I pushed a commit to the salsa.debian.org repo of scilab : next upload
will fix that. Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1739477
Title:
Scilab 6.0 shows warnings about files from
Is it fixed upstream too?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1166628
Title:
New compile error on ARM
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
(the question is so I know if it's useful to push changes around the ARM
asm issues upstream or not)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1166628
Title:
New compile error on ARM
To manage
Public bug reported:
I have the following compile error with gcc-4.7 version 4.7.2-23ubuntu2:
/bin/bash ../libtool --mode=compile --tag=CC ../mpn/m4-ccas --m4=m4 gcc
-std=gnu99 -c -DHAVE_CONFIG_H-O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -D__GMP_WITHIN_GMP
-I.. -DOPERATION_`echo udiv | sed 's/_$//'` -I.
I can confirm 4.6.2-16ubuntu1, uploaded Thu, 23 Feb 2012 19:39:11 +0100
fixes the problem : I can compile sage without compiler problems!
Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926855
This is still a problem with 2.13-24ubuntu4.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/713985
Title:
[armel] Function tgammal has precision issues in version
2.12.1-0ubuntu10.2 on ARM
To
Public bug reported:
I'm porting the sagemath software to ARM. I completed the port with
ubuntu oneiric.
I upgraded to (a snapshot of) precise, and now a single file in the
whole project doesn't build anymore.
Hence something has been broken from oneiric/armel to precise/armhf.
The attached
** Attachment added: Example problematic file
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926855/+attachment/2714685/+files/mp.c
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926855
Title:
[ARMhf] gcc
The file compiles with -O3 -funroll-loops -marm (someone suggested I
try)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926855
Title:
[ARMhf] gcc produces assembler it can't compile
To manage
Public bug reported:
Consider the following test program :
#include stdio.h
#include math.h
int
main (int argc,
char* argv[])
{
long double x = 6.0;
printf(tgammal (%.20Lf)=%.20Lfn, x, tgammal(x));
return 0;
}
When run on 2.12.1-0ubuntu10.2, the result is :
tgammal
I forgot to say that it was on an ARM (little-endian) box!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/713985
Title:
Function tgammal has precision issues in version 2.12.1-0ubuntu10.2 on
ARM
Public bug reported:
While investigating why I couldn't compile sage on the toshiba AC100 (an
ARM-based netbook) -- this is report
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10285 , it appeared that some
of the problems are due to the compiler, which from a C file goes to an
assembly file... and
Notice that launchpad insisted that my package number doesn't exist -- but I
know it does, since the head of /usr/share/doc/gcc-4.4/changelog.Debian.gz is :
gcc-4.4 (4.4.4-14ubuntu5) maverick; urgency=low
* Avoid include paths starting with a double slash. LP: #635840.
-- Matthias Klose
I reported it upstream as :
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10975
The more we will be interested and ready to give information about the
matter, the faster it will get fixed. The ideal situation is if one of
us had a clue about the code itself.
--
No more X on resume after hibernate
The fact is that we ekiga developpers develop ekiga.
And ubuntu packages ekiga.
If packages don't follow the bugfixes releases, then there's nothing we
can do except pester that the bug reports come directly to us, giving us
undue work.
--
ekiga segfaults on start up
No, that mean edgy itself hasn't been kept up to date, and we ekiga
developers suffer duplicate reports on duplicate reports although we try
to be as reactive as possible for volunteers. Pun intended.
--
ekiga segfaults on start up
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/63348
You received this bug
2.0.x releases are bugfix-only releases : cherry-picking makes no sense.
--
ekiga segfaults on start up
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/63348
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
2.0.3 is very old : we're releasing 2.0.9 in a few days!
--
ekiga segfaults on start up
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/63348
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Mark as rejected as you wish, but notice that 2.0.3 is old news already
: we're up to 2.0.5!
--
ekiga segfaults on start up
https://launchpad.net/bugs/63348
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Same here ; notice the camera is obviously detected by gnome-volume-
manager (I killed it and ran it with -n in console to check).
--
gnome-volume-manager-gthumb stopped working in Feisty
https://launchpad.net/bugs/78756
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
@Greg Michalec: did you try to disable DRI? That's what makes it mostly
work for me.
--
No more X on resume after hibernate
https://launchpad.net/bugs/23545
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Moving files behind the user's back is a very bad practice.
Doing so looking at their permissions is fragile.
My two eurocents.
--
Users should be discouraged from editing temporary files
https://launchpad.net/bugs/15179
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Removing files in the _temporary_ directory isn't behind users' back,
so it's better : you claim something, you stick to it.
Why not make applications save those files readonly? That way the user
will not write to them.
--
Users should be discouraged from editing temporary files
Eh, I have wonderful news : I got a wifi router, which meant I could use
'managed'.
And with managed, I get Rx invalid nwid by the hundred of thousands!
With 2.6.15-27-k7 in mode managed, I have only one such at the end of
the day!
--
Cannot set modes other than 'Managed' on Atheros based wifi
I commented the following to the blog post :
I save temporary files in /tmp, so you know at least one person which would
be very annoyed if you disallow /tmp.
A solution would be to make a special “Temporary” location, which would
really be /tmp, but would at least make things clear for a
It wasn't really rejected : it was marked as duplicate. Probably this
bug should track the other bug upstream.
--
Xorg exits when it receives an ACPI button/lid event
https://launchpad.net/bugs/61746
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
The druid may crash because accessibility is on... It's a bug in atk,
where multithreading isn't supported.
--
ekiga segfaults on start up
https://launchpad.net/bugs/63348
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Hmmm... if it's handling a condition which wasn't handled, then it's a
real fix :-)
If it's handling a condition which shouldn't have arisen in the first
place, then it's a workaround and it's bad :-)
--
Xorg exits when it receives an ACPI button/lid event
https://launchpad.net/bugs/61746
--
Eh, I removed this line and grub is able to show the menu again
normally.
--
grub does not respond to ESC
https://launchpad.net/bugs/63969
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Uh... I had forgotten I had reported the problem here... just discovered
it again.
I have both suspendhibernate working with 2.6.15-27-k7 (not perfectly
for hibernate : I have to switch backforth from console before getting
my screen back -- and it's not locked).
Disabling DRI made it work.
If it does like here, the menu isn't displayed, but is still there and
you can select the right line blindly.
--
grub does not respond to ESC
https://launchpad.net/bugs/63969
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
As I said, the fact that booting a different kernel makes the difference
between works and fails is certainly indicative of a bug between
acpid and kernel.
Could others test if using an older kernel helps ?
--
Xorg exits when it receives an ACPI button/lid event
(1) enough reports ;
(2) enough information to solve it.
--
Xorg exits when it receives an ACPI button/lid event
https://launchpad.net/bugs/61746
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Notice my comment about successfully using an older kernel with the rest
being the same.
I'm not sure playing with the xserver will really help :-/
--
Xorg exits when it receives an ACPI button/lid event
https://launchpad.net/bugs/61746
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
The upgrade to 2.6.17-10.29 didn't solve that : only managed is
available.
--
Cannot set modes other than 'Managed' on Atheros based wifi card
https://launchpad.net/bugs/62106
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
I have some new things to say about the problem :
(1) I'm using the radeon driver, not fglrx ;
(2) the problem occurs with 2.6.17-10.28 and 2.6.17-10.29
(3) but not with my trusty 2.6.15-27.48 (I upgraded from dapper recently)
What information could I provide to help with finding a solution?
--
After today's update, emacs in X works again!
Thanks!
--
fonts do not diplay when run in X
https://launchpad.net/bugs/57803
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
What I find strange is that the last entry in changelog.Debian.gz is to
say that the support for maxima had been re-enabled!
--
Can't init Maxima session within TeXmacs
https://launchpad.net/bugs/58498
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
I have seen the same issue today on an ASUS A2D with a Radeon Mobility
9200.
Notice that removing the battery had the same effect (power cable was
plugged, of course...) : kill X.
Isn't the X server a little touchy about acpid events ?
--
Xorg exits when it receives an ACPI button/lid event
are you sure it's gdm restarting and not the same as bug #61746, where X
dies ?
--
closing lid restarts gdm
https://launchpad.net/bugs/63800
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
(1) is perhaps related to bug #60938 ; I ran depmod -a and it fixed
the issue.
Now both linux-restricted-modules-2.6.17-10-generic and linux-
restricted-modules-2.6.17-10-386 have the only-managed problem.
--
Cannot set modes other than 'Managed' on Atheros based wifi card
Same problem here. I came here to report, and I'm pretty happy to see it
is already there :-)
I'm quite surprised the bug is still marked unconfirmed, though.
--
fonts do not diplay when run in X
https://launchpad.net/bugs/57803
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
I can confirm this with a netgear card.
I did have some problems when upgrading :
(1) linux-restricted-modules-2.6.17-10-generic couldn't load the module because
of unresolved symbol issues ;
(2) linux-restricted-modules-2.6.17-10-386 can load the module but cannot set
mode to non-managed.
So
Eh, today I fought quite a long time with synaptic to get it to unlock
some packages : no way. Synaptic did as it does when it does something,
but when I got hand again, nothing had changed.
I finally unlocked them by removing the /var/lib/synaptic/preferences
file (which had been created when
To be precise, I have 0.57.11ubuntu10 here and now.
--
Lock Version not working
https://launchpad.net/bugs/63777
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Pfff... I don't have the developpment environment ready to retest
anymore and lack the time to reinstall it properly.
I propose to close the bug.
PS: Isn't the reporter supposed to be able to close a report?
--
Can't link a C++ lib to a program
https://launchpad.net/bugs/2784
--
ubuntu-bugs
46 matches
Mail list logo
