[Bug 1650882] Re: Some sbackup messages in log are in Spanish

2018-05-19 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
Fixed upstream in commit https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~sbackup-dev/sbackup/0.11/revision/289 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1650882 Title: Some sbackup messages in log are in

[Bug 1650882] Re: Some sbackup messages in log are in Spanish

2018-05-19 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
I can confirm this. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1650882 Title: Some sbackup messages in log are in Spanish To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1650882] Re: Some sbackup messages in log are in Spanish

2018-05-19 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1650882 Title: Some sbackup messages in log are in Spanish To manage notifications

[Bug 1770528] Re: Purging of old backup - Simple cut-off is not happening

2018-05-19 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
tuation you got. I agree however that is not described in the documentation. I would welcome any suggestion on the way to describe it in a user friendly way. ** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Oumar Aziz OUATTARA (wattazoum) -- You received this bug notifi

[Bug 927636] Re: plymouthd crashed with SIGSEGV in script_obj_deref_direct()

2016-07-22 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
** Attachment added: "plymouth-debug.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plymouth/+bug/927636/+attachment/4705156/+files/plymouth-debug.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 927636] Re: plymouthd crashed with SIGSEGV in script_obj_deref_direct()

2016-07-22 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
Still happening on Xenial. The workaround suggested is not valid in xenial anymore. The suggested directory might now be /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/plymouth -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1218309] Re: Gnome-shell freeze

2013-12-21 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
Hello, Seeing the number of subscription to this bug, I believe it also affect a huge number of users. In fact, I usually use Unity. I had no problem. Then I installed gnome shell and started using it. It usually freezes out of the blue after 1 hour usage. As mentioned by the OP the mouse moves

[Bug 84899] Re: SSH with GSSAPIAuthentication option on SSH servers are very slow

2010-09-13 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
Hi, I have the same opinion as chifamba. People start thinking that SSH on Ubuntu is slow. I had also the same opinion before seeing this bug in Launchpad. -- SSH with GSSAPIAuthentication option on SSH servers are very slow https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/84899 You received this bug

[Bug 84899] Re: SSH with GSSAPIAuthentication option on SSH servers are very slow

2010-09-13 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
Hi, I have the same opinion as chifamba. People start thinking that SSH on Ubuntu is slow. I had also the same opinion before seeing this bug in Launchpad. -- SSH with GSSAPIAuthentication option on SSH servers are very slow https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/84899 You received this bug

[Bug 249292] Re: Simple backup Regex for Trash to be changed for using gvfs

2010-06-08 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
I believe that SBackup has been updated on lucid. I suggest that you try NSsbackup. Look for it on Launchpad. -- Simple backup Regex for Trash to be changed for using gvfs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/249292 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 328902] Re: Spelling and wording errors

2010-01-24 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
** Changed in: nssbackup Milestone: release0.2 = 0.2rc8 ** Changed in: nssbackup Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- Spelling and wording errors https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328902 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 328902] Re: Spelling and wording errors

2009-12-27 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
** Changed in: nssbackup Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed ** Changed in: nssbackup Assignee: (unassigned) = Oumar Aziz OUATTARA (wattazoum) ** Changed in: nssbackup Milestone: None = release0.2 -- Spelling and wording errors https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328902 You received

[Bug 311429] Re: simple-backup-config.py crashed with NoOptionError in get()

2009-10-15 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
Hi, Can you test the following ? https://launchpad.net/nssbackup/+announcement/2189 It's NSsbackup. It will be the new version of Sbackup. It's the supported version of Sbackup. We (NSsbackup team) don't change Sbackup anymore. We will push to have NSsbackup replacing Sbackup in the

[Bug 370214] Re: [Jaunty] Xorg FPS dropped down drastically

2009-05-07 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
Hi Bryce, Is it really a won't fix, just because I have not attached the required information. I believe the status should be Incomplete and not Won't Fix (unless you have some others reasons that I don't know). Regards ** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu) Status: Won't Fix =

[Bug 370214] [NEW] [Jaunty] Xorg FPS dropped down drastically

2009-04-30 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xorg Hi, I have noticed that since my upgrade to Jaunty I have a drastic drop of my FPS reported by glxgears. To ensure that it was not the old driver that was borked after the upgrade, I tested with Intrepid and Jaunty Live CDs. Here I attach the

[Bug 370214] Re: [Jaunty] Xorg FPS dropped down drastically

2009-04-30 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
** Attachment added: report-intrepid.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26203588/report-intrepid.txt -- [Jaunty] Xorg FPS dropped down drastically https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/370214 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 370214] Re: [Jaunty] Xorg FPS dropped down drastically

2009-04-30 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
** Attachment added: report-jauty.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26203598/report-jauty.txt ** Tags added: regression-release ** Description changed: Binary package hint: xorg Hi, I have noticed that since my upgrade to Jaunty I have a drastic drop of my FPS reported by

[Bug 363139] Re: xbmc not working with opensource radeon driver in jaunty

2009-04-24 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
** Tags added: regression-release -- xbmc not working with opensource radeon driver in jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363139 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

Re: [Nssbackup-team] [Bug 229218] Re: sbackupd.py crashed with ValueError in module()

2009-03-31 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
@Anton: In fact, we are supposed to support Sbackup also. This is why we receive the notification about Sbackup bugs. What I suggest it to propose to Sbackup users to try to reproduce using NSsbackup (since it will be the replacement of Sbackup). @MrWoo: Are you sure you reported on the right bug

[Bug 229218] Re: sbackupd.py crashed with ValueError in module()

2009-03-31 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = New -- sbackupd.py crashed with ValueError in module() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/229218 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 350128] [NEW] WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.28/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c:719 check_for_bios_corruption+0xc8/0xd0()

2009-03-28 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
Public bug reported: I got this warning at startup. ProblemType: KernelOops Annotation: Your system might become unstable now and might need to be restarted. Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 Failure: oops NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: linux-image-2.6.28-11-generic

[Bug 350128] Re: WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.28/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c:719 check_for_bios_corruption+0xc8/0xd0()

2009-03-28 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24443278/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: OopsText.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24443279/OopsText.txt -- WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.28/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c:719 check_for_bios_corruption+0xc8/0xd0()

[Bug 243344] Re: scim-bridge crashed with SIGSEGV in scim::IMEngineInstanceBase::get_frontend_data()

2009-03-28 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
This issue is happening to me every startup :-( -- scim-bridge crashed with SIGSEGV in scim::IMEngineInstanceBase::get_frontend_data() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/243344 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 350141] Re: update-notifier crashed with SIGSEGV [non-native unknown package]

2009-03-28 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
** Attachment added: CoreDump.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24443862/CoreDump.gz ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24443863/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24443864/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added:

[Bug 176838] Re: Incremental backups should not appear incremental when restoring

2009-03-10 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
Fixed in 0.2rc 7 ** Changed in: nssbackup Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- Incremental backups should not appear incremental when restoring https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/176838 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 176838] Re: Incremental backups should not appear incremental when restoring

2009-03-07 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
I really don't think this problem is still present on 0.2 RC 6. Currently, the full file list is shown from an incremental snapshot with the precision is the file is included or not. Then on can restore a non-included file using the revert and revert as button, which will get the latest

[Bug 176838] Re: Incremental backups should not appear incremental when restoring

2009-03-07 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
Fixed on 0.2 branch. ** Changed in: nssbackup Status: In Progress = Fix Committed -- Incremental backups should not appear incremental when restoring https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/176838 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 338878] Re: compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV

2009-03-06 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
** Attachment added: CoreDump.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23557055/CoreDump.gz ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23557056/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Disassembly.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23557057/Disassembly.txt ** Attachment

[Bug 333996] Re: totem-gstreamer-video-thumbnailer crashed with SIGSEGV

2009-02-24 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
** Attachment added: CoreDump.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23077908/CoreDump.gz ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23077909/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Disassembly.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23077910/Disassembly.txt ** Attachment

[Bug 317761] Re: debuild doesn't take *.a file anymore in the sources

2009-01-23 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- debuild doesn't take *.a file anymore in the sources https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317761 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 315774] Re: libsmbclient-dev missing smbc_urlencode in .a in intrepid

2009-01-17 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
Quoting the developer commit: == [Bug 6022] smbc_urlencode and smbc_urldecode were not exported - Since the revamp of libsmbclient, there has still been an external declaration for smbc_urlencode and smbc_urldecode in libsmbclient.h, yet those functions were renamed and made

[Bug 315774] Re: libsmbclient-dev missing smbc_urlencode in .a in intrepid

2009-01-17 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
** Attachment added: This patch comes from the Upstream commit http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21288671/recover_smbc_urlencode.patch ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = In Progress -- libsmbclient-dev missing smbc_urlencode in .a in intrepid

[Bug 315774] Re: libsmbclient-dev missing smbc_urlencode in .a in intrepid

2009-01-17 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
Debdiff attached. ** Attachment added: samba_3.2.3-1ubuntu4.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21290166/samba_3.2.3-1ubuntu4.debdiff -- libsmbclient-dev missing smbc_urlencode in .a in intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315774 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 315774] Re: libsmbclient-dev missing smbc_urlencode in .a in intrepid

2009-01-17 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
** Attachment removed: samba_3.2.3-1ubuntu4.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21290166/samba_3.2.3-1ubuntu4.debdiff ** Attachment added: samba_3.2.3-1ubuntu4.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21290586/samba_3.2.3-1ubuntu4.debdiff -- libsmbclient-dev missing smbc_urlencode in .a

[Bug 315774] Re: libsmbclient-dev missing smbc_urlencode in .a in intrepid

2009-01-17 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Assignee: Oumar Aziz OUATTARA (wattazoum) = (unassigned) Status: In Progress = Fix Committed -- libsmbclient-dev missing smbc_urlencode in .a in intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315774 You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 315774] Re: libsmbclient-dev missing smbc_urlencode in .a in intrepid

2009-01-17 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Oumar Aziz OUATTARA (wattazoum) -- libsmbclient-dev missing smbc_urlencode in .a in intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315774 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 315774] Re: libsmbclient-dev missing smbc_urlencode in .a in intrepid

2009-01-17 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
I tested and indeed, the smbc_urlencode symbol defined in the header is not found in the libsmbclient.a file on intrepid but is found in hardy (3.0.28a-1ubuntu4). I am trying to figure out is this is due to the sources or to a wrong build. ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: New =

[Bug 315774] Re: libsmbclient-dev missing smbc_urlencode in .a in intrepid

2009-01-17 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
Quoting the developer commit: == [Bug 6022] smbc_urlencode and smbc_urldecode were not exported - Since the revamp of libsmbclient, there has still been an external declaration for smbc_urlencode and smbc_urldecode in libsmbclient.h, yet those functions were renamed and made

[Bug 315774] Re: libsmbclient-dev missing smbc_urlencode in .a in intrepid

2009-01-17 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
** Attachment added: This patch comes from the Upstream commit http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21288671/recover_smbc_urlencode.patch ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = In Progress -- libsmbclient-dev missing smbc_urlencode in .a in intrepid

[Bug 315774] Re: libsmbclient-dev missing smbc_urlencode in .a in intrepid

2009-01-17 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
Debdiff attached. ** Attachment added: samba_3.2.3-1ubuntu4.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21290166/samba_3.2.3-1ubuntu4.debdiff -- libsmbclient-dev missing smbc_urlencode in .a in intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315774 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 315774] Re: libsmbclient-dev missing smbc_urlencode in .a in intrepid

2009-01-17 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
** Attachment removed: samba_3.2.3-1ubuntu4.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21290166/samba_3.2.3-1ubuntu4.debdiff ** Attachment added: samba_3.2.3-1ubuntu4.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21290586/samba_3.2.3-1ubuntu4.debdiff -- libsmbclient-dev missing smbc_urlencode in .a

[Bug 315774] Re: libsmbclient-dev missing smbc_urlencode in .a in intrepid

2009-01-17 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Assignee: Oumar Aziz OUATTARA (wattazoum) = (unassigned) Status: In Progress = Fix Committed -- libsmbclient-dev missing smbc_urlencode in .a in intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315774 You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 317761] Re: debuild doesn't take *.a file anymore in the sources

2009-01-17 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
Here is my log file. I don't have a .devscripts in my HOME directory. By the way, are you using intrepid for your tests ? ** Attachment added: test_1.0-1_source.build http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21295728/test_1.0-1_source.build -- debuild doesn't take *.a file anymore in the sources

[Bug 317761] Re: debuild doesn't take *.a file anymore in the sources

2009-01-16 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
Hi, I am not home for the moment so I can't provide a build.log right now but I can give you a link to the sources I wanted to pack on intrepid. https://edge.launchpad.net/~team-xbmc-svn/+archive * xbmc_8.10final1svn17113-hardy1.diff.gz (6.6 KiB) * xbmc_8.10final1svn17113-hardy1.dsc

[Bug 317761] Re: debuild doesn't take *.a file anymore in the sources

2009-01-16 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
Oki, Here is an example I have made. On intrepid, when running debuild -S -sa, the orig file doesn't contain the .a files. ** Attachment added: tests.zip http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21270813/tests.zip -- debuild doesn't take *.a file anymore in the sources

[Bug 317761] [NEW] debuild doesn't take *.a file anymore in the sources

2009-01-15 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: devscripts Hi, I noticed on intrepid that debuild doesn't take the .a files in the sources anymore. Thus I am not able to build my package which has some binaries inside the sources. The problem is not happening when using hardy. I was obliged to

[Bug 317761] Re: debuild doesn't take *.a file anymore in the sources

2009-01-15 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
Looking at the changelog in http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs/pool/main/d/dpkg/dpkg_1.14.20ubuntu6/changelog , I believe it version 1.14.17 that broke debuild. Not including some binaries in the sources is IMO a good choice, but we should at least have a way to tell dpkg-source to

[Bug 283580] Re: glxinfo crashed with SIGSEGV

2009-01-08 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
Here is the requested file ** Attachment added: lspci-vvnn.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21046711/lspci-vvnn.txt ** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-177 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- glxinfo crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/283580 You received this

[Bug 291308] Re: sbackup fills HDD when target is unmounted

2008-10-31 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
** Changed in: nssbackup Importance: Undecided = Medium Assignee: (unassigned) = Oumar Aziz OUATTARA (wattazoum) Status: New = Confirmed Target: None = release0.2 -- sbackup fills HDD when target is unmounted https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/291308 You received this bug

[Bug 130856] Re: ( wishlist )sbackup time to completion??

2008-10-30 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
** Also affects: nssbackup Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: nssbackup Importance: Undecided = Wishlist -- ( wishlist )sbackup time to completion?? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/130856 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 191127] Re: simple-backup-config does not check for validity of regex exclusion rules

2008-10-30 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
** Changed in: nssbackup Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed Target: None = release0.2 -- simple-backup-config does not check for validity of regex exclusion rules https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191127 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 289192] Re: bzr crashed with SIGSEGV in svn_swig_py_array_to_list()

2008-10-25 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
** Attachment added: CoreDump.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18889834/CoreDump.gz ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18889835/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Disassembly.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18889836/Disassembly.txt ** Attachment

[Bug 277633] Re: wireless doesn't work in 8.10 beta

2008-10-18 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
I have the same problem on my Fujitsu SiEMENS Amilo Pa2548. On Apha 6 the WIFI was working fine and when I upgraded to the new kernel 2.6.27-7-generic I lost my connection. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ lspci | grep Ethernet 00:0a.0 Ethernet controller: nVidia Corporation MCP67 Ethernet (rev a2) 03:00.0

[Bug 277633] Re: wireless doesn't work in 8.10 beta

2008-10-18 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
Moving status to confirm as there are 3 people to confirm it. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed ** Summary changed: - wireless doesn't work in 8.10 beta + wireless (Atheros AR5007EG) doesn't work anymore in 8.10 beta -- wireless (Atheros AR5007EG) doesn't work

[Bug 283580] Re: glxinfo crashed with SIGSEGV

2008-10-14 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
** Attachment added: CoreDump.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18551664/CoreDump.gz ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18551665/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Disassembly.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18551666/Disassembly.txt ** Attachment

[Bug 278439] Re: rapidsvn crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()

2008-10-04 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
** Attachment added: CoreDump.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18229207/CoreDump.gz ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18229208/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Disassembly.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18229209/Disassembly.txt ** Attachment

[Bug 275259] Re: compiz.real crashed with SIGSEGV

2008-09-27 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
** Attachment added: CoreDump.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18005746/CoreDump.gz ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18005747/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18005748/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added:

[Bug 176838] Re: Incremental backups should not appear incremental when restoring

2008-08-03 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
@francesco: One would say : This is why the source code is open. If you want to add something to the software, just do it (or find someone who can do it for you. I really hate this kind of comment. and which is only excusable because of !!! This software is made by developers on their free

[Bug 176838] Re: Incremental backups should not appear incremental when restoring

2008-08-03 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
. There is a ppa available for NSsbackup which is NSsbackup team PPA. I need to take time to work on NSsbackup 0.3/Sbackup 1.1 ... ** Also affects: nssbackup Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: nssbackup Assignee: (unassigned) = Oumar Aziz OUATTARA (wattazoum

[Bug 141002] Re: wish for multiple parallel backups

2008-07-14 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
0.2 beta 5 ** Changed in: nssbackup Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- wish for multiple parallel backups https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141002 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 149865] Re: [Wishlist] Option not to gzip

2008-07-14 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
0.2 beta 5 ** Changed in: nssbackup Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- [Wishlist] Option not to gzip https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/149865 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 144295] Re: Wishlist: Automatically split tar files at max size for filesystem

2008-07-14 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
** Changed in: nssbackup Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- Wishlist: Automatically split tar files at max size for filesystem https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/144295 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 87312] Re: xsane takes my TV card for a scanner

2008-06-19 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
I can tell you without removing my TV card that XSANE doesn't recognize my scanner. But that's another issue. I have opened this report because it takes my TV card for a scanner, not because the scanner is not recognized. Both are different issues indeed. ** Changed in: xsane (Ubuntu)

[Bug 87312] Re: xsane takes my TV card for a scanner

2008-06-08 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
This is still happening on Hardy : [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg-query --show xsane xsane 0.995-1ubuntu1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu 8.04 Release:8.04 Codename: hardy lspci gives the same output. The

[Bug 229218] Re: sbackupd.py crashed with ValueError in module()

2008-05-11 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
Hello, This looks like a configuration issue. Can you give the dirconfig part of your configuration file? I believe there is some entries that are invalid. ** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Oumar Aziz OUATTARA (wattazoum) Status: New = Incomplete

[Bug 150277] Re: curlftpfs-0.9.1 + libcurl/7.16.4 segfaults on removing files

2008-04-20 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
I confirm that it doesn't fix the issue. -- curlftpfs-0.9.1 + libcurl/7.16.4 segfaults on removing files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150277 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 150277] Re: curlftpfs-0.9.1 + libcurl/7.16.4 segfaults on removing files

2008-04-14 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
Hello, Any inputs on this one ? Regards -- curlftpfs-0.9.1 + libcurl/7.16.4 segfaults on removing files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150277 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 209314] Re: Crash No Such File Or Directory

2008-03-31 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
Thank you for your bug report. After your comments, I believe I can safely put this bug as invalid. right ? just tell me if I should reopen it . Regards ** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Oumar Aziz OUATTARA (wattazoum) Status: New = Invalid -- Crash

[Bug 150277] Re: curlftpfs-0.9.1 + libcurl/7.16.4 segfaults on removing files

2008-03-27 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
@John Dong: Can you please check and accept the debdiff ? @Walter Huf : More generally I think we shouldn't rely on backport to fix a bug on a stable release. Backports are meant just for new functionalities. Bugs should be fixed on every concerned supported release. So you're totally right. This

[Bug 207930] [NEW] olive-gtk crashed with PathNotChild in relpath()

2008-03-27 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 113659 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/113659 Public bug reported: Binary package hint: bzr-gtk Binary package hint: bzr-gtk ProblemType: Crash Architecture: i386 Date: Thu Mar 27 20:59:37 2008 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04 ExecutablePath:

[Bug 207930] Re: olive-gtk crashed with PathNotChild in relpath()

2008-03-27 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 113659 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/113659 ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12925767/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12925768/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment

[Bug 113659] Re: [apport] olive-gtk crashed with PathNotChild in relpath()

2008-03-27 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
Looking at the traceback, and after doing some tests, I have noticed that this bug happens when there is a symlink in the path to the bzr branch . ** Changed in: bzr-gtk (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- [apport] olive-gtk crashed with PathNotChild in relpath()

[Bug 204076] [NEW] exaile.py crashed with SIGSEGV in gtk_tree_view_remove_column()

2008-03-19 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: exaile using Ubuntu 8.04 Bug in exaile 0.2.11.1-0ubuntu2 I expected to not have this bug . I just closed exaile and got this bug report. ProblemType: Crash Architecture: i386 Date: Wed Mar 19 23:41:39 2008 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04 ExecutablePath:

[Bug 204076] Re: exaile.py crashed with SIGSEGV in gtk_tree_view_remove_column()

2008-03-19 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
** Attachment added: CoreDump.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12754795/CoreDump.gz ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12754796/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Disassembly.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12754797/Disassembly.txt ** Attachment

[Bug 3339] Re: Ubuntu grub should be deluxe and animated like OpenSUSE grub

2008-03-15 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
@andrea : If I could vote for you being in the ubuntu design team, I would :-) . I agree 100% with what you said. -- Ubuntu grub should be deluxe and animated like OpenSUSE grub https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/3339 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 174277] Re: Launchers under System Preferences and System Administration have similar names, leads to confusion.

2008-03-14 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
Discussion is on going on the ubuntu-devel mailing list . https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel- discuss/2008-March/003575.html -- Launchers under System Preferences and System Administration have similar names, leads to confusion. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174277 You received

[Bug 174277] Re: Launchers under System Preferences and System Administration have similar names, leads to confusion.

2008-03-13 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
** Attachment added: patch for the comment 6 change (gnome-menus) http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12648123/gnome-menus.patch -- Launchers under System Preferences and System Administration have similar names, leads to confusion. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174277 You received this bug

[Bug 174277] Re: Launchers under System Preferences and System Administration have similar names, leads to confusion.

2008-03-13 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
Packages available to test on my PPA. https://edge.launchpad.net/~wattazoum/+archive Please give me some feedbacks so that I can decide whether I do this change or not. -- Launchers under System Preferences and System Administration have similar names, leads to confusion.

[Bug 174277] Re: Launchers under System Preferences and System Administration have similar names, leads to confusion.

2008-03-13 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
* Rename menu items in System Administration * Network = Manage Network * Services = System Startup Services * Shared Folders = System Shared Folders * Time and Date = System Time and Date * Users and Groups = Manage Users and Groups ** Attachment added: gnome-system-tools.patch

[Bug 174277] Re: Launchers under System Preferences and System Administration have similar names, leads to confusion.

2008-03-13 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
* Rename menu items: Remote Desktop = Remote Access Rights ** Attachment added: vino.patch http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12654224/vino.patch -- Launchers under System Preferences and System Administration have similar names, leads to confusion. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174277 You

[Bug 174277] Re: Launchers under System Preferences and System Administration have similar names, leads to confusion.

2008-03-13 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
Just an idea that I had. Please tell me if it's valid and worth the effort : Currently we have 3 entries (by default) in the System Administration menu for Software management (Synaptic, Update Manager, Software source) . I suppose others would have also Adept there. So maybe a submenu is

[Bug 174277] Re: Launchers under System Preferences and System Administration have similar names, leads to confusion.

2008-03-13 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
@john : the easier way to test is to use my PPA https://help.ubuntu.com/7.10/add-applications/C/extra-repositories-adding.html . By the way it's on hardy , I didn't make those changes for gutsy. So you need to have hardy installed ( or to use a Virtual Machine - on VMware for instance) To

[Bug 174277] Re: Launchers under System Preferences and System Administration have similar names, leads to confusion.

2008-03-12 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
Here is the list of desktop files that might be impacted : - Under System - Administration : ~$ grep -e 'Categories=.*System' -r /usr/share/applications/* | grep Settings /usr/share/applications/displayconfig-gtk.desktop:Categories=GNOME;GTK;Settings;HardwareSettings;System;

[Bug 174277] Re: Launchers under System Preferences and System Administration have similar names, leads to confusion.

2008-03-12 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
Well , actually I tried to add vino but with no success. So please just mention in a comment the package that needs to be patch. Affects : vino -- Launchers under System Preferences and System Administration have similar names, leads to confusion. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174277 You

[Bug 174277] Re: Launchers under System = Preferences and System = Administration have similar names, leads to confusion.

2008-03-10 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
I'll try to manage this one. I am not very used to managing Gnome Desktop preferences and settings so any mentoring is welcome :-) . Best regards ** Changed in: ubuntu Assignee: (unassigned) = Oumar Aziz OUATTARA (wattazoum) -- Launchers under System = Preferences and System

[Bug 174277] Re: Launchers under System = Preferences and System = Administration have similar names, leads to confusion.

2008-03-10 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
There is a hot discussion on this topic on Brainstorm. http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/80/ According to the number of positive vote on this idea . I think this bug should be taken care off. -- Launchers under System = Preferences and System = Administration have similar names, leads to

[Bug 174277] Re: Launchers under System = Preferences and System = Administration have similar names, leads to confusion.

2008-03-10 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
Hello, This problem is indeed a naming issue but it's also due to a lack of communication. Even if we rename the menu entries, there will be some users not knowing (guessing?) where to go to do things. After some explanation one thinks it's logic to have those 2 entries, but if there is no help,

[Bug 164924] Re: [needs-packaging] Gladex

2008-03-07 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
am working on (from Upstream) ** Changed in: ubuntu Assignee: (unassigned) = Oumar Aziz OUATTARA (wattazoum) Status: Confirmed = In Progress ** Changed in: gladex Assignee: Charles Edward Pax (pax) = Oumar Aziz OUATTARA (wattazoum) Status: Confirmed = In Progress -- [needs

[Bug 164924] Re: [needs-packaging] Gladex

2008-03-07 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
This won't be available for 0.4 cause I have started the work using the trunk branch. So I am changing the target to milestone 0.5. ** Changed in: gladex Target: None = 0.5 -- [needs-packaging] Gladex https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/164924 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 164924] Re: [needs-packaging] Gladex

2008-03-02 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
The code has been merged in the trunk branch. The packages shall be available starting with gladgardsex 0.5. Regards ** Changed in: gladex Status: In Progress = Fix Committed -- [needs-packaging] Gladex https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/164924 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 176838] Re: Incremental backups should not appear incremental when restoring

2008-02-20 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
** Also affects: sbackup (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Incremental backups should not appear incremental when restoring https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/176838 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for

[Bug 164924] Re: [needs-packaging] Gladex

2008-02-20 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
Hello, I think this software is a great one, and, as recently I have learned packaging I think I can devote myself to this task. I'll contact you for further details. Regards wattazoum -- [needs-packaging] Gladex https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/164924 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 191127] Re: simple-backup-config does not check for validity of regex exclusion rules

2008-02-19 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
Hello, Thank you for your patch. I appreciate a lot your motivation and help. I don't maintain Sbackup (at least for now) anymore but as you have submitted a patch, it would be nice to have it included in Ubuntu for other users. There is a plan to re-merge Sbackup and NSsbackup though. But

[Bug 192571] [NEW] No support for fujitsu-siemens Amilo Pa2548

2008-02-17 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
Public bug reported: Hello, I have a fujitsu-siemens Amilo Pa2548 and the Volume keys doesn't work on Gutsy and Hardy. So I made a patch to add the support of those keys for it. Can you review it and upload on Gutsy and Hardy ? Best Regards Aziz ** Affects: hotkey-setup (Ubuntu)

[Bug 192571] Re: No support for fujitsu-siemens Amilo Pa2548

2008-02-17 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
** Attachment added: Futjitsu-siemens-pa2548-support.patch http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12045610/Futjitsu-siemens-pa2548-support.patch -- No support for fujitsu-siemens Amilo Pa2548 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192571 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 192571] Re: No support for fujitsu-siemens Amilo Pa2548

2008-02-17 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
** Changed in: hotkey-setup (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed ** Attachment added: hotkey-setup_0.1-17ubuntu21.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12045742/hotkey-setup_0.1-17ubuntu21.debdiff -- No support for fujitsu-siemens Amilo Pa2548 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192571 You

[Bug 191127] Re: simple-backup-config does not check for validity of regex exclusion rules

2008-02-11 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
regards wattazoum ** Also affects: nssbackup Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: nssbackup Importance: Undecided = High Assignee: (unassigned) = Oumar Aziz OUATTARA (wattazoum) Status: New = Confirmed -- simple-backup-config does not check for validity of regex

[Bug 191127] Re: simple-backup-config does not check for validity of regex exclusion rules

2008-02-11 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
I confirm the Bug for NSsbackup also. ** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- simple-backup-config does not check for validity of regex exclusion rules https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191127 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 191127] Re: simple-backup-config does not check for validity of regex exclusion rules

2008-02-11 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
oops, I meant Sbackup ** Also affects: sbackup Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: sbackup Status: New = Confirmed -- simple-backup-config does not check for validity of regex exclusion rules https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191127 You received this bug

[Bug 188288] Re: NautilusMenuItemDetails not defined in header file

2008-02-09 Thread Oumar Aziz OUATTARA
well the patch has been rejected by the nautilus-list so , I am closing this bug . ** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Invalid -- NautilusMenuItemDetails not defined in header file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188288 You received this bug notification because you are a

  1   2   >