This isn't on anyone's roadmap and nobody has provided a patch for it in
15 years - so its just clogging up bugzilla. That doesn't mean it isn't
a good idea - it just means nobody is planning on working on it. If
someone works on it then this should be opened as a new issue.
--
You received this
We are in a period where ftp is clearly deprecated and in general,
making changes to the code is riskier than letting it ride unless there
is a patch and reviewer available to make a good judgment about it. So
I'm going to wontfix ftp bugs related to enhancements, interop errors,
etc.. We will be b
ignore comment 15 - this bug wasn't supposed to be in that list
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/308952
Title:
FireFTP(Mozilla) cannot LIST files
To manage notifications about this bug
** Attachment added: "from /var/crash"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/1797782/+attachment/5228354/+files/_usr_bin_evince.1000.crash
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/b
I now have 23 hours of uptime thanks to 4.10.0-22 #24 from zesty
proposed. That's a zesty record for me :)
thanks.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1674838
Title:
kernel BUG at /build/
(In reply to Henrik Skupin (:whimboo) from comment #25)
>
> So would this be doable as a browser chrome test?
you can probably write an xpcshell test that sets some http proxy
address along with a PROXYCONFIG_MANUAL setting and then test the
results of a nsIProtocolProxyService.asyncResolve invoca
*** Bug 886973 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1194841
Title:
Firefox 22 uses stale manual proxy settings when configured to use
syste
(In reply to Gary Houston from comment #36)
> One thing puzzles me: why does google.com still work when a broken
> manual proxy is configured?
probly using ssl and that either takes a slightly different code path or
your old stale proxy config didn't cover that.
--
You received this bug notifica
is this a dup of 87717 (which was fixed in ff18)?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207456
Title:
refuses to connect to localhost http server when in offline mode
To manage notification
i would think you can carry the sr forward
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367531
Title:
firefox should be smarter about offline access
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
h
>
> (In reply to Patrick McManus [:mcmanus] from comment #41)
> > ::: browser/base/content/test/browser_bug435325.js
> > @@ +40,5 @@
> > >finish();
> > > }
> > >
> > > registerCleanupFunction(function() {
> > > + Services.
Comment on attachment 657902
Unbitrot
Review of attachment 657902:
-
The net effect of this is going to mean the socket thread stays constant
even when offline/online events occur. I think that's a really good
thing and it will elimi
>
> I'm also seeing warnings about potential deadlock again. Is this just a
> conservative warning, or something to be addressed?
>
That's quite real.. I think the reset() logic should take care of it -
are you confident this is fixed?
> Output:
>
> > ###!!! ASSERTION: Potential deadlock dete
(In reply to Laszlo Ersek from comment #262)
> Since the fix has been backed out, please consider reopening this BZ. Thanks!
it would just be a dup of the work being done in bug 769764, you can
follow it over there.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, w
backed out in bug 767005
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/113201
Title:
firefox spends lots of time hung
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefo
(In reply to Christian :Biesinger (don't email me, ping me on IRC) from
comment #30)
> +++ b/netwerk/protocol/http/nsHttpChannel.cpp
> -if (offline)
> -mLoadFlags |= LOAD_ONLY_FROM_CACHE;
>
> hrm, so I see why you're doing this, but a better solution would be highly
> desirabl
there's an idl change here, so don't forget the sr.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367531
Title:
firefox should be smarter about offline access
To manage notifications about this bug
Comment on attachment 619220
netwerk: Add offline mode to DNS service and STS. Add RESOLVE_OFFLINE flag for
nsHostResolver.
Review of attachment 619220:
-
r=mcmanus with the processpendingevnets() issue addressed. Thanks!
::: netw
Comment on attachment 575552
netwerk: single check for observer service before notifying
Review of attachment 575552:
-
I'll steal the review, because there is at least one significant
problem..
but, first, thanks Adam for the patch
me too: ubuntu 10.04 - 2.6.32-23
[433560.791484] i915 D 8800b8f93028 0 742 2 0x
[433560.791489] 8800b6f11d20 0046 00015bc0
00015bc0
[433560.791494] 8800b942df80 8800b6f11fd8 00015bc0
8800b942dbc0
[433560.791498
Public bug reported:
kubuntu 9.04 on amd64... I get this crash several times a day:
Application: Plasma Workspace (plasma), signal SIGSEGV
0x7fa214ac6d21 in nanosleep () from /lib/libc.so.6
[Current thread is 0 (LWP 20077)]
Thread 2 (Thread 0x7fa1fc549950 (LWP 20078)):
#0 pthread_cond_wait@
Public bug reported:
/home/mcmanus/t/t>lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 8.04.1
Release:8.04
/home/mcmanus/t/t>apt-cache policy libc6
libc6:
Installed: 2.7-10ubuntu3
Candidate: 2.7-10ubuntu3
Version table:
*** 2.7-10ubuntu3 0
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com hardy/main
22 matches
Mail list logo
