[Bug 669002] Re: Only root can start X at a reasonable resolution

2010-11-22 Thread Norbert Bollow
** Tags removed: lucid -- Only root can start X at a reasonable resolution https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/669002 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 669002] [NEW] Only root can start X at a reasonable resolution

2010-10-31 Thread Norbert Bollow
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xorg After upgrading from 10.04 to 10.10 on 2010-10-29, I've experienced the following show-stopper a problem: I'm using gdm. However, upon entering the correct password at gdm, the screen blinks and the gdm login screen is built up again. In order to

[Bug 669002] Re: Only root can start X at a reasonable resolution

2010-10-31 Thread Norbert Bollow
** Attachment added: Xorg.0.log file from failed 'startx' attempt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/669002/+attachment/1717833/+files/Xorg.0.log.nb.doesntwork -- Only root can start X at a reasonable resolution https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/669002 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 584674] Re: Lucid fresh install doesn't go beyond login. Possible Savage driver problem.

2010-10-31 Thread Norbert Bollow
I'm now convinced that my problem is a different bug, as it is not related to the SAVAGE driver, so I've created a bugtracker entry for it: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/669002 -- Lucid fresh install doesn't go beyond login. Possible Savage driver problem.

[Bug 584674] Re: Lucid fresh install doesn't go beyond login. Possible Savage driver problem.

2010-10-27 Thread Norbert Bollow
I've just upgraded from 10.04 to 10.10; now I'm experiencing a problem which is, superficially at least, very similar. I'm using gdm however. Upon entering the correct password at gdm, the screen blinks and the gdm login screen is built up again. Another similarity is that this is also with the

[Bug 217004] Re: install failure (regression) with ProSavageDDR graphics chipset

2009-02-12 Thread Norbert Bollow
Hugh, what I did is that I installed from the Ubuntu 8.10 server CD. IIRC I then installed GNOME manually with apt-get (which of course pulled in X11) and used an old xorg.conf file. -- install failure (regression) with ProSavageDDR graphics chipset https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217004

[Bug 320541] [NEW] needs updating to upstream version 1.6.5.1

2009-01-23 Thread Norbert Bollow
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: bibletime The subject says it all... this package needs updating to upstream version 1.6.5.1. ** Affects: bibletime (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- needs updating to upstream version 1.6.5.1

[Bug 320558] [NEW] needs updating to upstream version 1.5.11

2009-01-23 Thread Norbert Bollow
Public bug reported: The summary says it all, this package needs updating to upstream version 1.5.11 ** Affects: sword (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- needs updating to upstream version 1.5.11 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/320558 You received this bug notification

[Bug 320558] Re: needs updating to upstream version 1.5.11

2009-01-23 Thread Norbert Bollow
There's currently a team forming for jointly maintaining the CrossWire packages (e.g. sword, gnomesword, bibletime) for Ubuntu and Debian. The current package maintainer in Debian has just created a new mailing list and has invited everyone who is interested to join:

[Bug 295389] Re: This version is extremely out of date

2009-01-23 Thread Norbert Bollow
There's currently a team forming for jointly maintaining the CrossWire packages (e.g. sword, gnomesword, bibletime) for Ubuntu and Debian. The current package maintainer in Debian has just created a new mailing list and has invited everyone who is interested to join:

[Bug 320541] Re: needs updating to upstream version 1.6.5.1

2009-01-23 Thread Norbert Bollow
There's currently a team forming for jointly maintaining the CrossWire packages (e.g. sword, gnomesword, bibletime) for Ubuntu and Debian. The current package maintainer in Debian has just created a new mailing list and has invited everyone who is interested to join:

[Bug 217004] Re: install failure (regression) with ProSavageDDR graphics chipset

2009-01-22 Thread Norbert Bollow
Ok, done. Well, I didn't try installing your package on the live CD system (I'd be surprised if that's possible), but I made a jaunty alpha 3 install on a disk partition that has no valuable data. I had to use the alternate install CD for this: Installation with the desktop CD totally fails

[Bug 307607] Re: package ttf-mathematica4.1 4 failed to install: post-installation script terminated abnormally with an exit value of 1.

2008-12-13 Thread Norbert Bollow
Actually what the package does is that it tries to download (and then install fonts from) http://support.wolfram.com/mathematica/systems/windows/general/file/MathFonts_TrueType_41.exe This fails because the link is broken at support.wolfram.com: The server now redirects to

[Bug 307607] [NEW] package ttf-mathematica4.1 4 failed to install: post-installation script terminated abnormally with an exit value of 1.

2008-12-12 Thread Norbert Bollow
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ttf-mathematica4.1 I installed this system today using the server install CD (even though it is a desktop system, because the desktop CD fails to install on this machine), then installed gnome and a couple of other things manually. Then went looking for

[Bug 307607] Re: package ttf-mathematica4.1 4 failed to install: post-installation script terminated abnormally with an exit value of 1.

2008-12-12 Thread Norbert Bollow
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20394872/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20394873/DpkgTerminalLog.gz -- package ttf-mathematica4.1 4 failed to install: post-installation script terminated

[Bug 217004] Re: [hardy beta] install failure (regression) with ProSavageDDR graphics chipset

2008-11-07 Thread Norbert Bollow
I can confirm that the bug is NOT fixed in Intrepid 8.10 for me either. -- [hardy beta] install failure (regression) with ProSavageDDR graphics chipset https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217004 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 217004] Re: [hardy beta] install failure (regression) with ProSavageDDR graphics chipset

2008-04-14 Thread Norbert Bollow
Maybe in the case that no useful hsync and vrefresh info can be obtained from the monitor (in my case, a Highscreen MS 2195P), the installation system should ask the user to make a selection from a list? -- [hardy beta] install failure (regression) with ProSavageDDR graphics chipset

[Bug 217004] Re: [hardy beta] install failure (regression) with ProSavageDDR graphics chipset

2008-04-14 Thread Norbert Bollow
What happens in gutsy's install process is that during xserver-xorg postinst, MONITOR_IDENTIFIER is set to Generic Monitor, for which (somewhat reasonable) hsync and vrefresh values are then obtained from the monitors database. -- [hardy beta] install failure (regression) with ProSavageDDR

[Bug 217004] [NEW] [hardy beta] install failure (regression) with ProSavageDDR graphics chipset

2008-04-13 Thread Norbert Bollow
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ubiquity On my desktop PC, installing from the Hardy Beta iso fails unless safe graphics mode is chosen (which results in an install that uses a low graphics resolution). Ehat happens when trying to install in normal mode is not always the same.

[Bug 217004] Re: [hardy beta] install failure (regression) with ProSavageDDR graphics chipset

2008-04-13 Thread Norbert Bollow
** Attachment added: Xorg.0.log from hardy beta (Normal install mode) when I arrived in console text mode http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13414136/Xorg.0.log -- [hardy beta] install failure (regression) with ProSavageDDR graphics chipset https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217004 You received

[Bug 217004] Re: [hardy beta] install failure (regression) with ProSavageDDR graphics chipset

2008-04-13 Thread Norbert Bollow
** Attachment added: 'lspci -vvnn' output from hardy bety http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13414555/lspci -- [hardy beta] install failure (regression) with ProSavageDDR graphics chipset https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217004 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 217004] Re: [hardy beta] install failure (regression) with ProSavageDDR graphics chipset

2008-04-13 Thread Norbert Bollow
** Attachment added: dmesg from hardy beta (Normal install mode) when I arrived in console text mode http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13414566/dmesg -- [hardy beta] install failure (regression) with ProSavageDDR graphics chipset https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217004 You received this bug

[Bug 217004] Re: [hardy beta] install failure (regression) with ProSavageDDR graphics chipset

2008-04-13 Thread Norbert Bollow
Xorg.0.log from gutsy ** Attachment added: Xorg.0.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13414584/Xorg.0.log -- [hardy beta] install failure (regression) with ProSavageDDR graphics chipset https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217004 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 217004] Re: [hardy beta] install failure (regression) with ProSavageDDR graphics chipset

2008-04-13 Thread Norbert Bollow
** Attachment added: 'lspci -vvnn' output from gutsy http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13414598/lspci -- [hardy beta] install failure (regression) with ProSavageDDR graphics chipset https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217004 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 217004] Re: [hardy beta] install failure (regression) with ProSavageDDR graphics chipset

2008-04-13 Thread Norbert Bollow
** Attachment added: dmesg from gutsy http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13414612/dmesg -- [hardy beta] install failure (regression) with ProSavageDDR graphics chipset https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217004 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 217004] Re: [hardy beta] install failure (regression) with ProSavageDDR graphics chipset

2008-04-13 Thread Norbert Bollow
** Attachment added: Xorg.0.log from the install made with safe grphics mode http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13414620/Xorg.0.log -- [hardy beta] install failure (regression) with ProSavageDDR graphics chipset https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217004 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 217004] Re: [hardy beta] install failure (regression) with ProSavageDDR graphics chipset

2008-04-13 Thread Norbert Bollow
** Attachment added: dmesg from the hardy beta install made with safe graphics mode http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13414635/dmesg -- [hardy beta] install failure (regression) with ProSavageDDR graphics chipset https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217004 You received this bug notification because