Brian,
Just wanted to note the average user isn't going to understand that
message.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1477455
Title:
Incorrect instructions leave automatic updates block
Hello. I submitted this bug in 2015. See bug #1460396. In that report I
included a short patch for update-manager which would allow checking for
enough space for a new kernel, but it got little attention.
Although @Alberto mentioned patching update-manager would be over-
engineering, it's better t
** Summary changed:
- empty vpn
+ empty vpn
** Summary changed:
- empty vpn
+ Empty VPN
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/791770
Title:
Empty VPN
To manage notifications about this
Public bug reported:
Ran into this issue after do-release-upgrade from 15.10 to 16.04 failed
to successfully upgrade all my packages. do-release-upgrade worked fine
on my desktop, but failed on laptop.
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
Package: qml-module-ubuntu-performancemetrics-
Hello. Just installed Xen again, this time v 4.5, and no graphical
session is possible still. I am working on finding out a configuration
that works, and will make an update if a solution is found or not.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subs
Public bug reported:
Description:Ubuntu 15.10
Release:15.10
lightdm:
Installed: 1.16.7-0ubuntu1
Candidate: 1.16.7-0ubuntu1
Version table:
*** 1.16.7-0ubuntu1 0
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ wily-updates/main amd64
Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
Public bug reported:
System using Xen kernel boots up all the way until after the startup log
says "Starting LightDM [OK]." Then the screen goes black and is
unresponsive.
Using the normal kernel 3.19 works fine.
Using proprietary Nvidia drivers.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 15.04
Pac
The reasons to why old kernels are not intentionally being marked for
autoremoval (as of 2008-11-04) is because it was considered too
dangerous, and apt has an exception to not tag linux-image-* packages
for autoremoval because _we_ had no idea which kernels actually worked
for a system.
However,
The reasons to why old kernels are not intentionally being marked for
autoremoval (as of 2008-11-04) is because it was considered too
dangerous and apt has an exception to not tag linux-image-* packages for
autoremoval because we had no idea which kernels actually worked for a
system.
However, I h
Not sure what format the bugtracker/devs like to use for submitted
patches.
Here's the diff output between original and updated utils.py uploaded
earlier.
** Attachment added: "diff output between original and updated utils.py
uploaded earlier"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/updat
upgrade.
It has not been implemented in _main_, I figure the main package devs would
want to do that themselves, be it to use for removing the oldest kernel
version, or having the user pick from a list of installed kernels which to
remove.
Thanks.
-Tyler Dinsmoor
** Affects: update-
11 matches
Mail list logo
