both daily iso and beta2 64bit desktop iso hang, while trying to boot from usb
stick.
the splash is displayed and after about 10min there is massive text displayed
to stdout (so fast that i can't read anything)
previous released worked with this hardware
--
You received this bug notification
thus im also affected:
$ synclient -l synclient.log
http://paste.ubuntu.com/525572/
cat /proc/bus/input/devices devices.log
http://paste.ubuntu.com/525573/
model: T400
os: 10.10 maverik
--
Horizontal scroll doesn't work in maverick in SynPS/2 Synaptics Touchpad
this seems to be still present in 10.04 server
http://ubuntu.stackexchange.com/questions/4826/ubuntu-10-04-server-
switching-to-static-ip
--
dhclient3 keeps running after ifdown
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/38140
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server
this seems to be still present in 10.04 server
http://ubuntu.stackexchange.com/questions/4826/ubuntu-10-04-server-
switching-to-static-ip
--
dhclient3 keeps running after ifdown
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/38140
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
much more stable, does regard the GNOME standard, doesn't have ads, IS a
democracy, plus the devs don't customize the UI to death).
where is ad in ubuntu?
On a laptop of a friend where Jaunty was installed she was prompted to
upgrade to Lucid. I was surprised to hear that. A dist upgrade
ORIGIN OF THE PROBLEM: NXDOMAIN DNS Server
My ISP is using this new feature called NXDOMAIN redirecting.
With this feature the browser displays an isp search page for None existing
domains.
for example:
http://www.asfsdfaasdf.com/
how it works: if you request an none existing domain the dns
the problem is that theses voices are only the minority.
The most ubuntu users, don't test Beta1 ,2 or follow every bugreport.
they will install the new LTS when its available and after the installation the
will be surprised/ annoyed / happy
maybe they will google for it, or they will stick to
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 509177 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/509177
no update yet ?
no workaround?
the error at an uptodate beta
gnome-shell: Depends: libgjs0 but it is not going to be installed
E: Broken packages
apt-get install libgjs0
Depends: xulrunner-1.9.1
as of Apr 4 not fixed in repo
changed to confirmed
** Changed in: gnome-shell (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released = In Progress
** Changed in: gnome-shell (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress = Confirmed
--
Gnome-shell fails to install on lucid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/509177
You
as mentioned by Bernhard
workaround:
sudo apt-add-repository paa:ricotz/testing
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install gnome-shell
--
Gnome-shell fails to install on lucid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/509177
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
@Pyramid Technologies #607
i stand 100% behind your post. the problem is not the decision itself, but the
way how it was
- discussed
- communicated
- implemented
And i think this is a very important question for the whole community:
Should ubuntu ignore the community (lp,brainstorm, etc ..) to
fixed
--
lucid server alpha2 grub fails to install
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/520750
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 520750 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/520750
fixed in beta 1 (see duplicate bug)
--
Lucid server (alpha2) fails to install in VMware Player
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524185
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ubiquity
i used guess keyboard dialog during installation of
ubuntu lucid 10.04 beta 1 64bit
After asking me to do few types my keyboard ( germin without dead) is deteced.
i continue the installation with
default values.
After first start i
I WAS affected too. but since Karmic all things are running fine.
--
Slow performance with Gmail
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217580
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
i can confirm that the i386 desktop alpha2 seems not to be affected.
--
lucid server alpha2 grub fails to install
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/520750
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
did a default installation with the amd64 cd and it's also affected.
To sum up: Every server installation fails when it wants to install grub.
I tried with LVM, or no LVM
--
lucid server alpha2 grub fails to install
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/520750
You received this bug notification
i'm getting same error at alpha2 lucid i368
[8b4567] ldap_result() failed: No such object
lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description:Ubuntu lucid (development branch)
Release:10.04
Codename: lucid
apt-cache policy libnss-ldap
libnss-ldap:
solution:
you have to change the config line
/etc/nslcd.conf
base dc=satega,dc=local/
to
base dc=satega,dc=local
(remove the / at the end)
i think the installer creates a broken on
--
Replacing libnss-ldap with libnss-ldapd fails
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/235920
You received this bug
i would suggest as a workaround to execute this when the package is
configured.
sudo gzip -d /usr/share/doc/smbldap-tools/configure.pl.gz
sudo perl /usr/share/doc/smbldap-tools/configure.pl
if not hope this will help others (workaround tested and working on
lucid 10.04 alpha2)
--
wrong path in
this bug is still open in LUCID alpha2 10.04
but the level=0 fix works.
#lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description:Ubuntu lucid (development branch)
Release:10.04
Codename: lucid
#apt-cache policy phpldapadmin
phpldapadmin:
Installed:
i checked the upstream repo:
it was been fixed in
ea17aadef46fd29850160987fe7740ceed1381ad
http://phpldapadmin.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=phpldapadmin/phpldapadmin;a=commit;h=ea17aadef46fd29850160987fe7740ceed1381ad
this had been released in RELEASE-1.2.0-rc2
--
E_STRICT: Declaration
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: grub
i installed lucid alpha2 server i386 on vmware 2.0.0 and vbox 3.1
on both systems i used the default setttings. (except autoinstall security
updates)
at the step where grub is installed the installer told me:
Are you sure you don't want to install
** Attachment added: Screenshot-lucidsatega - 192.168.178.67-4.png
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39079921/Screenshot-lucidsatega%20-%20192.168.178.67-4.png
--
lucid server alpha2 grub fails to install
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/520750
You received this bug notification because you are
** Attachment added: Screenshot-lucidsatega - 192.168.178.67.png
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39079927/Screenshot-lucidsatega%20-%20192.168.178.67.png
--
lucid server alpha2 grub fails to install
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/520750
You received this bug notification because you are a
** Attachment added: Screenshot-lucidsatega - 192.168.178.67-1.png
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39079931/Screenshot-lucidsatega%20-%20192.168.178.67-1.png
--
lucid server alpha2 grub fails to install
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/520750
You received this bug notification because you are
** Attachment added: Screenshot-lucidsatega - 192.168.178.67-2.png
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39079938/Screenshot-lucidsatega%20-%20192.168.178.67-2.png
--
lucid server alpha2 grub fails to install
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/520750
You received this bug notification because you are
** Attachment added: Screenshot-lucidsatega - 192.168.178.67-3.png
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39079946/Screenshot-lucidsatega%20-%20192.168.178.67-3.png
--
lucid server alpha2 grub fails to install
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/520750
You received this bug notification because you are
** Attachment added: Screenshot-lucidsatega - 192.168.178.67-5.png
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39079952/Screenshot-lucidsatega%20-%20192.168.178.67-5.png
--
lucid server alpha2 grub fails to install
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/520750
You received this bug notification because you are
this has been patched released upstream (pidgin 2.6.5)
http://developer.pidgin.im/wiki/ChangeLog
is this going to be a ubuntu security update?
--
Security problem allows to remotely read user files (MSN protocol)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/501089
You received this bug notification because
@tobiasly
ok i can confirm, that F3.5 has a hard time with the google reader. But its
definitly not the same sluggish scrolling issue.
I think the problem of this site is the heavy usage of javascript.
When i start to scroll, firefox just does not repaint the images as fast
as (for example
at least this is fixed in karmic (beta)
same system with jaunty is affected till today (all updates ..)
--
Slow performance with Gmail
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217580
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 419126 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/419126
i tried the beta desktop live iso (amd64)
but i also can't boot (Nvidia GT250 card). After 2 secs there is lust a
black screen an a cursor is blinking (nothing is happending)
this live cd worked fine on my
** Changed in: impressive (Ubuntu)
Status: New = In Progress
--
impressive does not prevent screensaver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/393637
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
will this ever be fixed?
--
Ubuntu 8.10 Server Guide Samba and LDAP
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348657
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
added
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=587638
upstream link.
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #587638
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=587638
** Also affects: seahorse via
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=587638
Importance: Unknown
Status:
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: impressive
impressive does not prevent the screensaver from starting.
this is VERY annoying because the screensaver should only be started when the
system is idle. But it seems that gnome does not notice that the user is
clicking through a
maybe this code also added to mplayer can fix this problem
http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=347190#p347190
can someone confirm that this is the correct approach, because then i
will write a patch and send it upstream
--
impressive does not prevent screensaver
@Michael Rooney
what kernel are you using?
maybe its an kernel - nvidea driver issue.
I mean 2.6.30 may fit with the 180.60
I will investigate this.
--
Slow performance with Gmail
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217580
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
ok i tracked down the issue. The problem is that is use an different icon style
called Tangerine.
and there is no icon in this folder
Solution: copy
/usr/share/icons/Human/scaleable/status/notification-network-wireless-full.svg
to
/usr/share/icons/Tangerine/scaleable/status/
ensure that there
on my ubuntu 9.04 machine ALL kde4 apps are making rendering problems.
Like yakuake does only display parts of the text.
Amarok. Does only display 1/10 of the folder in the file open dialog. the other
folder are just not painted in the control
Or when i click down arrow it paints each element
Public bug reported:
as you can see in the attached image the network manager does not show
the wirless icon in the notifications when i connect to an wlan. All
other symbols are shown correctly.
** Affects: network-manager-applet (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
the probem is that this has worked before and then stopped working for
no reason. I'm using ext4 WITHOUT nodelloc probably and system hang was
the issue?
Reinstalling the network-manager-gnome packet in synaptica had no affect
** Attachment added: missing icon
anyone knows if this is a firefox or a xulrunner related problem?
if xulrunner is not the problem i will remove it from the affected projects.
Imho we also have to remove the fix commited because this is simply
not the case.
--
Slow performance with Gmail
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217580
i can confirm bad behaviour on Intel 4500MHD. (After extensive scrolling the
windows turns gray and keeps scrolling)
hope the bug will be fixed in FF 3.5
--
Slow performance with Gmail
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217580
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
although xorg uses all the cpu time it must be a firefox bug because opera qt
does not show any of this issues.
Is this an xulrunner or an firefox bug ?
** Also affects: firefox via
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=427431
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
Slow
this is an updated version of the page. It does not contain any
position:fixed element on it.
as you can see the scrolling is very fast.
http://stinkt.kicks-
ass.org/1b6cc1af2e8437646c9b7422d78e6eb3/no_css_fix_pos.html
(original page with the position:fixed elements)
ok i did some further investigation.
The Process that causes all the CPU load is xorg.
But i don't think that xorg is the problem. I played a little bit with
the css of the page and i found the following:
the css code that causes all the problems is:
position:fixed;
Each time there is a static
the best example:
http://stinkt.kicks-ass.org/1b6cc1af2e8437646c9b7422d78e6eb3/slidecast%20-%20studio%20-%20vertical-view.html
(this is a static copy of the site)
just try scrolling with you mousewheele up and down very fast. Then you
can see that the page is still scrolling seconds after you
I can confirm Firefox @ Jaunty running VERY SLOW on very long sites.
My hardware: Nvidia GTS 250 CPU E6600 2GB RAM.
I testet opera linked with qt3 and it is running extreme fast. No lag at all.
So this must be a problem either with gtk or with geko engine.
--
Slow performance with Gmail
I can confirm Firefox @ Jaunty running VERY SLOW on very long sites.
My hardware: Nvidia GTS 250 CPU E6600 2GB RAM.
I testet opera linked with qt3 and it is running extreme fast. No lag at all.
So this must be a problem either with gtk or with geko engine.
--
Slow performance with Gmail
** Attachment added: Screenshot-seahorse.png
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25888067/Screenshot-seahorse.png
--
seahorse can not change trust level
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365540
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: seahorse
It is not possible to change the trust of the key i signed.
The gui always displays : Trust: Marginal and the dropdown box is disabled. (as
you can see in the screenshot)
the gpg command displayes 2 trust levels:
1. trust:marginal
2. [ full ]
sry forgotten about
$ apt-cache policy seahorse
seahorse:
Installed: 2.26.1-0ubuntu1
Candidate: 2.26.1-0ubuntu1
Version table:
*** 2.26.1-0ubuntu1 0
500 http://at.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/main Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
sry forgotten about:
$ apt-cache policy
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: seahorse
The old seahorse in jaunty displayed the correct Key ID for the inner
certificate
The seahorse version in jaunty (all updates) just displays something not
useable.
The certficate is valid because the firefox addon FireGPG CAN handle this.
** Attachment added: Screenshot-Passwords and Encryption Keys.png
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25865792/Screenshot-Passwords%20and%20Encryption%20Keys.png
--
seahorse does not correctly handel keys with subkeys
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365315
You received this bug notification
ok:
the KeyID is 2FCC2BB4 this key is in the security tab of my mailaccount @
evolution.
i write a testmail to myself from the account with the KeyID 2FC ..
I check Security PGP Sign
send:
it asks me to unlock the cached passphrase for Key with ID 2FCC2BB4
It sends the message without any
an additional problem is: when i send a email with the content testmail to a
friend (his public key is known)
and want to encrypt that, evolutionis encrypting the mail with MY key.
When i display the sourcecode of the sent mail i just get a long
-BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9
58 matches
Mail list logo
