[Bug 351463] Re: KDE4 screensaver lock doesn't accept password

2013-02-12 Thread Oliver Siegmar
Had the same issue with a fresh installation (not upgraded) of Ubuntu 12.04 (Precise). I could also fix it by changing the group of /etc/shadow from root to shadow. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to kdebase-workspace in Ubuntu.

[Bug 603363] Re: sshd never stops, prevents umount of /usr partition

2011-03-15 Thread Oliver Siegmar
Test was successful - the /usr partition could be unmounted correctly. One strange thing remains - the /var partition can only be mounted in read-only mode, but that might have nothing to do with this issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team,

[Bug 603363] Re: sshd never stops, prevents umount of /usr partition

2011-03-15 Thread Oliver Siegmar
Test was successful - the /usr partition could be unmounted correctly. One strange thing remains - the /var partition can only be mounted in read-only mode, but that might have nothing to do with this issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 721108] [NEW] Regression in 4.71-3ubuntu1.1 (lucid) when using macros

2011-02-17 Thread Oliver Siegmar
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: exim4 exim4 4.71-3ubuntu1.1 (using lucid) completely stopped our mail server working, because we have three queues -DINCOMING, -DOUTGOING and the default one (no -D). Is there any way to configure a whitelist for -D switches (not the WHITELIST_D_MACROS

[Bug 721108] [NEW] Regression in 4.71-3ubuntu1.1 (lucid) when using macros

2011-02-17 Thread Oliver Siegmar
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: exim4 exim4 4.71-3ubuntu1.1 (using lucid) completely stopped our mail server working, because we have three queues -DINCOMING, -DOUTGOING and the default one (no -D). Is there any way to configure a whitelist for -D switches (not the WHITELIST_D_MACROS

[Bug 697934] Re: Merge exim4 4.73~rc1-1 (main) from Debian experimental (main)

2011-02-16 Thread Oliver Siegmar
exim4 4.71-3ubuntu1.1 completely stopped our mail server working, because we have three queues -DINCOMING, -DOUTGOING and the default one (no -D). Is there any way to configure a whitelist for -D switches (not the WHITELIST_D_MACROS compile time option)? -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 697934] Re: Merge exim4 4.73~rc1-1 (main) from Debian experimental (main)

2011-02-16 Thread Oliver Siegmar
exim4 4.71-3ubuntu1.1 completely stopped our mail server working, because we have three queues -DINCOMING, -DOUTGOING and the default one (no -D). Is there any way to configure a whitelist for -D switches (not the WHITELIST_D_MACROS compile time option)? -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 603363] Re: sshd never stops, prevents umount of /usr partition

2011-02-12 Thread Oliver Siegmar
I hope it will be part of 10.04.2 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/603363 Title: sshd never stops, prevents umount of /usr partition -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing

[Bug 603363] Re: sshd never stops, prevents umount of /usr partition

2011-02-12 Thread Oliver Siegmar
I hope it will be part of 10.04.2 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/603363 Title: sshd never stops, prevents umount of /usr partition -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 603363] Re: sshd never stops, prevents umount of /usr partition

2011-01-04 Thread Oliver Siegmar
I think the problem is the upstart configuration for the ssh daemon /etc/init/ssh.conf - stop on runlevel S Shouldn't that be: stop on runlevel [!2345] ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in ubuntu.

[Bug 603363] Re: sshd never stops, prevents umount of /usr partition

2011-01-04 Thread Oliver Siegmar
I think the problem is the upstart configuration for the ssh daemon /etc/init/ssh.conf - stop on runlevel S Shouldn't that be: stop on runlevel [!2345] ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 660596] Re: Black screen after installing Nvidia drivers on 10.10

2010-12-26 Thread Oliver Siegmar
I've tested two cards. GeForce 6200 TurboCache runs perfectly with the 260.19.06 driver, but I had no luck with a brand new GeForce GT 240 - black screen / system hangs when starting X. Unfortunately that card isn't supported by the 195 driver, so I tried the 256 - system shows login screen (KDM)

[Bug 689411] [NEW] mailscanner died unexpectedly because of eval in taint mode

2010-12-12 Thread Oliver Siegmar
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: mailscanner After upgrading from jaunty to lucid my mailscanner dies when constructing a warning message. When launching mailscanner with debug enabled, I get this: In Debugging mode, not forking... Trying to setlogsock(unix) Building a message batch

[Bug 689411] Re: mailscanner died unexpectedly because of eval in taint mode

2010-12-12 Thread Oliver Siegmar
I could work around this problem by adding a '--chuid Debian-exim' parameter to the start-stop-daemon call in /etc/init.d/mailscanner - start-stop-daemon --start --quiet --nicelevel $run_nice --chuid Debian-exim --exec $DAEMON --name $NAME -- $DAEMON_ARGS \ || return 2 I could also find

[Bug 603363] Re: sshd never stops, prevents umount of /usr partition

2010-11-21 Thread Oliver Siegmar
Sometimes it is not even possible to remount the filesystem readonly. This can cause damage to the filesystem, thus this issue should get high priority. ** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu Lucid) Status: New = Incomplete ** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu Lucid) Status: Incomplete =

[Bug 603363] Re: sshd never stops, prevents umount of /usr partition

2010-11-21 Thread Oliver Siegmar
Sometimes it is not even possible to remount the filesystem readonly. This can cause damage to the filesystem, thus this issue should get high priority. ** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu Lucid) Status: New = Incomplete ** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu Lucid) Status: Incomplete =

[Bug 592576] [NEW] Parse error for workers.properties

2010-06-11 Thread Oliver Siegmar
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: libapache-mod-jk I'm running libapache-mod-jk 1.2.28-2 on Ubuntu 10.04 and I have this content in my workers.properties file: worker.list = dev worker.dev.type = ajp13 worker.dev.host = localhost worker.dev.port = 8009 Apache doesn't start and my

[Bug 484307] Re: Partitions not unmounted correctly

2010-05-22 Thread Oliver Siegmar
I found a workaround. Before installing the VMware-Tools I rename /sbin/insserv to /sbin/insserv.bak - then the VMware-Tools installer uses update-rc.d as a fallback. After the installation I rename /sbin/insserv.bak back to /sbin/insserv . -- Partitions not unmounted correctly

[Bug 484307] Re: Partitions not unmounted correctly

2010-05-21 Thread Oliver Siegmar
I noticed that the installation of VMware-Tools (VMware- Tools-4.0.0-236512 for ESX 4.0 in my case) causes that the sequence numbers of rc0 and rc6 changes. Before the installation halt is linked with S90halt, after the installation it is S01halt. -- Partitions not unmounted correctly

[Bug 484307] Re: Partitions not unmounted correctly

2010-05-21 Thread Oliver Siegmar
This is the log when installing the VMware-Tools. There are several lines like this: insserv: warning: current start runlevel(s) (0) of script `halt' overwrites defaults (empty). ** Attachment added: Installation Log of VMware-Tools-4.0.0-236512

[Bug 484307] Re: Partitions not unmounted correctly

2010-05-21 Thread Oliver Siegmar
OK - here is how you can reproduce this: r...@ubuntutpl:~# cat /etc/init.d/testinit #!/bin/sh ### BEGIN INIT INFO # Provides: test # Required-Start: $local_fs # Required-Stop: $local_fs # X-Start-Before: $network # X-Stop-After: $network # Default-Start: 2 3 5 # Default-Stop: 0 6 ### END INIT

[Bug 531017] Re: Unable to detect VMware's PVSCSI device during installation.

2010-03-10 Thread Oliver Siegmar
I tried with todays server ISO image (2010-03-10). The good thing is, that the installer contains both, the VMXNET3 and the PVSCSI driver and detects the virtual hardware flawlessly. Unfortunately the system doesn't boot afterwards when installed in minimal virtual machine mode (using the

[Bug 531017] Re: Unable to detect VMware's PVSCSI device during installation.

2010-03-08 Thread Oliver Siegmar
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Lucid) Status: Fix Released = Confirmed -- Unable to detect VMware's PVSCSI device during installation. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/531017 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 531017] Re: Unable to detect VMware's PVSCSI device during installation.

2010-03-06 Thread Oliver Siegmar
I don't know why this issue is marked as fixed. The Installer of 10.04 Alpha 3 (Server Edition) still lacks support for PVSCSI and VMXNET3 (both - the -server and the -virtual linux kernel image). -- Unable to detect VMware's PVSCSI device during installation.

[Bug 420320] Re: unhandled vm exit: 0x31

2009-12-06 Thread Oliver Siegmar
This happened one more time - now with 2.6.28-17.58-server -- unhandled vm exit: 0x31 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420320 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 420320] [NEW] unhandled vm exit: 0x31

2009-08-28 Thread Oliver Siegmar
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: kvm One of my virtual machines crashed after weeks of normal operation. I got this in my /var/log/libvirt/qemu/[virtmachine].log file: unhandled vm exit: 0x31 vcpu_id 1 rax 88001deebfd8 rbx rcx rdx

[Bug 362288] Re: virsh destroy might also kill another running VM

2009-07-14 Thread Oliver Siegmar
Bryan, I couldn't apply the event-handling-fix-rh499698-lp362288.patch against libvirt_0.6.1-0ubuntu5 - $ quilt push Applying patch event-handling-fix-rh499698-lp362288.patch patching file libvirt-0.6.1/qemud/event.c Hunk #12 FAILED at 429. Hunk #13 succeeded at 542 (offset -1 lines). Hunk #14

[Bug 362288] Re: virsh destroy might also kill another running VM

2009-07-14 Thread Oliver Siegmar
Thank's Bryan! Patch is installed and works great (tested save, restore and destroy) so far. -- virsh destroy might also kill another running VM https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/362288 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 362288] Re: virsh destroy might also kill another running VM

2009-07-10 Thread Oliver Siegmar
Please note, that also a 'virsh save domain' destroys other domains. Any updates here? -- virsh destroy might also kill another running VM https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/362288 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --