[Bug 1914940] [NEW] libsbigudrv2 contains udev rules prevent firmware from loading

2021-02-07 Thread bkloppenborg
Public bug reported: The libsbigudrv2 package contains several minor udev rule errors that prevents firmware from loading. These include queries to SYSFS instead of ATTR, assignment of ENV{DEVTYPE}, and a missing comma (causing 1801362). These items cause the rule to not apply to the underlying

[Bug 1174145] Re: Broadcom 4313 causes heavy interference with wireless clients after 13.04 upgrade

2013-06-25 Thread bkloppenborg
Great. So to other users affected by this bug, simply apply the broadcom-kernel-source package from saucy as described in post #18 above. ** Changed in: bcmwl (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1174145] Re: Broadcom 4313 causes heavy interference with wireless clients after 13.04 upgrade

2013-06-23 Thread bkloppenborg
I've been trying the drivers from saucy (i.e. 6.30.223.30-bdcom0-ubuntu1) for the last week or so. The interference issue is either entirely gone or significantly reduced. If this is true for other users, we should probably suggest upgrading as a workaround (to the driver from here

[Bug 1174145] Re: Broadcom 4313 causes heavy interference with wireless clients after 13.04 upgrade

2013-06-23 Thread bkloppenborg
No, no kernel panic for me with the saucy drivers (6.30.223.30-bdcom0-ubuntu1) running iwconfig via. sudo: $ sudo iwconfig eth1 [sudo] password for bkloppenborg: eth1 IEEE 802.11abg ESSID:XX Mode:Managed Frequency:2.412 GHz Access Point: 00:1C:28:XX:XX:XX

[Bug 1097519] Re: Wrong driver used for older Broadcom chipsets

2013-06-17 Thread bkloppenborg
The merger of Bug #1174145 into this group is inappropriate. This bug appears to be related to getting brcmsmac selected by default, whereas Bug #1174145 is related to a WLAN interference issue that popped up between bcmwl-kernel-source versions 5.100.82.112+bdcom-0ubuntu3 shipped with 12.10 and

[Bug 1174145] Re: Broadcom 4313 causes heavy interference with wireless clients after 13.04 upgrade

2013-06-17 Thread bkloppenborg
Unmarked this bug as a duplicate of 1097519 for reasons explained here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/1097519/comments/30 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1097519 Wrong driver used for older Broadcom chipsets -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 1174145] Re: Broadcom 4313 causes heavy interference with wireless clients after 13.04 upgrade

2013-06-09 Thread bkloppenborg
Interference cause tracked to changes of bcmwl-kernel-source between 5.100.82.112 and 6.20.155.1. ** Package changed: ubuntu = bcmwl (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1174145

[Bug 1174145] Re: Broadcom 4313 causes heavy interference with wireless clients after 13.04 upgrade

2013-06-09 Thread bkloppenborg
To make my comment above a little more specific, the version of bcmwl- kernel-source that does not cause interference in my tests is 5.100.82.112+bdcom-0ubuntu3 (the last release for quantal). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1174145] Re: Broadcom 4313 causes heavy interference with wireless clients after 13.04 upgrade

2013-06-09 Thread bkloppenborg
And fixing a typo in #12, the quantal version comes from here: http://packages.ubuntu.com/quantal/amd64/bcmwl-kernel-source/download -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1174145 Title:

[Bug 1174145] Re: Broadcom 4313 causes heavy interference with wireless clients after 13.04 upgrade

2013-06-06 Thread bkloppenborg
I just compared the current version (6.20.155.1) of bcmwl-kernel-source against the 5.100.82.112 version of the driver from quantal (downloaded from http://packages.ubuntu.com/raring/amd64/bcmwl-kernel- source/download) Experimental setup was as follows: Computer A: BCM4313 on Windows pinging

[Bug 996966] Re: No results from HUD search

2012-05-27 Thread bkloppenborg
Same issue here (HUD would return no results, regardless of application/query string). I had just updated from 10.04 to 12.04 and was missing indicator-appmenu. Installing via. apt fixed the issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 775071] Re: UI not properly redrawing

2011-05-04 Thread bkloppenborg
I too have been experiencing problems with 11.04 not redrawing. I think this problem resides upstream (i.e. in Gnome or X) as I have experienced the same and additional redrawing problems with Banshee, Rhythmbox, Nautilus, Thunderbird, and Chrome as what you illustrate above. The primary problem

[Bug 775071] Re: UI not properly redrawing

2011-05-04 Thread bkloppenborg
Similar issues reported elsewhere, but with different applications. Very similar problem, but with a different application: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/756560 Another redrawing issue with similar sounding experiences, thinks problem is in Compiz:

[Bug 659348] Re: Kernel Oops - unable to handle kernel paging request; EIP is at videobuf_dma_unmap+0x43/0xb0

2010-10-16 Thread bkloppenborg
I can confirm the same issue with the Dvico FusionHDTV7. Firmware upload successful, but any attempt to tune in channels using either MythTV's built-in scanner or the dvb-apps scan utility result in above bug. Partial dmesg report attached. lspci: Multimedia video controller: Conexant Systems,

[Bug 323823] Re: Battery Status Detected Incorrectly (MSI-1719 / GX700)

2009-05-02 Thread bkloppenborg
I just upgraded to 9.04 over the weekend. The persons who solved this problem in 8.10 (kernel 2.6.27-11) are again working towards a solution for 9.04 (kernel 2.6.28-11). I suggest that all further discussion of this bug be directed to Bug 12011 instead

[Bug 323823] Re: Battery Status Detected Incorrectly (MSI-1719 / GX700)

2009-05-02 Thread bkloppenborg
Please note that the current work to fix the bug is hosted on bugzilla.kernel.org not on launchpad. Follow the explicit http link above (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12011), not the Bug 12011 link. -- Battery Status Detected Incorrectly (MSI-1719 / GX700)

[Bug 323823] Re: Battery Status Detected Incorrectly (MSI-1719 / GX700)

2009-02-25 Thread bkloppenborg
I've been running the kernel with Timo's patch for four days now without any kernel parameters. The battery status has always been detected correctly. The patch in question is found here: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12011#c105 And is compiled by normal means (see discussion and

[Bug 323823] Re: Battery Status Detected Incorrectly (MSI-1719 / GX700)

2009-02-21 Thread bkloppenborg
Timo, thank you for the update. Do you need another tester or do you anticipate that the patch will be released in the mainstream kernel anytime soon? Lastly, does this patch fix both issues I discussed above, namely can I run my laptop without the acpi=noirq kernel parameter or does this just

[Bug 323823] Re: Battery Status Detected Incorrectly (MSI-1719 / GX700)

2009-02-21 Thread bkloppenborg
I just finished compiling the kernel with Timo's patch. One hour and 30 minutes of uptime (without any kernel parameters) and my battery is still detected. I'll post back if it disappears. Way to go! -- Battery Status Detected Incorrectly (MSI-1719 / GX700)

[Bug 323823] Re: Battery Status Detected Incorrectly (MSI-1719 / GX700)

2009-02-18 Thread bkloppenborg
Given that Zygfryd (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12011#c110) isn't having luck with his GX700, this doesn't seem like an option at the moment. I'll continue checking in on that bug report from time to time. -- Battery Status Detected Incorrectly (MSI-1719 / GX700)

[Bug 323823] Re: Battery Status Detected Incorrectly (MSI-1719 / GX700)

2009-02-08 Thread bkloppenborg
The battery disappeared after the laptop was running for ~10 hours on AC power WITH the acpi=noirq kernel parameter specified. ** Attachment added: Tarball of the /proc/acpi directory WITH the acpi=noirq kernel parameter specified after the battery disappears.

[Bug 323823] Re: Battery Status Detected Incorrectly (MSI-1719 / GX700)

2009-02-07 Thread bkloppenborg
Because this got moved to the acpi section, I've included the standard information. $ uname -a Linux Lappy 2.6.27-11-generic #1 SMP Thu Jan 29 19:28:32 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux Attached is lspci output ** Attachment added: lspci.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22082037/lspci.txt --

[Bug 323823] Re: Battery Status Detected Incorrectly (MSI-1719 / GX700)

2009-02-07 Thread bkloppenborg
From $ sudo dmidecode dmidecode.txt ** Attachment added: dmidecode.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22082045/dmidecode.txt -- Battery Status Detected Incorrectly (MSI-1719 / GX700) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/323823 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 323823] Re: Battery Status Detected Incorrectly (MSI-1719 / GX700)

2009-02-07 Thread bkloppenborg
Tarball of the /proc/acpi directory with the acpi=noirq kernel parameter specified while the battery is detected (I'll post another copy of this when the battery is not detected). cp -r /proc/acpi /tmp sudo tar -cvjf ~/acpi.tar.bz /tmp/acpi ** Attachment added: acpi.tar.bz

[Bug 323823] Re: Battery Status Detected Incorrectly (MSI-1719 / GX700)

2009-02-07 Thread bkloppenborg
** Attachment added: Tarball of the /proc/acpi directory without any acpi-related kernel parameters specified. http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22085069/acpi.normal.tar.bz -- Battery Status Detected Incorrectly (MSI-1719 / GX700) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/323823 You received this bug

[Bug 323823] Re: Battery Status Detected Incorrectly (MSI-1719 / GX700)

2009-02-07 Thread bkloppenborg
** Attachment added: Tarball of the /proc/acpi directory without any acpi-related kernel parameters specified after the battery disappears. http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22085082/acpi.batgone.tar.bz -- Battery Status Detected Incorrectly (MSI-1719 / GX700)

[Bug 323823] [NEW] Battery Status Detected Incorrectly (MSI-1719 / GX700)

2009-01-31 Thread bkloppenborg
Public bug reported: Although it was closed and a patch released, bug 147560(https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/147560) pertaining to the battery status being incorrectly detected still persists in Ubuntu 8.10 x86_64, kernel 2.6.27-11-generic and in Ubuntu 9.04 alpha3 except now

[Bug 323823] Re: Battery Status Detected Incorrectly (MSI-1719 / GX700)

2009-01-31 Thread bkloppenborg
** Description changed: Although it was closed and a patch released, bug - [url=https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/147560]147560[/url] + 147560(https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/147560) pertaining to the battery status being incorrectly detected still

[Bug 147560] Re: Kernel detects battery management wrong (MSI PR200 / System76)

2009-01-31 Thread bkloppenborg
This bug still persists in 8.10. The acpi=noirq kernel parameter fixed the symptoms, with 2.6.27-11 I still loose the correct battery status WITH the acpi=noirq kernel option, although it takes ~1-2 hours before it happens. Because bug is closed, with a patch released and then broken, I have

[Bug 292998] Re: ds9 does not work on intrepid amd64

2008-12-15 Thread bkloppenborg
Again, another workaround but this one doesn't involve compiling anything... simply replace the executable. Instructions below for 64-bit Linux (32-bit packages here: http://hea- www.harvard.edu/RD/ds9/) wget http://hea-www.harvard.edu/saord/download/ds9/linux64/ds9.linux64.5.4.tar.gz tar xvf

[Bug 287093] Re: wrong battery management (MSI PR200/System76 daru2)

2008-11-16 Thread bkloppenborg
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 147560 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/147560 Further details of this bug can be found here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/147560 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 147560 Kernel detects battery management wrong

[Bug 190000] Re: g-p-m does not indicate battery state correctly + changing brightness to random values.

2008-11-16 Thread bkloppenborg
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 147560 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/147560 By reading the above thread, these issues appear to be caused by a problem in the Linux Kernel itself as described here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux- source-2.6.22/+bug/147560/ A bug fix