed in: nova
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1418590
Title:
** Summary changed:
- No ERROR state if image deleted, _base is lost and instance is rescued
+ Instance is left in ACTIVE state even if rescue fails
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Summary changed:
- No ERROR state if image deleted, _base is lost and instance is rescued
+ Instance is left in ACTIVE state even if rescue fails
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
** Changed in: nova
Assignee: (unassigned) => George Shuklin (george-shuklin)
** Changed in: nova
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
It looks like ceph 0.80.10 is breaking openstack, see bug 1492432 -
there is a missing class now in the rbd module and we're hitting an
AttributeError.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to ceph in Ubuntu.
It looks like ceph 0.80.10 is breaking openstack, see bug 1492432 -
there is a missing class now in the rbd module and we're hitting an
AttributeError.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Tags added: kilo-backport-potential
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1426324
Title:
VFS blkid calls need to handle 0 or 2 return codes
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
** Tags added: kilo-backport-potential
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1426324
Title:
VFS blkid calls need to handle 0 or 2 return codes
To manage notifications about
** Changed in: neutron
Assignee: Ilya Shakhat (shakhat) = (unassigned)
** Changed in: neutron
Status: In Progress = Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1286209
Title:
** Changed in: neutron
Assignee: Ilya Shakhat (shakhat) = (unassigned)
** Changed in: neutron
Status: In Progress = Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to neutron in Ubuntu.
We hit the same thing with powerkvm testing in juno have basically the
same patch out of tree, I can't remember exactly why it didn't get
upstream now, but I think there was at least a bug reported, I'm trying
to dig that up for reference.
** Tags added: juno-backport-potential
--
You received
The other bug was bug 1376307.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1418187
Title:
_get_host_numa_topology assumes numa cell has memory
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
We hit the same thing with powerkvm testing in juno have basically the
same patch out of tree, I can't remember exactly why it didn't get
upstream now, but I think there was at least a bug reported, I'm trying
to dig that up for reference.
** Tags added: juno-backport-potential
--
You received
The other bug was bug 1376307.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1418187
Title:
_get_host_numa_topology assumes numa cell has memory
To manage notifications about this
Which virt driver are you using?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1418590
Title:
No ERROR state if image deleted, _base is lost and instance is rescued
To manage
Why would you remove /var/lib/nova/instances/_base/* ?
** Tags added: juno-backport-potential
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1418590
Title:
No ERROR state if image deleted, _base is
Why would you remove /var/lib/nova/instances/_base/* ?
** Tags added: juno-backport-potential
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1418590
Title:
No ERROR state if image
Which virt driver are you using?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1418590
Title:
No ERROR state if image deleted, _base is lost and instance is rescued
To manage notifications about
Nevermind, not a problem in stable/icehouse because of this:
https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/stable/icehouse/nova/api/openstack/compute/contrib/floating_ips.py#L109
So was regressed in stable/juno, and I was on the review that regressed
it, damn.
** Tags removed:
Also busted in icehouse:
https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/stable/icehouse/nova/network/neutronv2/api.py#L856
** Tags added: api network
** Tags added: icehouse-backport-potential
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Also busted in icehouse:
https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/stable/icehouse/nova/network/neutronv2/api.py#L856
** Tags added: api network
** Tags added: icehouse-backport-potential
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to
Nevermind, not a problem in stable/icehouse because of this:
https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/stable/icehouse/nova/api/openstack/compute/contrib/floating_ips.py#L109
So was regressed in stable/juno, and I was on the review that regressed
it, damn.
** Tags removed:
** Changed in: nova
Importance: Undecided = High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1380965
Title:
Floating IPs don't have instance ids in Juno
To manage notifications about this bug
** Changed in: nova
Importance: Undecided = High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1380965
Title:
Floating IPs don't have instance ids in Juno
To manage notifications
What release is this on, or trunk/master for Juno on 6/5?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1326901
Title:
ServiceBinaryExists - binary for nova-conductor already exists
To manage
** Changed in: nova
Status: In Progress = Triaged
** Changed in: nova
Assignee: Christopher Yeoh (cyeoh-0) = (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1235220
Title:
** Tags added: libvirt testing
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1295876
Title:
libvirtError: internal error unable to add domain xxx to cgroup: No
space left on device
To manage
This makes me nervous, this merged on 3/20 and logstash shows that's
when this started failing:
https://review.openstack.org/77593
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1295876
Title:
This also merged on 3/20 and deals with vcpus, which looks bad given
what Serge said, but the change looks pretty tame:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/73548/
The logic seems OK to me.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
** Tags added: libvirt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1228977
Title:
n-cpu seems to crash when running with libvirt 1.1.1 from ubuntu cloud
archive
To manage notifications about
** Tags added: libvirt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1244694
Title:
Creating snapshot fails due to nonexistent temporary directory
To manage notifications about this
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
