Public bug reported:
Installing `lam4-dev` in a clean Ubuntu Bionic or Cosmic fails as below.
Which dependency is missing?
Preparing to unpack .../lam4-dev_7.1.4-3.1build1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking lam4-dev (7.1.4-3.1build1) ...
Setting up lam4-dev (7.1.4-3.1build1) ...
Running into this as well. The 0.8.0 branch has renamed
'ssh_get_publickey' to 'ssh_get_server_publickey' however it is not
possible to test for this in the macro because from the headers is looks
like we are running libssh 0.7.0.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Public bug reported:
I would like to request to update the 'jq' package in ubuntu xenial from
1.5+dfsg-1 to 1.5+dfsg-2.
The reason is that the old version is missing the libjq-dev library and
headers. These were added in 1.5+dfsg-2 however currently this is only
available on Ubuntu Zesty. It
Yes, the problem seems to be fixed. Thank you.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1626773
Title:
CVE-2016-2182.patch has broken BN_bn2dec
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Below a minimal example:
https://gist.github.com/jeroenooms/cc9391276b160404c5a635f961bc06f6
** Summary changed:
- CVE-2016-2182.patch has broken BN_bn2dec broken in 1.0.1
+ CVE-2016-2182.patch has broken BN_bn2dec
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Public bug reported:
My software which links to libcrypto stopped working on both Ubuntu
12.04 / 14.04 / 16.04 last week.
The problem is that BN_bn2dec returns NULL all the time (without setting
an error message) even for valid input values. I think is a bug in
CVE-2016-2182.patch.
** Affects:
Can you be more specific in which way the libapache2-mod-r-base package
is not following guidelines?
Also the problem still remains that the package 'apache2-prefork-dev'
exists but is broken. It seems you need to either completely remove this
package, or add something like:
Provides:
In that case, perhaps you can help me suggest how I should specify my
build-depends such that apache2-prefork-dev can correctly be resolved?
Currently the control file is as follows, which does not resolve, even
though there is no version of apache2-prefork-dev specified:
It's additional work to maintain separate packages for different
releases. If possible, I would like to have a single source package that
builds with either Apache 2.2 or Apache 2.4.
In general it seems to me that you don't want to break all current
packages with a dependency on
Can you be more specific in which way the libapache2-mod-r-base package
is not following guidelines?
Also the problem still remains that the package 'apache2-prefork-dev'
exists but is broken. It seems you need to either completely remove this
package, or add something like:
Provides:
In that case, perhaps you can help me suggest how I should specify my
build-depends such that apache2-prefork-dev can correctly be resolved?
Currently the control file is as follows, which does not resolve, even
though there is no version of apache2-prefork-dev specified:
It's additional work to maintain separate packages for different
releases. If possible, I would like to have a single source package that
builds with either Apache 2.2 or Apache 2.4.
In general it seems to me that you don't want to break all current
packages with a dependency on
Public bug reported:
I use Apache2 and mod_proxy_ajp to proxy requests to Tomcat. Apache is
sandboxed with mod_apparmor. Everything works OK when the host has a
valid ipv4 address. However when used inside parallels with only a LAN
address, the proxy returns empty pages.
When looking at
Same in Ubuntu 11.10 Unity 3D. Very annoying.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/711567
Title:
Double window controls in Chromium after enabling Use System Title
Bar and Borders
To
14 matches
Mail list logo
