[Bug 1597911] [NEW] varnishlog exists when sending SIGHUP

2016-06-30 Thread Ruben Laban
Public bug reported: The currently shipped systemd unit file causes varnishlog to exit when SIGHUP is sent to it. SIGHUP has two meanings for varnishlog: 1) when running in daemon mode: reopen logfile 2) when not running in daemon mode: exit Since the current systemd unit file doesn't run

[Bug 1547702] Re: iputils-ping does not support IPv6 in ping command

2016-03-09 Thread Ruben Laban
What would it take to get this update going? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1547702 Title: iputils-ping does not support IPv6 in ping command To manage notifications about this bug

[Bug 1272788] Re: php5-fpm upstart job is not compatible with precise upstart

2015-04-01 Thread Ruben Laban
This decision has some REALLY annoying side effects on Trusty, which took us quite some time to figure out. With the commented reload stanza, the reload function is broken in a horrible way: It sends SIGHUP to the php5-fpm master process causing it to terminate! Without any warning or indication

[Bug 1272788] Re: php5-fpm upstart job is not compatible with precise upstart

2015-04-01 Thread Ruben Laban
This decision has some REALLY annoying side effects on Trusty, which took us quite some time to figure out. With the commented reload stanza, the reload function is broken in a horrible way: It sends SIGHUP to the php5-fpm master process causing it to terminate! Without any warning or indication

[Bug 1008385] Re: apache-mpm-itk writes wrong process name in /proc/$$/status

2013-08-29 Thread Ruben Laban
I can confirm that removing libapache2-mod-perl2 fixes this. Question remains: why does libapache2-mod-perl2 break it in the first place? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1008385] Re: apache-mpm-itk writes wrong process name in /proc/$$/status

2013-08-29 Thread Ruben Laban
I can confirm that removing libapache2-mod-perl2 fixes this. Question remains: why does libapache2-mod-perl2 break it in the first place? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1008385 Title:

[Bug 1008385] Re: apache-mpm-itk writes wrong process name in /proc/$$/status

2013-07-31 Thread Ruben Laban
Just did an interesting find: When starting Apache using the usual apache2ctl start, the process name is mangled. When starting Apache using the not-so-usual . /etc/apache2/envvars apache2 -k start, the process name isn't mangled. Investigation continues... -- You received this bug

[Bug 1008385] Re: apache-mpm-itk writes wrong process name in /proc/$$/status

2013-07-31 Thread Ruben Laban
Turns out apache2 doesn't strip off the path properly: /usr/sbin/apache2 -k start yields /usr/sbin/apach apache2 -k start yields apache2 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1008385] Re: apache-mpm-itk writes wrong process name in /proc/$$/status

2013-07-31 Thread Ruben Laban
Unfortunately this isn't part of the actual solution. On good servers, invoking it through /usr/sbin/apache2 works fine as well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1008385

[Bug 1008385] Re: apache-mpm-itk writes wrong process name in /proc/$$/status

2013-07-31 Thread Ruben Laban
Just did an interesting find: When starting Apache using the usual apache2ctl start, the process name is mangled. When starting Apache using the not-so-usual . /etc/apache2/envvars apache2 -k start, the process name isn't mangled. Investigation continues... -- You received this bug

[Bug 1008385] Re: apache-mpm-itk writes wrong process name in /proc/$$/status

2013-07-31 Thread Ruben Laban
Turns out apache2 doesn't strip off the path properly: /usr/sbin/apache2 -k start yields /usr/sbin/apach apache2 -k start yields apache2 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1008385 Title:

[Bug 1008385] Re: apache-mpm-itk writes wrong process name in /proc/$$/status

2013-07-31 Thread Ruben Laban
Unfortunately this isn't part of the actual solution. On good servers, invoking it through /usr/sbin/apache2 works fine as well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1008385 Title:

[Bug 1008385] Re: apache-mpm-itk writes wrong process name in /proc/$$/status

2013-07-30 Thread Ruben Laban
Really curious as to what could be used as a fix or workaround. Currently it's breaking the New Relic agent on quite a few of our servers (it fails to detect the Apache2 processes properly). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed

[Bug 1008385] Re: apache-mpm-itk writes wrong process name in /proc/$$/status

2013-07-30 Thread Ruben Laban
Really curious as to what could be used as a fix or workaround. Currently it's breaking the New Relic agent on quite a few of our servers (it fails to detect the Apache2 processes properly). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 985198] Re: Ldirectord Subroutine main::pack_sockaddr_in6 redefined

2012-11-13 Thread Ruben Laban
Here's my revised patch. As there was still some stuff not working properly. ** Attachment added: fix-gethostinfo-v2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/resource-agents/+bug/985198/+attachment/3432065/+files/fix-gethostinfo-v2 -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 985198] Re: Ldirectord Subroutine main::pack_sockaddr_in6 redefined

2012-10-26 Thread Ruben Laban
Patch appears to work for me as well. Any plans to release an update yet? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/985198 Title: Ldirectord Subroutine main::pack_sockaddr_in6 redefined To

[Bug 1020914] [NEW] The disk drive for /boot is not yet ready or not present

2012-07-04 Thread Ruben Laban
Public bug reported: Fresh install of Ubuntu Server 12.04. 2 mdadm volumes, one for /boot and one for LVM for the rest of the system. At each boot this error shows up: The disk drive for /boot is not yet ready or not present If I choose manual recovery, I can do mount /boot exit and the

[Bug 1020914] Re: The disk drive for /boot is not yet ready or not present

2012-07-04 Thread Ruben Laban
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1020914 Title: The disk drive for /boot is not yet ready or not present To manage notifications about this bug go to:

Re: [Bug 347165] Re: /sbin/ipvsadm doesn't work when $PATH doesn't contain /sbin

2009-10-15 Thread Ruben Laban
On Thursday 15 October 2009 at 19:06 (CET), Chuck Short wrote: 1. Is this reproducible? Yes. 2. If so, what specific steps should we take to recreate this bug? Be as detailed as possible. This will help us to find and resolve the problem. As described in the bugreport itself: $ sudo crontab

Re: [Bug 347165] Re: /sbin/ipvsadm doesn't work when $PATH doesn't contain /sbin

2009-10-15 Thread Ruben Laban
On Thursday 15 October 2009 at 19:06 (CET), Chuck Short wrote: 1. Is this reproducible? Yes. 2. If so, what specific steps should we take to recreate this bug? Be as detailed as possible. This will help us to find and resolve the problem. As described in the bugreport itself: $ sudo crontab

[Bug 347165] [NEW] /sbin/ipvsadm doesn't work when $PATH doesn't contain /sbin

2009-03-23 Thread Ruben Laban
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ipvsadm As /sbin/ipvsadm is a wrapper script for 2 versions of ipvsadm and isn't using full paths to those executables, running /sbin/ipvsadm when /sbin is not part of $PATH, the script will fail. (Root) Cronjobs by default don't appear to have /sbin in

[Bug 337276] [NEW] /var/log/installer/initial-status.gz is empty on server installs

2009-03-03 Thread Ruben Laban
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: installation-report Example: # ls /var/log/installer/initial-status.gz -l -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 2009-03-02 12:02 /var/log/installer/initial-status.gz I get similar results on Hardy and Intrepid, i386 and amd64. ** Affects: installation-report

[Bug 289921] Re: network interface does not come up after installing open-vm-tools

2009-01-19 Thread Ruben Laban
I have another works-for-me (tm) solution (other than adding vmxnet to initrd): Modify /etc/init.d/open-vm-tools: --- /etc/init.d/open-vm-tools.orig 2009-01-19 10:57:02.0 +0100 +++ /etc/init.d/open-vm-tools 2009-01-19 10:51:49.0 +0100 @@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ then

[Bug 289921] Re: network interface does not come up after installing open-vm-tools

2008-12-28 Thread Ruben Laban
Travis, I think it was as simple as adding vmxnet (on a single line) to the file /etc/initramfs-tools/modules and rebuild your initrd (using: sudo update-initramfs -u). Followed by a reboot ofcourse. This is what I recall from what I did (I had same other projects take up my time in the mean

[Bug 289921] Re: network interface does not come up after installing open-vm-tools

2008-12-02 Thread Ruben Laban
The above mentioned fix/workaround didn't work for me for some reason. Adding vmxnet to the list modules to be included in the initrd did work for me though. -- network interface does not come up after installing open-vm-tools https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/289921 You received this bug

[Bug 278711] Re: open-vm-source doesn't build

2008-12-02 Thread Ruben Laban
Works for me as well (ESXi 3.5 host). -- open-vm-source doesn't build https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278711 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 218141] [NEW] partman-md sets up all the RAID devices from scratch

2008-04-16 Thread Ruben Laban
Public bug reported: 10:50 _ruben another annoying thing btw (havent checked if there's a bug for it already) .. say you create a /dev/md0 for /boot and a /dev/md1 for lvm .. format /dev/md0 as ext2 and assign to /boot .. then go setup your lvm .. the reference to /boot will be gone

[Bug 141601] Re: tasksel packages stays at 100%

2008-02-13 Thread Ruben Laban
Mohamed, The current workaround is to use sudo apt-get install lamp-server^ instead of using tasksel. It also *seems* to be safe to just kill the processes that tasksel has hanging around, since when doing so everything *looks* being installed just ok. I ran a sudo apt-get install lamp-server^ to

[Bug 141601] Re: tasksel packages stays at 100%

2007-11-30 Thread Ruben Laban
Excerpt from ps uaxfww : ruben 4576 0.0 0.1 20692 3640 pts/0Ss 20:13 0:00 | \_ -bash root 4796 0.1 0.4 36460 12568 pts/0S+ 20:13 0:00 | \_ /usr/bin/perl /usr/bin/tasksel root 4816 0.0 0.3 47924 10772 pts/0S+ 20:13 0:00 |

[Bug 141601] Re: tasksel packages stays at 100%

2007-11-25 Thread Ruben Laban
Same issue here. Installing any task (tried SSH/LAMP/Samba) causes tasksel to hang at 100%. I don't recall the details but it involves a process ending up in the Zombie state. Killing procs works, but is a nasty workaround. This is on a fresh-feisty-with-all-updates-upgraded-to-gutsy. As in: I

[Bug 149476] Re: Having /var/log as a seperate partition breaks udev and possibly more

2007-10-08 Thread Ruben Laban
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 149319 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/149319 I had a hunch it would be related; I created this extra bug just to be sure in case there wouldn't be an unilateral fix. Good job on the quick fix! -- Having /var/log as a seperate partition breaks udev and

[Bug 149319] network interfaces not properly configured

2007-10-05 Thread Ruben Laban
Public bug reported: After a clean install of Ubuntu Gutsy Gibbon on a Dell PowerEdge860, the network configuration is more or less messed up. During installation there's an eth0 and eth1 interface (two broadcom nics, tg3 driver), which are configured fine. Yet after first reboot the devices

[Bug 149319] Re: network interfaces not properly configured

2007-10-05 Thread Ruben Laban
** Changed in: udev (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: None = udev -- network interfaces not properly configured https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/149319 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 149319] Re: network interfaces not properly configured

2007-10-05 Thread Ruben Laban
After some troubleshooting with help from soren and ivoks on IRC, we found out that a restart of udev (sudo /etc/init.d/udev stop sudo /etc/init.d/udev start) in fact does populate the file /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules properly. Also in order to have the file properly generated when

[Bug 149476] Having /var/log as a seperate partition breaks udev and possibly more

2007-10-05 Thread Ruben Laban
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: udev I have /var/log as a separate partition on top of lvm on top software raid. At the time udev starts, /var/log isn't available yet. This causes the problem that it can't move the logfile to /var/log/udev.log. Furthermore, /var/log/boot shows

[Bug 149319] Re: network interfaces not properly configured

2007-10-05 Thread Ruben Laban
Some more information that might be related to this issue: /var/log resides on a separate partition (lvm volume on software raid) which causes some errors during boot. It complains about a command similar to 'mv /dev/.udev.log /var/log/udev.log'. This fails because /var/log isn't available at that