[Bug 1042111] Re: gs can't render some fonts. Example was created with 10.04

2012-08-28 Thread ReimarBauer
This bug is solved in ghostscript 9.0.6 http://ghostscript.com/pipermail/gs-bugs/2011-March/018517.html -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1042111 Title: gs can't render some fonts.

[Bug 1042111] Re: gs can't render some fonts. Example was created with 10.04

2012-08-28 Thread ReimarBauer
Hmm, ok, it sounded too similiar. Another workaround was to user ps2ps with the example file ps2ps example.ps fix.ps evince fix.ps It can be shown with evince but also I get many lines of GPL Ghostscript 9.05: Error: Font Renderer Plugin ( FreeType ) return code = -1 with gs fix.ps works

[Bug 1042111] [NEW] gs can't render some fonts. Example was created with 10.04

2012-08-27 Thread ReimarBauer
Public bug reported: ~/gs_bug$ gs example.ps GPL Ghostscript 9.05 (2012-02-08) Copyright (C) 2010 Artifex Software, Inc. All rights reserved. This software comes with NO WARRANTY: see the file PUBLIC for details. Loading NimbusSanL-Regu font from /usr/share/fonts/type1/gsfonts/n019003l.pfb...

[Bug 1042111] Re: gs can't render some fonts. Example was created with 10.04

2012-08-27 Thread ReimarBauer
** Attachment added: gs ./example.ps leads in this error message https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1042111/+attachment/3278676/+files/example.ps -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1042111

[Bug 997517] [NEW] package libdb5.1-java 5.1.25-11build1 failed to install/upgrade: './usr/share/java/db-5.1.25.jar' is different from the same file on the system

2012-05-10 Thread ReimarBauer
Public bug reported: lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Release:12.04 ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: libdb5.1-java 5.1.25-11build1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-23.36-generic 3.2.14 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-23-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules:

[Bug 997517] Re: package libdb5.1-java 5.1.25-11build1 failed to install/upgrade: './usr/share/java/db-5.1.25.jar' is different from the same file on the system

2012-05-10 Thread ReimarBauer
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/997517 Title: package libdb5.1-java 5.1.25-11build1 failed to install/upgrade: './usr/share/java/db-5.1.25.jar' is different from the same file on

[Bug 997524] [NEW] package gcc-4.4-base (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: './usr/share/doc/gcc-4.4-base/README.Debian.gz' is different from the same file on the system

2012-05-10 Thread ReimarBauer
Public bug reported: lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Release:12.04 ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: gcc-4.4-base (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-23.36-generic 3.2.14 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-23-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules:

[Bug 997524] Re: package gcc-4.4-base (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: './usr/share/doc/gcc-4.4-base/README.Debian.gz' is different from the same file on the system

2012-05-10 Thread ReimarBauer
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/997524 Title: package gcc-4.4-base (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: './usr/share/doc/gcc-4.4-base/README.Debian.gz' is different from the

[Bug 997541] [NEW] package libxml2-dev 2.7.8.dfsg-5.1ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: './usr/bin/xml2-config' is different from the same file on the system

2012-05-10 Thread ReimarBauer
Public bug reported: lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Release:12.04 ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: libxml2-dev 2.7.8.dfsg-5.1ubuntu4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-23.36-generic 3.2.14 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-23-generic x86_64

[Bug 997541] Re: package libxml2-dev 2.7.8.dfsg-5.1ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: './usr/bin/xml2-config' is different from the same file on the system

2012-05-10 Thread ReimarBauer
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/997541 Title: package libxml2-dev 2.7.8.dfsg-5.1ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: './usr/bin/xml2-config' is different from the same file on the

[Bug 995967] [NEW] old kernels not removed on upgrade

2012-05-07 Thread ReimarBauer
Public bug reported: after upgrading from 10.04 to 12.04 I have lots of old kernels in my /boot partition. They are also listed in /boot/grub/grub.cfg. But they are not shown as installed in the package database. Currently I don't know if that is my fault, I just recognized that. ** Affects:

[Bug 988979] Re: upgrade from CD removes NFS entries from fstab, auto.direct and ldap

2012-04-27 Thread ReimarBauer
The ISO file ISO md5sum ubuntu-12.04-desktop-amd64.iso 128f0c16f4734c420b0185a492d92e52 ubuntu-12.04-desktop-amd64.iso That is the same as UbuntuHashes hmm, that looks different dd if=/dev/cdrom bs=1 count=705998848 | md5sum fde2d30d2902770eae2125728ed3f446 - 705998848+0 Datensätze ein

[Bug 988979] Re: upgrade from CD removes NFS entries from fstab, auto.direct and ldap

2012-04-27 Thread ReimarBauer
arg wait, mistake with the size for dd, doing again -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/988979 Title: upgrade from CD removes NFS entries from fstab, auto.direct and ldap To manage

[Bug 988979] Re: upgrade from CD removes NFS entries from fstab, auto.direct and ldap

2012-04-27 Thread ReimarBauer
dd if=/dev/cdrom bs=1 count=732213248 | md5sum 732213248+0 Datensätze ein 732213248+0 Datensätze aus 732213248 Bytes (732 MB) kopiert, 1092,59 s, 670 kB/s 128f0c16f4734c420b0185a492d92e52 - it is the same, so I have run the correct one -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 988979] [NEW] upgrade from CD removes NFS entries from fstab, auto.direct and ldap

2012-04-26 Thread ReimarBauer
Public bug reported: An upgrade of 12.04 from CD desktop edition removes all nfs mount options from /etc/fstab /etc/auto.direct is also removed Also my setup for ldap is gone. I had to create a local user during the upgrade process. At least there should be a hint that this happens. **

[Bug 387675] Re: shutdown fails

2010-09-12 Thread ReimarBauer
yes the CD image was verified. -- shutdown fails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/387675 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 592493] Re: runlevel arguments (2 3 4 5) do not match LSB Default-Start values (none)

2010-09-09 Thread ReimarBauer
just run in this today too dpkg-reconfigure libnss-ldap I decided to use the same values for start and stop as ssh is using # Default-Start: 2 3 4 5 # Default-Stop: It tells me now: dpkg-reconfigure libnss-ldap update-rc.d: warning: libnss-ldap stop runlevel arguments (0 1 6) do not

[Bug 592493] Re: runlevel arguments (2 3 4 5) do not match LSB Default-Start values (none)

2010-09-09 Thread ReimarBauer
just run in this today too dpkg-reconfigure libnss-ldap I decided to use the same values for start and stop as ssh is using # Default-Start: 2 3 4 5 # Default-Stop: It tells me now: dpkg-reconfigure libnss-ldap update-rc.d: warning: libnss-ldap stop runlevel arguments (0 1 6) do not

[Bug 387675] Re: shutdown fails

2010-09-07 Thread ReimarBauer
We need some additionals info: These sistems was installed from the same image (disk or key)? installed from same isntallation CD Are the machines eguals? yes Can you reproduce the bug then attach here these files: /var/log/syslog /var/log/dmesg /var/log/kern.log ok, will do. I recognized

[Bug 387675] Re: shutdown fails

2010-09-07 Thread ReimarBauer
** Attachment added: dmesg https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/387675/+attachment/1553043/+files/dmesg -- shutdown fails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/387675 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 387675] Re: shutdown fails

2010-09-07 Thread ReimarBauer
** Attachment added: kern.log https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/387675/+attachment/1553047/+files/kern.log -- shutdown fails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/387675 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 387675] Re: shutdown fails

2010-09-07 Thread ReimarBauer
the ata messages are new on that machine. (something else is may be broken, but that is independent to this problem) ** Attachment added: syslog https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/387675/+attachment/1553048/+files/syslog -- shutdown fails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/387675 You

[Bug 387675] Re: shutdown fails

2010-09-06 Thread ReimarBauer
ok, i have some 9.04 systems where it still happens and some which do continue to reboot after some minutes. I have not checked 10.04 yet. How can I help to track this bug down? I have no idea how I can use the common reporting tools for this case. cheers Reimar -- shutdown fails

[Bug 387675] Re: shutdown fails

2010-09-05 Thread ReimarBauer
I look tom. if I still have it on an uptodate 9.04 or recent 10.04 -- shutdown fails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/387675 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 580730] Re: xserver no response 100%

2010-05-18 Thread ReimarBauer
I tried but it tells apport-collect 580730 The authorization page: should be opening in your browser. After you have authorized this program to access Launchpad on your behalf you should come back here and press Enter to finish the authentication process. Package xorg-server not installed

[Bug 446218] Re: killing the screensaver gives access

2010-05-16 Thread ReimarBauer
i have not the problem with myself killing the process. Sometimes it seems not to work to login again, The password check hangs. Since I know that I can safely stop this program and get my session back I often use it. But this leeds in a false sensitive for security. I would prefer I become

[Bug 580730] [NEW] xserver no response 100%

2010-05-14 Thread ReimarBauer
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xserver-xorg if I many times restart firefox (more than 1000 times) at some time the screen freezes. The keyboard does not response to numlock key pressed. This does not happen if I run the same program by ssh -X from an other machine on this box.

[Bug 578504] [NEW] package postfix (not instal led) failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess installie rtes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 75 zur ück

2010-05-10 Thread ReimarBauer
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: postfix installation of it fails during the 9.10 to 10.04 upgrade process ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: postfix (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-22.33-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2 Uname: Linux

[Bug 578504] Re: package postfix (not installed ) failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess installierte s post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 75 zurü ck

2010-05-10 Thread ReimarBauer
** Attachment added: AptOrdering.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48236212/AptOrdering.txt ** Attachment added: Df.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48236213/Df.txt ** Attachment added: Dmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48236215/Dmesg.txt ** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.gz

[Bug 578504] [NEW] package postfix (not instal led) failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess installie rtes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 75 zur ück

2010-05-10 Thread ReimarBauer
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: postfix installation of it fails during the 9.10 to 10.04 upgrade process ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: postfix (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-22.33-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2 Uname: Linux

[Bug 578504] Re: package postfix (not installed ) failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess installierte s post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 75 zurü ck

2010-05-10 Thread ReimarBauer
** Attachment added: AptOrdering.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48236212/AptOrdering.txt ** Attachment added: Df.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48236213/Df.txt ** Attachment added: Dmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48236215/Dmesg.txt ** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.gz

[Bug 113976] Re: PPKLite plugin is unable to initialize under AMD64

2009-12-04 Thread ReimarBauer
On all of our quadcore amd64 systems I get the same result for loading a digital signed pdf file. We run 9.04. model name : AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 945 Processor MemTotal : 8078920 kB Some older Systems based on e.g. AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 175 or AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core

[Bug 464524] Re: acroread for AMD64 crashes when opening digitally signed document

2009-11-30 Thread ReimarBauer
Thanks for this report. Now I know how I can get it working on several of our boxes. I have recognized that they can't open complex forms. I must note that I have a small amount of boxes too which also works with that file in place. -- acroread for AMD64 crashes when opening digitally signed

[Bug 247960] Re: initrd image is read really slowly when booting from USB2.0 HDD

2009-11-30 Thread ReimarBauer
after live cd boot {{{ sudo su - }}} = prepare chroot = {{{ mount /dev/sda3 /mnt mount /dev/sda1 /mnt/boot mount -t proc /proc /mnt/proc mount -o bind /dev /mnt/dev }}} == chroot == {{{ chroot /mnt }}} == remount boot == for some unknown reason this was neccesary {{{ umount /boot mount /dev/sda1

[Bug 53622] Re: configuration not saved when selecting Options-Save Options

2009-11-27 Thread ReimarBauer
can you please show the fix patch for 9.04. -- configuration not saved when selecting Options-Save Options https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/53622 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list