[Bug 816724] [NEW] error on console

2011-07-26 Thread Paul Elliott
Public bug reported: When running kdiff3 comparing 2 directories the following message appears on the console: $ kdiff3 maitreya-6.0.3 maitreya-6.0.5 QInotifyFileSystemWatcherEngine::addPaths: inotify_add_watch failed: No such file or directory QFileSystemWatcher: failed to add paths:

[Bug 806720] [NEW] gimp crashes on invocation

2011-07-06 Thread Paul Elliott
Public bug reported: I have installed kubuntu 11.04 and gimp. Crashes on startup. pelliott@hrnowl:~$ gimp --version GNU Image Manipulation Program version 2.6.11 pelliott@hrnowl:~$ gimp (gimp:3823): GLib-WARNING **: /build/buildd/glib2.0-2.28.6/./glib/goption.c:2132: ignoring no-arg,

[Bug 609976] Re: pin entry dialog zips in and out of view before anyone can input anything

2011-03-23 Thread Paul Elliott
I have the same problem but only when I am ssh -X ed into another X server! It does not happen when I am not using ssh -X on either the x-server or the x-client. I am already using pinentry-qt4! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 737860] [NEW] Impress Insert Movie Sound fails to play

2011-03-18 Thread Paul Elliott
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: openoffice.org If I add an ogg sound file to a slide with Insert/Movie and Sound and then display the slide show. The sound does not play. This bug exists at slide creation time. If I create the slide with the version of OO that comes with debian 5 and

[Bug 737860] Re: Impress Insert Movie Sound fails to play

2011-03-18 Thread Paul Elliott
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/737860 Title: Impress Insert Movie Sound fails to play -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 737860] Re: Impress Insert Movie Sound fails to play

2011-03-18 Thread Paul Elliott
If I add an ogg file with insert/movie and sound. then play the slide show and verify sound does not play. Next save the presentation. Reopen presentation still does not play. Exit OO. Copy the X.odp to X.zip. unzip the X.zip. edit the file content.xml changing href=media/tromba.ogg to

[Bug 737860] Re: Impress Insert Movie Sound fails to play

2011-03-18 Thread Paul Elliott
If I add an ogg file with insert/movie and sound. then play the slide show and verify sound does not play. Next save the presentation. Reopen presentation still does not play. Exit OO. Copy the X.odp to X.zip. unzip the X.zip. edit the file content.xml changing href=media/tromba.ogg to

[Bug 737860] Re: Impress Insert Movie Sound fails to play

2011-03-18 Thread Paul Elliott
If I add an ogg file with insert/movie and sound. then play the slide show and verify sound does not play. Next save the presentation. Reopen presentation still does not play. Exit OO. Copy the X.odp to X.zip. unzip the X.zip. edit the file content.xml changing

[Bug 737860] Re: Impress Insert Movie Sound fails to play

2011-03-18 Thread Paul Elliott
If I add an ogg file with insert/movie and sound. then play the slide show and verify sound does not play. Next save the presentation. Reopen presentation still does not play. Exit OO. Copy the X.odp to X.zip. unzip the X.zip. edit the file content.xml changing

[Bug 737860] Re: Impress Insert Movie Sound fails to play

2011-03-18 Thread Paul Elliott
If I add an ogg file with insert/movie and sound. then play the slide show and verify sound does not play. Next save the presentation. Reopen presentation still does not play. Exit OO. Copy the X.odp to X.zip. unzip the X.zip. edit the file content.xml changing

[Bug 737860] Re: Impress Insert Movie Sound fails to play

2011-03-18 Thread Paul Elliott
If I add an ogg file with insert/movie and sound. then play the slide show and verify sound does not play. Next save the presentation. Reopen presentation still does not play. Exit OO. Copy the X.odp to X.zip. unzip the X.zip. edit the file content.xml changing

[Bug 651678] Re: crashes with assertion failure on startup

2011-03-15 Thread Paul Elliott
I am also aflected by the anjuta version of this bug! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/651678 Title: crashes with assertion failure on startup -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 651678] Re: crashes with assertion failure on startup

2011-03-15 Thread Paul Elliott
I am also aflected by the anjuta version of this bug! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/651678 Title: crashes with assertion failure on startup -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 651678] Re: crashes with assertion failure on startup

2011-03-15 Thread Paul Elliott
I am also afflicted by the anjuta version of this bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/651678 Title: crashes with assertion failure on startup -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 723755] Re: When using Samba authenticating via Kerberos against a windows AD, winbind hangs on boot

2011-03-10 Thread Paul Elliott
Hi Chuck - what logs would you like and from what point? The point being I wasn't getting a lot of logs - samba would fail with a rather obscure failure to connect if you attempted to access the shares at that point, and obviously winbind was not logging anything as it had hung. The fix was purely

[Bug 723755] Re: When using Samba authenticating via Kerberos against a windows AD, winbind hangs on boot

2011-03-10 Thread Paul Elliott
Hi Chuck - what logs would you like and from what point? The point being I wasn't getting a lot of logs - samba would fail with a rather obscure failure to connect if you attempted to access the shares at that point, and obviously winbind was not logging anything as it had hung. The fix was purely

[Bug 723755] [NEW] When using Samba authenticating via Kerberos against a windows AD, winbind hangs on boot

2011-02-23 Thread Paul Elliott
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba Hi all, I recently set about making a linux box (Ubuntu Server LTS 10.04) authenticate against a windows based AD via Kerberos, in order to provide shares which would accept domain logins. Everything (eventually) went fine with this, until I

[Bug 723755] [NEW] When using Samba authenticating via Kerberos against a windows AD, winbind hangs on boot

2011-02-23 Thread Paul Elliott
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba Hi all, I recently set about making a linux box (Ubuntu Server LTS 10.04) authenticate against a windows based AD via Kerberos, in order to provide shares which would accept domain logins. Everything (eventually) went fine with this, until I

[Bug 657840] Re: Kplayer does not upgrade because a file conflicts with kplayer-data

2010-12-07 Thread Paul Elliott
This problem prevented my from installing ubuntu data. this was error message: E: /var/cache/apt/archives/kplayer-data_1%3a0.7-2ubuntu1_all.deb: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps/kplayer.png', which is also in package kplayer 1 -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 657840] Re: Kplayer does not upgrade because a file conflicts with kplayer-data

2010-12-07 Thread Paul Elliott
This problem prevented my from installing ubuntu data. this was error message: E: /var/cache/apt/archives/kplayer-data_1%3a0.7-2ubuntu1_all.deb: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps/kplayer.png', which is also in package kplayer 1 -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 657840] Re: Kplayer does not upgrade because a file conflicts with kplayer-data

2010-12-07 Thread Paul Elliott
This problem prevented my from installing kplayer-data. this was error message: E: /var/cache/apt/archives/kplayer-data_1%3a0.7-2ubuntu1_all.deb: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps/kpl -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 582491] Re: ganeti2 just doesn't work

2010-08-25 Thread Paul Elliott
SRU verification report: I have replicated the original failure of the gnt-instance command from 2.0.5-1 and have successfully verified that 2.0.5-1ubuntu0.1 from lucid-proposed successfully resolves the (exception) issue. ** Tags added: verification-done ** Tags removed: verification-needed

[Bug 570513] Re: NIS-based autofs maps don't load on startup

2010-08-18 Thread Paul Elliott
This should be fixed when bug 569757 is fixed (migration of NIS to upstart). -- NIS-based autofs maps don't load on startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/570513 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nis in ubuntu. --

[Bug 108737] Re: [apport] ypbind crashed with SIGSEGV in test_bindings_once()

2010-08-18 Thread Paul Elliott
Both Ubuntu Edgy and Feisty are EOL (end of life) and no longer supported. Please let us know if you come across this issue again in any of the supported releases: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases ** Changed in: nis (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Invalid -- [apport] ypbind crashed with

[Bug 570513] Re: NIS-based autofs maps don't load on startup

2010-08-18 Thread Paul Elliott
This should be fixed when bug 569757 is fixed (migration of NIS to upstart). -- NIS-based autofs maps don't load on startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/570513 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing

[Bug 108737] Re: [apport] ypbind crashed with SIGSEGV in test_bindings_once()

2010-08-18 Thread Paul Elliott
Both Ubuntu Edgy and Feisty are EOL (end of life) and no longer supported. Please let us know if you come across this issue again in any of the supported releases: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases ** Changed in: nis (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Invalid -- [apport] ypbind crashed with

[Bug 569757] Re: NIS upstart dependancy broken for lucid

2010-08-17 Thread Paul Elliott
Branch added that switches to upstart for the NIS package in Maverick. We've had a version of this branch running locally for a couple of months now with no known issues although we are only using the client side of the package. I've done very limited testing of the server side. Feedback

[Bug 569757] Re: NIS upstart dependancy broken for lucid

2010-08-17 Thread Paul Elliott
Branch added that switches to upstart for the NIS package in Maverick. We've had a version of this branch running locally for a couple of months now with no known issues although we are only using the client side of the package. I've done very limited testing of the server side. Feedback

[Bug 489142] Re: All scripts in /usr/share/cacti/cli have a wrong path to the include directory

2010-08-17 Thread Paul Elliott
) Assignee: (unassigned) = Paul Elliott (omahn) ** Changed in: cacti (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- All scripts in /usr/share/cacti/cli have a wrong path to the include directory https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/489142 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 590133] Re: [data-loss] Trying to keep backups 'forever' ends up keeping backups 6 months

2010-08-17 Thread Paul Elliott
@mterry - I've attempted to test the update in -proposed but your script fails with the following: File forever-test.py, line 135, in run success = method() File forever-test.py, line 247, in forever backup_simple() File forever-test.py, line 226, in backup_simple

[Bug 512253] Re: Mistake in /etc/network/interfaces keeps the system from booting

2010-08-17 Thread Paul Elliott
SRU verification for Lucid: I have reproduced the problem with ifupdown 0.6.8ubuntu29 in lucid and have verified that ifupdown 0.6.8ubuntu29.1 in lucid-proposed fixes the issue. ** Tags added: verification-done ** Tags removed: verification-needed -- Mistake in /etc/network/interfaces keeps

[Bug 493156] Re: Please enable CONFIG_TASK_DELAY_ACCT

2010-08-08 Thread Paul Elliott
SRU justification IMPACT: Without this option enabled tools such as iotop are missing functionality that is extremely useful for diagnosing performance issues. DEVELOPMENT BRANCH: The option CONFIG_TASK_DELAY_ACCT was enabled in Mavericks kernel 2.6.35-5.6 without any reported regressions.

[Bug 493156] Re: Please enable CONFIG_TASK_DELAY_ACCT

2010-08-07 Thread Paul Elliott
Please can a SRU be initiated to enable CONFIG_TASK_DELAY_ACCT in Lucid given the LTS nature of Lucid. It's extremely useful to have full statistics in iotop and in our server testing having this option enabled has no noticeable performance hit. -- Please enable CONFIG_TASK_DELAY_ACCT

[Bug 539460] Re: Hardy images fail to build with 0.12.2-0ubuntu3

2010-07-19 Thread Paul Elliott
Successfully verified that 0.12.4-0ubuntu0.1 fixes the issue and can successfully build hardy images again. ** Tags added: verification-done ** Tags removed: verification-needed -- Hardy images fail to build with 0.12.2-0ubuntu3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/539460 You received this bug

[Bug 539460] Re: Hardy images fail to build with 0.12.2-0ubuntu3

2010-07-19 Thread Paul Elliott
Successfully verified that 0.12.4-0ubuntu0.1 fixes the issue and can successfully build hardy images again. ** Tags added: verification-done ** Tags removed: verification-needed -- Hardy images fail to build with 0.12.2-0ubuntu3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/539460 You received this bug

[Bug 557890] Re: transfer lockup connecting to a NetApp/CIFS share

2010-07-08 Thread Paul Elliott
We've just found that disabling extended attributes with either the nouser_xattr mount option or by disabling CONFIG_CIFS_XATTR in the kernel, will allow us to use a NetApp CIFS mount albeit without the extended attribute support. Can anyone else confirm that disabling extended attribute support

[Bug 569757] Re: NIS upstart dependancy broken for lucid

2010-06-29 Thread Paul Elliott
Emil, rather than remove, it would probably be safer to just rename the /etc/init.d/nis script to prevent it firing. We have a local package here with the necessary changes and it appears to work fine. After a bit more testing I'll upload for others to review. -- NIS upstart dependancy broken

[Bug 569757] Re: NIS upstart dependancy broken for lucid

2010-06-29 Thread Paul Elliott
Emil, rather than remove, it would probably be safer to just rename the /etc/init.d/nis script to prevent it firing. We have a local package here with the necessary changes and it appears to work fine. After a bit more testing I'll upload for others to review. -- NIS upstart dependancy broken

[Bug 569757] Re: NIS upstart dependancy broken for lucid

2010-06-11 Thread Paul Elliott
** Attachment added: ypbind upstart script http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50135877/ypbind.conf -- NIS upstart dependancy broken for lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569757 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nis in

[Bug 569757] Re: NIS upstart dependancy broken for lucid

2010-06-11 Thread Paul Elliott
** Attachment added: yppasswd upstart script http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50135878/yppasswdd.conf -- NIS upstart dependancy broken for lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569757 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nis

[Bug 569757] Re: NIS upstart dependancy broken for lucid

2010-06-11 Thread Paul Elliott
** Attachment added: ypserv upstart script http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50135885/ypserv.conf -- NIS upstart dependancy broken for lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569757 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nis in

[Bug 569757] Re: NIS upstart dependancy broken for lucid

2010-06-11 Thread Paul Elliott
** Attachment added: ypxfrd upstart script http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50135892/ypxfrd.conf -- NIS upstart dependancy broken for lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569757 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nis in

[Bug 569757] Re: NIS upstart dependancy broken for lucid

2010-06-11 Thread Paul Elliott
Please find attached my first attempt at converting the nis init script to upstart jobs. Please can others review and let me know how these look? I've tested the client side (with ypbind) here and that works well. I've done very little testing with the server components other than checking they

[Bug 569757] Re: NIS upstart dependancy broken for lucid

2010-06-11 Thread Paul Elliott
** Attachment added: ypbind upstart script http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50135877/ypbind.conf -- NIS upstart dependancy broken for lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569757 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 569757] Re: NIS upstart dependancy broken for lucid

2010-06-11 Thread Paul Elliott
** Attachment added: yppasswd upstart script http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50135878/yppasswdd.conf -- NIS upstart dependancy broken for lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569757 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 569757] Re: NIS upstart dependancy broken for lucid

2010-06-11 Thread Paul Elliott
** Attachment added: ypserv upstart script http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50135885/ypserv.conf -- NIS upstart dependancy broken for lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569757 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 569757] Re: NIS upstart dependancy broken for lucid

2010-06-11 Thread Paul Elliott
** Attachment added: ypxfrd upstart script http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50135892/ypxfrd.conf -- NIS upstart dependancy broken for lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569757 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 569757] Re: NIS upstart dependancy broken for lucid

2010-06-11 Thread Paul Elliott
Please find attached my first attempt at converting the nis init script to upstart jobs. Please can others review and let me know how these look? I've tested the client side (with ypbind) here and that works well. I've done very little testing with the server components other than checking they

[Bug 571999] Re: package wine1.2 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade when both wine and wine1.2 are installed

2010-06-09 Thread Paul Elliott
Successfully verified both the original issue (steps -- package wine1.2 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade when both wine and wine1.2 are installed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/571999 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 571999] Re: package wine1.2 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade when both wine and wine1.2 are installed

2010-06-09 Thread Paul Elliott
(sorry, click happy) Successfully confirmed both the original issue after following steps 1-5 and that the -proposed update fixes the issue by verifying steps 6-9. ** Tags added: verification-done ** Tags removed: verification-needed -- package wine1.2 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade

[Bug 584560] Re: get-iplayer broken by BBC changes, simple fix enclosed.

2010-06-03 Thread Paul Elliott
Successfully verified that 2.66-1ubuntu1 from lucid-proposed can now download streams again. (Used different program to download than original reported as the quoted PID is no longer valid.) ** Tags added: verification-done ** Tags removed: verification-needed -- get-iplayer broken by BBC

[Bug 569273] Re: memory leak in gnome-power-manager on lucid

2010-06-03 Thread Paul Elliott
Can I just verify the test case, is to simply run the gnome-power- manager from -proposed for a while and check if the memory usage is reasonable? -- memory leak in gnome-power-manager on lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569273 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 586306] Re: software-center crashed with TypeError in display_search()

2010-06-03 Thread Paul Elliott
Successfully verified that software-center 2.0.5 from lucid-proposed installs fine and can perform searches from the installed applications section. ** Tags added: verification-done ** Tags removed: verification-needed -- software-center crashed with TypeError in display_search()

[Bug 579281] Re: http method for msn protocoll does not work when behind a proxy

2010-06-03 Thread Paul Elliott
** Tags added: verification-done ** Tags removed: verification-needed -- http method for msn protocoll does not work when behind a proxy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579281 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 548920] Re: resizing sidebar corrupts navigation buttons

2010-06-03 Thread Paul Elliott
Successfully verified that software-center 2.0.5 from lucid-proposed no longer shows distorted back/forward buttons when resizing using the middle pane slider. (Tested under VirtualBox after replicating the original fault in 2.0.4) ** Tags added: verification-done ** Tags removed:

[Bug 533747] Re: themonospot file missing

2010-06-03 Thread Paul Elliott
I've been unable to replicate the original fault in 0.7.3.1-4 from lucid, when installing on a fresh machine the package installs and themonospot runs fine. Have you both had a copy of the themonospot installed from a previous release? -- themonospot file missing

[Bug 456468] Re: upgrade triggers nm-applet resource not found ... missing icon nm-applet-device

2010-06-03 Thread Paul Elliott
Can anyone clarify what the test case is for this proposed update? -- upgrade triggers nm-applet resource not found ... missing icon nm-applet-device https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/456468 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 573591] Re: Uploads greater than 64 kilobytes corrupted when using Apache mod_fcgid

2010-06-03 Thread Paul Elliott
** Tags added: verification-done ** Tags removed: verification-needed -- Uploads greater than 64 kilobytes corrupted when using Apache mod_fcgid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/573591 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 557890] Re: transfer lockup connecting to a NetApp/CIFS share

2010-06-02 Thread Paul Elliott
We have also verified that the issue exists in v7.3.3 and have reported the issue to NetApp. -- transfer lockup connecting to a NetApp/CIFS share https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557890 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 582539] Re: mistake in upstart-script

2010-05-21 Thread Paul Elliott
Hi Dave, thanks for the clarification on the version number! I've corrected the debdiff and reattached. Thanks, Paul. ** Patch removed: Fix typo http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48708293/vsftpd_2.2.2-3ubuntu7.debdiff ** Patch added: Debdiff to fix typo

[Bug 582539] Re: mistake in upstart-script

2010-05-21 Thread Paul Elliott
Hi Dave, thanks for the clarification on the version number! I've corrected the debdiff and reattached. Thanks, Paul. ** Patch removed: Fix typo http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48708293/vsftpd_2.2.2-3ubuntu7.debdiff ** Patch added: Debdiff to fix typo

[Bug 582539] Re: mistake in upstart-script

2010-05-19 Thread Paul Elliott
I believe the attached debdiff corrects the typo. Subscribing main sponsors. ** Patch added: Fix typo http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48708293/vsftpd_2.2.2-3ubuntu7.debdiff -- mistake in upstart-script https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/582539 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 582539] Re: mistake in upstart-script

2010-05-19 Thread Paul Elliott
I believe the attached debdiff corrects the typo. Subscribing main sponsors. ** Patch added: Fix typo http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48708293/vsftpd_2.2.2-3ubuntu7.debdiff -- mistake in upstart-script https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/582539 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 566127] Re: Picture of the day does not work

2010-05-16 Thread Paul Elliott
Successfully verified that kdeplasma-addons 4:4.4.2-0ubuntu2 from lucid- proposed restores the previously broken 'Picture of the day' functionality to the picture widget. ** Tags added: verification-done ** Tags removed: verification-needed -- Picture of the day does not work

[Bug 578841] Re: unetbootin should contain the 10.04 LTS as an install option

2010-05-15 Thread Paul Elliott
Successfully verified that unetbootin 408-1ubuntu0.10.04.1 from lucid- proposed successfully lists Lucid and works as intended. ** Tags added: verification-done ** Tags removed: verification-needed -- unetbootin should contain the 10.04 LTS as an install option

[Bug 577540] Re: Provided by Ubuntu leaks memory

2010-05-15 Thread Paul Elliott
Testing with the original software-center 2.0.3 showed an increase of ~10 megabytes on each reload of the software list, 2.0.4 from lucid- proposed no longer leaks to this extent although usage of the app does still increase slightly over time. As the remaining leak is small I'm happy to mark this

[Bug 557890] Re: transfer lockup connecting to a NetApp/CIFS share

2010-05-14 Thread Paul Elliott
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Confirmed -- transfer lockup connecting to a NetApp/CIFS share https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557890 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 570583] Re: does not check all required locks in is_package_system_locked

2010-05-13 Thread Paul Elliott
I'm not sure 0.1.20.1 from lucid-proposed fixes the issue, after following the test case and installing the proposed package, update- manager does not appear at all on my system in the final step when issuing: NO_FAKE_STAT=1 faketime -f +10d update-notifier This is even when no other apt

[Bug 570583] Re: does not check all required locks in is_package_system_locked

2010-05-13 Thread Paul Elliott
** Tags added: verification-failed ** Tags removed: verification-needed -- does not check all required locks in is_package_system_locked https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/570583 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 553082] Re: hangs while opening trash if there are files with emblems inside

2010-05-13 Thread Paul Elliott
I've tested with 1.6.1-0ubuntu1build1 from lucid-proposed and my Nautilus window still hangs when opening the trash that already contains an icon with an emblem created with the older GVFS. Does the fix simply address files with emblems added after installing 1.6.1-0ubuntu1build1 from

[Bug 553082] Re: hangs while opening trash if there are files with emblems inside

2010-05-13 Thread Paul Elliott
** Tags added: verification-failed ** Tags removed: verification-needed -- hangs while opening trash if there are files with emblems inside https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/553082 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 557890] Re: transfer lockup connecting to a NetApp/CIFS share

2010-05-13 Thread Paul Elliott
I also have this on Lucid. We're attempting to mount a CIFS share from a NetApp 3070 using pam_mount at login. Attempts to login at GDM produce the same kernel errors as provided by OP and result in the login hanging. -- transfer lockup connecting to a NetApp/CIFS share

[Bug 557890] Re: transfer lockup connecting to a NetApp/CIFS share

2010-05-13 Thread Paul Elliott
Verified that the problem still exists in 2.6.34-020634rc6-generic from the mainline kernel repo. -- transfer lockup connecting to a NetApp/CIFS share https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557890 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 91432] Re: Restarts dbus in postinst

2010-05-12 Thread Paul Elliott
With smart-notifier 0.28-2 from lucid I see the dbus restart on postinst (resulting in my desktop session getting terminated). I'm happy to confirm that with smart-notifier 0.28-2ubuntu1 from lucid-proposed this no longer happens and it installs cleanly. ** Tags added: verification-done ** Tags

[Bug 571734] Re: crashes if a package fails to get marked for upgrade

2010-05-12 Thread Paul Elliott
Successfully installed and verified unattended-upgrades 0.55ubuntu4 from lucid-proposed fixes the typo. ** Tags added: verification-done ** Tags removed: verification-needed -- crashes if a package fails to get marked for upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/571734 You received this bug

[Bug 252686] Re: Reload action on init script kills daemon

2010-04-06 Thread Paul Elliott
The 4.69-2ubuntu0.1 package from hardy-proposed fixes the issue on my test machines. Can anyone else also provide verification? -- Reload action on init script kills daemon https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252686 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team,

[Bug 252686] Re: Reload action on init script kills daemon

2010-04-06 Thread Paul Elliott
The 4.69-2ubuntu0.1 package from hardy-proposed fixes the issue on my test machines. Can anyone else also provide verification? -- Reload action on init script kills daemon https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252686 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 252686] Re: Reload action on init script kills daemon

2010-04-01 Thread Paul Elliott
@Thierry: Well spotted, strange that it still worked without the command at the end of the parameters to start-stop-daemon. Anyway, please find attached a corrected debdiff. ** Attachment added: exim4_4.69-2ubuntu0.1.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42785694/exim4_4.69-2ubuntu0.1.debdiff

[Bug 252686] Re: Reload action on init script kills daemon

2010-04-01 Thread Paul Elliott
@Thierry: Well spotted, strange that it still worked without the command at the end of the parameters to start-stop-daemon. Anyway, please find attached a corrected debdiff. ** Attachment added: exim4_4.69-2ubuntu0.1.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42785694/exim4_4.69-2ubuntu0.1.debdiff

[Bug 252686] Re: Reload action on init script kills daemon

2010-03-31 Thread Paul Elliott
** Changed in: exim4 (Ubuntu Hardy) Assignee: (unassigned) = Paul Elliott (omahns-home) ** Changed in: exim4 (Ubuntu Hardy) Status: Triaged = In Progress -- Reload action on init script kills daemon https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252686 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 252686] Re: Reload action on init script kills daemon

2010-03-31 Thread Paul Elliott
SRU: Minimal patch to fix 'reload' action in exim4 init script I would like to nominate this for SRU in Hardy. Newer releases do not have this issue as the underlying problem in init-functions is fixed: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/hardy/+source/exim4/+bug/252686/comments/2 Currently it's

[Bug 252686] Re: Reload action on init script kills daemon

2010-03-31 Thread Paul Elliott
Hi John, Thanks for your pointers, I've updated the target to hardy-proposed and corrected the version number. Please find the updated debdiff attached. Please can somebody provide sponsorship and upload to hardy-proposed for further testing? Thanks, Paul. ** Attachment added: Corrected

[Bug 252686] Re: Reload action on init script kills daemon

2010-03-31 Thread Paul Elliott
Hi John, Thanks for your pointers, I've updated the target to hardy-proposed and corrected the version number. Please find the updated debdiff attached. Please can somebody provide sponsorship and upload to hardy-proposed for further testing? Thanks, Paul. ** Attachment added: Corrected

[Bug 252686] Re: Reload action on init script kills daemon

2010-03-31 Thread Paul Elliott
** Changed in: exim4 (Ubuntu Hardy) Assignee: (unassigned) = Paul Elliott (omahns-home) ** Changed in: exim4 (Ubuntu Hardy) Status: Triaged = In Progress -- Reload action on init script kills daemon https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252686 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 252686] Re: Reload action on init script kills daemon

2010-03-31 Thread Paul Elliott
SRU: Minimal patch to fix 'reload' action in exim4 init script I would like to nominate this for SRU in Hardy. Newer releases do not have this issue as the underlying problem in init-functions is fixed: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/hardy/+source/exim4/+bug/252686/comments/2 Currently it's

[Bug 546677] Re: Puppet fails silently if etckeeper isn't installed

2010-03-25 Thread Paul Elliott
Confirmed - currently marks etckeeper as suggested rather than depends. ** Changed in: puppet (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- Puppet fails silently if etckeeper isn't installed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/546677 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 546677] Re: Puppet fails silently if etckeeper isn't installed

2010-03-25 Thread Paul Elliott
Confirmed - currently marks etckeeper as suggested rather than depends. ** Changed in: puppet (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- Puppet fails silently if etckeeper isn't installed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/546677 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 402260] Re: [Needs SRU] segfault when running Xdmx

2010-03-08 Thread Paul Elliott
Verified - I'm also happy to report that the karmic-proposed packages fix this issue. -- [Needs SRU] segfault when running Xdmx https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/402260 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 461793] Re: virtualbox-ose-modules-2.6.24-27-generic is missing

2010-03-08 Thread Paul Elliott
Verified - I'm happy to report that virtualbox-ose- modules-2.6.24-27-generic from hardy-proposed installs and works perfectly well on Hardy 8.04 LTS. -- virtualbox-ose-modules-2.6.24-27-generic is missing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/461793 You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 497842] Re: debconf sets wrong server for zoneedit

2010-03-06 Thread Paul Elliott
Verified - I'm happy to report that ddclient 3.8.0-4ubuntu1.1 from karmic-proposed correctly connects to dynamic.zoneedit.com. -- debconf sets wrong server for zoneedit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/497842 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 530632] Re: Upgrading from 8.04 to 10.04 fails on update-initramfs

2010-03-06 Thread Paul Elliott
** Tags added: hardy2lucid -- Upgrading from 8.04 to 10.04 fails on update-initramfs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/530632 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 530632] Re: Upgrading from 8.04 to 10.04 fails on update-initramfs

2010-03-03 Thread Paul Elliott
** Tags added: lucid -- Upgrading from 8.04 to 10.04 fails on update-initramfs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/530632 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 530632] Re: Upgrading from 8.04 to 10.04 fails on update-initramfs

2010-03-03 Thread Paul Elliott
I've now replicated this on a clean install of 8.04 when upgrading to 10.04, screenshot attached showing the point of failure. ** Attachment added: initramfs-fail.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40055365/initramfs-fail.png -- Upgrading from 8.04 to 10.04 fails on update-initramfs

[Bug 530632] Re: Upgrading from 8.04 to 10.04 fails on update-initramfs

2010-03-03 Thread Paul Elliott
Logs from /var/log/dist-upgrade from one of our test hosts (puppet2). ** Attachment added: 530632-dist-upgrade.tar.bz2 http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40064478/530632-dist-upgrade.tar.bz2 -- Upgrading from 8.04 to 10.04 fails on update-initramfs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/530632 You

[Bug 530632] Re: Upgrading from 8.04 to 10.04 fails on update-initramfs

2010-03-03 Thread Paul Elliott
A little piece of extra information that may be useful. Before I start the do-release-upgrade the file /etc/modprobe.d/arch-aliases exists as a symlink to ./arch/i386 but something appears to be removing it before the update-initramfs runs resulting in the error and failed upgrade. This leaves the

[Bug 522910] Re: hardy installation fails to take direct route to lucid

2010-03-02 Thread Paul Elliott
Please can you post the contents of /etc/update-manager/release- upgrades, it should look something like this unless it has been changed: # default behavior for the release upgrader # [DEFAULT] # default prompting behavior, valid options: # never - never prompt for a new distribution version #

[Bug 530632] [NEW] Upgrading from 8.04 to 10.04 fails on update-initramfs

2010-03-02 Thread Paul Elliott
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: initramfs-tools For the past 3 days (at least) I have been failing to upgrade 8.04 to 10.04 with do-release-upgrade -d due to a failure in the update- initramfs trigger. The terminal output is shown below: Processing triggers for initramfs-tools ...

[Bug 527605] Re: kubuntu 8.04 - 10.04 upgrade fails, due to likely dependency cycle

2010-02-25 Thread Paul Elliott
Same here on a 8.04 server install when trying to upgrade with do- release-upgrade -d. ** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- kubuntu 8.04 - 10.04 upgrade fails, due to likely dependency cycle https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/527605 You received this bug

[Bug 506297] Re: Graphical Ubuntu logo enabled on servers, no more login prompt

2010-02-12 Thread Paul Elliott
Colin, that is fair enough but it seems the level of output is too low for server environments. Is it possible to configure the amount of output with plymouth or would that also require changes to packages? -- Graphical Ubuntu logo enabled on servers, no more login prompt

[Bug 506297] Re: Graphical Ubuntu logo enabled on servers, no more login prompt

2010-02-11 Thread Paul Elliott
+1 for comment #9 from Etienne. Unless Plymouth is absolutely required for the boot process on a server then I don't see what benefits it brings. Feel free to correct me though. I would much rather see every kernel/boot message on a plain text console for my servers. (The opposite applies of

  1   2   >