Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. It seems that your bug report is not filed about a
specific source package though, rather it is just filed against Ubuntu
in general. It is important that bug reports be filed about source
packages so that people
** Package changed: ubuntu => libreoffice (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2081585
Title:
package libreoffice-writer 1:7.3.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.7 failed to
install/upgr
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. It seems that your bug report is not filed about a
specific source package though, rather it is just filed against Ubuntu
in general. It is important that bug reports be filed about source
packages so that people
,
proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding
autopkgtest regressions [1].
https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-
migration/noble/update_excuses.html#initramfs-tools
[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions
Thank you
,
proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding
autopkgtest regressions [1].
https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-
migration/noble/update_excuses.html#initramfs-tools
[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions
Thank you
The attachment "2100-fix-build-against-ffmpeg-7.patch" seems to be a
patch. If it isn't, please remove the "patch" flag from the attachment,
remove the "patch" tag, and if you are a member of the ~ubuntu-
reviewers, unsubscribe the team.
[This is an automat
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. It seems that your bug report is not filed about a
specific source package though, rather it is just filed against Ubuntu
in general. It is important that bug reports be filed about source
packages so that people
failures,
proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding
autopkgtest regressions [1].
https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-
migration/jammy/update_excuses.html#qemu
[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions
Thank you
This bug has been reported on the Ubuntu ISO testing tracker.
A list of all reports related to this bug can be found here:
http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/reports/bugs/2081306
** Tags added: iso-testing
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
This bug has been reported on the Ubuntu ISO testing tracker.
A list of all reports related to this bug can be found here:
http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/reports/bugs/2081309
** Tags added: iso-testing
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
This bug has been reported on the Ubuntu ISO testing tracker.
A list of all reports related to this bug can be found here:
http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/reports/bugs/2081274
** Tags added: iso-testing
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
This bug has been reported on the Ubuntu ISO testing tracker.
A list of all reports related to this bug can be found here:
http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/reports/bugs/2081256
** Tags added: iso-testing
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
The attachment "rust-cargo-c-minor-fix.debdiff" seems to be a patch. If
it isn't, please remove the "patch" flag from the attachment, remove the
"patch" tag, and if you are a member of the ~ubuntu-reviewers,
unsubscribe the team.
[This is an automated message
** Package changed: ubuntu => xorg (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2081244
Title:
External Monitor backlight does not turn off on blank
To manage notifications about t
This bug has been reported on the Ubuntu ISO testing tracker.
A list of all reports related to this bug can be found here:
http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/reports/bugs/2081238
** Tags added: iso-testing
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
This bug has been reported on the Ubuntu ISO testing tracker.
A list of all reports related to this bug can be found here:
http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/reports/bugs/2081233
** Tags added: iso-testing
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
This bug has been reported on the Ubuntu ISO testing tracker.
A list of all reports related to this bug can be found here:
http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/reports/bugs/2081229
** Tags added: iso-testing
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
This bug has been reported on the Ubuntu ISO testing tracker.
A list of all reports related to this bug can be found here:
http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/reports/bugs/2081228
** Tags added: iso-testing
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
This bug has been reported on the Ubuntu ISO testing tracker.
A list of all reports related to this bug can be found here:
http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/reports/bugs/2063895
** Tags added: iso-testing
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
This bug has been reported on the Ubuntu ISO testing tracker.
A list of all reports related to this bug can be found here:
http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/reports/bugs/2081230
** Tags added: iso-testing
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
This bug has been reported on the Ubuntu ISO testing tracker.
A list of all reports related to this bug can be found here:
http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/reports/bugs/2081221
** Tags added: iso-testing
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
This bug has been reported on the Ubuntu ISO testing tracker.
A list of all reports related to this bug can be found here:
http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/reports/bugs/2046844
** Tags added: iso-testing
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. It seems that your bug report is not filed about a
specific source package though, rather it is just filed against Ubuntu
in general. It is important that bug reports be filed about source
packages so that people
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. It seems that your bug report is not filed about a
specific source package though, rather it is just filed against Ubuntu
in general. It is important that bug reports be filed about source
packages so that people
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. It seems that your bug report is not filed about a
specific source package though, rather it is just filed against Ubuntu
in general. It is important that bug reports be filed about source
packages so that people
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. It seems that your bug report is not filed about a
specific source package though, rather it is just filed against Ubuntu
in general. It is important that bug reports be filed about source
packages so that people
** Package changed: ubuntu => xorg (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080966
Title:
I have random log out as well as a flickering dock bar
To manage notifications about t
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted livecd-rootfs (2.765.50) for jammy have
finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
ubuntu-image/unknown (armhf)
Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures,
proceeding
This bug has been reported on the Ubuntu ISO testing tracker.
A list of all reports related to this bug can be found here:
http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/reports/bugs/2080949
** Tags added: iso-testing
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
This bug has been reported on the Ubuntu ISO testing tracker.
A list of all reports related to this bug can be found here:
http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/reports/bugs/2080925
** Tags added: iso-testing
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding
autopkgtest regressions [1].
https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-
migration/focal/update_excuses.html#apparmor
[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions
Thank you!
--
You received this bug
The attachment "Upstream patch that can resolve this issue." seems to be
a patch. If it isn't, please remove the "patch" flag from the
attachment, remove the "patch" tag, and if you are a member of the
~ubuntu-reviewers, unsubscribe the team.
[This is
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. It seems that your bug report is not filed about a
specific source package though, rather it is just filed against Ubuntu
in general. It is important that bug reports be filed about source
packages so that people
** Package changed: ubuntu => ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080867
Title:
An unresolvable problem occurred while calculating the upgrade. (f
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. It seems that your bug report is not filed about a
specific source package though, rather it is just filed against Ubuntu
in general. It is important that bug reports be filed about source
packages so that people
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. It seems that your bug report is not filed about a
specific source package though, rather it is just filed against Ubuntu
in general. It is important that bug reports be filed about source
packages so that people
** Package changed: ubuntu => udisks2 (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080694
Title:
systemdudevd crashes and uses complete CPU core ( 25% ) on my 4 core
PC crashes au
The attachment "fix-build-against-ffmpeg-7.patch" seems to be a patch.
If it isn't, please remove the "patch" flag from the attachment, remove
the "patch" tag, and if you are a member of the ~ubuntu-reviewers,
unsubscribe the team.
[This is an automated message
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. It seems that your bug report is not filed about a
specific source package though, rather it is just filed against Ubuntu
in general. It is important that bug reports be filed about source
packages so that people
The attachment "2004_fix_build_against_ffmpeg_7.patch" seems to be a
patch. If it isn't, please remove the "patch" flag from the attachment,
remove the "patch" tag, and if you are a member of the ~ubuntu-
reviewers, unsubscribe the team.
[This is an automat
The attachment "fix-build-against-ffmpeg-7.patch" seems to be a patch.
If it isn't, please remove the "patch" flag from the attachment, remove
the "patch" tag, and if you are a member of the ~ubuntu-reviewers,
unsubscribe the team.
[This is an automated message
** Package changed: ubuntu => bluez (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080638
Title:
Bluetoth turning off every reboot and i need to reinstall e restart
the modules everyt
This bug has been reported on the Ubuntu ISO testing tracker.
A list of all reports related to this bug can be found here:
http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/reports/bugs/2080527
** Tags added: iso-testing
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is
This bug has been reported on the Ubuntu ISO testing tracker.
A list of all reports related to this bug can be found here:
http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/reports/bugs/2080620
** Tags added: iso-testing
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
and this bug will be closed.
See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Thank you!
** Tags added: kernel-spammed-noble-linux-oem-6.11-v2
verification-needed-noble-linux-oem-6.11
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub
and this bug will be closed.
See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Thank you!
** Tags added: kernel-spammed-noble-linux-oem-6.11-v2
verification-needed-noble-linux-oem-6.11
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub
and this bug will be closed.
See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Thank you!
** Tags added: kernel-spammed-noble-linux-oem-6.11-v2
verification-needed-noble-linux-oem-6.11
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub
** Package changed: ubuntu => ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080541
Title:
Failed upgrade from 22.04.4 LTS to 24.04.1 LTS due to gco
This bug has been reported on the Ubuntu ISO testing tracker.
A list of all reports related to this bug can be found here:
http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/reports/bugs/2038087
** Tags added: iso-testing
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
This bug has been reported on the Ubuntu ISO testing tracker.
A list of all reports related to this bug can be found here:
http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/reports/bugs/2080522
** Tags added: iso-testing
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
The attachment "[PATCH] apparmor: lxc-copy: Replace mistyped filename
lxc-start by lxc-copy" seems to be a debdiff. The ubuntu-sponsors team
has been subscribed to the bug report so that they can review and
hopefully sponsor the debdiff. If the attachment isn't a patch, please
re
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. It seems that your bug report is not filed about a
specific source package though, rather it is just filed against Ubuntu
in general. It is important that bug reports be filed about source
packages so that people
The attachment "1011-fix-build-against-ffmpeg-7.patch" seems to be a
patch. If it isn't, please remove the "patch" flag from the attachment,
remove the "patch" tag, and if you are a member of the ~ubuntu-
reviewers, unsubscribe the team.
[This is an automat
The attachment "0010-fix-build-against-ffmpeg-7.patch" seems to be a
patch. If it isn't, please remove the "patch" flag from the attachment,
remove the "patch" tag, and if you are a member of the ~ubuntu-
reviewers, unsubscribe the team.
[This is an automat
,
proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding
autopkgtest regressions [1].
https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-
migration/noble/update_excuses.html#gnome-initial-setup
[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions
Thank you
,
proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding
autopkgtest regressions [1].
https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-
migration/noble/update_excuses.html#gnome-initial-setup
[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions
Thank you
,
proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding
autopkgtest regressions [1].
https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-
migration/noble/update_excuses.html#gnome-initial-setup
[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions
Thank you
,
proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding
autopkgtest regressions [1].
https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-
migration/noble/update_excuses.html#gnome-initial-setup
[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions
Thank you
,
proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding
autopkgtest regressions [1].
https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-
migration/noble/update_excuses.html#gnome-initial-setup
[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions
Thank you
,
proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding
autopkgtest regressions [1].
https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-
migration/noble/update_excuses.html#gnome-initial-setup
[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions
Thank you
,
proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding
autopkgtest regressions [1].
https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-
migration/noble/update_excuses.html#gnome-initial-setup
[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions
Thank you
,
proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding
autopkgtest regressions [1].
https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-
migration/noble/update_excuses.html#gnome-initial-setup
[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions
Thank you
,
proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding
autopkgtest regressions [1].
https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-
migration/noble/update_excuses.html#gnome-initial-setup
[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions
Thank you
,
proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding
autopkgtest regressions [1].
https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-
migration/noble/update_excuses.html#gnome-initial-setup
[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions
Thank you
,
proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding
autopkgtest regressions [1].
https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-
migration/noble/update_excuses.html#gnome-initial-setup
[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions
Thank you
,
proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding
autopkgtest regressions [1].
https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-
migration/noble/update_excuses.html#gnome-initial-setup
[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions
Thank you
The attachment "fix-build-against-ffmpeg-7.patch" seems to be a patch.
If it isn't, please remove the "patch" flag from the attachment, remove
the "patch" tag, and if you are a member of the ~ubuntu-reviewers,
unsubscribe the team.
[This is an automated message
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (34~22.04) for
jammy have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
software-properties/unknown (s390x)
update-motd/unknown (arm64)
Please visit the excuses page listed below
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (34~20.04) for
focal have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
software-properties/unknown (armhf)
ubuntu-advantage-tools/unknown (armhf)
Please visit the excuses page
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (34~24.04) for
noble have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
ubuntu-advantage-tools/unknown (armhf)
update-motd/unknown (armhf)
wsl-pro-service/unknown (armhf)
Please
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (34~18.04) for
bionic have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
ubuntu-advantage-tools/unknown (armhf)
update-manager/1:18.04.12 (armhf)
Please visit the excuses page
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (34~22.04) for
jammy have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
software-properties/unknown (s390x)
update-motd/unknown (arm64)
Please visit the excuses page listed below
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (34~16.04) for
xenial have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
ubuntu-advantage-tools/unknown (arm64)
Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (34~20.04) for
focal have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
software-properties/unknown (armhf)
ubuntu-advantage-tools/unknown (armhf)
Please visit the excuses page
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (34~24.04) for
noble have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
ubuntu-advantage-tools/unknown (armhf)
update-motd/unknown (armhf)
wsl-pro-service/unknown (armhf)
Please
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (34~18.04) for
bionic have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
ubuntu-advantage-tools/unknown (armhf)
update-manager/1:18.04.12 (armhf)
Please visit the excuses page
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (34~16.04) for
xenial have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
ubuntu-advantage-tools/unknown (arm64)
Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (34~22.04) for
jammy have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
software-properties/unknown (s390x)
update-motd/unknown (arm64)
Please visit the excuses page listed below
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (34~24.04) for
noble have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
ubuntu-advantage-tools/unknown (armhf)
update-motd/unknown (armhf)
wsl-pro-service/unknown (armhf)
Please
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (34~20.04) for
focal have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
software-properties/unknown (armhf)
ubuntu-advantage-tools/unknown (armhf)
Please visit the excuses page
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (34~18.04) for
bionic have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
ubuntu-advantage-tools/unknown (armhf)
update-manager/1:18.04.12 (armhf)
Please visit the excuses page
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (34~20.04) for
focal have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
software-properties/unknown (armhf)
ubuntu-advantage-tools/unknown (armhf)
Please visit the excuses page
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (34~16.04) for
xenial have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
ubuntu-advantage-tools/unknown (arm64)
Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (34~22.04) for
jammy have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
software-properties/unknown (s390x)
update-motd/unknown (arm64)
Please visit the excuses page listed below
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (34~24.04) for
noble have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
ubuntu-advantage-tools/unknown (armhf)
update-motd/unknown (armhf)
wsl-pro-service/unknown (armhf)
Please
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (34~18.04) for
bionic have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
ubuntu-advantage-tools/unknown (armhf)
update-manager/1:18.04.12 (armhf)
Please visit the excuses page
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (34~16.04) for
xenial have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
ubuntu-advantage-tools/unknown (arm64)
Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the
investigate the failures,
proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding
autopkgtest regressions [1].
https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-
migration/focal/update_excuses.html#snapd
[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. It seems that your bug report is not filed about a
specific source package though, rather it is just filed against Ubuntu
in general. It is important that bug reports be filed about source
packages so that people
** Package changed: ubuntu => ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080197
Title:
Applications does not save their expanded status afer upgrade Ununtu
22.0
-proposed tracker
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076174
Title:
noble/linux-oem-6.11: 6.11.0-1001.1 -proposed tracker
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https
om the source code, and this bug will be closed.
See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Thank you!
** Tags added: kernel-spammed-jammy-linux-realtime-6.8-v2
verification-needed-jammy-linux-realtime-6.8
--
You received this bug notific
om the source code, and this bug will be closed.
See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Thank you!
** Tags added: kernel-spammed-jammy-linux-realtime-6.8-v2
verification-needed-jammy-linux-realtime-6.8
--
You received this bug notific
om the source code, and this bug will be closed.
See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Thank you!
** Tags added: kernel-spammed-jammy-linux-realtime-6.8-v2
verification-needed-jammy-linux-realtime-6.8
--
You received this bug notific
om the source code, and this bug will be closed.
See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Thank you!
** Tags added: kernel-spammed-jammy-linux-realtime-6.8-v2
verification-needed-jammy-linux-realtime-6.8
--
You received this bug notific
om the source code, and this bug will be closed.
See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Thank you!
** Tags added: kernel-spammed-jammy-linux-realtime-6.8-v2
verification-needed-jammy-linux-realtime-6.8
--
You received this bug notific
om the source code, and this bug will be closed.
See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Thank you!
** Tags added: kernel-spammed-jammy-linux-realtime-6.8-v2
verification-needed-jammy-linux-realtime-6.8
--
You received this bug notific
om the source code, and this bug will be closed.
See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Thank you!
** Tags added: kernel-spammed-jammy-linux-realtime-6.8-v2
verification-needed-jammy-linux-realtime-6.8
--
You received this bug notific
om the source code, and this bug will be closed.
See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Thank you!
** Tags added: kernel-spammed-jammy-linux-realtime-6.8-v2
verification-needed-jammy-linux-realtime-6.8
--
You received this bug notific
om the source code, and this bug will be closed.
See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Thank you!
** Tags added: kernel-spammed-jammy-linux-realtime-6.8-v2
verification-needed-jammy-linux-realtime-6.8
--
You received this bug notific
1 - 100 of 10296 matches
Mail list logo
