Same for the Maverick test.
Note that CentOS 5.4 installs fine using both controllers as well as
using LVM and MD.
** Attachment added: 2raid_nomdlvm_Maverick.tar
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/695842/+attachment/1792687/+files/2raid_nomdlvm_Maverick.tar
--
Upon further testing with scenarios with permutations on the following:
- installation to disks involving one or two controllers
- inclusion of LVM
- inclusion of MD (software RAID)
my hypothesis is that the installer is simply getting confused by the
dual controllers.
Some observations:
a)
Also forthcoming is a repetition of scenario (c) above but with
Maverick.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/695842
Title:
Cannot install on HP Proliant DL385 G7 - dual RAID controllers
I've also hit this ('partman-lvm/device_remove_lvm' not having effect).
However, it doesn't manifest itself on KVM guests.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154086
Title:
Installing to
** Attachment added: syslog
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/695842/+attachment/1780025/+files/syslog
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/695842
Title:
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: debian-installer
The installation of Lucid is futile on a HP Proliant DL385 G7 system
(uncertified). Other releases have not been tested at this time.
Logs (syslog and partman) generated during install time (using just one
of the two available RAID
** Attachment added: syslog
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/695766/+attachment/1779843/+files/syslog
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/695766
Title:
[Lucid] Cannot install - unable
** Attachment added: partman
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/695766/+attachment/1779844/+files/partman
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/695766
Title:
The end of syslog contains the following lines:
Dec 28 13:12:22 debootstrap: Selecting previously deselected package base-files.
Dec 28 13:12:22 debootstrap: (Reading database ... 0 files and directories
currently installed.)
Dec 28 13:12:22 debootstrap: dpkg: regarding
** Changed in: debian-installer (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/695766
Title:
[Lucid] Cannot install - unable to execute installed
The syslog file contains the following lines:
Dec 28 13:12:22 debootstrap: Selecting previously deselected package base-files.
Dec 28 13:12:22 debootstrap: (Reading database ... 0 files and directories
currently installed.)
Dec 28 13:12:22 debootstrap: dpkg: regarding
** Attachment added: partman
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/695842/+attachment/1780026/+files/partman
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/695842
Title:
It appears the lag of a few seconds is enough to prevent other network-
required services from starting. I have tried with openvpn and
dhcp3-server. So I need to resort to the same rc.local [1] I had when
the bridge wasn't coming up at all pre-Lucid. I have tested this on
Maverick only.
[1]:
It appears the lag of a few seconds is enough to prevent other network-
required services from starting. I have tried with openvpn and
dhcp3-server. So I need to resort to the same rc.local [1] I had when
the bridge wasn't coming up at all pre-Lucid. I have tested this on
Maverick only.
[1]:
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: bridge-utils
On a fresh (vmbuilder) install of Maverick (server 64-bit) I cannot get
a vanilla bridge to come up upon boot using the standard configuration
method (via /etc/network/interfaces [1]). A manual restart of the
networking service gets it to
Weird. Either there was a recent update or there was a wicked delay for
the bridge to come up because it's working now (with a delay of around 5
seconds). I will try it again soon on my similarly plagued Karmic
machine.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: cron
In Lucid I cannot update the PATH variable via PAM using:
~/.pam_environment
/etc/security/pam_env.conf
Seems that cron supports the pam_env module but leaves out the capacity
to alter PATH. Can we please pull in this feature? Also, only the
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: bridge-utils
On a fresh (vmbuilder) install of Maverick (server 64-bit) I cannot get
a vanilla bridge to come up upon boot using the standard configuration
method (via /etc/network/interfaces [1]). A manual restart of the
networking service gets it to
apport information
** Tags added: apport-collected
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: bridge-utils
On a fresh (vmbuilder) install of Maverick (server 64-bit) I cannot get
a vanilla bridge to come up upon boot using the standard configuration
method (via
Weird. Either there was a recent update or there was a wicked delay for
the bridge to come up because it's working now (with a delay of around 5
seconds). I will try it again soon on my similarly plagued Karmic
machine.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
I tried to confirm but everything went well. From my logs:
-
Setting up tomcat6 (6.0.28-2ubuntu1) ...
Creating config file /etc/default/tomcat6 with new version
Adding system user `tomcat6' (UID 105) ...
Adding new user `tomcat6' (UID 105) with group `tomcat6' ...
Not creating home
You seem to be running Lucid. Huh?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat6 in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/690138
Title:
tomcat6 installation failure on Ubuntu 10.10
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
** Changed in: tomcat6 (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat6 in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/690138
Title:
tomcat6 installation failure on Ubuntu 10.10
--
On a fresh (vmbuilder) install Maverick (server 64-bit) I can't even get
a vanilla bridge to come up via /etc/network/interfaces [1]. A manual
restart of the networking service gets it to work however:
$ sudo /etc/init.d/networking restart
Should I open a new bug or should we change focus of
I tried to confirm but everything went well. From my logs:
-
Setting up tomcat6 (6.0.28-2ubuntu1) ...
Creating config file /etc/default/tomcat6 with new version
Adding system user `tomcat6' (UID 105) ...
Adding new user `tomcat6' (UID 105) with group `tomcat6' ...
Not creating home
You seem to be running Lucid. Huh?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/690138
Title:
tomcat6 installation failure on Ubuntu 10.10
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
** Changed in: tomcat6 (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/690138
Title:
tomcat6 installation failure on Ubuntu 10.10
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
On a fresh (vmbuilder) install Maverick (server 64-bit) I can't even get
a vanilla bridge to come up via /etc/network/interfaces [1]. A manual
restart of the networking service gets it to work however:
$ sudo /etc/init.d/networking restart
Should I open a new bug or should we change focus of
Public bug reported:
A HP Proliant DL360 G6 system running Lucid 64-bit (only certified by
Canonical for 9.04 64bit and 10.10 32bit [1]) is using a dual-port
netxen_nic-based ethernet device.
When ethernet bonding is configured via /etc/network/interfaces [2] the
bonded device appears to exist
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 632554 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/632554
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 632554
tomcat fails to start with: /bin/bash already running.
* You can subscribe to bug 632554 by following this link:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 632554 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/632554
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 632554
tomcat fails to start with: /bin/bash already running.
* You can subscribe to bug 632554 by following this link:
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: vim
it's slow
** Affects: vim (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
it's slow
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/673642
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
apport information
** Tags added: apport-collected
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: vim
it's slow
+ ---
+ Architecture: amd64
+ DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
+ EcryptfsInUse: Yes
+ InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release amd64 (20100427.1)
+ Package: vim
** Changed in: vim (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
it's slow
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/673642
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Public bug reported:
Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS
Linux hostname10 2.6.32-24-generic #42-Ubuntu SMP Fri Aug 20 14:21:58
UTC 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux
This system is experiencing regular lockups and is only accessible via
IPMI (screenshots attached). It is a physical host under heavy load
(couchdb) with some
** Attachment added: lscpi.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/671001/+attachment/1722965/+files/lscpi.txt
--
[lucid] system locks up (system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/671001
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
** Attachment added: 10.20.133.151.jpg
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/671001/+attachment/1722968/+files/10.20.133.151.jpg
--
[lucid] system locks up (system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/671001
You received this bug notification because you
** Attachment added: 10.20.133.151-2.jpg
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/671001/+attachment/1722970/+files/10.20.133.151-2.jpg
--
[lucid] system locks up (system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/671001
You received this bug notification because
** Attachment added: 10.20.133.151-1.jpg
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/671001/+attachment/1722969/+files/10.20.133.151-1.jpg
--
[lucid] system locks up (system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/671001
You received this bug notification because
** Attachment added: 10.20.133.151-3.jpg
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/671001/+attachment/1722971/+files/10.20.133.151-3.jpg
--
[lucid] system locks up (system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/671001
You received this bug notification because
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: bash
The GID variable is not defined upon user GDM login for the bash shell.
I've tested this on Ubuntu releases 9.04 to 10.10 and the behaviour is
the same. I've tested the Zsh shell and I don't see this (GID is
defined).
I believe that this variable
I don't see any mention of umask in the sshd_config man page after
installing 10.10 RC.
--
Openssh5.1p1 sftp file control
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563216
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in ubuntu.
--
OK, it's in the sftp-server man page.
--
Openssh5.1p1 sftp file control
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563216
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
I don't see any mention of umask in the sshd_config man page after
installing 10.10 RC.
--
Openssh5.1p1 sftp file control
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563216
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
OK, it's in the sftp-server man page.
--
Openssh5.1p1 sftp file control
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563216
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Installed. Looks normal. I didn't test any specific load however.
$ apt-cache policy linux-image-virtual
linux-image-virtual:
Installed: 2.6.31.22.35
Candidate: 2.6.31.22.35
Version table:
*** 2.6.31.22.35 0
500 http://archive.ubuntu.com karmic-updates/main Packages
500
$ apt-cache policy linux-image-generic
linux-image-generic:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 2.6.31.22.35
Version table:
2.6.31.22.35 0
500 http://archive.ubuntu.com karmic-updates/main Packages
500 http://security.ubuntu.com karmic-security/main Packages
A customer was
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: cups
In Ubuntu 9.10 and 10.04 (CUPS 1.3 and 1.4) when sending multiple print
jobs there is a 5 second delay due to CUPS waiting for confirmation that
the previous job was completed. This is fine but the documentation says
that when using the AppSocket
Public bug reported:
Network module atl1c 1.0.1.0-NAPI is not available in Lucid.
Acer Aspire D260 netbooks require the atl1c network module. The version
of the module in Lucid 10.04.0 (1.0.0.1-NAPI) does not support the
onboard card [1]. There is a newer version (1.0.0.2-NAPI) in linux-
I tested this and confirmed that the entire test ISO was properly
downloaded.
--
PHP5 under Apache2 on 64 bit system is not completely 64 bit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/564920
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in
I tested this and confirmed that the entire test ISO was properly
downloaded.
--
PHP5 under Apache2 on 64 bit system is not completely 64 bit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/564920
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
This is a critical piece of functionality that has been removed from Ubuntu
without any advance notice or
warning.
Please see
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LucidLynx/ReleaseNotes
--
No option to log in remotely via XDMCP
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/408417
You received this bug notification
Please stop insinuating that this is a Ubuntu problem. It's not.
Ubuntu does not write/maintain GDM.
--
No option to log in remotely via XDMCP
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/408417
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Another option (not using XDMCP) is to use neatx-server (Google) in
combination with NoMachine's free NX clients (for Linux or Windows).
--
No option to log in remotely via XDMCP
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/408417
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
@R. Jones
Go to
https://launchpad.net/~zulcss/+archive/ppa
and follow instructions under Adding this PPA to your system.
Install
php5 5.3.2-1ubuntu4.3
I tested this myself and the results were unsatisfactory (Apache error
after about 10% download of the test ISO file). Can you confirm
@R. Jones
Go to
https://launchpad.net/~zulcss/+archive/ppa
and follow instructions under Adding this PPA to your system.
Install
php5 5.3.2-1ubuntu4.3
I tested this myself and the results were unsatisfactory (Apache error
after about 10% download of the test ISO file). Can you confirm
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: lsb
Currently (Lucid), lsb_release only shows information about current
system status. It would be nice (wishlist) if we could keep track of
the last fresh install and all intervening release upgrades.
Current output to lsb_release -a (omitting ugly
This turned out to be a duplicate of
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=44522
Submitted: 2008-03-24 18:21 UTC
** Bug watch added: bugs.php.net/ #44522
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=44522
--
PHP5 under Apache2 on 64 bit system is not completely 64 bit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/564920
Yes, we are doing just that.
--
PHP5 under Apache2 on 64 bit system is not completely 64 bit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/564920
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
This turned out to be a duplicate of
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=44522
Submitted: 2008-03-24 18:21 UTC
** Bug watch added: bugs.php.net/ #44522
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=44522
--
PHP5 under Apache2 on 64 bit system is not completely 64 bit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/564920
Yes, we are doing just that.
--
PHP5 under Apache2 on 64 bit system is not completely 64 bit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/564920
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
I sent this bug upstream.
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=52102
** Bug watch added: bugs.php.net/ #52102
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=52102
--
PHP5 under Apache2 on 64 bit system is not completely 64 bit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/564920
You received this bug notification because you
I sent this bug upstream.
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=52102
** Bug watch added: bugs.php.net/ #52102
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=52102
--
PHP5 under Apache2 on 64 bit system is not completely 64 bit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/564920
You received this bug notification because you
I have confirmed this.
A 64-bit Lucid Apache server hosting a file of size
4697126912 bytes
and a client (happens to be Lucid also) downloading the file via the
above test.php script only gets
402159616 bytes
** Changed in: php5 (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
PHP5 under Apache2
I have confirmed this.
A 64-bit Lucid Apache server hosting a file of size
4697126912 bytes
and a client (happens to be Lucid also) downloading the file via the
above test.php script only gets
402159616 bytes
** Changed in: php5 (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
PHP5 under Apache2
I can confirm this. What other information is required?
--
grub-pc upgrade crashing in stack.pm
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/545647
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: emacs23
$ sudo aptitude install emacs23-nox
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Reading extended state information
Initialising package states... Done
The following NEW packages will be
** Summary changed:
- tomcat6 package should fully support running as a different user
+ tomcat6 does not respect dpkg-statoverride settings
--
tomcat6 does not respect dpkg-statoverride settings
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557300
You received this bug notification because you are a member
** Summary changed:
- tomcat6 does not respect dpkg-statoverride settings
+ tomcat6 package should fully support running as a different user
--
tomcat6 package should fully support running as a different user
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557300
You received this bug notification because you
Is this also broken in 10.04?
--
Problems with calls when VPN tunnel is active
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/511150
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
** Summary changed:
- tomcat6 package should fully support running as a different user
+ tomcat6 does not respect dpkg-statoverride settings
--
tomcat6 does not respect dpkg-statoverride settings
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557300
You received this bug notification because you are a member
** Summary changed:
- tomcat6 does not respect dpkg-statoverride settings
+ tomcat6 package should fully support running as a different user
--
tomcat6 package should fully support running as a different user
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557300
You received this bug notification because you
I made a PPA based on Soren's comment (#5) and all seems to work.
--
Virt-manager unable to display guest consoles when connecting to a host user
who is using the zsh shell
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/556113
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
You need to convert the schema to LDIF format and then add it to the
server.
--
the package pure-ftpd-ldap doesn't install pureftpd.schema
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/562153
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Creating a new user on the host with the default bash shell and
authenticating via this user allows guest consoles to be viewed.
** Summary changed:
- Virt-manager unable to display console when using the zsh shell
+ Virt-manager unable to display guest consoles when connecting to a host user
It looks like the command being passed to zsh is
nc -q 0 127.0.0.1 5905
whereas it should really be just
nc
with arguments
-q 0 127.0.0.1 5905
--
Virt-manager unable to display guest consoles when connecting to a host user
who is using the zsh shell
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/556113
** Summary changed:
- Virt-manager unable to display console.
+ Virt-manager unable to display console when using the zsh shell
--
Virt-manager unable to display console when using the zsh shell
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/556113
You received this bug notification because you are a member
Sorry about that. Confirmed.
--
tomcat6 package should fully support running as a different user
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557300
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to tomcat6 in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing
Sorry about that. Confirmed.
--
tomcat6 package should fully support running as a different user
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557300
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Same problem on Lucid.
** Summary changed:
- [karmic] /etc/apt/preferences is not updated during upgrade to karmic
+ [lucid] /etc/apt/preferences is not updated during upgrade to lucid
** Summary changed:
- [lucid] /etc/apt/preferences is not updated during upgrade to lucid
+ [karmic]
I upgraded today and I lost the volume applet.
I started a Lucid upgrade this morning at 8:50 EDT albeit with the beta2
DVD. An hour later I mopped up with a network upgrade.
--
Volume Control gnome-volume-control-applet entry is removed from Startup
Applications gnome-session-properties
I don't recall ever removing the indicator applet.
--
Volume control icon not present after upgrade to Lucid when app indicator
applet has been removed by hand in Karmic
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/552221
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
@Milan, how do I add the notification applet? All I see is the
notification area under the 'Add to Panel...' facility.
--
Volume control icon not present after upgrade to Lucid when app indicator
applet has been removed by hand in Karmic
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/552221
You received this
OK, I installed the indicator applet and I got the knob, plus an
envelope.
--
Volume control icon not present after upgrade to Lucid when app indicator
applet has been removed by hand in Karmic
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/552221
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
PPA available:
odvr - 0.1.5-iacobs3
https://edge.launchpad.net/~iacobs/+archive/m0n5t3r
--
[needs-packaging] Olympus Digital Voice Recorder user-space driver (odvr)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/561575
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
I just tested this on a fresh Hardy install (tomcat55) and it also does
not work:
==
# dpkg-statoverride --add ubuntu ubuntu 755 /etc/tomcat5.5
# dpkg-statoverride --list
ubuntu ubuntu 755 /etc/tomcat5.5
# aptitude install tomcat5.5
# ls -ld /etc/tomcat5.5/
drwxr-x--- 4 tomcat55 adm
Public bug reported:
In Ubuntu 8.04 the module
netxen_nic
exists but does not work. It can be loaded manually but that's all.
This affects, at least, the following HP/NetXen Gigabit network
controller:
NC522SFP
103c:705b NC522SFP Dual Port 10GbE Server Adapter
** Attachment added: info.tar.gz
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42515638/info.tar.gz
--
[hardy] Support for NC522SFP Gb network card is broken
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551855
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Spoke to tgabi. The kernel is reporting fine.
--
[karmic] CPU load not being reported accurately
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/513848
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = New
--
[karmic] CPU load not being reported accurately
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/513848
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Here are new screenshots for Jaunty and Karmic. Each test ran for a
good 25 minutes. I've also added a Karmic screenshot for 'top' showing
(some of) the threads associated with the single Java process. In
addition, I have copied my recent post (2010-03-10) to kernel-
t...@lists.ubuntu.com :
** Attachment added: dstat+top+jconsole-904-A_80p.png
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40877627/dstat%2Btop%2Bjconsole-904-A_80p.png
--
[karmic] CPU load not being reported accurately
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/513848
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
** Attachment added: dstat+top+jconsole-910-A_80p.png
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40877638/dstat%2Btop%2Bjconsole-910-A_80p.png
--
[karmic] CPU load not being reported accurately
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/513848
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
I wish I could have gotten a higher CPU usage out of the Karmic test.
Nonetheless, I believe I have a very valid case for discussion.
--
[karmic] CPU load not being reported accurately
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/513848
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
** Attachment added: top_threads-910-A.png
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40877640/top_threads-910-A.png
--
[karmic] CPU load not being reported accurately
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/513848
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
I may be able to build a package for you from the Intrepid sources.
This gives the following version which has provided me the parameter in
question:
dovecot-imapd 1:1.1.4-0ubuntu1.3
I'll test this on my side and let you know if it will work.
--
Dovecot-auth doesn't close sockets
I may be able to build a package for you from the Intrepid sources.
This gives the following version which has provided me the parameter in
question:
dovecot-imapd 1:1.1.4-0ubuntu1.3
I'll test this on my side and let you know if it will work.
--
Dovecot-auth doesn't close sockets
I've only managed to use this parameter with Ubuntu 8.04 . Otherwise,
the error above is thrown.
--
Dovecot-auth doesn't close sockets
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/503008
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dovecot in
Hmmm, the default shipped with 8.10 is
dovecot-imapd 1:1.1.4-0ubuntu1.3
but an updated 8.04 has
dovecot-imapd 1:1.2.9-1ubuntu3
Why does this parameter work with the older version?
And @Gaylord, why aren't you running the latest available with 8.04
anyway?
--
Dovecot-auth doesn't close
Strange. I built a Hardy virtual machine and 1.2.9 was installed.
Indeed, the archives do say 1.0.10. I'll have to determine what
happened with my VM. At any rate, if the error is thrown then that
version doesn't support the parameter.
--
Dovecot-auth doesn't close sockets
401 - 500 of 640 matches
Mail list logo
