[Bug 1938097] Re: ubuntu-advantage-tools upgrade fails configure

2021-07-26 Thread Sebastian Marsching
An alternative workaround is uninstalling the cloud-init package. If this package is not installed, cloud-init cannot be found, so the error does not happen. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1938097] Re: ubuntu-advantage-tools upgrade fails configure

2021-07-26 Thread Sebastian Marsching
I think the problem is in the postinst script, line 295: cloud_id="" if command -v "cloud-id" > /dev/null ; then cloud_id=$(cloud-id) fi The third line should rather be: cloud_id=$(cloud-id || true) This way, an error reported by the cloud-id command is treated just

[Bug 1734700] Re: mounting CIFS share failure (cifs_mount failed w/return code = -2)

2021-02-21 Thread Sebastian Marsching
I can also confirm that installing the keyutils package fixes the problem (on Ubuntu 20.04). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1734700 Title: mounting CIFS share failure (cifs_mount

[Bug 1887177] Re: ovsdb-server.service needs a depedency on local-fs.target

2020-07-29 Thread Sebastian Marsching
We are affected by this bug, too. A more stable workaround than modifying /lib/systemd/system/ovsdb- server.service might be adding an overrides file (so that the fix will survive package upgrades). On our affected systems, we added a file /etc/systemd/system/ovsdb-

[Bug 1867916] Re: Regression in kernel 4.15.0-91 causes kernel panic with Bcache

2020-07-26 Thread Sebastian Marsching
We don’t have any systems with Xenial any longer, so I can’t test there. In fact, just this week we decommissioned the Bionic-based system where I originally discovered this bug, so even there, I can’t test it any longer. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1867916] Re: Regression in kernel 4.15.0-91 causes kernel panic with Bcache

2020-07-07 Thread Sebastian Marsching
Thank you, Mauricio! I can confirm that your test kernel for Bionic (4.15.0-110.111+lp1867916.1) fixes the problem for me. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1867916 Title: Regression in

[Bug 1867916] Re: Regression in kernel 4.15.0-91 causes kernel panic with Bcache

2020-06-02 Thread Sebastian Marsching
Hi Mauricio, according to my Bash history, I used the following two commands to create the Bcache device: make-bcache -B -b 524288 -w 524288 -o 8192 /dev/vg0/vg2-backend make-bcache -C -b 4194304 -w 4096 -o 8192 /dev/vg1/vg2-cache I think the reason why I used this block size was that the MD

[Bug 1867916] Re: Regression in kernel 4.15.0-91 causes kernel panic with Bcache

2020-06-02 Thread Sebastian Marsching
Hi Mauricio, I have attached the requested information. Best regards, Sebastian ** Attachment added: "lp1867916-queue_block_size.seb" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1867916/+attachment/5379837/+files/lp1867916-queue_block_size.seb -- You received this bug

[Bug 1867916] Re: Regression in kernel 4.15.0-91 causes kernel panic with Bcache

2020-06-01 Thread Sebastian Marsching
Hi Mauricio, I can confirm that your patched kernel fixes the problem for me on Bionic (kernel 4.15). Thanks for your help! -Sebastian -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1867916 Title:

[Bug 1867916] Re: Regression in kernel 4.15.0-91 causes kernel panic with Bcache

2020-04-06 Thread Sebastian Marsching
Hi Mauricio, thanks for your support. I have attached the requested information to the bug. I had to pseudomize some of the logical volume names because they are considered sensitive, but I did so in a consistent way so the structure should still be clear. So that you don’t have to look through

[Bug 1867916] Re: Regression in kernel 4.15.0-91 causes kernel panic with Bcache

2020-04-06 Thread Sebastian Marsching
** Attachment added: "block device hierarchy" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1867916/+attachment/5347771/+files/lp1867916.1.out -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1867916] Re: Regression in kernel 4.15.0-91 causes kernel panic with Bcache

2020-04-03 Thread Sebastian Marsching
Hi Mauricio, there is the problem that this tarball contains an awful lot of sensitive data, some of that personal data that is protected under the GDPR. Maybe you could tell me which specific parts / sections you are interested in, so that I can anonymize and upload them. Thanks, Sebastian --

[Bug 1867916] [NEW] Regression in kernel 4.15.0-91 causes kernel panic with Bcache

2020-03-18 Thread Sebastian Marsching
Public bug reported: After upgrading from kernel 4.15.0-88 to 4.15.0-91 one of our systems does not boot any longer. It always crashes during boot with a kernel panic. I suspect that this crash might be related to Bcache because this is the only one of our systems where we use Bcache and the

[Bug 1337898] Re: Invalid symlinks for libungif.so and libungif.a

2017-03-06 Thread Sebastian Marsching
I guess there is only one case where the current "fix" would help. If someone had some library providing libungif in a different place, the broken symlinks in /usr/lib might take precedence, thus hiding the correct files. In my opinion, removing the dangling symlinks is a slight improvement on

[Bug 1337898] Re: Invalid symlinks for libungif.so and libungif.a

2017-03-06 Thread Sebastian Marsching
I tested the package from trusty-proposed, but I am not sure whether the issue can be considered fixed. In fact, the dangling symlinks have been removed, but they have not been added in the right place. This means that software depending on libungif will still not compile. The question is,

[Bug 1337898] Re: Invalid symlinks for libungif.so and libungif.a

2017-02-25 Thread Sebastian Marsching
I updated the Impact and Test Case sections of this bug's description. I hope this better fits the purpose of describing the actual impact on users. ** Description changed: Impact == - libgif-dev in Ubuntu 14.04 LTS depends on libgif4 and has these symlinks: - /usr/lib/libungif.a ->

[Bug 1608646] Re: ip4 static routes added in NetworkManager UI fail and prevent connection

2017-01-26 Thread Sebastian Marsching
The workaround suggested by Ikuya Awashiro (setting the gateway for the route to 0.0.0.0) does not work for me. The problem persits even after applying this workaround. The VPN connection is only established when all static routes are deleted from the configuration. -- You received this bug

[Bug 1611348] Re: support for pki missing

2016-09-10 Thread Sebastian Marsching
** Patch added: "bareos-openssl.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bareos/+bug/1611348/+attachment/4738164/+files/bareos-openssl.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1611348] Re: support for pki missing

2016-09-10 Thread Sebastian Marsching
This problem exists because the build-process of the package compiles against GnuTLS insteaed of OpenSSL. The encryption features are only supported when compiling with OpenSSL. In order to change from GnuTLS to OpenSSL, the following changes have to be applied to the source tree: diff -Naur

[Bug 1527902] Re: 3.13.0-71: IPv6 UDP DNS packets are not received

2016-02-06 Thread Sebastian Marsching
I think that unlike the bug title and description suggest, this bug is not limited to IPv6. I am having the same problem with FreeRADIUS when RADIUS packets are received over IPv4. This problem is fixed by the Kernel from trusty-proposed, too. Actually, this problem looks a lot like a regression

[Bug 1337898] Re: Invalid symlinks for libungif.so and libungif.a

2015-12-13 Thread Sebastian Marsching
@sds: Yes, they exist, but in /usr/lib, while they should be in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu (depending on the platform). As libgif.* is not in /usr/lib, the symbol links point to files that do not exist. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1337898] Re: Invalid symlinks for libungif.so and libungif.a

2015-11-15 Thread Sebastian Marsching
Are there any plans to backport this change to giflib-4.1.6-11 on trusty? Considering that trusty is still going to be supported for more than three years, it might make sense to backport this bugfix. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1510213] Re: Regression: Stable kernel update to 3.13.0-66 breaks UDP sockets

2015-10-27 Thread Sebastian Marsching
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1508510 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1508510 I can confirm that this bug is a duplicate of bug #1508510 and that the kernel from -proposed fixes the problem. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1510213] [NEW] Regression: Stable kernel update to 3.13.0-66 breaks UDP sockets

2015-10-26 Thread Sebastian Marsching
Public bug reported: I am running the 3.13 series kernel on Ubuntu 14.04 LTS (Trusty Tahr). A change introduced in version 3.13.0-66.108 of this kernel breaks UDP sockets under certain circumstances. The effect is that the recvfrom operation returns with an error, setting errno to EFAULT, even

[Bug 1406105] Re: Broken logrotate script in freeradius-2.1.12+dfsg-1.2ubuntu8 on Ubuntu 14.04 LTS

2015-08-31 Thread Sebastian Marsching
I verified that the bug is fixed in version 2.1.12+dfsg-1.2ubuntu8.1 and that the upgrade process (restart) works as intended. Thank you very much for your efforts in fixing this bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1406105] Re: Broken logrotate script in freeradius-2.1.12+dfsg-1.2ubuntu8 on Ubuntu 14.04 LTS

2015-08-31 Thread Sebastian Marsching
I verified that the bug is fixed in version 2.1.12+dfsg-1.2ubuntu8.1 and that the upgrade process (restart) works as intended. Thank you very much for your efforts in fixing this bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1406105] Re: Broken logrotate script in freeradius-2.1.12+dfsg-1.2ubuntu8 on Ubuntu 14.04 LTS

2015-08-31 Thread Sebastian Marsching
** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1406105 Title: Broken logrotate script in

[Bug 1406105] Re: Broken logrotate script in freeradius-2.1.12+dfsg-1.2ubuntu8 on Ubuntu 14.04 LTS

2015-08-31 Thread Sebastian Marsching
** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1406105 Title: Broken logrotate script in freeradius-2.1.12+dfsg-1.2ubuntu8 on

[Bug 1406105] [NEW] Broken logrotate script in freeradius-2.1.12+dfsg-1.2ubuntu8 on Ubuntu 14.04 LTS

2014-12-28 Thread Sebastian Marsching
Public bug reported: The freeradius-2.1.12+dfsg-1.2ubuntu8 on Ubuntu 14.04 LTS (Trusty Tahr) has a bug in the logrotate script (/etc/logrotate.d/freeradius): The command /etc/init.d/freeradius reload is used for reloading freeradius after its logfile(s) have been rotated. However, in Ubuntu

[Bug 1406105] Re: Broken logrotate script in freeradius-2.1.12+dfsg-1.2ubuntu8 on Ubuntu 14.04 LTS

2014-12-28 Thread Sebastian Marsching
I just realized that there is a better solution for the logrotate script: By using service freeradius reload, the script will work when Upstart is used but also when the traditional init script is used. ** Patch added: Revised patch for the logrotate script

[Bug 1406105] [NEW] Broken logrotate script in freeradius-2.1.12+dfsg-1.2ubuntu8 on Ubuntu 14.04 LTS

2014-12-28 Thread Sebastian Marsching
Public bug reported: The freeradius-2.1.12+dfsg-1.2ubuntu8 on Ubuntu 14.04 LTS (Trusty Tahr) has a bug in the logrotate script (/etc/logrotate.d/freeradius): The command /etc/init.d/freeradius reload is used for reloading freeradius after its logfile(s) have been rotated. However, in Ubuntu

[Bug 1406105] Re: Broken logrotate script in freeradius-2.1.12+dfsg-1.2ubuntu8 on Ubuntu 14.04 LTS

2014-12-28 Thread Sebastian Marsching
I just realized that there is a better solution for the logrotate script: By using service freeradius reload, the script will work when Upstart is used but also when the traditional init script is used. ** Patch added: Revised patch for the logrotate script

[Bug 940825] Re: apt-get update reporting not acceptable

2014-08-28 Thread Sebastian Marsching
I think that the originally described problem is in fact caused by the bug described in #20. Unless we expect every archive mirror to support ranged requests (which IMHO is a bit much to ask), the 406 error needs to be handled properly. Even if a mirror supports ranges, the implementation in the

[Bug 1333553] Re: linux-image-3.13.0-29-generic - soft lockup in kvm guests

2014-07-09 Thread Sebastian Marsching
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1307473 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1307473 I am not sure whether this bug is really a duplicate of #1307473. I experienced the problems described in this bug report without CPU pinning being used. I might add that I had the impression that Windows

[Bug 1337898] [NEW] Invalid symlinks for libungif.so and libungif.a

2014-07-04 Thread Sebastian Marsching
Public bug reported: In Ubuntu 14.04 LTS on x86_64 I am experiencing the following bug in libgif-dev 4.1.6-11: Symbol links for libungif.a, libungif.la, and libungif.so are created in /usr/lib that point to libgif.a, libgif.la and libgif.so.4.1.6 respectively. However, these files are not in

[Bug 940825] Re: apt-get update reporting not acceptable

2013-09-07 Thread Sebastian Marsching
This problem seems to appear when a file has been partially downloaded to /var/lib/apt/lists/partial and the server does not support request ranges. Here is the error I got when running aptitude update and the corresponding HTTP requests / responses: [...] Err http://de.archive.ubuntu.com

[Bug 1125611] Re: DKMS brcompat module circular dependency causes broken module

2013-02-18 Thread Sebastian Marsching
I tested the following packages from precise-proposed on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS (amd64) and they work fine for me: openvswitch-brcompat_1.4.0-1ubuntu1.5 openvswitch-common_1.4.0-1ubuntu1.5 openvswitch-controller_1.4.0-1ubuntu1.5 openvswitch-datapath-dkms_1.4.0-1ubuntu1.5

[Bug 1125611] Re: DKMS brcompat module circular dependency causes broken module

2013-02-18 Thread Sebastian Marsching
I tested the following packages from precise-proposed on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS (amd64) and they work fine for me: openvswitch-brcompat_1.4.0-1ubuntu1.5 openvswitch-common_1.4.0-1ubuntu1.5 openvswitch-controller_1.4.0-1ubuntu1.5 openvswitch-datapath-dkms_1.4.0-1ubuntu1.5

[Bug 1125611] Re: Upgrade to 1.4.0-1ubuntu1.4 breaks brcompat support

2013-02-16 Thread Sebastian Marsching
I do not think that it is the same bug as originally described in bug #1088160. This bug was an issue with the build system. However, it might be the same problem that that one comment (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openvswitch/+bug/1088160/comments/2) to that bug described. -- You

[Bug 1125611] Re: DKMS brcompat module circular dependency causes broken module

2013-02-16 Thread Sebastian Marsching
I can confirm the the new version (from the PPA) fixes the problem for me. Thank you very much for the quick solution! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openvswitch in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1125611

[Bug 1125611] Re: Upgrade to 1.4.0-1ubuntu1.4 breaks brcompat support

2013-02-16 Thread Sebastian Marsching
I do not think that it is the same bug as originally described in bug #1088160. This bug was an issue with the build system. However, it might be the same problem that that one comment (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openvswitch/+bug/1088160/comments/2) to that bug described. -- You

[Bug 1125611] Re: DKMS brcompat module circular dependency causes broken module

2013-02-16 Thread Sebastian Marsching
I can confirm the the new version (from the PPA) fixes the problem for me. Thank you very much for the quick solution! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1125611 Title: DKMS brcompat

[Bug 1125611] [NEW] Upgrade to 1.4.0-1ubuntu1.4 breaks brcompat support

2013-02-14 Thread Sebastian Marsching
Public bug reported: On Ubuntu 12.04.2 LTS, after an automatic upgrade from openvswitch 1.4.0-1ubuntu1.3 to openvswith 1.4.0-1ubuntu1.4 the brcompat support does not work any longer. The brcompat kernel module can be build, installed, and loaded, but openvswitch-brcompatd will not start with the

[Bug 1125611] [NEW] Upgrade to 1.4.0-1ubuntu1.4 breaks brcompat support

2013-02-14 Thread Sebastian Marsching
Public bug reported: On Ubuntu 12.04.2 LTS, after an automatic upgrade from openvswitch 1.4.0-1ubuntu1.3 to openvswith 1.4.0-1ubuntu1.4 the brcompat support does not work any longer. The brcompat kernel module can be build, installed, and loaded, but openvswitch-brcompatd will not start with the

[Bug 986371] Re: Regression in nvidia-graphics-drivers causes freezes in combination with gnome-screensaver

2012-07-14 Thread Sebastian Marsching
Peter, yes I was trying to install the nvidia-current from the quantal repository, which has the dependency on the newer X version. A few weeks ago I updated the affected system to precise. The version of the nvidia-current package in precise had the same problems as the one in lucid. In fact it

[Bug 986371] Re: Regression in nvidia-graphics-drivers causes freezes in combination with gnome-screensaver

2012-05-06 Thread Sebastian Marsching
It might be fixed in 295.49, however there is no way to test this, because 295.49 is only available in quantal while I am running lucid. In fact I cannot install it manually either, because it depends on xserver- xorg-core (= 2:1.10.99.901) and the newest version available in lucid is

[Bug 986371] Re: Regression in nvidia-graphics-drivers causes freezes in combination with gnome-screensaver

2012-04-20 Thread Sebastian Marsching
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/986371 Title: Regression in nvidia-graphics-drivers causes freezes in combination with gnome-screensaver To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 986371] [NEW] Regression in nvidia-graphics-drivers causes freezes in combination with gnome-screensaver

2012-04-20 Thread Sebastian Marsching
Public bug reported: The security update of the nvidia graphics driver causes a problem on my system (GeForce 8800 GTS): When the screen is locked (using gnome-screensaver) the screen freezes for about 30 seconds. The same thing happens, when the screen is unlocked. This problem appeared after

[Bug 350936] Re: Should shut down domains on system shutdown

2011-06-13 Thread Sebastian Marsching
The problem of shutting down the virtual machines consists of two parts: If a init-script is used, libvirtd might be killed, before the shutdown command has been sent to the virtual machines. If the pre-stop script in the libvirt-bin upstart job is used or a new upstart job starting on stopping

[Bug 350936] Re: Should shut down domains on system shutdown

2011-06-13 Thread Sebastian Marsching
The problem of shutting down the virtual machines consists of two parts: If a init-script is used, libvirtd might be killed, before the shutdown command has been sent to the virtual machines. If the pre-stop script in the libvirt-bin upstart job is used or a new upstart job starting on stopping

[Bug 280421] [NEW] ethtool not available in post-ifup script

2008-10-08 Thread Sebastian Marsching
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ethtool PROBLEM: I am running Ubuntu 8.04 in a Xen DomU. To fix network performance issues, the line post-up /usr/sbin/ethtool -K eth0 tx off is needed for the virtual ethernet device within the /etc/network/intefaces file. Usually this works fine,