[Bug 634487] Re: t1.micro instance hangs when installing java

2011-06-21 Thread Wolfgang Nagele
Does not seem to fix the problem. Tested using Maverick (ami-ccf405a5) and aki-805ea7e9 it still triggers a 100% CPU state when installing the Sun JDK. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 432154] Re: dynamic block device attach/detach not functional with karmic KVM

2010-11-10 Thread Wolfgang Nagele
@Serge: Yes acpiphp is definitely loaded. I used the UEC images. @Kiall: Thanks for the hint about vdX. Does that mean you just specify (for example) vda when attaching the device to the instance and that will work? I have no cluster installed with which i could test atm. -- dynamic block

[Bug 432154] Re: dynamic block device attach/detach not functional with karmic KVM

2010-11-10 Thread Wolfgang Nagele
@Serge: Yes acpiphp is definitely loaded. I used the UEC images. @Kiall: Thanks for the hint about vdX. Does that mean you just specify (for example) vda when attaching the device to the instance and that will work? I have no cluster installed with which i could test atm. -- dynamic block

[Bug 432154] Re: dynamic block device attach/detach not functional with karmic KVM

2010-10-28 Thread Wolfgang Nagele
I believe this bug is still existing in the latest 10.10 server release. When attaching a volume the nc.log shows that it was properly mounted via iSCSI and one can access it on the node but it will not appear in the guest. The guest is the latest UEC release of Lucid. Can anybody confirm that

[Bug 432154] Re: dynamic block device attach/detach not functional with karmic KVM

2010-10-28 Thread Wolfgang Nagele
I believe this bug is still existing in the latest 10.10 server release. When attaching a volume the nc.log shows that it was properly mounted via iSCSI and one can access it on the node but it will not appear in the guest. The guest is the latest UEC release of Lucid. Can anybody confirm that

[Bug 242956] Re: Bind9 (8.04) not returning 'ad' flag when dnssec is enabled

2009-08-10 Thread Wolfgang Nagele
RedHat has some quite simple patches that were used to enable this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=205842 Maybe somebody wants to port this into the Ubuntu source? ** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #205842 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=205842 -- Bind9 (8.04)

[Bug 242956] Re: Bind9 (8.04) not returning 'ad' flag when dnssec is enabled

2009-08-10 Thread Wolfgang Nagele
RedHat has some quite simple patches that were used to enable this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=205842 Maybe somebody wants to port this into the Ubuntu source? ** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #205842 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=205842 -- Bind9 (8.04)

[Bug 242956] Re: Bind9 (8.04) not returning 'ad' flag when dnssec is enabled

2009-06-12 Thread Wolfgang Nagele
The only system i could get this working at the moment was OpenBSD. To enable this i had to provide 'edns0' as an option in resolv.conf[1]. I have attached a PCAP (openbsd.pcap) generated with tcpdump. If you observe it (for instance with Wireshark) you will see that the request for the SSHFP

[Bug 242956] Re: Bind9 (8.04) not returning 'ad' flag when dnssec is enabled

2009-06-12 Thread Wolfgang Nagele
The only system i could get this working at the moment was OpenBSD. To enable this i had to provide 'edns0' as an option in resolv.conf[1]. I have attached a PCAP (openbsd.pcap) generated with tcpdump. If you observe it (for instance with Wireshark) you will see that the request for the SSHFP