[Bug 492797] Re: aptitude segfaults with --show-why -v

2009-12-05 Thread bse4711
Architecture: amd64 Version: 0.4.11.11-1ubuntu6 Affects both karmic and lucid -- aptitude segfaults with --show-why -v https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/492797 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list u

[Bug 492797] [NEW] aptitude segfaults with --show-why -v

2009-12-05 Thread bse4711
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: aptitude aptitude segfaults reproducibly when -W is combined with -v on package libvirt-bin. (gdb) run -W -v install libvirt-bin Starting program: /usr/bin/aptitude -W -v install libvirt-bin [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] Reading package l

[Bug 484168] [NEW] aufs is missing in -virtual flavor

2009-11-17 Thread bse4711
Public bug reported: In package linux-image-2.6.31-14-virtual the config-file /boot/config-2.6.31-14-server indicates that AUFS was compiled as a module, but the actual .ko file is missing. ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- aufs is missing in -virtual

[Bug 481854] [NEW] pam_motd patch to show /etc/legal fails to set flag

2009-11-13 Thread bse4711
Public bug reported: The annoying patch added to pam_motd to show /etc/legal on first login tries to create a file in the user's home directory. On systems where the home directories are NOT accessible by root (i.e. nfs-mounted with root-squashing or kerberos) that fails, and the annoying legales

[Bug 460781] [NEW] nfs-boot with unionfs doesn't work

2009-10-25 Thread bse4711
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: casper When using unionfs=unionfs and nfsboot, the "ro" option for the unionfs mountpoint is replaced by "nfsro". This option has been removed more than two years ago. Instead, the default "ro" should be used. --- casper 2009-10-08 15:51:19.000

[Bug 454827] Re: linux-image-2.6.31-14-server and linux-image-2.6.31-14-virtual don't list a conflict with each other, but both provide vmlinuz-server on amd64

2009-10-25 Thread bse4711
Why does there have to be a conflict anyway? If the kernel in the virtual flavor was named vmlinuz-2.6.x-y-virtual, the packages could coexist. -- linux-image-2.6.31-14-server and linux-image-2.6.31-14-virtual don't list a conflict with each other, but both provide vmlinuz-server on amd64 https: