Filed as bug 749602 - please lend your weight to it if you think it's
worth fixing.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/738330
Title:
Today's Natty update means no guest additions in virtu
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: virtualbox-ose-guest-x11
This bug report is a spin-off of bug 738330.
When you install Ubuntu as the guest OS in Virtual Box, your natural
first instinct is to install Guest Additions from the Virtual Box menu.
According to comments in 738330 you shouldn
Can somebody confirm what package we're supposed to install? A search
in software centre for Guest Additions only returns the host package.
Perhaps we should have a separate bug for something like
"it's totally not obvious what you're supposed to install to get Guest
Additions working (there isn'
Compiz is working, for me, but the panel and launcher only go
transparent when I mouse over them, and the drop shadows are just opaque
black boxes.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/738330
Same problem here. Problem did not occur with previous (rather swanky)
icon. The other new icons function as expected.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/742024
Title:
Inconsistency betw
@Felix - I've found a package called virtualbox-guest-additions in the
software center, but it doesn't sound like that's what you mean:
"This package provides an iso image which contains the guest additions
for Linux, Solaris and Windows to be installed on the host system. The
guest systems then c
Yep, I am using 4.0.4 guest additions too.
@Felix - that in the repos is it?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/738330
Title:
Today's Natty update means no guest additions in virtualbox
I can't run those commands, RedSingularity, am on an OS X host, but I'm
using virtual box 4.0.4 r70112. Also, you're right - seamless and auto-
resize aren't working either, so the problem is that Guest Additions
don't work in the newest build.
Could the bug title be changed to reflect this?
--
Public bug reported:
I'm running Ubuntu in Virtual Box on a Mac host and today's update has
broken 3D. Normally every time there's an update I restart Ubuntu and
see a 2D interface, but then I re-install the guest additions and
restart and see a 3D interface, but no such look today.
I imagine yo
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: light-themes
Some people would like a transparant panel when no window is maximized
and an opaque panel when a window is maximized (I can't decide if I am
one such person). I expect this could easily be added as an option.
On a related note, I personall
Still here in Natty alpha 2 (with Firefox 4.0b11)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/418203
Title:
"Mozilla Firefox for Ubuntu canonical - 1.0" doesn't make sense
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
> ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/soffice.bin
> InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Release i386
> (20101007)
> ProcEnviron:
> LANGUAGE=en_GB.UTF-8:en
> LANG=en_GB.UTF-8
> LC_MESSAGES=en_AG.utf8
> SHELL=/bin/bash
> SourcePackag
I think there are too many different dialogs involved. We have:
option 1) you press Print Screen and you get a dialogue with no options other
than saving the screenshot
option 2) you run --interactive which gives you a dialog with options, followed
by the dialog from option 1
The way I see it
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/705711
Title:
Screenshot should give you the option of hiding the cursor when you
take a screenshot
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.u
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gnome-screenshot
When you take a screenshot a dialogue pops up asking you where to save.
This dialogue should have the option of hiding the cursor. The option
may be configurable somewhere, but it's not intuitive or easy to use, it
should be right there
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/705710
Title:
Update should check (refresh) automatically when run
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: update-manager
When you start update-manager it's unintuitive that you have to click
Check to check for updates - that's what you expect the programme you
just started to do anyway. It should check automatically.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 1
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/705461
Title:
LibreOffice won't launch from Unity Launcher
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: libreoffice
Start LibreOffice (I've tried the generic start center, and the word
processor), right click on it in the Launcher and click keep in
Launcher, close the app, click the launcher icon for the app. It
wibbles for a bit, then goes blank, the app
I'm not sure what more to add to this - I've tried both the 64 and 32
bit version of 10.10, the normal download from the Ubuntu website, on
two machines, and had the same issue on both. Are you sure you've tried
it on a fresh install? Maybe you've ticked something in some settings
somewhere that
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/658301/+attachment/1684389/+files/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/658301/+attachment/1684390/+files/ProcMaps.txt
** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt"
https://
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: software-center
On a fresh Ubuntu 10.10 install when you go to install GIMP from the
Software Centre you get the message "Requires installation of untrusted
packages" and then the installation terminates.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
Pack
owever, RGBA support is
> enabled by default and there is a chance for some fallout from this being
> added.
>
> To unsubscribe from this bug, go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-ubuntu/+bug/491521/+subscribe
>
--
Sam Illingworth
--
Decorations and RGBA
https://bugs
Before you go blocking people perhaps you could tell us how to utilize
this fix? I still get this error every time I do an update, regardless
of how many times I reload the repos. Is some manual change required?
--
package ttf-mscorefonts-installer 2.6 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
post-
The attached screen-shot confirms the settings are the same in each app
for the same account (Empathy on the left, Pidgin on the right).
Setting a proxy on my machine makes no difference, but bear in mind that
even if I choose "Direct internet connection", my corporate network will
route me through
Sorry, ignore that first screenshot - I had a Google account showing in
Empathy and an MSN account showing in Pidgin. /This/ screenshot shows
both apps using the same MSN account with the same settings.
** Attachment added: "Screenshot.png"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38873455/Screenshot.png
THANK YOU! :D
--
Please upgrade evolution-mapi to 0.28.1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/472552
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailm
THANK YOU! :D
--
evolution mapi connection crash seg fault
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453279
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/ma
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38173860/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38173861/ProcMaps.txt
** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38173862/ProcStatus.txt
** Attachm
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: empathy
Empathy cannot connect ("Network error") to my gtalk or MSN account over
my work's network. I assume this is caused by corporate firewalls and
transparent proxies and other annoying things like that, but Pidgin
doesn't have any problems.
Problem
@ liquidweaver
:D I love you.
--
tsclient always tries to reconnect
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/293660
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.c
This bug's being going on for ages! Please let's get it fixed for
Lucid!
Can anyone give me instructions for installing that patch (and indeed
other patches)?
--
tsclient always tries to reconnect
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/293660
You received this bug notification because you are a member
Does that workaround work for everyone? I did it but for some reason
every time I boot I'm running at 30hz and have to change it to 60 every
time. I thought that might be caused by doing "gksudo amdcccle" instead
of "amdxdg-su -c amdcccle"?
--
Administrative Control Centre does not work (wrong
I have this problem but I don't have any proxy set in Gnome, it all
happens invisibly somewhere on the corporate LAN. Is this likely to be
the same issue?
--
Does not use system proxy settings
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/304889
You received this bug notification because you are a member of U
I also had no problem with the version compiled from source, but have
this problem with the version from the repo. Trouble with using the
compiled version is that it doesn't seem to take the same arguments as
the old version in the repo, and I can't get it to run with xwinwrap :(
--
Unable to do
Works for me in fresh Karmic install :)
--
Cannot use Windows key in keyboard shortcuts
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/12153
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https:
Well, I suppose it's good that it's not affecting other people, but I've
never manually edited my sources file, and I've disabled every optional
repo so I'm only looking at the standard Ubuntu ones, so this would
still seem to be an Ubuntu bug. Hmm. Well, I'm planning on doing a
fresh install whe
Attached
** Attachment added: "sources.list"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33957627/sources.list
--
samba and smbfs depend on an old version of samba-common
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444926
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed t
Public bug reported:
I originally raised this as an idea on the brainstorm, but was told it
should be reported as a bug by the brainstorm admin (the brainstorm is
here: http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/21745/).
When you click on an executable text file, such as a script to which
you've just made
This is a high priority bug.
Scenario:
- User A leaves themselves connected to Remote Machine then goes away from
their local machine
- User B has a high priority reason to connect to Remote Machine, so User B
connects, disconnecting User A
- Since User A is not around to click cancel, their
Sorry for the delay.
Oh, sorry, thought I had included the version I was on. I was using the
Karmic alpha but I've had to switch back to Jaunty for various reasons
(shouldn't really have been using an alpha version on my work machine I
suppose).
I don't know if this still exists in the beta, but
Do you mean the "Download from" option on the first tab of Software
Sources? I tried changing that a couple of times, no difference.
Can anyone replicate this? What's showing up under "latest version" for
the various samba packages for you guys?
--
samba and smbfs depend on an old version of s
OK, I've tried that, can still replicate.
Here's a screenshot showing the samba packages sorted by latest version;
you're right - some are 3, some 3.1.
Funny thing is, if I go to Force Version on samba-common it lists the
two options as
2:3.3.2-1ubuntu3.1 (now)
2:3.3.2-1ubuntu3 (Jaunty)
But I'm
Public bug reported:
Cannot install samba, so unable to create shares. Here are the errors
Synaptic gives me if I try to install smbfs or samba:
smbfs:
Depends: samba-common (=2:3.3.2-1ubuntu3) but 2:3.3.2-1ubuntu3.1 is to be
installed
samba:
Depends: samba-common (=2:3.3.2-1ubuntu3) but
I agree that this isn't a papercut, but will it still get fixed?
Perhaps it should be raised upstream? Who makes the remote desktop
client?
--
Logging off causes error on client
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124348
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whi
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: nautilus
Assign a couple of background colours so that they make a gradient.
Works fine for one folder, but if you use middle-click or control-click
to apply it to all folders, then close and open Nautilus, only the
second colour you select has been remem
Public bug reported:
I've checked the key assignment, but pressing my prinst screen key
(while recognised by the keyboard shortcuts application) is not causing
the print screen application to pop up.
** Affects: ubuntu
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
screenshot not working
ht
Public bug reported:
I was going to include some screenshots with this, but screenshots
aren't working in Karmic either (I'll raise that next).
I've found that my volume control isn't working. Anything lower than
about 20% is silent, anything higher is full volume.
** Affects: ubuntu
Impor
Agreed - while Live Previews would be nice, can't we at least have a
none-stretched icon or a cached thumbnail of the minimized application
in the meantime?
--
Compiz shift-switcher should show preview for minimized windows
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/136336
You received this bug notificati
Well, with Super mapped to the win keys I can now (in Jaunty) use the
Windows key in any short-cut, so that appears to be part of this bug
fixed. If other Jaunty users can confirm this is fixed then all that
remains is to change the default setting when Ubuntu is installed.
Would that be a design
I've just read through this entire thread - to summarize:
It seems we have two/three issues:
1) The out-of-the-box behaviour only allows the windows key to be used
on it's own, not as part of a shortcut using the keyboard shortcut
applet
2) The workaround of setting super or meta is mapped to th
Hi Guys - firstly I apologise for not being very technial here - I'm
quite new to Linux.
For me setting "Super is mapped to the win keys" or "Meta is mapped to
the win keys" (they appear to do the same thing, and shouldn't one of
them be selected by default anyway? I've installed Ubuntu on four
c
52 matches
Mail list logo
