[Bug 308594] Re: Infinite loop of Xf86battery key presses

2009-01-04 Thread apaprocki
This affects my XPS M1530 as well. There appears to be a kernel patch for this.. http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernelm=123055061901679w=2 -- Infinite loop of Xf86battery key presses https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/308594 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 308594] Re: Infinite loop of Xf86battery key presses

2009-01-04 Thread apaprocki
These are the links to the two patches which need to be applied to atkbd.c: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernelm=121868482014229w=2 http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernelm=123056100215208w=2 -- Infinite loop of Xf86battery key presses https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/308594 You received this bug

[Bug 173890] Re: flashplugin-nonfree fails to install due to md5sum mismatch

2008-12-23 Thread apaprocki
to be far more reliable with the 64 bit alpha than the 32 bit released version. I agree. The 32-bit wrapper version didn't work at all on my 8.10 install. If a movie started at all it would freeze after the first few seconds. After installing the 64-bit version everything has worked perfectly.

[Bug 173890] Re: flashplugin-nonfree fails to install due to md5sum mismatch

2008-12-19 Thread apaprocki
So what happens to flashplugin-nonfree? Should it be removed completely? I hate to be a nag about the user experience, but how will end users use the intrepid partner repository pasted above? Will Ubuntu updater have an option to select partner packages? Will the OS installer allow you to select

[Bug 173890] Re: flashplugin-nonfree fails to install due to md5sum mismatch

2008-12-19 Thread apaprocki
Perhaps. Or turned into a package that tells you how, or helps, to enable the other one? Other options? Maybe temporarily until the next release when it is removed completely? It wouldn't make sense to keep the package long-term. how will end users use the intrepid partner repository pasted

[Bug 173890] Re: flashplugin-nonfree fails to install due to md5sum mismatch

2008-12-18 Thread apaprocki
Since Adobe offers .deb packages directly, why can't they get set up as an apt source and use a signed package instead of this download mechanism? Wouldn't that fix this issue once and for all instead of having to always have a period where users are broken whenever Adobe bumps a version? --

[Bug 173890] Re: flashplugin-nonfree fails to install due to md5sum mismatch

2008-12-17 Thread apaprocki
This must have just broken again.. It fails to install on Intrepid amd64: Linux xps 2.6.27-9-generic #1 SMP Thu Nov 20 22:15:32 UTC 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux ... Unpacking flashplugin-nonfree (from .../flashplugin-nonfree_10.0.12.36ubuntu1_amd64.deb) ... Setting up flashplugin-nonfree

[Bug 309262] [NEW] i8kutils package missing for amd64 arch (8.10)

2008-12-17 Thread apaprocki
Public bug reported: The i8k kernel module has had 64-bit support now for a while, but the i8kutils package is not being built for the amd64 architecture: # apt-get install i8kutils Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done E: Couldn't find