Let me get this straight, I get that re. Ubuntu this is Incomplete and
now expired, but this bug report is pretty complete in regards of hplip.
There is no reason to keep relying on QT4 in new versions when it is EOL
for a long time now. And here is the issue, the installer still requires
qt4
This is still an issue in Ubuntu 16.04 derivative (Linux Mint 18.1)
Using the workaround (imwheel -k -b "0 0 0 0 11 10") helped.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1517468
Title:
I can't really reproduced, don't have a similar setup ready. However, analyzing
the backtrace and the code, the following may fix the issue:
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/2fddfb0a95288d39cee2e82376297ce43296743b
It has already been pushed to the ceph stable branch, though it's not in
any
I can't really reproduced, don't have a similar setup ready. However, analyzing
the backtrace and the code, the following may fix the issue:
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/2fddfb0a95288d39cee2e82376297ce43296743b
It has already been pushed to the ceph stable branch, though it's not in
any
Note that while libapache2-mod-fastcgi is currently the better way to
go, there's also libapache2-mod-fcgid, or nginx/lighttpd with fastcgi.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to libfcgi in Ubuntu.
Note that while libapache2-mod-fastcgi is currently the better way to
go, there's also libapache2-mod-fcgid, or nginx/lighttpd with fastcgi.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017978
At the time we went through the entire code base. It didn't make sense going
just through the ceph code and not through the radosgw code, they reside on the
same tree and share code. Also, the radosgw code size is not as big as it was
implied at the time.
In any case, we audited that code
At the time we went through the entire code base. It didn't make sense going
just through the ceph code and not through the radosgw code, they reside on the
same tree and share code. Also, the radosgw code size is not as big as it was
implied at the time.
In any case, we audited that code
We fixed all the issues that were pointed out, and it was already ready for
precise. At the time it was communicated that the main issue for not including
radosgw was libfcgi, however, that doesn't appear to be an issue any more.
We've also created a test suite for radosgw
We fixed all the issues that were pointed out, and it was already ready for
precise. At the time it was communicated that the main issue for not including
radosgw was libfcgi, however, that doesn't appear to be an issue any more.
We've also created a test suite for radosgw
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: xsane
Canon Lide 30 should be recognized by and work with Xsane (with Suse it
worked just fine) but using Ubuntu 7.04 it doesn't work. Xsane
recognizes the scanner but the scanner is dead. Trying to scan or
preview a black background appears as the
11 matches
Mail list logo
