[Bug 554426] [NEW] Switching X back from VT slow for serial tablets

2010-04-03 Thread Tom Jaeger
Public bug reported: Switching back from the console or (more commonly) resuming from suspend incurs a 5-second wait if there's a serial wacom device. The following messages appear in Xorg.0.log: (WW) Serial Wacom Tablet: Waited too long for answer (failed after 3 tries). (WW) Serial Wacom

Re: [Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment

2010-04-01 Thread Tom Jaeger
Here's an idea: Why not make the upper right hand corner of each window an 'activity corner' in gnome 3? On 04/01/2010 02:12 PM, Mark Shuttleworth wrote: Our intent is to encourage innovation, discussion, and design with the right of the window title bar. We have some ideas, and others are

Re: [Bug 546650] Re: Unable to click items below notifications

2010-03-30 Thread Tom Jaeger
On 03/30/2010 01:03 PM, Mirco Müller wrote: The branch for fixing this in notify-osd I put up for review here: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~macslow/notify- osd/fix-546650/+merge/22469 This keeps the changes within notify-osd. I don't fully understand why only this works and the old way

[Bug 539912] Re: [lucid] current battery charge not easily accessable

2010-03-29 Thread Tom Jaeger
I've attached a patch that adds the battery percentage when it is useful. I've also built the package which is temporarily available in my PPA: https://launchpad.net/~thjaeger/+archive/ppa/+packages ** Attachment added: percentage.debdiff

Re: [Bug 532641] Re: window controls don't scale up

2010-03-29 Thread Tom Jaeger
Is this really true? I just replaced object_width/object_height by width/height in my metacity-theme-1.xml file and then increased button_width/button_height. The buttons scale up as expected. They are are a little blurry, of course, but this wouldn't be an issue if they were .svg files instead

[Bug 532641] Re: window controls don't scale up

2010-03-28 Thread Tom Jaeger
** Also affects: metacity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- window controls don't scale up https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532641 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

Re: [Bug 532641] Re: window controls don't scale up

2010-03-28 Thread Tom Jaeger
Seconded. This makes the new theme very awkward to use on a high-resolution display -- and I'm in my 20s. On 03/18/2010 11:13 AM, jgv wrote: Can you confirm this is a design decision and not a design flaw? So the designers have made a specific decision to ignore the needs of disabled Ubuntu

[Bug 512615] Re: fonts are incorrectly rendered due to not using system cairo

2010-03-28 Thread Tom Jaeger
@asac: Sorry it took me so long to reply, here's a little bit about the history of the patch. The subpixel patch that ubuntu is currently using was added to cairo master during the 1.8.0 cycle, but then dropped shortly before the release [1], essentially because of concerns over the test suite

[Bug 379761] Re: MASTER - FF 3.5 font hinting does not honour gnome-settings

2010-03-28 Thread Tom Jaeger
@asac: Sorry it took me so long to reply, here's a little bit about the history of the patch. The subpixel patch that ubuntu is currently using was added to cairo master during the 1.8.0 cycle, but then dropped shortly before the release [1], essentially because of concerns over the test suite

[Bug 379761] Re: MASTER - FF 3.5 font hinting does not honour gnome-settings

2010-03-28 Thread Tom Jaeger
Please ignore the last comment, I meant to add it to bug #512615. Sorry about the noise. -- MASTER - FF 3.5 font hinting does not honour gnome-settings https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/379761 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

Re: [Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment

2010-03-24 Thread Tom Jaeger
On 03/24/2010 01:13 PM, Pako wrote: Oh, you made me cry http://www.ubuntu.com/community/conduct If you don't have anything nice (or meaningful) to say, don't say it. This bug is already long enough. -- [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment

Re: [Bug 532633] Re: [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment

2010-03-22 Thread Tom Jaeger
On 03/22/2010 09:21 AM, Aigars Mahinovs wrote: While you might the merfect mouse sharpshooter, keeping in mind the needs of people with less precise mouse movements is also important - the precision needed to hit these buttons on the left among all the other control elements there is much

[Bug 539912] [NEW] [lucid] current battery charge not easily accessable

2010-03-16 Thread Tom Jaeger
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-power-manager Ever since the gnome-power-manager icon transition from the notification area to the indicator applet it is unnecessary complicated to find out what the current battery charge percentage is. We used to be able to just hover over the

Re: [Bug 539912] Re: [lucid] current battery charge not easily accessable

2010-03-16 Thread Tom Jaeger
Yeah, there's more obvious ways of shortening the menu text, like writing 1:50 instead of 1 hour and 50 minutes or dropping Laptop battery altogether. On 03/16/2010 06:11 PM, Chris Coulson wrote: We just removed the percentage from the menu deliberately, because the menu was far too wide with

Re: [Bug 512615] Re: fonts are incorrectly rendered due to not using system cairo

2010-03-12 Thread Tom Jaeger
Martin, let me repeat my question from comment #126: Why not take care of this now? What do you expect to happen between now and beta 2? On 03/12/2010 09:03 AM, Martin Pitt wrote: ** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu Lucid) Milestone: ubuntu-10.04-beta-1 = ubuntu-10.04-beta-2 -- fonts are

Re: [Bug 522318] Re: Serial Tablet PCs not supported in lucid

2010-03-03 Thread Tom Jaeger
Can you run udevadm info --path=/sys/class/tty/ttyS0/ --attribute-walk ? I'll also attach my /etc/udev/rules.d/65-xorg-wacom.rules file for reference. On 03/03/2010 03:05 AM, michael.huettemann wrote: After the update, now that the committed patch has arrived, it still does not work. The

Re: [Bug 522318] Re: Serial Tablet PCs not supported in lucid

2010-03-03 Thread Tom Jaeger
The only thing I can think of is that the new rules need to be added before the KERNEL!=event[0-9]* or after the LABEL=wacom_end line, since you only get an event device for USB tablets. On 03/03/2010 04:46 AM, michael.huettemann wrote: @Tom Jaeger Bingo! Your /etc/udev/rules.d/65-xorg

Re: [Bug 522318] Re: Serial Tablet PCs not supported in lucid

2010-03-02 Thread Tom Jaeger
On 03/02/2010 11:04 AM, Timo Aaltonen wrote: I've got a lenovo X61 tablet, and 'udevadm info --export-db' shows WAC only for some acpi device. 'cat /sys/class/tty/ttyS1/device/id' shows WACf004 though, but since udev doesn't seem to know about the device, it isn't initialized though I have the

Re: [Bug 522318] Re: Serial Tablet PCs not supported in lucid

2010-03-01 Thread Tom Jaeger
Are you sure you're running a patched X server? The status of the bug is still 'fix committed', so the package currently in lucid does not contain the patch. What is the output of cat /sys/class/tty/ttyS0/device/id on your system? On 03/01/2010 12:10 PM, michael.huettemann wrote: On my

Re: [Bug 217908] Re: FFe: Pixellated Images in Firefox/Opera due to incorrect EXTEND_PAD implementation in several video drivers

2010-02-28 Thread Tom Jaeger
Sorry, I've been slow at uploading updated packages lately, partly because I'm not running karmic anymore, so I don't notice when the repository gets out of date. Anyway, it should work now until the next update... On 02/21/2010 08:13 PM, NoBugs! wrote: The latest Firefox security update broke

[Bug 527508] [NEW] Inconsistent spacing of items in indicator applet

2010-02-24 Thread Tom Jaeger
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: indicator-applet The items in the indicator applet are much farther apart then anything else in the gnome panel. In particular, its icons are presented very differently from the icons in the notification area. This is both visually unappealing and a

[Bug 522318] [NEW] Serial Tablet PCs not supported in lucid

2010-02-15 Thread Tom Jaeger
Public bug reported: Fixing this requires two things: (1) An xserver patch. This is now upstream: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/commit/?id=84905007702da2c05a4f7446b3fc5ff52be49655 (2) Additional udev rules need to be added to the xf86-input-wacom rules file. ACTION==add|change,

[Bug 521548] [NEW] Please upgrade easystroke to 0.5.3

2010-02-13 Thread Tom Jaeger
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: easystroke The release fixes a crasher, all other changes are pretty minor. ** Affects: easystroke (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Please upgrade easystroke to 0.5.3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/521548 You received this

Re: [Bug 521548] [NEW] Please upgrade easystroke to 0.5.3

2010-02-13 Thread Tom Jaeger
easystroke (0.5.3-0ubuntu1) lucid; urgency=low * New upstream release (LP: #521548) - Fixes a crash when a gesture times out during recording -- Thomas Jaeger thjae...@gmail.com Sat, 13 Feb 2010 19:09:23 -0500 ** Attachment added: easystroke_0.5.3.orig.tar.gz

Re: [Bug 512615] Re: fonts are incorrectly rendered due to not using system cairo

2010-02-12 Thread Tom Jaeger
Alexander Sack wrote: On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 07:07:07PM -, Tom Jaeger wrote: I fail to see how the two issues are related and why one needs to be fixed before the other. I also think you have your priorities wrong: This issue has already generated much more discussion than the hinting

Re: [Bug 512615] Re: fonts are incorrectly rendered due to not using system cairo

2010-02-11 Thread Tom Jaeger
Alexander Sack wrote: I guess I don't really understand what you expect to happen between now and beta1. The chances of an lcd filtering patch landing in cairo master in this timeframe is minuscule and even if it did, there'd be hardly enough time for testing. So we're limited to the patch

Re: [Bug 512615] Re: fonts are incorrectly rendered due to not using system cairo

2010-02-08 Thread Tom Jaeger
Alexander Sack wrote: On Sun, Feb 07, 2010 at 03:55:29PM -, Yuri Khan wrote: Alexander Sack wrote on 2010-02-04: This has highest priority ... but we prefer this getting fixed upstream rather than running our own patches or even system cairo again What are the negative consequences of

[Bug 418241] Re: Bad image quality

2010-02-04 Thread Tom Jaeger
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 217908 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217908 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 217908 FFe: Pixellated Images in Firefox/Opera due to incorrect EXTEND_PAD implementation in several video drivers -- Bad image quality

[Bug 516249] [NEW] Please upgrade to hdparm-9.27

2010-02-02 Thread Tom Jaeger
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: hdparm A recent version of hdparm is required to get the wiper.sh script running, which is the only practical way of issuing TRIM commands to SSDs at this point. While I wouldn't suggest shipping wiper.sh yet, updating to hdparm-9.27 would make it

[Bug 516249] Re: Please upgrade to hdparm-9.27

2010-02-02 Thread Tom Jaeger
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38677453/Dependencies.txt -- Please upgrade to hdparm-9.27 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/516249 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 492392] Re: [lucid, intel] After suspend, flickering screen and then blank screen.

2010-01-20 Thread Tom Jaeger
Andy, As far as I can tell, this issue has been fixed upstream in the stable tree, and the fix is already in the ubuntu kernel: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14781 http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=ubuntu/ubuntu- lucid.git;a=commit;h=b9e13497d8cdc40e74a4f14faaa255a0051bb1db So there

Re: [Bug 492392] Re: [lucid, intel] After suspend, flickering screen and then blank screen.

2010-01-20 Thread Tom Jaeger
If that's the case, why is the workaround not limited to 945? I think such a workaround is a bad idea anyway: Not having this linked to an upstream bug virtually guarantees that even if the issue gets fixed upstream we won't notice and continue to waste power. Robert Hooker wrote: The 965

[Bug 509786] Re: Floating point exception with Bluetooth Mouse

2010-01-19 Thread Tom Jaeger
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 466532 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/466532 This bug has been fixed in a later version of easystroke, I suggest that you install 0.4.11 from the easystroke PPA: https://launchpad.net/~easystroke/+archive/ppa/ ** This bug has been marked a duplicate

[Bug 217908] Re: FFe: Pixellated Images in Firefox/Opera due to incorrect EXTEND_PAD implementation in several video drivers

2010-01-07 Thread Tom Jaeger
For the record, here's an updated patch for xulrunner-1.9.2/firefox-3.6. ** Attachment added: extend-pad.patch http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37586395/extend-pad.patch -- FFe: Pixellated Images in Firefox/Opera due to incorrect EXTEND_PAD implementation in several video drivers

Re: [Bug 502366] Re: Please upgrade easystroke to 0.5.2

2010-01-04 Thread Tom Jaeger
Benjamin Drung wrote: Thanks for your work, I have uploaded it now. I have switched to debhelper v7 and it builds without problems. The files are installed correctly. Is there an reason, why this package is only in Ubuntu and not in Debian? It seems it'd be a lot of work to also maintain

[Bug 502366] [NEW] Please upgrade easystroke to 0.5.2

2010-01-02 Thread Tom Jaeger
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: easystroke In order for easystroke to take advantage of XI 2.0, we need to upgrade to the 0.5 series. ** Affects: easystroke (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Please upgrade easystroke to 0.5.2

[Bug 502366] [NEW] Please upgrade easystroke to 0.5.2

2010-01-02 Thread Tom Jaeger
easystroke (0.5.2-0ubuntu1) lucid; urgency=low * New upstream release (LP: #502366) - Fixes crash when the third axis is a relative one (LP: #466532) -- Thomas Jaeger thjae...@gmail.com Sat, 02 Jan 2010 11:41:36 -0500 ** Attachment added: easystroke_0.5.2.orig.tar.gz

Re: [Bug 502366] Re: Please upgrade easystroke to 0.5.2

2010-01-02 Thread Tom Jaeger
/37366738/changes.diff ** Changed in: easystroke (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete ** Changed in: easystroke (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Tom Jaeger (thjaeger) ** Attachment added: easystroke_0.5.2.orig.tar.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37370420/easystroke_0.5.2

Re: [Bug 480807] Re: easystroke at times doesn't recognize mouse movement

2009-12-01 Thread Tom Jaeger
Sorry, I didn't realize the version of xinput in karmic was this old. xinput set-int-prop device-num 'Device Enabled' 8 0 should work then. Redge wrote: Hmm, the command xinput set-prop doesn't seem to work. For me, it just prints usage: -- easystroke at times doesn't recognize mouse movement

[Bug 480807] Re: easystroke at times doesn't recognize mouse movement

2009-11-30 Thread Tom Jaeger
Thanks for the log. I think what the issue is that you have two Logitech USB Receiver devices, one of which sends bogus motion events (or no motion events at all). Easystroke will only accept input from the device which emitted the first press, so if the buggy device wins the race, easystroke

[Bug 241258] Re: UN§expanded panels on Ubuntu 6.06LTS, 7.04 and 8.04LTS (all up-to-date) ge t jumbled

2009-11-29 Thread Tom Jaeger
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 44082 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/44082 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 111893 Panel items lose their order when panel is not expanded ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 44082 GNOME Panel icons (on right side) move

[Bug 187650] Re: gnome-panel incorrect order after unexpand

2009-11-29 Thread Tom Jaeger
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 44082 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/44082 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 111893 Panel items lose their order when panel is not expanded ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 44082 GNOME Panel icons (on right side) move

[Bug 135384] Re: Dashboard not extended

2009-11-29 Thread Tom Jaeger
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 44082 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/44082 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 111893 Panel items lose their order when panel is not expanded ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 44082 GNOME Panel icons (on right side) move

[Bug 128117] Re: Icons get mixed up in in non-Expanded panel

2009-11-29 Thread Tom Jaeger
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 44082 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/44082 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 111893 Panel items lose their order when panel is not expanded ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 44082 GNOME Panel icons (on right side) move

[Bug 111893] Re: Panel items lose their order when panel is not expanded

2009-11-29 Thread Tom Jaeger
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 44082 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/44082 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 44082 GNOME Panel icons (on right side) move apparently randomly on session start in some situations -- Panel items lose their order when panel is not

[Bug 480807] Re: easystroke at times doesn't recognize mouse movement

2009-11-28 Thread Tom Jaeger
Does restarting easystroke fix this? Can you attach a log of when this happens (easystroke - easystroke.log)? -- easystroke at times doesn't recognize mouse movement https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480807 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

Re: [Bug 217908] Re: FFe: Pixellated Images in Firefox/Opera due to incorrect EXTEND_PAD implementation in several video drivers

2009-11-18 Thread Tom Jaeger
laulau wrote: if the workaround isn't still needed, can someone drop it so that Firefox has the same features as under Windows (fast and beatifull scalings) ? That's exactly what the packages in the firefox-smooth-scaling PPA do. But upstream is unresponsive on the issue, and the ubuntu

Re: [Bug 217908] Re: FFe: Pixellated Images in Firefox/Opera due to incorrect EXTEND_PAD implementation in several video drivers

2009-11-17 Thread Tom Jaeger
First could someone explain exactly what feature in the graphics driver people think is wrong. Many graphics drivers didn't use to accelerate composite operations with repeat type PAD (and REFLECT) correctly. This was a year ago; i believe these issues have long been fixed. Could a small

Re: [Bug 217908] Re: FFe: Pixellated Images in Firefox/Opera due to incorrect EXTEND_PAD implementation in several video drivers

2009-11-17 Thread Tom Jaeger
kenjo wrote: On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 01:57 +, Tom Jaeger wrote: First could someone explain exactly what feature in the graphics driver people think is wrong. Many graphics drivers didn't use to accelerate composite operations with repeat type PAD (and REFLECT) correctly. This was a year

[Bug 378416] Re: Thinkfinger cleanup

2009-11-11 Thread Tom Jaeger
This bug is about cleaning up the (totally screwed-up) package that is currently in ubuntu, not about any functional change. This could make everybody's life easier that's going to work on the package in the future, but apparently, killing off the package is a higher priority. Not exactly the way

[Bug 474488] Re: Easystroke not start in Ubuntu 9.10

2009-11-08 Thread Tom Jaeger
** Changed in: easystroke (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Invalid ** Also affects: gnome2-globalmenu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Easystroke not start in Ubuntu 9.10 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/474488 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 474488] Re: Easystroke not start in Ubuntu 9.10

2009-11-08 Thread Tom Jaeger
Why do people want their linux desktop to look like Mac OS? Disgusting. In any case, this is not a bug in any package shipping with ubuntu. ** Bug watch added: code.google.com/p/gnome2-globalmenu/issues #536 http://code.google.com/p/gnome2-globalmenu/issues/detail?id=536 ** Changed in:

Re: [Bug 466532] Re: [Karmic]Easystroke: Crash when recording.

2009-11-07 Thread Tom Jaeger
Well, did the package from my PPA fix it? gidantribal wrote: I have the same crash problem, but with an ordinary 3/buttons mouse. -- [Karmic]Easystroke: Crash when recording. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/466532 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 474488] Re: Easystroke not start in Ubuntu 9.10

2009-11-04 Thread Tom Jaeger
Googling reveals that this is a general problem with gtkmm applications (such as easystroke and gnome-system-monitor) that somehow depends on the theme used: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1289649 This is probably not a gtkmm bug either, but I've assigned it to gtkmm so that the gtkmm

[Bug 466532] Re: [Karmic]Easystroke: Crash when record. (kernel)

2009-11-03 Thread Tom Jaeger
** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New = Confirmed ** Summary changed: - [Karmic]Easystroke: Crash when record. (kernel) + [Karmic]Easystroke: Crash when recording. ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: Confirmed = Invalid ** Package changed: ubuntu = easystroke (Ubuntu) ** Changed in:

Re: [Bug 466532] Re: [Karmic]Easystroke: Crash when record. (kernel)

2009-11-03 Thread Tom Jaeger
MephSnake wrote: /home/daniel apt-get source easystroke (.) gpgv: Firmado el jue 20 ago 2009 18:50:04 CEST usando clave DSA ID 491E5389 gpgv: Imposible comprobar la firma: Clave pública no encontrada dpkg-source: aviso: fallo al verificar la firma en ./easystroke_0.4.9-0ubuntu1.dsc

Re: [Bug 439138] Re: [karmic] Xorg 100% CPU utilization -- only after first login

2009-11-02 Thread Tom Jaeger
Can you attach the output of grep -r ^console /etc/init? Ride wrote: Same problem here. As manolo said, I just upgraded to 9.10 (from a 9.04), network upgrade, and Xorg cpu consumption rises to almost 100%. The machine is an Acer 5810T laptop (with an Intel graph card). With 9.04 went

Re: [Bug 439138] Re: [karmic] Xorg 100% CPU utilization -- only after first login

2009-11-02 Thread Tom Jaeger
manolo wrote: Hi Wolfgang Kufner. Thanks for your reply. At the moment I can provide the following video showing my tests made in order to confirm that Xorg still goes crazy, at least on my system: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=skuog28ZnoM Then, please show me any other way to

Re: [Bug 439138] Re: [karmic] Xorg 100% CPU utilization -- only after first login

2009-11-02 Thread Tom Jaeger
Ride wrote: Hi again, this is the output of the command grep -r ^console /etc/init /etc/init/mountall.conf:console output /etc/init/ufw.conf:console output /etc/init/mountall-shell.conf:console owner /etc/init/rcS.conf:console owner Killing Xorg process doen't work for me. It seems

Re: [Bug 439138] Re: [karmic] Xorg 100% CPU utilization -- only after first login

2009-11-02 Thread Tom Jaeger
manolo wrote: Tom, thanks for your reply. Actually that video showed the best performing session I've had with karmic :( Anyway, the CPU consuming is ** at least 25% ** when no other programm is running, beside system daemons. Executing Firefox, for example, maked Xorg consume up to 80%

Re: [Bug 466532] Re: [Karmic]Easystroke: Crash when record. (kernel)

2009-11-02 Thread Tom Jaeger
Sorry, I'll need a real backtrace with debug symbols enabled. This is a little bit more work since you need to recompile the applications. You should be able to use the following instructions (untested): sudo apt-get build-dep easystroke apt-get source easystroke cd easystroke-0.4.9 echo

Re: [Bug 217908] Re: FFe: Pixellated Images in Firefox/Opera due to incorrect EXTEND_PAD implementation in several video drivers

2009-11-02 Thread Tom Jaeger
I don't have the time and energy to keep the jaunty packages up to date, so I deleted them. The karmic packages should work fine on jaunty, though. NoBugs! wrote: Firefox 3.5.4 update seems to have broken the pixellated images fix. Will this package be updated in 9.04? -- FFe: Pixellated

[Bug 462444] Re: easystroke assert failure: ERROR:poa.c:1028:ORBit_POA_activate_object_T: assertion failed: ((poa-life_flags ORBit_LifeF_DeactivateDo) == 0)

2009-10-31 Thread Tom Jaeger
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 461344 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/461344 Sorry, I can't tell you anything about this bug until someone unlocks the master bug. -- easystroke assert failure: ERROR:poa.c:1028:ORBit_POA_activate_object_T: assertion failed: ((poa-life_flags

[Bug 466532] Re: [Karmic]Easystroke: Crash when record. (kernel)

2009-10-31 Thread Tom Jaeger
There's no obvious place where a division by zero could occur, so I'll need a backtrace. As a first step, can you run easystroke in gdb (gdb easystroke, then enter run) and then issue the bt command when it crashes? -- [Karmic]Easystroke: Crash when record. (kernel)

[Bug 410407] Re: flash does not recognise mouse clicks

2009-10-24 Thread Tom Jaeger
My guess would also be that this is somehow related to gtk's new client- side window approach. Can someone try if invoking firefox from the command line as GDK_NATIVE_WINDOWS=1 firefox fixes the issue? -- flash does not recognise mouse clicks https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/410407 You received

[Bug 378416] Re: Thinkfinger cleanup

2009-10-17 Thread Tom Jaeger
I have neither the time nor enough knowledge about its internals to even consider taking over the project. I just want things to work smoothly: Thinkfinger is stable enough that it only takes minimal effort to keep up with minor kernel or X changes that happen over time. But one thing is for

Re: [Bug 378416] Re: Thinkfinger cleanup

2009-10-16 Thread Tom Jaeger
This makes no sense. If the package is dropped from debian, we should be free to do whatever we want with the package. fprint is not an acceptable replacement for thinkfinger, as it allows password login only after fingerprint authentication has timed out (i.e. after 30 seconds!). Michael Terry

[Bug 453614] Re: Easystroke problem when using compiz Paint fire plugin

2009-10-16 Thread Tom Jaeger
** Also affects: compiz (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: compiz (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid ** Changed in: easystroke (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid ** Changed in: compiz (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = Confirmed -- Easystroke problem when

[Bug 453614] Re: Easystroke problem when using compiz Paint fire plugin

2009-10-16 Thread Tom Jaeger
Easystroke does send out the clear command, I think the problem is that compiz never processes it. IIRC, the compiz main loop is coded in such a way that compiz only processes commands sent by DBus if it is idle, so it never gets to clearing the screen when it is too busy drawing the fire. --

[Bug 444301] Re: Easystroke crashes when trying to add an application

2009-10-15 Thread Tom Jaeger
** Bug watch added: sourceforge.net/apps/trac/easystroke/ #6 https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/easystroke/ticket/6 ** Also affects: easystroke via https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/easystroke/ticket/6 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- Easystroke crashes when trying to add

[Bug 439138] Re: [karmic] Xorg 100% CPU utilization -- only after first login

2009-10-13 Thread Tom Jaeger
** Also affects: cryptsetup (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: cryptsetup (Ubuntu Karmic) Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: usplash (Ubuntu Karmic) Status: Confirmed = Invalid ** Changed in: upstart (Ubuntu Karmic) Status: Invalid =

Re: [Bug 439138] Re: [karmic] Xorg 100% CPU utilization -- only after first login

2009-10-13 Thread Tom Jaeger
rid of console owner is upstart, right? Now if someone familiar with the cryptsetup package could explain why it needs console ownership, we could actually get anywhere. Scott James Remnant wrote: On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 15:46 +, Tom Jaeger wrote: ** Also affects: cryptsetup (Ubuntu

Re: [Bug 439138] Re: [karmic] Xorg 100% CPU utilization -- only after first login

2009-10-13 Thread Tom Jaeger
Steve Langasek wrote: On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 07:05:18PM -, Tom Jaeger wrote: Now if someone familiar with the cryptsetup package could explain why it needs console ownership, we could actually get anywhere. Because it needs to be able to prompt users for passphrases. How does knowing

[Bug 439138] Re: [karmic] Xorg 100% CPU utilization -- only after first login

2009-10-13 Thread Tom Jaeger
Scott was kind enough to provide some background on this bug in the #upstart channel: Keybuk in Linux, we have consoles Keybuk but really we mean Virtual Terminals (VTs) Keybuk and we have TTYs too Keybuk not to mention Pseudo-Terminals Keybuk (PTYs) Keybuk it's all a bit of the kind of jumble

[Bug 439138] Re: [karmic] Xorg 100% CPU utilization -- only after first login

2009-10-11 Thread Tom Jaeger
Does upstart ensure that only one 'console owner' job can run at the same time? I assume it would also be a problem if one 'console owner' job took away the console from another one. In this case, couldn't we just make gdm/kdm 'console owner' jobs as well? -- [karmic] Xorg 100% CPU utilization

Re: [Bug 439138] Re: [karmic] Xorg 100% CPU utilization -- only after first login

2009-10-10 Thread Tom Jaeger
Scott James Remnant wrote: That precisely fits the problem definition. console owner while X is running while forcibly take the ownership of tty7 away from X. It doesn't like that so much (cf. this bug) Scott So this is essentially bug #60487 (!). Any thoughts on a solution? X really

[Bug 439138] Re: [karmic] Xorg 100% CPU utilization -- only after first login

2009-10-09 Thread Tom Jaeger
I can still reproduce the issue after the latest updates. Steve Langasek wrote: Seeing how cryptsetup wasn't updated and usplash was, sounds like this was indeed fixed in usplash, then. :) Marking as fixed; if anyone is still seeing this with usplash 0.5.41, please reopen (and yell). **

Re: [Bug 439138] Re: [karmic] Xorg 100% CPU utilization -- only after first login

2009-10-09 Thread Tom Jaeger
Sorry, I didn't realize this was an upstream task. The last thing I noticed before my shiny new SSD died a horrible death today was that the problem would go away if I commented out the line console owner in /etc/init/cryptdisks-enable.conf. Steve Langasek wrote: (re-closing the cryptsetup

Re: [Bug 439138] Re: [karmic] Xorg 100% CPU utilization -- only after first login

2009-10-08 Thread Tom Jaeger
Martin Pitt wrote: So Scott says that something in the boot process steals vt7 (where X.org starts up). /etc/init.d/console-setup does not touch vt7, so that's not it. So we need to find what it is. Do all of the reporters have cryptsetup installed? If you don't need it for encrypted hard

[Bug 412169] Re: Easystroke doesn't like Up or Down

2009-10-08 Thread Tom Jaeger
** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Invalid -- Easystroke doesn't like Up or Down https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/412169 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 412169] Re: Easystroke doesn't like Up or Down

2009-10-08 Thread Tom Jaeger
Sorry, I think I was wrong in calling this a bug: My assumption that each event contains a full set of axis values was wrong. (But I'm in good company here, until very recently, gtk+ made the same faulty assumption). -- Easystroke doesn't like Up or Down https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/412169

[Bug 441755] Re: [FFe] Please sync xournal to 0.4.5 from debian

2009-10-07 Thread Tom Jaeger
StefanPotyra wrote: Ack #2, FFe granted, please go ahead. (side note: maybe it makes sense to merge 0.4.5-1 from unstable instead of bringing in the new upstream version independently?) I hadn't noticed that debian has the new version already, I guess we can just sync, then. Debian has

Re: [Bug 439138] Re: [karmic] Xorg 100% CPU utilization -- only after first login

2009-10-07 Thread Tom Jaeger
Bryce Harrington wrote: On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 09:56:10PM -, Martin Albisetti wrote: Bryce's GDM fixes the issue for me as well. I'm still seeing the issue after disabling ACPI in the X server. The only thing it does is get rid of the warning in xorg.conf, since the acpi initialization

Re: [Bug 439138] Re: [karmic] Xorg 100% CPU utilization -- only after first login

2009-10-06 Thread Tom Jaeger
Scott James Remnant wrote: What's this got to do with Upstart? X is started too early during bootup when the console isn't ready yet. Where we don't know yet what ready means. There's also this: (WW) Open ACPI failed (/var/run/acpid.socket) (No such file or directory) So we need a dependency

Re: [Bug 439138] Re: [karmic] Xorg 100% CPU utilization -- only after first login

2009-10-06 Thread Tom Jaeger
It has *nothing* to do with tcflush(). As I said above, If I revert the patch that introduced the tcflush() call, I can still reproduce this problem. This is just the semantics of select(): If a fd is in an error state, then a subsequent read() or write() won't block (since they will just return

Re: [Bug 439138] Re: [karmic] Xorg 100% CPU utilization -- only after first login

2009-10-06 Thread Tom Jaeger
You're right, I actually forgot to install the package, so you don't have 100% CPU anymore after reverting the commit. But this really doesn't fix the underlying problem, we still have an invalid console fd floating around, which for example is preventing us from switching virtual terminals.

Re: [Bug 439138] Re: [karmic] Xorg 100% CPU utilization -- only after first login

2009-10-06 Thread Tom Jaeger
Samuel thibault wrote: Tom Jaeger, did you actually notice switching VT not working? Could you get an strace of that happening? Yes, I did. The issue comes and goes; and unfortunately I can't reproduce it right now. This is the system call that failed, though (hw/xfree86/common/xf86Events.c

Re: [Bug 439138] Re: [karmic] Xorg 100% CPU utilization -- only after first login

2009-10-06 Thread Tom Jaeger
Samuel thibault wrote: Could people getting the error check /proc/`pidof X`/status? Here I have SigIgn: 10301000 The important part is the 3. If the 3 is not there it's normal that tcflush() return EIO for the console: because X starts its own session alone, it is an orphaned

[Bug 441755] Re: [FFe] Please upgrade xournal to 0.4.5

2009-10-06 Thread Tom Jaeger
** Changed in: xournal (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- [FFe] Please upgrade xournal to 0.4.5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441755 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

Re: [Bug 217908] Re: Pixellated Images in Firefox/Opera due to incorrect EXTEND_PAD implementation in several video drivers

2009-10-05 Thread Tom Jaeger
kenjo wrote: deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/firefox-smooth-scaling/ppa/ubuntu jaunty ii xulrunner-1.9.1 1.9.1.4~hg20091002r26447+nobinonly-0ubuntu2~umd1~jaunty XUL + XPCOM application runner ii xulrunner-1.9.1-gnome-support

[Bug 439138] Re: [karmic] Xorg 100% CPU utilization -- only after first login

2009-10-04 Thread Tom Jaeger
This one doesn't make the system slow and unresponsive at all -- it's barely noticable at all, except for the fan ramping up. But I agree, some of the 'me too' replies are clearly instances of this bug. -- [karmic] Xorg 100% CPU utilization -- only after first login

[Bug 439138] Re: [karmic] Xorg 100% CPU utilization -- only after first login

2009-10-04 Thread Tom Jaeger
** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- [karmic] Xorg 100% CPU utilization -- only after first login https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/439138 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 441755] [NEW] Please upgrade xournal to 0.4.5

2009-10-03 Thread Tom Jaeger
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xournal The recent release of xournal 0.4.5 contains some much-needed bug fixes along with some very worthwhile new features (in particular, much better PDF rendering). Let me know if I need to file a FFE. ** Affects: xournal (Ubuntu) Importance:

[Bug 441755] Re: Please upgrade xournal to 0.4.5

2009-10-03 Thread Tom Jaeger
xournal (0.4.5-0ubuntu1) karmic; urgency=low * New upstream release (LP: #441755) - bugfixes for GTK+ 2.16/2.17 issues with xinput events (LP: #410813, LP: #348706, LP: #432388) - gettext internationalization (contributed by David Planella) - use poppler instead of pdftoppm to

[Bug 441755] Re: Please upgrade xournal to 0.4.5

2009-10-03 Thread Tom Jaeger
** Attachment added: xournal_0.4.5-0ubuntu1+1.dsc http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32953677/xournal_0.4.5-0ubuntu1%2B1.dsc -- Please upgrade xournal to 0.4.5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441755 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 441755] Re: Please upgrade xournal to 0.4.5

2009-10-03 Thread Tom Jaeger
Sorry, I attached the wrong .dsc file. ** Attachment added: xournal_0.4.5-0ubuntu1.dsc http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32953794/xournal_0.4.5-0ubuntu1.dsc -- Please upgrade xournal to 0.4.5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441755 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

Re: [Bug 441755] Re: Please upgrade xournal to 0.4.5

2009-10-03 Thread Tom Jaeger
Thanks, fixed in the attachment. Denis Auroux wrote: On 10/03/2009 03:00 PM, Tom Jaeger wrote: Sorry, I attached the wrong .dsc file. ** Attachment added: xournal_0.4.5-0ubuntu1.dsc http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32953794/xournal_0.4.5-0ubuntu1.dsc Small correction needed

Re: [Bug 441755] Re: Please upgrade xournal to 0.4.5

2009-10-03 Thread Tom Jaeger
Denis has convinced me that leaving the XInput workaround enabled is the correct thing to do (main reasons: rotation and touchpad/mouse input), so here's another update. -- xournal (0.4.5-0ubuntu1) karmic; urgency=low * New upstream release (LP: #441755) - bugfixes for GTK+ 2.16/2.17

[Bug 441755] Re: Please upgrade xournal to 0.4.5

2009-10-03 Thread Tom Jaeger
Here's the relevant part of the upstream changelog: Version 0.4.5 (Oct 2, 2009): - bugfixes for GTK+ 2.16/2.17 issues with xinput events - various minor UI bugfixes - gettext internationalization (contributed by David Planella) - Catalan translation (by David Planella), French translation

Re: [Bug 441755] Re: Please upgrade xournal to 0.4.5

2009-10-03 Thread Tom Jaeger
Build log and install log attached. ** Attachment added: xournal-build.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32964208/xournal-build.log ** Attachment added: xournal-install.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32964209/xournal-install.log -- Please upgrade xournal to 0.4.5

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   >