[Bug 1876034] Re: apt update crashes with "KeyError: 'suite'" in cnf-update-db if index compression is enabled

2020-07-02 Thread Michael Sparmann
Actually, upon a closer look, it appears like command-not-found has been entirely unmaintained for more than 2 years now, so efforts to get this fixed upstream, let alone backported to focal, are probably futile. We should probably just remove this package from our base image and let the end

[Bug 1876034] Re: apt update crashes with "KeyError: 'suite'" in cnf-update-db if index compression is enabled

2020-07-02 Thread Michael Sparmann
I'm aware of that, but that workaround defeats the point of enabling compressed list storage. We're using the patch linked above to solve the real issue without that space overhead, but such local fixes are a maintenance issue. Sadly there appears to be no intention to accept the fix upstream.

[Bug 1876034] [NEW] apt update crashes with "KeyError: 'suite'" in cnf-update-db if index compression is enabled

2020-04-29 Thread Michael Sparmann
Public bug reported: On all Ubuntu releases since at least 19.10, enabling compressed APT package list storage with command-not-found installed leads to this crash in the cnf-update-db hook called by apt update: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/cnf-update-db", line 26, in

[Bug 1765998] Re: FS access deadlock with btrfs quotas enabled

2019-03-01 Thread Michael Sparmann
Hm, it's been a while... I think back then I made some btrfs developers aware of it on IRC, but never got around to sending it to the mailing list. I'm running my own kernel builds for now (I had to do that to fix some other issues anyway) with the patch from comment #4 applied, which seems to

[Bug 1765980] Re: IPv6 fragments with nf_conntrack_reasm loaded cause net_mutex deadlock upon LXD container shutdown

2018-04-24 Thread Michael Sparmann
So far I have not been able to reproduce it on the mainline kernel linked above. However, given the intermittent nature of the problem, I'm not convinced that this was actually fixed. The source code related to the underlying root cause looks unchanged, and the symptoms may well be hidden away

[Bug 1765998] Re: FS access deadlock with btrfs quotas enabled

2018-04-23 Thread Michael Sparmann
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed ** Tags added: kernel-bug-exists-upstream -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1765998 Title: FS access

[Bug 1765998] Re: FS access deadlock with btrfs quotas enabled

2018-04-23 Thread Michael Sparmann
I can confirm that the issue still exists in the mainline kernel build linked above. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1765998 Title: FS access deadlock with btrfs quotas enabled To

[Bug 1765998] Re: FS access deadlock with btrfs quotas enabled

2018-04-23 Thread Michael Sparmann
This patch seems to fix it for me (running that for several days now). ** Patch added: "0002-qgroup_accounting_fix.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1765998/+attachment/5126022/+files/0002-qgroup_accounting_fix.patch -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1765998] Re: FS access deadlock with btrfs quotas enabled

2018-04-21 Thread Michael Sparmann
I cannot run the affected (production) system using a broken kernel, and it will lockup after boot within seconds. If necessary, I can provide additional information or testing upon request. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- You received this bug

[Bug 1765980] Re: IPv6 fragments with nf_conntrack_reasm loaded cause net_mutex deadlock upon LXD container shutdown

2018-04-21 Thread Michael Sparmann
** Description changed: I've spent the last few days tracking down an issue where an attempt to shutdown an LXD container after several hours of host uptime on Ubuntu Bionic (4.15.0-15.16-generic) would cause a kworker thread to start spinning on one CPU core and all subsequent container

[Bug 1765980] Re: IPv6 fragments with nf_conntrack_reasm loaded cause net_mutex deadlock upon LXD container shutdown

2018-04-21 Thread Michael Sparmann
The cause of the issue is already understood, and the machine currently isn't running an unmodified kernel for debugging reasons. Apport logs won't help here. Contact me if you need specific information. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- You received this

[Bug 1765998] [NEW] FS access deadlock with btrfs quotas enabled

2018-04-21 Thread Michael Sparmann
Public bug reported: I'm running into an issue on Ubuntu Bionic (but not Xenial) where shortly after boot, under heavy load from many LXD containers starting at once, access to the btrfs filesystem that the containers are on deadlocks. The issue is quite hard to reproduce on other systems, quite

[Bug 1765980] [NEW] IPv6 fragments with nf_conntrack_reasm loaded cause net_mutex deadlock upon LXD container shutdown

2018-04-21 Thread Michael Sparmann
Public bug reported: I've spent the last few days tracking down an issue where an attempt to shutdown an LXD container after several hours of host uptime on Ubuntu Bionic (4.15.0-15.16-generic) would cause a kworker thread to start spinning on one CPU core and all subsequent container start/stop

[Bug 1669578] Re: Get ttyname() to work properly in containers

2017-03-28 Thread Michael Sparmann
The fix does not seem to work, it just changes the error message to "Cannot open your terminal '' - please check." for me. The reason seems to be that the patch relies on attach_fd to be set by code that's inside an ifndef NAMEDPIPE block, which isn't being compiled for the ubuntu package. That

[Bug 1605664] Re: ghost file engine gone haywire

2017-02-07 Thread Michael Sparmann
I just had something very similar after statefully stopping a container (in order to do a kernel update from 4.4.0-59 to 4.4.0-62) and attempting to start it back up. I have saved the state files and logs in case they can be of any help, please let me know how I can send those to you: ~7MB of log

[Bug 1247107] Re: Runaway irqbalance consuming CPU and Memory

2014-06-01 Thread Michael Sparmann
Seen on several ARM devices (ODROID-X2, Cubieboard1, OLinuXino-A20-MICRO) on Ubuntu 14.04 as well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to irqbalance in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1247107 Title: Runaway

[Bug 1247107] Re: Runaway irqbalance consuming CPU and Memory

2014-06-01 Thread Michael Sparmann
Seen on several ARM devices (ODROID-X2, Cubieboard1, OLinuXino-A20-MICRO) on Ubuntu 14.04 as well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1247107 Title: Runaway irqbalance consuming CPU and

[Bug 1207972] Re: Xorg crashed with SIGABRT

2014-01-09 Thread Michael Sparmann
This crash occurred in a certain situation after nouveau switches to software rendering because of a GPU lockup. This used to happen once every few days on 13.04. After the upgrade to 13.10 nouveau became completely unusable with GPU lockups and Xorg crashes happening every few minutes, causing

[Bug 1132555] Re: mission-control-5 crashed with SIGSEGV in g_slist_find()

2013-05-24 Thread Michael Sparmann
Does not appear to be fixed in the official repositories yet, despite being in Fix Released state since more than 6 weeks? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1132555 Title:

[Bug 1163384] Re: nvidia drivers on ubuntu 13.04 causes skype to crash

2013-04-28 Thread Michael Sparmann
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1155327 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1155327 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1155327 skype crashed with SIGSEGV in malloc@plt() -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 917174] Re: gnome-shell crashed with SIGSEGV in clutter_actor_get_accessible()

2013-04-27 Thread Michael Sparmann
This crash happened to me shortly after a release upgrade from quantal to raring, but only once. GNOME shell seems to work well apart from this single crash so far. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1058115] Re: remmina crashed with SIGSEGV in gdi_memblt()

2012-12-07 Thread Michael Sparmann
Happened to me yesterday while using RDP to a Windows Server 2003 system. It usually works nicely, but yesterday it just suddenly crashed while I was using the session. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1027828] Re: [Quantal] black screen on resume on 3.5.0-5.5 (regression from 3.5.0-4.4)

2012-07-23 Thread Michael Sparmann
Same here with 3.5.0-5 on precise. (I think I got it through the xorg-edgers PPA or something.) 3.5.0-4 worked fine, 3.5.0-5 hangs on resume, with bluetooth LED on, wifi LED off, black screen on Lenovo T410. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 1008991] Re: synaptikscfg crashed with UndefinedPropertyError in _get_property_atom(): u'Synaptics Circular Pad'

2012-06-08 Thread Michael Sparmann
Seems like the X input device is missing a bunch of properties expected by synaptiks, in my case: - Synaptics Edge Motion Always - Synaptics Tap FastTap - Synaptics Circular Pad This is on a Lenovo T410 with a SynPS/2 Synaptics TouchPad. After making it assume [False] as the value of those

[Bug 506670] Re: 2TB/GPT: Must warn if BIOS boot partition is missing (unbootable system!)

2011-10-21 Thread Michael Sparmann
Unbelievable that this bug is still present in 11.10. I had to redo the whole installation because of this, as attempting to go back to the partitioning step to add the missing partition makes all later steps fail irrecoverably because of the installer forgetting that partitioning was already

[Bug 709245] Re: panda: USB disk IO slow

2011-08-05 Thread Michael Sparmann
I ran the tests again, with the noop, cfq and deadline I/O schedulers, and the results differed in interesting ways. See attached logs. ** Attachment added: noop test run 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux-linaro/+bug/709245/+attachment/2256614/+files/speedtest-noop.log -- You received this

[Bug 709245] Re: panda: USB disk IO slow

2011-08-05 Thread Michael Sparmann
** Attachment added: cfq test run 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux-linaro/+bug/709245/+attachment/2256615/+files/speedtest-cfq.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/709245 Title:

[Bug 709245] Re: panda: USB disk IO slow

2011-08-05 Thread Michael Sparmann
** Attachment added: deadline test run 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux-linaro/+bug/709245/+attachment/2256616/+files/speedtest-deadline.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/709245

[Bug 709245] Re: panda: USB disk IO slow

2011-08-05 Thread Michael Sparmann
** Attachment added: noop test run 2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux-linaro/+bug/709245/+attachment/2256617/+files/speedtest-noop%20%282%29.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 709245] Re: panda: USB disk IO slow

2011-08-05 Thread Michael Sparmann
** Attachment added: cfq test run 2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux-linaro/+bug/709245/+attachment/2256618/+files/speedtest-cfq%20%282%29.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/709245

[Bug 709245] Re: panda: USB disk IO slow

2011-08-05 Thread Michael Sparmann
** Attachment added: deadline test run 2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux-linaro/+bug/709245/+attachment/2256619/+files/speedtest-deadline%20%282%29.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 709245] Re: panda: USB disk IO slow

2011-08-02 Thread Michael Sparmann
Let me quote from #pandaboard: prpplague TheSeven: the direction the debugging is going is that this is a thread issue, i suspect that the .0099 is just under the thread timing prpplague TheSeven: linaro folks and fedora folks are working on debugging this prpplague TheSeven: it doesn't appear

[Bug 709245] Re: panda: USB disk IO slow

2011-08-02 Thread Michael Sparmann
I just tried the 3.0 kernel, and it behaves in exactly the same way. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/709245 Title: panda: USB disk IO slow To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 787246] Re: Slow SD card and USB HDD I/O for block sizes bigger than a couple of bytes

2011-08-01 Thread Michael Sparmann
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 709245 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/709245 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 709245 panda: USB disk IO slow -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 709245] Re: panda: USB disk IO slow

2011-08-01 Thread Michael Sparmann
Guess what, this issue indeed seems to be completely unrelated to USB. Something similar is going on for SD card access (see Bug #787246), and accessing LAN/WLAN has only an indirect influence. Look at this: http://paste.ubuntu.com/656410/ Seems like the CPU entering sleep states or something

[Bug 709245] Re: panda: USB disk IO slow

2011-08-01 Thread Michael Sparmann
No noticable improvement: http://paste.ubuntu.com/656498/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/709245 Title: panda: USB disk IO slow To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 709245] Re: panda: USB disk IO slow

2011-08-01 Thread Michael Sparmann
Further testing points towards thread switching behavior being related: Nothing running in parallel: 10MB/s at big block sizes perl -e while (1) { }: 5MB/s perl -e use Time::HiRes qw( usleep ); while (1) { usleep(1) }: 20-25MB/s perl -e use Time::HiRes qw( nanosleep ); while (1) { nanosleep(1) }:

[Bug 709245] Re: panda: USB disk IO slow

2011-08-01 Thread Michael Sparmann
When running just dd at 1MB block size, I get ~5.5MB/s. When running with sudo ping -q -i.0100 localhost in the background, ping causes 1% CPU load, and I get ~10MB/s at 1MB block size and these ping statistics: 6228 packets transmitted, 6227 received, 0% packet loss, time 97329ms rtt

[Bug 553789] Re: [MASTER] [GT21x] X freeze/crash with nouveau driver

2011-06-23 Thread Michael Sparmann
This bug seems to have gone away in 2.6.39, as indicated by the upstream bug report. I updated to 2.6.39 amd64 yesterday and haven't had a single freeze since that, while it happened every couple of minutes before. (Lenovo T410, Nvidia NVS 3100m) -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 787246] [NEW] Slow SD card and USB HDD I/O for block sizes bigger than a couple of bytes

2011-05-23 Thread Michael Sparmann
Public bug reported: I'm observing weird I/O behavior with natty's 2.6.38-1209-omap4 kernel running on a pandaboard: When reading from a USB HDD, the relationship between read block sizes and throughput looks like this: http://paste.ubuntu.com/604616/ (the buffer cache has been flushed with

[Bug 787246] Re: Slow SD card and USB HDD I/O for block sizes bigger than a couple of bytes

2011-05-23 Thread Michael Sparmann
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/787246 Title: Slow SD card and USB HDD I/O for block sizes bigger than a couple of bytes -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 290285] Re: Grayed out Connect button when using WPA2 Entreprise+TLS authentication

2008-11-24 Thread Michael Sparmann
When trying to connect to a not yet configured network, NM asks for the certificates etc. In the bottom right corner of the Window is the confirmation button, which will save the information provided and try to connect to the network, in German it's called Verbinden, so Connect is a guess. --

[Bug 290285] Re: Grayed out Connect button when using WPA2 Entreprise+TLS authentication

2008-11-10 Thread Michael Sparmann
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- Grayed out Connect button when using WPA2 Entreprise+TLS authentication https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/290285 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 290285] Re: Grayed out Connect button when using WPA2 Entreprise+TLS authentication

2008-11-03 Thread Michael Sparmann
Same issue here. When I try to connect to a WPA2 TLS network, the OK button in the form asking me for the certificates is grayed out no matter what I do. nm-applet says the following: ** (nm-applet:11940): WARNING **: Invalid connection: 'NMSettingWireless' / 'ssid' invalid: 2 repeated 13 times

[Bug 251538] Re: b44 module does not load anymore

2008-07-24 Thread Michael Sparmann
I can confirm this; it turned up after the update to 2.6.24-20, along with some other weirdnesses. -- b44 module does not load anymore https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251538 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 212401] Re: bb freeze when begin music

2008-04-13 Thread Michael Sparmann
I can confirm this. If you enable sound, the text output will freeze unless it's running at root in current hardy. -- bb freeze when begin music https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/212401 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --