[Bug 1267059] Re: "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work

2016-02-08 Thread SeanBoran
Hi, I regularly have systems with /boot full due, I believe, to this issue and had an example this morning. Manually running "apt-get autoremove" deleted kernels+headers for the last 10 kernels or so. How can that be automated? Above one refers to version .76ubuntu1.2, and I have

[Bug 1309535] Re: lightdm: PAM unable to dlopen(pam_kwallet.so): /lib/security/pam_kwallet.so

2014-05-30 Thread SeanBoran
An update to #8: I no longer have this issue, but am not sure why. Installed another 14.04 laptop and it worked fine, no need change /etc/pam.d/lightdm /etc/pam.d/lightdm-greeter either. Tips: after joining the domin (e.g. net rpc getsid; net rpc join), try some of the following to verify

[Bug 1309535] Re: lightdm: PAM unable to dlopen(pam_kwallet.so): /lib/security/pam_kwallet.so

2014-05-24 Thread SeanBoran
** Attachment removed: /var/log/lightdm/*log https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/1309535/+attachment/4118448/+files/lighdm.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1309535] Re: lightdm: PAM unable to dlopen(pam_kwallet.so): /lib/security/pam_kwallet.so

2014-05-23 Thread SeanBoran
Installed a fresh 14.04 deskop, and joined to a Samba domain (server running 12.04 samba). Having setup samba as a member server with winbind, I can now enumerate Domain users and login via SSH. When logging in via the GUI desktop, the above happens: - authentication success, the desktop

[Bug 1309535] Re: lightdm: PAM unable to dlopen(pam_kwallet.so): /lib/security/pam_kwallet.so

2014-05-23 Thread SeanBoran
Installed a fresh 14.04 deskop, and joined to a Samba domain (server running 12.04 samba). Having setup samba as a member server with winbind, I can now enumerate Domain users and login via SSH. When logging in via the GUI desktop, the above happens: - authentication success, the desktop

[Bug 1301015] Re: Networking does not restart

2014-04-24 Thread SeanBoran
Er, I've been just bitten by this feature too. Having the habit of using /etc/init.d/* (since it works on many different platforms and my fingers learned it many years ago) I presumed that would at some stage be replaced by the service command - but not that networking would be started in some

[Bug 1014640] Re: 12.04/openssl refusing some verisign certified sites

2014-02-15 Thread SeanBoran
** Description changed: Summary: SSL refuses to work with some https sites on both 12.04, 13.04, 13.10, for fresh and updated installations. It is an issue with OpenSSL's handling of certificates.. - Fix: none yet, Openssl needs to be fixed upstream. -

[Bug 1014640] Re: 12.04/openssl refusing some verisign certified sites

2013-08-21 Thread SeanBoran
** Description changed: - Summary: SSL refuses to work with some sites on both 12.04 and 13.04, - for fresh and updated installations. No known workarounds, although - running c_rehash may help in some scenarios. + Summary: SSL refuses to work with some https sites on both 12.04, 13.04, + 13.10,

[Bug 1014640] Re: 12.04/openssl refusing some verisign certified sites

2013-08-13 Thread SeanBoran
Fix: Verisign's 2009 ROOT certificate is missing, so download it an install it. 1) Copy the Root CA from Symantec: https://knowledge.verisign.com/support/ssl-certificates- support/index?page=contentid=AR1556 2) Save to a file like verisign2009.crt in /usr/local/share/ca-certificates/ $ sudo

[Bug 1014640] Re: 12.04/openssl refusing some verisign certified sites

2013-07-24 Thread SeanBoran
** Description changed: + Summary: SSL refuses to work with some sites on both 12.04 and 13.04, + for fresh and updated installations. No known workarounds, although + running c_rehash may help in some scenarios. + + Original post: After upgrading a 10.04 server to 12.04, SSL refuses to work

[Bug 1014640] Re: 12.04/openssl refusing some verisign certified sites

2013-06-10 Thread SeanBoran
update-ca-certificates --fresh or c_rehash does not fix the issue for me. Whereas your example with ev-root.digicert.com is ok, the other tests I mentioned are not OK wget https://postfinance.ch --2013-06-10 15:36:43-- https://postfinance.ch/ Resolving postfinance.ch (postfinance.ch)...

[Bug 993660] Re: package samba-common 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.4 failed to install/upgrade: unable to open '/etc/dhcp3/dhclient-enter-hooks.d/samba.dpkg-new': Too many levels of symbolic links

2013-02-20 Thread SeanBoran
I came accross this ina similar situation. When installing samba-common: dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/samba-common_2%3a3.6.3-2ubuntu2.3_all.deb (--unpack): unable to open '/etc/dhcp3/dhclient-enter-hooks.d/samba.dpkg-new': No such file or directory In my case /etc/dhcp3 was

[Bug 993660] Re: package samba-common 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.4 failed to install/upgrade: unable to open '/etc/dhcp3/dhclient-enter-hooks.d/samba.dpkg-new': Too many levels of symbolic links

2013-02-20 Thread SeanBoran
I came accross this ina similar situation. When installing samba-common: dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/samba-common_2%3a3.6.3-2ubuntu2.3_all.deb (--unpack): unable to open '/etc/dhcp3/dhclient-enter-hooks.d/samba.dpkg-new': No such file or directory In my case /etc/dhcp3 was

[Bug 541886] Re: clamd: can't initialize the internal logger

2012-11-22 Thread SeanBoran
So apparmor is not correctly configured then? What apparmor config change is needed? By settings into complain mode, presumably after a reboot, apparmor will log errors again? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to clamav in

[Bug 541886] Re: clamd: can't initialize the internal logger

2012-11-22 Thread SeanBoran
So apparmor is not correctly configured then? What apparmor config change is needed? By settings into complain mode, presumably after a reboot, apparmor will log errors again? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1014640] Re: 12.04/openssl refusing some verisign certified sites

2012-06-26 Thread SeanBoran
I found a fix: copy Verisign_Class_3_Public_Primary_Certification_Authority.crt from a lucid/10.04 system (in /usr/share/ca-certificates/mozilla) Sounds a bit whacky, but invalid certs have been delivered with 12.04? I did a diff, the changes between 10.04 and 12.04 in that directory for

[Bug 1014640] [NEW] 12.04/openssl refusing some verisign certified sites

2012-06-18 Thread SeanBoran
Public bug reported: After upgrading a 10.04 server to 12.04, SSL refuses to work with some sites. On 10.04, curl -v https://cs.directnet.com/dn/c/cls/auth?language=de works fine, on 12.04 it says: error:14090086:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_SERVER_CERTIFICATE:certificate verify failed This happens on

[Bug 938520] Re: 12.04 alpha: dns-nameservers in /etc/network/interfaces missing

2012-03-13 Thread SeanBoran
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 932275 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/932275 I tested a daily server build of Ubuntu 12.04 beta today. This issue is fixed :-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 932275] Re: Bogus or no nameserver information written to /etc/network/interfaces

2012-03-13 Thread SeanBoran
FYI. I tested a daily server build of Ubuntu 12.04 beta today. The (duplicate) issue 938520 I had noted on /etc/resolv.conf and /etc/network/interfaces is fixed :-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 954251] [NEW] precise/12.04 server beta: tasksel install: most options missing

2012-03-13 Thread SeanBoran
Public bug reported: I install a beta server daily build to test the new release. The installation went just fine, and after logging on the console, I wanted to install the lamp stack via the usual tasksel install but there were only 3 option: basic ubuntu server, openssh, or manual package

[Bug 537884] Re: mouse movement a bit jerky (lucid)

2012-03-01 Thread SeanBoran
That sound interesting, can this patch be got into 12.04/precise, which is in alpha right now? Have you any influence or ideas to get fixes committed for 12.04? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 939300] Re: precise 12.04: consider adding Apache 2.4 ?

2012-02-27 Thread SeanBoran
I agree with both #3 and #4, its a question of whats the best compromise, whether its too late in the release cycle, and if not, what is the procedure to do fast track in a key change in a controlled and successful way. This issue is obviously much more important for the server edition. As