Re: [Bug 1912371] Re: [MIR] flashrom + libftdi

2021-05-19 Thread Stefan Tauner
a few years ago. While I was using the github repo+tracker, there is currently ~nobody taking care of that. A more promising way to reach the right people is to write an email to flash...@flashrom.org -- Kind regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Stefan Tauner -- You received this bug notification because y

[Bug 1876633] Re: cfv not available in 20.04 LTS (focal)

2020-05-03 Thread Stefan Tauner
Right, thanks for the pointer. I missed that it was already removed from Debian stable/Buster. It will soon follow in testing. There is some (stalled) effort porting it to Python 3 though: https://github.com/cfv- project/cfv/issues/8 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #936288

[Bug 1876633] [NEW] cfv not available in 20.04 LTS (focal)

2020-05-03 Thread Stefan Tauner
Public bug reported: For some reason cfv did not make it into 20.04, why? It is contained in 19.10 as well as all current Debian suits including testing and unstable. I could not easily find any explanation. ** Affects: cfv (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You

[Bug 472426] Re: terminus not available after karmic upgrade - reinstall fixes

2020-02-13 Thread Stefan Tauner
That would actually mean that the package now is completely broken. Have you tried restarting your desktop session (e.g., reboot)? Fonts are sometimes not picked up without that... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1586753] Re: regression: unusable UI of gitg 3.x

2019-10-12 Thread Stefan Tauner
No, it isn't. More appropriately it should be tagged as won't fix. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1586753 Title: regression: unusable UI of gitg 3.x To manage notifications about

[Bug 1310307] Re: spamassassin postinst uses a login shell

2018-11-10 Thread Stefan Tauner
And I just noticed that this bug is about 5 years old... this is with Ubuntu 18.04 and ubuntu-mate-default-settings version 18.04.17. The actual output is: Installing new version of config file /etc/init.d/spamassassin ... -su: 2: [: x: unexpected operator -su: 2: [: x: unexpected

[Bug 1310307] Re: spamassassin postinst uses a login shell

2018-11-10 Thread Stefan Tauner
In my case the culprit is/was '/etc/profile.d/mate-qt.sh' from package 'ubuntu-mate-default-settings'. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1310307 Title: spamassassin postinst uses a

[Bug 1754458] Re: nm-applet symbol not displayed on mate (18.04)

2018-08-25 Thread Stefan Tauner
** Also affects: mate-indicator-applet (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1754458 Title: nm-applet symbol not displayed on mate

[Bug 1754458] Re: nm-applet symbol not displayed on mate (18.04)

2018-08-20 Thread Stefan Tauner
I ran into this after an update from 16.04. I had a custom panel as well but I found a way to show the notification panel again without resetting the dconf configuration. I had three indicator-application.desktop files (and I IIRC likewise as many probably competing running instances of it):

[Bug 1754458] Re: nm-applet symbol not displayed on mate (18.04)

2018-08-20 Thread Stefan Tauner
Possible duplicate/related bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator- application/+bug/1728449 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1754458 Title: nm-applet symbol not

[Bug 90085] Re: When /tmp is mounted noexec, preconfigure fails

2018-04-07 Thread Stefan Tauner
My workaround uses a dedicated directory for apt that is noexec as well but becomes temporally during installs: /etc/fstab: tmpfs /tmp tmpfs defaults,noatime,nosuid,nodev,noexec,mode=1777,size=512M 0 0 tmpfs /var/tmp/apt tmpfs defaults,noatime,nosuid,nodev,noexec,mode=1777,size=512M 0 0

[Bug 1742124] [NEW] Missing update-alternatives configuration in 5.0 package for Xenial

2018-01-09 Thread Stefan Tauner
Public bug reported: Hi, I did not look at the package metadata but installing clang-5.0 from xenial-updates/universe and afterwards removing clang (and thus clang 3.8) left me without a clang alias while other package provide this alternative. It was fixable via update-alternatives

[Bug 1597740] Re: iwyu 3.7-1 should depend on clang-3.7

2017-11-17 Thread Stefan Tauner
libclang-common-3.7-dev would be enough actually -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1597740 Title: iwyu 3.7-1 should depend on clang-3.7 To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 311836] Re: visual glitches when messages are selected with the keyboard

2016-08-12 Thread Stefan Tauner
Nope, has been fixed in the mean time. I don't know which version fixed it though. ** Changed in: claws-mail (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1586753] [NEW] regression: unusable UI of gitg 3.x

2016-05-29 Thread Stefan Tauner
Public bug reported: The upstream 3.x branch of gitg is an almost complete rewrite that changes the very nature of the program. For example, the new version packaged for Xenial completely lacks any visible keyboard shortcuts and has many other obstructions for my daily work flow that have been

[Bug 1585107] Re: ding only matches words beginning a-i

2016-05-24 Thread Stefan Tauner
I can confirm the issue and that both suggestions fix the issue, i.e. adding "-a" to the egrep options or switching to the internal grep implementation. I cannot tell if I have changed this in my 14.04 install before upgrading (if that was possible at all, I cannot remember the GUI at all). I

[Bug 1301158] Re: nm-applet icon invisible

2016-05-21 Thread Stefan Tauner
I can confirm that the dbus-launch workaround mentioned in #14 also helps when running mate-desktop in 16.04 xenial upgraded from 12.04+14.04 (manually... so this might not be a real bug there). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1168518] Re: "The value 'precise' is invalid for APT::Default-Release" when upgrading from precise to quantal via command line

2016-05-20 Thread Stefan Tauner
In my case I get it when upgrading to trusty... I presume because precise is no longer supported. Removing the Apt preference/directive «APT::Default-Release "precise";» e.g. in /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/ helps. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1558822] Re: [FFe] sync flashrom 0.9.9+r1954-1 from Debian

2016-03-26 Thread Stefan Tauner
** Information type changed from Public to Public Security -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1558822 Title: [FFe] sync flashrom 0.9.9+r1954-1 from Debian To manage notifications about

[Bug 1558822] Re: [FFe] sync flashrom 0.9.9+r1954-1 from Debian

2016-03-26 Thread Stefan Tauner
Yes, indeed that was a mistake, sorry. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1558822 Title: [FFe] sync flashrom 0.9.9+r1954-1 from Debian To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1558822] Re: [FFe] sync flashrom 0.9.9+r1954-1 from Debian unstable

2016-03-24 Thread Stefan Tauner
** Description changed: In bug #1547144 a FFe was granted to merge Debian's package of - flashrom's 0.9.9 release candidate into xenial was granted and the - package has been updated. Upstream has now released 0.9.9 final - including a security fix and I would like to request another exception

[Bug 1558822] [NEW] [FFe] sync flashrom 0.9.9+r1954-1 from Debian unstable

2016-03-19 Thread Stefan Tauner
Public bug reported: In bug #1547144 a FFe was granted to merge Debian's package of flashrom's 0.9.9 release candidate into xenial was granted and the package has been updated. Upstream has now released 0.9.9 final including a security fix and I would like to request another exception (and a

[Bug 1547144] Re: [FFe] sync flashrom_0.9.9~rc1+r1942-1 from Debian unstable

2016-02-23 Thread Stefan Tauner
** Description changed: flashrom has released 0.9.9-rc1 and intends to release 0.9.9 final shortly after xenial beta freeze (around 2016-02-28). Currently Ubuntu still ships 0.9.7+r1852-1.1 due to timing constraints of the respective Debian maintainer. However, said release candidate

[Bug 1547144] Re: [FFe] sync flashrom_0.9.9~rc1+r1942-1 from Debian unstable

2016-02-23 Thread Stefan Tauner
** Description changed: flashrom has released 0.9.9-rc1 and intends to release 0.9.9 final shortly after xenial beta freeze (around 2016-02-28). - Currently Ubuntu still ships 0.9.7+r1852-1.1 which is missing quite a few critical bugfixes (cf. bug #1404568) and does not build on all

[Bug 1547144] Re: [FFe] sync flashrom_0.9.9~rc1+r1942-1 from Debian unstable

2016-02-23 Thread Stefan Tauner
** Description changed: - flashrom has released 0.9.9-rc1. + flashrom has released 0.9.9-rc1 and intends to release 0.9.9 final + shortly after xenial beta freeze (around 2016-02-28). - Ubuntu is still at 0.9.7+r1852-1.1 which is missing quite a few critical - bugfixes and does not build on

[Bug 1311893] Re: kdbg does not start after upgrading to Trusty

2015-06-17 Thread Stefan Tauner
This is fixed upstream by this commit http://repo.or.cz/w/kdbg.git/commit/dd2ecd5010070ec7af0a67b1f9dbfcaf58668170 and would be trivial to fix in Ubuntu by including the regenerated image. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1373221] Re: guvcview crashed with SIGSEGV in get_ctrl_by_id()

2015-06-05 Thread Stefan Tauner
Whoopsie... I completely missed the subject and the stack traces above, sorry. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1373221 Title: guvcview crashed with SIGSEGV in get_ctrl_by_id() To

[Bug 1373221] Re: guvcview crashed with SIGSEGV in get_ctrl_by_id()

2015-06-05 Thread Stefan Tauner
This is probably more interesting (from running guvcview in gdb): [New Thread 0x7fffe5e44700 (LWP 27177)] Cannot connect to server socket err = No such file or directory Cannot connect to server request channel jack server is not running or cannot be started [Thread 0x7fffe5e44700 (LWP 27177)

[Bug 1373221] Re: guvcview crashed with SIGSEGV in get_ctrl_by_id()

2015-06-05 Thread Stefan Tauner
I doubt that this verbose log helps much, but here you go... This is with a Trust 17676 webcam (145f:019f) on Debian 8 (guvcview 2.0.1+debian-1). $ guvcview --verbosity=2 GUVCVIEW: couldn't open /home/.../.config/guvcview2/video0 for read: No such file or directory GUVCVIEW: language catalog=

[Bug 1404568] [NEW] segfaults with 24 older flash chips

2014-12-20 Thread Stefan Tauner
Public bug reported: The flashrom included in ubuntu 14.10 vivid segfaults when running on a computer with any of 24 affected flash chips due to a bug I have added in r1833 (vivid ships r1852). For details please see the attached patch that should fix the issue. ** Affects: flashrom (Ubuntu)

[Bug 1404568] Re: segfaults with 24 older flash chips

2014-12-20 Thread Stefan Tauner
** Description changed: - The flashrom included in ubuntu 14.10 vivid segfaults when running on a computer with any of 24 affected flash chips due to a bug I have added in r1833 (vivid ships r1852). - For details please see the attached patch that should fix the issue. + The flashrom included

[Bug 1307657] Re: UBUNTU_MENUPROXY should not be set in Xfce

2014-11-01 Thread Stefan Tauner
** Changed in: unity-gtk-module (Ubuntu Trusty) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1307657 Title: UBUNTU_MENUPROXY should not be set in Xfce To manage

[Bug 1104230] Re: DisplayPort 1.2 MST support seems to be broken in the Intel driver

2014-02-17 Thread Stefan Tauner
@ickle: could you please respond as to why this is not an xserver-xorg- video-intel bug? ** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 274799] Re: xchat freezes when trying to connect to a server

2014-01-08 Thread Stefan Tauner
This is not fixed but quite hard to reproduce. I am quite lucky to be able to reproduce it now quite consistently on my (mostly) 12.04 installation. I am using various packages from quantal, raring, saucy and I think even trusty because I need a lot of different updated texlive packages, but they

[Bug 274799] Re: xchat freezes when trying to connect to a server

2014-01-08 Thread Stefan Tauner
Oh and BTW the other thread (there are exactly two at that point) has always the same stack trace (so is probably just blocked at that select call): Thread 2 (Thread 0x7fffe565d700 (LWP 5684)): #0 0x7529d763 in select () at ../sysdeps/unix/syscall-template.S:82 #1 0x7fffe573898a in

[Bug 274799] Re: xchat freezes when trying to connect to a server

2014-01-07 Thread Stefan Tauner
** Changed in: xchat (Ubuntu) Status: Expired = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/274799 Title: xchat freezes when trying to connect to a server To manage

[Bug 719563] Re: mountall: fatal error: cannot open /dev/mapper/crypthome_unformatted

2013-12-26 Thread Stefan Tauner
The situation should definitely be improved. I had some problems already with ubuntu's init (bug #1077650) and this is another case 1) that would make it impossible for a less knowledgeable person to boot and 2) that is rather hard to diagnose even if you have some profound knowledge. I second

[Bug 1077650] Re: booting from raid in degraded mode ends in endless loop

2013-12-03 Thread Stefan Tauner
this is *not* a duplicate (of bug #728435) as bernd wrote. i am not entirely sure, because in my case i am also suffering from another crypto-related bug, but i think lvm2 might be involved too: mountroot_fail() in /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/init- premount/lvm2 does never return 0

[Bug 1003309] Re: Boot fails after installing updates, error: “cryptsetup: evms_activate is not available

2013-12-03 Thread Stefan Tauner
i had the same problem as the_nipper (robert-wirth-gmx) #58. i migrated a previous root in lvm in luks to root in lvm in luks in raid1 (by creating new block devices incl. a degraded raid1, copying all data over and changing the configuration of crypttab, fstab etc. and updating the initramfs).

[Bug 1255920] Re: Multiple flash chips report, but only one flash chip is installed

2013-11-28 Thread Stefan Tauner
The right one ;) flashrom cannot decide which one (yet), so you have to either check the chip visually, or - if you feel lucky - just choose one of the two. The basic definition for both chips is equal, but the (optional) write protection is different. If that is not active it should work with

[Bug 1255920] Re: Multiple flash chips report, but only one flash chip is installed

2013-11-28 Thread Stefan Tauner
** Changed in: flashrom (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1255920 Title: Multiple flash chips report, but only one flash chip is installed To

[Bug 774071] Re: Indicator-datetime-service renders 100% CPU usage

2013-07-06 Thread Stefan Tauner
Don't expect anybody to read a bug report that has a fix released state since 2011. Either change the state of this bug report or file a new one (I think the latter would be better actually, but i did not read the whole thread in detail). -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 551382] Re: [needs-packaging] Bring this package back in Karmic and Lucid

2013-04-03 Thread Stefan Tauner
Good news: the 2.0 release has been added to Debain sid http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/u/usbview/usbview_2.0-1/changelog We can either wait until it hits Debian testing (which will have to wait until the next Debian release because of their freeze AFAIK) and gets automatically

[Bug 893828] Re: Granting Wireshark capture privileges does not allow USB capture

2013-02-13 Thread Stefan Tauner
Similar arguments can be brought up against allowing a user to capture network traffic. So arguing against it - at least if there were a fine- grained option in the kernel - is not convincing, especially if it is disabled by default as the network privilege is ATM. And if there were such a

[Bug 893828] Re: Granting Wireshark capture privileges does not allow USB capture

2013-02-13 Thread Stefan Tauner
I think if a system uses NAS… I meant it more generally: information leaks on networks are so common that you can compare the thread level to that of a sniffable USB. This opens a security hole on the system as detailed above. That's exactly my point, this should not be needed, because it greatly

[Bug 1103416] Re: 12.04 isn't cleanly unmounted

2013-02-03 Thread Stefan Tauner
hm... I am pretty sure now that this was fixed by linux- image-3.2.0-37-generic (3.2.0-37.58), i can still reproduce the wrong behavior (even with a second bind mount sometimes apparently) with linux-image-3.2.0-36-generic (3.2.0-36.57). can anyone confirm this? -- You received this bug

[Bug 1103416] Re: 12.04 isn't cleanly unmounted

2013-02-03 Thread Stefan Tauner
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1101666 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1101666 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1101666 inotify fd leak -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1103416] Re: 12.04 isn't cleanly unmounted

2013-02-01 Thread Stefan Tauner
lsof -x fl +D /data/home output is empty. losetup -a -v does only show the .iso mounted: /dev/loop0: [fc02]:6162260 (/tftpboot/isos/systemrescuecd-x86-3.0.0.iso) losetup -f returns the first unused loop device, which is loop1. there is no nfs server running. i am running out of ideas... other

[Bug 1103416] Re: 12.04 isn't cleanly unmounted

2013-01-31 Thread Stefan Tauner
i have been digging further. REG_MTPTS contains the following values in my setup: /tftpboot/loops/sysrescuecd /tftpboot /data/backup/home-recover /var/cache /home /boot /data i have redirected the output of the umount call (initiated via fstab-decode) to a log file: fstab-decode umount

[Bug 1103416] Re: 12.04 isn't cleanly unmounted

2013-01-31 Thread Stefan Tauner
** Attachment added: umountfs-ps.log https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sysvinit/+bug/1103416/+attachment/3509716/+files/umountfs-ps.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1103416] Re: 12.04 isn't cleanly unmounted

2013-01-31 Thread Stefan Tauner
grep -v ^# /etc/fstab proc/proc procnodev,noexec,nosuid 0 0 /dev/mapper/ssd-root/ ext4noatime,errors=remount-ro,discard 0 1

[Bug 1103416] Re: 12.04 isn't cleanly unmounted

2013-01-31 Thread Stefan Tauner
... autoloop,ro sorry -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1103416 Title: 12.04 isn't cleanly unmounted To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1103416] Re: 12.04 isn't cleanly unmounted

2013-01-23 Thread Stefan Tauner
I am seeing this too in the last couple of reboots. My / and home are on separate lvm volumes and share the same crypted luks partition. /home is actually bind-mounted from my data partition: /dev/mapper/ssd-root/ ext4

[Bug 1103416] Re: 12.04 isn't cleanly unmounted

2013-01-23 Thread Stefan Tauner
I have added some debug prints to umountfs and umountroot (in /etc/init.d/). Namely: mount /umountrootfs-mount.log lsof /umountrootfs-lsof.log ps auxf /umountrootfs-ps.log and similarly in umountfs before they run their umount sequences. The umountrootfs-mount.log

[Bug 916948] Re: josm does not always find a valid JVM

2012-10-24 Thread Stefan Tauner
i have not looked at how debian does this (we probably better should do that), but FWIW this is my solution... this most probably is not what the original authors wanted though, because this will try to launch josm even on headless-only solutions i think. but it has the advantage, that it uses

[Bug 916948] Re: josm does not always find a valid JVM

2012-10-23 Thread Stefan Tauner
after installing openjdk-7-jdk and removing the following packages: default-jdk openjdk-6-jre-headless default-jre-headless icedtea-6-jre-jamvm openjdk-6-jre openjdk-6-jre-lib icedtea-6-jre-cacao openjdk-6-jdk default-jre openjdk-6-demo the josm start script failed to load it as described

[Bug 1035051] [NEW] Sync flashrom 0.9.6.1+r1563-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2012-08-09 Thread Stefan Tauner
/Flashrom/0.9.6 To summarize: new programmers, new chips, new CLI options, new bugs! Thanks! -- Kind regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Stefan Tauner ** Affects: flashrom (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 524407] Re: hibernating wakes up sleeping harddrives

2012-08-05 Thread Stefan Tauner
gotta love the bots... this is still an issue on afaik ALL kernels, see upstream bug report... ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 984785] Re: .goutputstream files polluting $HOME

2012-07-24 Thread Stefan Tauner
mine are either 104 or 0 bytes, but that's just because there are two keys/cookies in them: xauth -f ~/.goutputstream-5X9DGW list hostname/unix:11 MIT-MAGIC-COOKIE-1 key1 hostname/unix:10 MIT-MAGIC-COOKIE-1 key2 (no idea why there are two though...) apart from that i am using mate-desktop but

[Bug 660250] Re: On AC state changes udisks-daemon wakes disks from standby

2012-04-27 Thread Stefan Tauner
apparently this issue remains in 12.04. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/660250 Title: On AC state changes udisks-daemon wakes disks from standby To manage notifications about this

[Bug 961997] Re: *** VTE ***: Failed to load terminal capabilities from '/etc/termcap'

2012-04-24 Thread Stefan Tauner
not only the cursor keys dont work, also enter does no longer work in my case and that is pretty bad. it happened today while i was upgrading from 10.10 to 11.04 (via do-release-upgrade in gnome-terminal) (so most probably other versions involved). since such an upgrade takes quite some time it

[Bug 985294] Re: NUnit assembly is not picked up by monodevelop

2012-04-21 Thread Stefan Tauner
yes: dpkg -l *nunit* Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend |/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name Version

[Bug 985294] Re: NUnit assembly is not picked up by monodevelop

2012-04-21 Thread Stefan Tauner
afaik un (unknown, no errors) indicates that they were purged. unpurged packages (i.e. those with left over config files) are rc (remove(d)/conf-files). nevertheless i have purged them with aptitude to no avail. how does monodevelop determine the available references? is there another similar

[Bug 985294] [NEW] NUnit assembly is not picked up by monodevelop

2012-04-18 Thread Stefan Tauner
Public bug reported: nothing NUnit-related does show up in the references dialog although i have everything remotely related installed. if i add the assembly by hand it works correctly. the nunit addin works correctly afaik (i.e. the window is there and i can launch test runs). ProblemType:

[Bug 985294] Re: NUnit assembly is not picked up by monodevelop

2012-04-18 Thread Stefan Tauner
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/985294 Title: NUnit assembly is not picked up by monodevelop To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 976717] [NEW] Sync flashrom 0.9.5.2+r1517-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2012-04-08 Thread Stefan Tauner
Grüßen, Stefan Tauner ** Affects: flashrom (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/976717 Title: Sync flashrom 0.9.5.2+r1517-1 (universe

[Bug 901547] Re: Doesn't work

2012-03-28 Thread Stefan Tauner
the updated (see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi- bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=651027) package in 12.04 still does not work correctly. ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #651027 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=651027 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 966506] [NEW] xsd.exe does not handle default values for xs:decimal correctly

2012-03-27 Thread Stefan Tauner
Public bug reported: when xsd.exe is used with the /c switch to generate c# code from an existing xml schema (.xsd), it handles attributes like the following incorrectly: xs:attribute name=setup type=xs:decimal default=123/ this will generate: [System.ComponentModel.DefaultValue(123m)]

[Bug 941555] [NEW] FFE: Sync flashrom 0.9.5.1+r1508-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2012-02-26 Thread Stefan Tauner
/Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Stefan Tauner ** Affects: flashrom (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/941555 Title: FFE: Sync flashrom

[Bug 938156] [NEW] FFE: Sync flashrom 0.9.5+r1503-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2012-02-21 Thread Stefan Tauner
. This could be probably dropped and replaced with a dependency on the linux kernel headers for Ubuntu already (will be done so in Debian ASAP), but is not a big issue for most Ubuntu users i guess. -- Kind regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Stefan Tauner ** Affects: flashrom (Ubuntu) Importance

[Bug 933484] [NEW] installation fails because $DPKG_MAINTSCRIPT_ARCH is not set

2012-02-16 Thread Stefan Tauner
Public bug reported: hi! the upgrade of flashplugin-nonfree 11.1.102.62ubuntu0.10.10.1 (in ubuntu maverick) broke flash for me so i looked into it... dpkg-reconfigure flashplugin-installer Installing from local file /var/cache/flashplugin-installer/adobe-flashplugin_11.1.102.62.orig.tar.gz

[Bug 933484] Re: installation fails because $DPKG_MAINTSCRIPT_ARCH is not set

2012-02-16 Thread Stefan Tauner
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/933484 Title: installation fails because $DPKG_MAINTSCRIPT_ARCH is not set To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 876001] Re: alsactl store throws /home/(username) not ours errors

2011-10-29 Thread Stefan Tauner
probably a duplicate of bug #557016 and hence only a cosmetic problem. i am not changing the bug state (yet), please do so if you agree. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/876001 Title:

[Bug 822432] Re: dmidecode does falsely use bit 7 when decoding the chassis-type

2011-08-07 Thread Stefan Tauner
** Patch added: 0001-Make-dmi_chassis_type-aware-of-the-lock-bit.patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/822432/+attachment/2260545/+files/0001-Make-dmi_chassis_type-aware-of-the-lock-bit.patch ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #637028

[Bug 822432] [NEW] dmidecode does falsely use bit 7 when decoding the chassis-type

2011-08-07 Thread Stefan Tauner
Public bug reported: the bug is present in all vanilla versions since at least 2.9. the attached patch was sent upstream and to Debian. for details please see the patch. ** Affects: dmidecode (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: dmidecode (Debian)

[Bug 816918] Re: please sync flashrom 0.9.4+r1394-1 from debian unstable

2011-07-29 Thread Stefan Tauner
thanks for the ack! regarding the SRU: sorry for using the wrong term. the problem is that there is no single patch/commit that could be ported and we don't have the resources to look at 400 commits to find all corner cases and port them. maybe it would be easier to just remove the package from

[Bug 816918] Re: please sync flashrom 0.9.4+r1394-1 from debian

2011-07-28 Thread Stefan Tauner
** Summary changed: - please sync flashrom 0.9.4 from debian + please sync flashrom 0.9.4+r1394-1 from debian -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/816918 Title: please sync flashrom

[Bug 816918] Re: please sync flashrom (0.9.4+r1394-1) from debian unstable

2011-07-28 Thread Stefan Tauner
** Summary changed: - please sync flashrom 0.9.4+r1394-1 from debian + please sync flashrom (0.9.4+r1394-1) from debian unstable ** Description changed: - i am one of the upstream maintainers. we have released a new stable - version yesterday (http://www.flashrom.org/Flashrom/0.9.4). one of us

[Bug 816918] [NEW] please sync flashrom 0.9.4 from debian

2011-07-27 Thread Stefan Tauner
Public bug reported: i am one of the upstream maintainers. we have released a new stable version yesterday (http://www.flashrom.org/Flashrom/0.9.4). one of us is currently preparing the upload of a new debian package. i'll update this bug when it is ready. ** Affects: flashrom (Ubuntu)

[Bug 791335] Re: please sync avr-libc (1:1.7.1-2) from debian unstable

2011-07-27 Thread Stefan Tauner
oh. sorry benjamin about that! https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SyncRequestProcess does not mention (changed) dependencies. can you point me to some documentation explaining what i can do to fix this please? the main question for me is: why are those dependencies not available at build(?) time? some of

[Bug 791335] Re: please sync avr-libc (1:1.7.1-2) from debian unstable

2011-07-27 Thread Stefan Tauner
how can one test this easily? i would have to (try to) build it myself then i guess? regarding the output you pasted: i was puzzled because as you said most of the dependencies are in place, but it prints them as unmet anyway... for binutils-avr the situation is clear. in oneiric there is

[Bug 816957] [NEW] Please merge binutils-avr 2.20.1-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2011-07-27 Thread Stefan Tauner
Public bug reported: this is a dependency for syncing avr-libc see bug 791335 i am new to this stuff, but the mom report looks like it is not a big problem: https://merges.ubuntu.com/b/binutils-avr/REPORT what scares me a bit is the huge ubuntu delta... why is it so huge? ** Affects:

[Bug 791335] Re: please sync avr-libc (1:1.7.1-2) from debian unstable

2011-07-26 Thread Stefan Tauner
** Summary changed: - avr-libc is terribly out of date + please sync avr-libc (1:1.7.1-2) from debian unstable -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/791335 Title: please sync avr-libc

[Bug 791335] Re: please sync avr-libc (1:1.7.1-2) from debian unstable

2011-07-26 Thread Stefan Tauner
** Description changed: avr-libc 1.6.8 has been released on 2010-02-11 and it's the actual version in Ubuntu 11.04. In the meantime avr-libc 1.7.0 has been released on 2010-06-16 and avr-libc 1.7.1 has been released on 2011-02-16. - I think it's time to update this package. + It has

[Bug 791335] Re: avr-libc is terribly out of date

2011-07-10 Thread Stefan Tauner
1.7.1 was packaged for debian now (will show up shortly), but because the deadline for the automatic sync of debian packages for 11.10 was already two weeks ago, it will not be in 11.10 without intervention from some ubuntu maintainers. -- You received this bug notification because you are a