Re: [Bug 106086] Re: n_sectors mismatch, boot hang in 2.6.20-14 not 2.6.20-12

2007-04-13 Thread Matthew Kennel
yes, it does seem inconsistently (in terms of where it craps out) consistent and coincidental with the version error message. I'm relieved. Is there a way to merge all the bugs so we can all see the progress on the central issue no matter how we found it? cheers Matt On 4/12/07, David Symons

Re: [Bug 106086] Re: n_sectors mismatch, boot hang in 2.6.20-14 not 2.6.20-12

2007-04-13 Thread Matthew Kennel
By the way, recent commenters on bug 82314 seem to now be coming up with the same error message as mine. On 4/12/07, David Symons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tagged as a possible duplicate of https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/106063 Matthew, thankyou for your detailed report. Cheers,

[Bug 106086] n_sectors mismatch, boot hang in 2.6.20-14 not 2.6.20-12

2007-04-12 Thread Matthew Kennel
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: linux-source-2.6.20 I have a problem which may be related to other reported SATA problems but I haven't seen a direct match. Basic facts: Fresh installation of 7.04 beta, on a Dell Dimension E521, AMD Dual Core 3800 CPU. One hard drive, one DVD/ROM

[Bug 106086] Re: n_sectors mismatch, boot hang in 2.6.20-14 not 2.6.20-12

2007-04-12 Thread Matthew Kennel
Sorry, I now see the link for uploading lspci output. ** Attachment added: lspci -vv output under working kernel http://librarian.launchpad.net/7315843/lspci.log -- n_sectors mismatch, boot hang in 2.6.20-14 not 2.6.20-12 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106086 You received this bug

[Bug 106086] Re: n_sectors mismatch, boot hang in 2.6.20-14 not 2.6.20-12

2007-04-12 Thread Matthew Kennel
Let me clarify the comment about the hang. It seems to hang all the time, but where it is in the boot process is occasionally unpredictable. Sometimes I have also seen errors in that it doesn't seem to be able to find the god-awful long UUID string for the root file system. My guess is that