[Bug 1596095] Re: [needs packaging] 3.2.4-0ubuntu4 available in xenial or trusty

2016-08-26 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
** Changed in: juju-mongodb3.2 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1596095 Title: [needs packaging] 3.2.4-0ubuntu4 available in xenial or

[Bug 1612713] Re: Please merge debian version of golang-juju-loggo-dev

2016-08-23 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1612713 Title: Please merge debian version of golang-juju-loggo-dev To manage

[Bug 1613718] Re: [SRU] Juju 2.0-beta15 for Xenial

2016-08-23 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
Tested 2.0~beta15-0ubuntu2.16.04.1. Works as expected. ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1613718 Title: [SRU] Juju

[Bug 1614969] Re: Juju packaging allows builds for unsupported architectures

2016-08-22 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
** Changed in: juju-release-tools Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: juju-release-tools Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1614969 Title: Juju

[Bug 1614724] Re: Juju isn't protected from new versions of LXD

2016-08-22 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
** Changed in: juju-release-tools Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: juju-release-tools Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1614724 Title: Juju

[Bug 1614959] Re: /usr/bin/juju is missing after upgrade to 1.25.6

2016-08-19 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
I cannot reproduce this myself, on our CI servers, nor could lazypower who I asked to try on his machine. See an upgrade: http://paste.ubuntu.com/23070808/. My only thought is perhaps you manually mucked with /usr/bin/juju and somehow that's causing you issues now. ** Changed in:

[Bug 1614969] Re: Juju packaging allows builds for unsupported architectures

2016-08-19 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
** Also affects: conjure-up Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: charm-tools Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: charm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** No longer affects: conjure-up ** No longer affects: charm-tools **

[Bug 1614724] Re: Juju isn't protected from new versions of LXD

2016-08-19 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
** Also affects: juju-core-1 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** No longer affects: juju-core-1 (Ubuntu) ** Also affects: juju-core (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** No longer affects: juju-core -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1614959] Re: /usr/bin/juju is missing after upgrade to 1.25.6

2016-08-19 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
$ dpkg-divert --list | grep juju diversion of /usr/bin/juju to /usr/bin/juju.default by juju-1-default ** Attachment added: "dpkg-divert --list | grep juju" https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-release-tools/+bug/1614959/+attachment/4724019/+files/divert -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1614959] Re: /usr/bin/juju is missing after upgrade to 1.25.6

2016-08-19 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
Expected output should look something like this: $ ls -al /usr/bin/juju* lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Aug 16 16:04 /usr/bin/juju -> juju-1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 9 Aug 16 16:04 /usr/bin/juju-1 -> juju-1.25 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 68 Aug 16 16:04 /usr/bin/juju-1.25 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 67 Jul 28

[Bug 1614959] Re: /usr/bin/juju is missing after upgrade to 1.25.6

2016-08-19 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
** Attachment added: "ls -al /usr/bin/juju*" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/juju-core-1/+bug/1614959/+attachment/4723996/+files/ls%20usr%20binjuju -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1614959] Re: /usr/bin/juju is missing after upgrade to 1.25.6

2016-08-19 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
** Attachment added: "juju-xenial-upgrade-log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/juju-core-1/+bug/1614959/+attachment/4723998/+files/juju-xenial-upgrade-log ** Also affects: juju-release-tools Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1614959] [NEW] /usr/bin/juju is missing after upgrade to 1.25.6

2016-08-19 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
Public bug reported: After upgrading from 1.25.5 on xenial to 1.25.6-0ubuntu1.16.04.1, /usr/bin/juju has disappeared. Attached are the upgrade logs, as well as an ls of /usr/bin/juju* after the upgrade showing the diversion, but missing /usr/bin/juju. ** Affects: juju-release-tools

[Bug 1611855] Re: [SRU] Juju 1.25.6

2016-08-17 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1611855 Title: [SRU] Juju 1.25.6 To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1611855] Re: [SRU] Juju 1.25.6

2016-08-17 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
Tested on xenial. Deploys, tearsdown, installs and removes cleanly, and works with juju-1-default as expected. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1611855 Title: [SRU] Juju 1.25.6 To

[Bug 1612713] Re: Please merge debian version of golang-juju-loggo-dev

2016-08-17 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
** Description changed: The current package in ubuntu is old and the maintainer is no longer able to maintain the package. I'd like to request we replace this package with the debian version which is newer and has a maintainer. + + NOTE: juju-core in xenial would like to depend on this

[Bug 1611855] Re: [SRU] Juju 1.25.6

2016-08-16 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
** Changed in: juju-core-1 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Fix Committed ** Changed in: juju-core (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1612116] Re: please remove juju-core-1 and juju-mongodb packages from yakkety

2016-08-16 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
@mwhudson, a new version of juju-core-1, 1.25.6, is being uploaded into yakkety. I agree with the package removal, but given the extended timeline for juju 2.0, it's possible yakkety retains juju-core-1. Let's revisit this before FF. I definitely agree with not including it in Z. -- You received

[Bug 1613718] [NEW] [SRU] Juju 2.0-beta15 for Xenial

2016-08-16 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
Public bug reported: Juju 2.0 is not quite final, as per the risks and timeline outlined in the FFe for Xenial, bug 1545913. As such, we intend to release SRU's post-xenial release. This updates juju to the lastest 2.0 milestone version. [SRU Information] juju-core has a stable release

[Bug 1611855] Re: [SRU] Juju 1.25.6

2016-08-15 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
I've restored the debhelper script to version 7 as released. The juju-1-default.links file was present in my version, heh, but not added and thus not in the repository. This too has been corrected. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 1612713] [NEW] Please merge debian version of golang-juju-loggo-dev

2016-08-12 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
Public bug reported: The current package in ubuntu is old and the maintainer is no longer able to maintain the package. I'd like to request we replace this package with the debian version which is newer and has a maintainer. ** Affects: golang-juju-loggo (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided

[Bug 1611855] Re: [SRU] Juju 1.25.6

2016-08-10 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
** Branch linked: lp:~juju-qa/ubuntu/yakkety/juju/juju-1.25.6 ** Description changed: Juju 1.25.6 is a stable update containing critical bug fixes, including MAAS compatibility, for the 1.25 series. [SRU Information] juju-core has a stable release exception, including for major

[Bug 1611930] [NEW] [SRU] Juju 1.25.6

2016-08-10 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1611855 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1611855 Public bug reported: Juju 1.25.6 is a stable update containing critical bug fixes, including MAAS compatibility, for the 1.25 series. [SRU Information] juju-core has a stable release exception, including

[Bug 1611855] Re: [SRU] Juju 1.25.6 for trusty

2016-08-10 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
** Summary changed: - [SRU] Juju 1.25.6 + [SRU] Juju 1.25.6 for trusty ** Branch unlinked: lp:~juju-qa/ubuntu/yakkety/juju/juju-1.25.6 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1611855 Title:

[Bug 1611855] Re: [SRU] Juju 1.25.6

2016-08-10 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
** Branch linked: lp:~juju-qa/ubuntu/yakkety/juju/juju-1.25.6 ** Branch linked: lp:~juju-qa/ubuntu/trusty/juju/juju-1.25.6 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1611855 Title: [SRU] Juju

[Bug 1611855] [NEW] [SRU] Juju 1.25.6

2016-08-10 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
Public bug reported: Juju 1.25.6 is a stable update containing critical bug fixes, including MAAS compatibility, for the 1.25 series. [SRU Information] juju-core has a stable release exception, including for major version updates, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/JujuUpdates. [Impact] This update

[Bug 1604137] Re: [SRU] Juju 2.0 beta12 for Xenial

2016-07-28 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
Verified I can bootstrap, the gui is pulling the correct version, lxd and aws all work. Looks good. ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1604137] Re: [SRU] Juju 2.0 beta12 for Xenial

2016-07-22 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
** Changed in: juju-core (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1604137 Title: [SRU] Juju 2.0 beta12 for Xenial To manage notifications

[Bug 1583740] Re: mongo client is missing

2016-07-22 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
Binary is present $ ls /usr/lib/juju/mongo3.2/bin mongo mongod mongoperf mongos mongosniff I could invoke the binary $ /usr/lib/juju/mongo3.2/bin/mongo MongoDB shell version: 3.2.4 apt-cache show juju-mongodb3.2 Package: juju-mongodb3.2 Priority: optional Section: universe/database

[Bug 1583740] Re: mongo client is missing

2016-07-21 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
** Description changed: - Admins and developers are unable to access to the juju mongodb instance - to investigation issues. + [Impact] + Admins and developers are unable to access to the juju mongodb instance to investigation issues. The mongo client is built, but not included in the

[Bug 1604137] Re: [SRU] Juju 2.0 beta12 for Xenial

2016-07-21 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
It should be noted we were forced to disable one test as it fails on some architectures due to https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju- core/+bug/1605313. As we've released the final tarball for beta12, we'd like to land this SRU and continue working on squashing that bug completely in the future. --

[Bug 1602192] Re: when starting many LXD containers, they start failing to boot with "Too many open files"

2016-07-19 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
It sounds like the "fix" for this lies outside of LXD. Can we add the affected packages and involve the right upstreams for this? Are we going to pursue this purely upstream with systemd / kernel or are we going to attempt a distro-patch of some sort? -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1508122] Re: please transition to shared libraries

2016-07-19 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
** Changed in: juju-core (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1508122 Title: please transition to shared libraries To manage notifications about

[Bug 1604137] [NEW] [SRU] Juju 2.0 beta12 for Xenial

2016-07-18 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
Public bug reported: Juju 2.0 is not quite final, as per the risks and timeline outlined in the FFe for Xenial, bug 1545913. As such, we intend to release SRU's post-xenial release. This updates juju to the lastest 2.0 milestone version. [SRU Information] juju-core has a stable release

[Bug 1596920] Re: Juju 2.0-beta10 in ubuntu

2016-07-18 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
Marking invalid due to presence of beta12 which will go into yakkety / xenial. ** Changed in: juju-core (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1596920] Re: Juju 2.0-beta10 in ubuntu

2016-07-18 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
Marking invalid due to presence of beta12 which will go into yakkety / xenial. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1596920 Title: Juju 2.0-beta10 in ubuntu To manage notifications about

[Bug 1583740] Re: mongo client is missing

2016-06-22 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
** Also affects: trusty-backports Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1583740 Title: mongo client is missing To manage notifications about

[Bug 1568165] Re: [MIR] golang-golang-x-oauth2

2016-06-13 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
** Changed in: golang-golang-x-oauth2 (Ubuntu) Status: Expired => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1568165 Title: [MIR] golang-golang-x-oauth2 To manage

[Bug 1568162] Re: [MIR] golang-gopkg-mgo.v2

2016-06-13 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
** Changed in: golang-gopkg-mgo.v2 (Ubuntu) Status: Expired => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1568162 Title: [MIR] golang-gopkg-mgo.v2 To manage notifications

[Bug 1568168] Re: [MIR] golang-github-natefinch-lumberjack

2016-06-13 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
** Changed in: golang-github-natefinch-lumberjack (Ubuntu) Status: Expired => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1568168 Title: [MIR] golang-github-natefinch-lumberjack

[Bug 1568163] Re: [MIR] golang-google-api

2016-06-13 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
** Changed in: golang-google-api (Ubuntu) Status: Expired => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1568163 Title: [MIR] golang-google-api To manage notifications about

[Bug 1588403] Re: Tab completion missing in Juju 2.0 betas

2016-06-06 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
So src/github.com/juju/juju/etc/bash_completion.d/juju2 is indeed the cause of the failure. It's not clear why the file was renamed, but I've added a packaging rule to swap the name so it installs into /usr/share /bash-completion/completions/juju-core. We should fix upstream if possible. In my

[Bug 1532935] Re: Nodes stuck at grub menu when attempting to deploy

2016-05-25 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
** Also affects: grub2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1532935 Title: Nodes stuck at grub menu when attempting to deploy To

[Bug 1581645] Re: [SRU] Juju 2.0 beta7 for Xenial

2016-05-18 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
I have installed the proposed package on trusty and verified its functionality. ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1581645] Re: [SRU] Juju 2.0 beta7 for Xenial

2016-05-17 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
** Description changed: Juju 2.0 is not quite final, as per the risks and timeline outlined in the FFe for Xenial, bug 1545913. As such, we intend to release SRU's post-xenial release. This updates juju to the lastest 2.0 milestone version. [SRU Information] juju-core has a

[Bug 1581645] [NEW] [SRU] Juju 2.0 beta7 for Xenial

2016-05-13 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
Public bug reported: Juju 2.0 is not quite final, as per the risks and timeline outlined in the FFe for Xenial, bug 1545913. As such, we intend to release SRU's post-xenial release. This updates juju to the lastest 2.0 milestone version. [SRU Information] juju-core has a stable release

[Bug 1530530] Re: Installer doesn't show up on some Chromebook

2016-04-27 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
@Timo, ahh! Hence the fascination with unetbootin. Makes sense now. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1530530 Title: Installer doesn't show up on some Chromebook To manage

[Bug 1530530] Re: Installer doesn't show up on some Chromebook

2016-04-26 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
Timo, this only affects newer releases. 14.04 works with the workaround mentioned. The issue is indeed the resolution and 3:2 scaling I'd guess. There's no graceful fallback either and you have to workaround it or patch even after installed. -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 1575299] [NEW] Package version number should include release

2016-04-26 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
Public bug reported: See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/UpdatePreparation#Update_the_packaging Since we want to support multi-release from the same branch, let's make sure we adopt using the release name in strings as well. ** Affects: juju-core (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided

[Bug 1573176] Re: [SRU] Juju 2.0 for Xenial

2016-04-25 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
** Description changed: Juju 2.0 is not quite final, as per the risks and timeline outlined in the FFe for Xenial, bug 1545913. As such, we intend to release SRU post- - xenial release. This updates juju to the lastest 2.0 milestone version, - beta5. - + xenial release. This updates juju to

[Bug 1573176] Re: [SRU] Juju 2.0 for Xenial

2016-04-25 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
** Summary changed: - [SRU] Juju 2.0 beta5 for Xenial + [SRU] Juju 2.0 for Xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1573176 Title: [SRU] Juju 2.0 for Xenial To manage notifications

[Bug 1568148] Re: Juju packaging for xenial must depend on everything in the archive

2016-04-25 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
** Changed in: juju-core (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: Triaged => Fix Released ** Changed in: juju-core (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1573176] [NEW] [SRU] Juju 2.0 beta5 for Xenial

2016-04-21 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
Public bug reported: Juju 2.0 is not quite final, as per the risks and timeline outlined in the FFe for Xenial, bug 1545913. As such, we intend to release SRU post- xenial release. This updates juju to the lastest 2.0 milestone version, beta5. [SRU Information] juju-core has a stable release

[Bug 1573111] [NEW] vcs:bzr is missing

2016-04-21 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
Public bug reported: We should have a vcs:bzr entry in debian/control ** Affects: juju-core (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: packaging -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1564670] Re: After dist upgrade Juju 1.X should still be the default

2016-04-20 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
We fixed bug 1564622, along with creating a juju-1-default package in xenial to alleviate this issue. Juju 2.0 is the default /usr/bin/juju and will remain as such in Xenial, regardless of the installation path. ** Changed in: juju-core Status: Triaged => Fix Released ** Changed in:

[Bug 1568148] Re: Juju packaging for xenial must depend on everything in the archive

2016-04-13 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
Packaging has been updated and tested with all packages in main. Juju in xenial should depend on the packages in main listed above with the next upload. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1568148] Re: Juju packaging for xenial must depend on everything in the archive

2016-04-12 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
** Description changed: As part of acceptance into main for juju2, we need to ensure our package depends on everything we can that is already in the archive. See bug 1545913 for the FFe. This bug will track our dependencies to ensure we meet this requirement. - Currently we need to

[Bug 1568162] Re: [MIR] golang-gopkg-mgo.v2

2016-04-12 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
mterry, the ubuntu server team should be the team bug subscriber. I added canonical-juju-qa as we are helping package this, and thus it makes it easier for us to also keep track during this process. Sorry for the confusion. On the test front, mongodb has had some packaging work done during xenial

[Bug 1568168] Re: [MIR] golang-github-natefinch-lumberjack

2016-04-11 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
** Description changed: [Availability] Source-only package currently available in universe. [Rationale] Build-dependency for juju. This is part of our on-going work for bug 1508120, to stop bundling our dependencies in our source package. [Security] This is a source package

[Bug 1568165] Re: [MIR] golang-golang-x-oauth2

2016-04-11 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
** Description changed: [Availability] Source-only package currently available in universe. [Rationale] Build-dependency for juju. This is part of our on-going work for bug 1508120, to stop bundling our dependencies in our source package. [Security] This is a source package

[Bug 1568162] Re: [MIR] golang-gopkg-mgo.v2

2016-04-11 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
** Description changed: [Availability] Source-only package currently available in universe. [Rationale] Build-dependency for juju. This is part of our on-going work for bug 1508120, to stop bundling our dependencies in our source package. [Security] This is a source package

[Bug 1568164] Re: [MIR] golang-github-azure-azure-sdk-for-go-dev

2016-04-11 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
@vorlon, yes you are correct, nothing is changing on that front. I've simply added the juju-qa team as well so we can also keep an eye on things during this process. ** Description changed: [Availability] Source-only package currently available in universe. [Rationale]

[Bug 1568163] Re: [MIR] golang-google-api

2016-04-11 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
** Description changed: [Availability] Source-only package currently available in universe. [Rationale] Build-dependency for juju. This is part of our on-going work for bug 1508120, to stop bundling our dependencies in our source package. [Security] This is a source package

[Bug 1568148] Re: Juju packaging for xenial must depend on everything in the archive

2016-04-08 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
** Description changed: As part of acceptance into main for juju2, we need to ensure our package depends on everything we can that is already in the archive. See https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/juju-core/+bug/1545913 for the FFe. This bug will track our dependencies to

[Bug 1568168] [NEW] [MIR] golang-github-natefinch-lumberjack

2016-04-08 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
Public bug reported: [Availability] Source-only package currently available in universe. [Rationale] Build-dependency for juju. This is part of our on-going work for bug 1508120, to stop bundling our dependencies in our source package. [Security] This is a source package which will only be

[Bug 1568163] [NEW] [MIR] golang-google-api

2016-04-08 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
Public bug reported: [Availability] Source-only package currently available in universe. [Rationale] Build-dependency for juju. This is part of our on-going work for bug 1508120, to stop bundling our dependencies in our source package. [Security] This is a source package which will only be

[Bug 1545913] Re: [FFe] juju-core 2.0

2016-04-08 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
For juju, we still need to ensure our MIR's are reviewed and land into main, and that our packaging utilizes all possible dependencies that are already in the archive. This work is targeted before release and is being tracked in bug 1568148. -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 1568164] [NEW] [MIR] golang-github-azure-azure-sdk-for-go-dev

2016-04-08 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
Public bug reported: [Availability] Source-only package currently available in universe. [Rationale] Build-dependency for juju. This is part of our on-going work for bug 1508120, to stop bundling our dependencies in our source package. [Security] This is a source package which will only be

[Bug 1568162] [NEW] [MIR] golang-gopkg-mgo.v2

2016-04-08 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
Public bug reported: [Availability] Source-only package currently available in universe. [Rationale] Build-dependency for juju. This is part of our on-going work for bug 1508120, to stop bundling our dependencies in our source package. [Security] This is a source package which will only be

[Bug 1568165] [NEW] [MIR] golang-golang-x-oauth2

2016-04-08 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
Public bug reported: [Availability] Source-only package currently available in universe. [Rationale] Build-dependency for juju. This is part of our on-going work for bug 1508120, to stop bundling our dependencies in our source package. [Security] This is a source package which will only be

[Bug 1568148] [NEW] Juju packaging for xenial must depend on everything in the archive

2016-04-08 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
Public bug reported: As part of acceptance into main for juju2, we need to ensure our package depends on everything we can that is already in the archive. See https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/juju-core/+bug/1545913 for the FFe. This bug will track our dependencies to ensure we meet this

[Bug 1564168] Re: juju list-credentials --show-secrets does not display passwords

2016-04-04 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
** Changed in: juju-core Milestone: None => 2.0.0 ** Changed in: juju-core Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: juju-core Importance: Undecided => High ** Tags added: docteam juju-release-support -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1564165] Re: Credentials file displays unhelpful message for syntax errors

2016-04-04 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
** Also affects: juju-core Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1564165 Title: Credentials file displays unhelpful message for syntax errors To

[Bug 1564157] Re: juju list-credentials fails to display

2016-04-04 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
** Also affects: juju-core Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1564157 Title: juju list-credentials fails to display To manage notifications

[Bug 1561633] Re: help should work properly with alternatives

2016-04-04 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
** Changed in: juju-core (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1561633 Title: help should work properly with alternatives To manage notifications

[Bug 1564168] Re: juju list-credentials --show-secrets does not display passwords

2016-04-04 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
** Also affects: juju-core Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1564168 Title: juju list-credentials --show-secrets does not display passwords

[Bug 1564670] Re: After upgrade Juju 1.X should still be the default

2016-04-04 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
** Also affects: juju-core Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1564670 Title: After upgrade Juju 1.X should still be the default To manage

[Bug 1564163] Re: environment name in credentials file is not a tag

2016-04-04 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
** Also affects: juju-core Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1564163 Title: environment name in credentials file is not a tag To manage

[Bug 1508120] Re: please break out embedded code copies into archive packages

2016-03-31 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
Here's the ppa with the packages: https://launchpad.net/~nskaggs/+archive/ubuntu/juju/+packages And here's the status for each dependency mentioned. http://paste.ubuntu.com/15569917/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1508120] Re: please break out embedded code copies into archive packages

2016-03-31 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
Here's the ppa with the packages: https://launchpad.net/~nskaggs/+archive/ubuntu/juju/+packages And here's the status for each dependency mentioned. http://paste.ubuntu.com/15569917/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1508120] Re: please break out embedded code copies into archive packages

2016-03-31 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
Jamie, the additional packages are: golang-github-altoros-gosigma golang-github-dustin-go-humanize golang-github-gabriel-samfira-sys golang-github-gosuri-uitable golang-github-joyent-gocommon golang-github-joyent-gomanta golang-github-joyent-gosdc golang-github-joyent-gosign

[Bug 1508120] Re: please break out embedded code copies into archive packages

2016-03-31 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
Jamie, the additional packages are: golang-github-altoros-gosigma golang-github-dustin-go-humanize golang-github-gabriel-samfira-sys golang-github-gosuri-uitable golang-github-joyent-gocommon golang-github-joyent-gomanta golang-github-joyent-gosdc golang-github-joyent-gosign

[Bug 1545913] Re: [FFe] juju-core 2.0

2016-03-30 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
Adam has built the initial version desired for upload: https://launchpad.net/~adam-stokes/+archive/ubuntu/juju-pkg -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to juju-core in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1545913 Title:

[Bug 1545913] Re: [FFe] juju-core 2.0

2016-03-30 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
Adam has built the initial version desired for upload: https://launchpad.net/~adam-stokes/+archive/ubuntu/juju-pkg -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1545913 Title: [FFe] juju-core 2.0

[Bug 1564168] [NEW] juju list-credentials --show-secrets does not display passwords

2016-03-30 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
Public bug reported: juju list-credentials --show-secrets does not display password data, unless used with --format yaml. The following commands all fail to show additonal information using --show-secrets juju list-credentials --show-secrets juju list-credentials --format json --show-secrets

[Bug 1564168] [NEW] juju list-credentials --show-secrets does not display passwords

2016-03-30 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
Public bug reported: juju list-credentials --show-secrets does not display password data, unless used with --format yaml. The following commands all fail to show additonal information using --show-secrets juju list-credentials --show-secrets juju list-credentials --format json --show-secrets

[Bug 1564165] [NEW] Credentials file displays unhelpful message for syntax errors

2016-03-30 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
Public bug reported: If credentials.yaml contains invalid syntax, the error is ERROR credentials.blarhg.google.credentials: expected string, got map which does not accurately convey 'blarhg' is not valid syntax. ** Affects: juju-core (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New --

[Bug 1564165] [NEW] Credentials file displays unhelpful message for syntax errors

2016-03-30 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
Public bug reported: If credentials.yaml contains invalid syntax, the error is ERROR credentials.blarhg.google.credentials: expected string, got map which does not accurately convey 'blarhg' is not valid syntax. ** Affects: juju-core (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New --

[Bug 1564163] [NEW] environment name in credentials file is not a tag

2016-03-30 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
Public bug reported: It would be nice to include a tag of the environment name from my credentials file. aws: default-credential: balloons balloons: auth-type: access-key access-key: XXXxxx secret-key: xxx Given those credentials, I expect

[Bug 1564163] [NEW] environment name in credentials file is not a tag

2016-03-30 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
Public bug reported: It would be nice to include a tag of the environment name from my credentials file. aws: default-credential: balloons balloons: auth-type: access-key access-key: XXXxxx secret-key: xxx Given those credentials, I expect

[Bug 1564157] [NEW] juju list-credentials fails to display

2016-03-30 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
Public bug reported: When a cloud is not found in your credentials file, the credentials are not listed. In addition, the credentials error given is confusing, and non-consistent. nskaggs@pixel:~$ juju list-credentials ERROR removing secrets from credentials for cloud maas18: cloud maas18 not

[Bug 1564157] [NEW] juju list-credentials fails to display

2016-03-30 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
Public bug reported: When a cloud is not found in your credentials file, the credentials are not listed. In addition, the credentials error given is confusing, and non-consistent. nskaggs@pixel:~$ juju list-credentials ERROR removing secrets from credentials for cloud maas18: cloud maas18 not

[Bug 1561037] Re: [needs-packaging] conjure

2016-03-29 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
This package is sitting in the xenial upload queue, ready for review. The upload has been blocked upon juju2 landing into xenial, and thus should be considered for an exception to missing the upload window. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1561043] Re: [needs-packaging] bigdata

2016-03-29 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
This package is sitting in the xenial upload queue, ready for review. The upload has been blocked upon juju2 landing into xenial, and thus should be considered for an exception to missing the upload window. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1545913] Re: [FFe] juju-core 2.0

2016-03-29 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
** Description changed: - The Juju team is preparing for a 2.0-beta1 release in time for the - xenial feature freeze date (18-Feb), but not all features required for - 2.0 will be ready by that date. We believe we will have a complete and - stable Juju 2.0 by the time of the xenial release, but

[Bug 1545913] Re: [FFe] juju-core 2.0

2016-03-29 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
** Description changed: - The Juju team is preparing for a 2.0-beta1 release in time for the - xenial feature freeze date (18-Feb), but not all features required for - 2.0 will be ready by that date. We believe we will have a complete and - stable Juju 2.0 by the time of the xenial release, but

[Bug 1561210] Re: juju-core should depend on python3

2016-03-24 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
** Tags added: packaging -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1561210 Title: juju-core should depend on python3 To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1561633] [NEW] help should work properly with alternatives

2016-03-24 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
Public bug reported: When calling help using juju2 directly, it refers to using the commands as 'juju', rather than juju2. The help should be dynamic as well with the alternatives packaging so when juju2 help is called directly, it also specifies the use of juju2. ** Affects: juju-core (Ubuntu)

[Bug 1561633] [NEW] help should work properly with alternatives

2016-03-24 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
Public bug reported: When calling help using juju2 directly, it refers to using the commands as 'juju', rather than juju2. The help should be dynamic as well with the alternatives packaging so when juju2 help is called directly, it also specifies the use of juju2. ** Affects: juju-core (Ubuntu)

[Bug 1561210] Re: juju-core should depend on python3

2016-03-24 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
** Tags added: packaging -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to juju-core in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1561210 Title: juju-core should depend on python3 To manage notifications about this bug go to:

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >