[Bug 381183] Re: mdadm assembling -but not auto assembling- after crash

2010-03-29 Thread ceg
Do you actually use the name /dev/md_d0 in /etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf? Maybe you updated the superblocks to that name but not mdadm.conf. The following will recreate a static mdadm.conf and update the initramfs images: # start your array manually # cp /etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf /etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf.bak

[Bug 403767] Re: mdadm -A device... fails

2010-03-29 Thread ceg
patch above -- madam: no devices found for /dev/md0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/403767 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 403767] Re: mdadm -A device... fails

2010-03-29 Thread ceg
attatching above patch again as a file upload in order for this issue being listeted as containing patch. ** Attachment added: patch http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42384132/patch ** Summary changed: - mdadm -A device... fails + madam: no devices found for /dev/md0 -- madam: no devices found

[Bug 418803] Re: apt-get install mdadm on a 8e partion type

2010-03-29 Thread ceg
Cann't you change the partition type with cfdisk? sudo update-initramfs -k all -u will recreate your initramfs images ** Summary changed: - apt-get install mdadm on a 8e partion type + initramfs images not recreated during uninstall -- initramfs images not recreated during uninstall

[Bug 425213] Re: segfault with data= option in fstab

2010-03-29 Thread ceg
** Summary changed: - mdadm segfault when OTHER fs data= in fstab + segfault with data= option in fstab -- segfault with data= option in fstab https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/425213 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 158918] Re: [-UUIDudev] installing mdadm (or outdated mdadm.conf) breaks bootup

2010-03-29 Thread ceg
A note for /etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf: # ARRAY definitions you make here will be honored only when executing mdadm manually. # The mdadm calls executed on udev events do use this file replacing all lines containing ARRAY. -- [-UUIDudev] installing mdadm (or outdated mdadm.conf) breaks bootup

[Bug 442737] Re: ubuntu-bug mdadm - Fails due to permission denied

2010-03-29 Thread ceg
** Also affects: apport (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: mdadm (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- ubuntu-bug mdadm - Fails due to permission denied https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/442737 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 446445] Re: raid partition is not recognized during system startup

2010-03-29 Thread ceg
** Changed in: mdadm (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- raid partition is not recognized during system startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/446445 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing

[Bug 538526] Re: md mirror disappears after reboot

2010-03-29 Thread ceg
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 136252 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/136252 From what you wrote the first ARRAY line should not be there. (You did not create it after creating the array.) So I suspect maybe you called dpkg-reconfigure mdadm or /usr/share/mdadm/mkconf force-generate

[Bug 538597] Re: RAID1 partitions created in Jaunty not recognised by Karmic

2010-03-29 Thread ceg
Bug #442735 dmraid eats mdadm-managed raid in upgrading from 9.04 to 9.10 If you don't use sata fakeraid, try uninstalling dmraid and sudo update-initramfs -k all -u. -- RAID1 partitions created in Jaunty not recognised by Karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/538597 You received this bug

[Bug 469574] Re: mdadm does not remember its actions correctly

2010-03-29 Thread ceg
I think it was in 9.04 when udev switched to use mdadm --incremental. So you reported what's discussed at http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=8407182, and experience those Bug #550131 initramfs missing /var/run/mdadm dir (loosing state) Bug #136252 [-UUIDudev] mdadm.conf w/o ARRAY lines but

[Bug 469574] Re: [-UUIDudev] new array not assembled correctly after reboot

2010-03-29 Thread ceg
Your old arrays probably work because they got written to mdadm.conf during the update. ** Summary changed: - mdadm does not remember its actions correctly + [-UUIDudev] new array not assembled correctly after reboot ** Changed in: mdadm (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- [-UUIDudev]

[Bug 469574] Re: [-UUIDudev] new array not assembled correctly after reboot

2010-03-29 Thread ceg
workaround: # start your arrays manualy # /usr/share/mdadm/mkconf force-generate /etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf # update-initramfs -k all -u -- [-UUIDudev] new array not assembled correctly after reboot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/469574 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 332235] Re: RAID5 partitions disappear after initial reboot

2010-03-29 Thread ceg
Also dmraid eats mdadm-managed raid in upgrading from 9.04 to 9.10 Bug #442735 ** Summary changed: - RAID5 partitions disappear after initial reboot + RAID5 partitions disappear after initial reboot [old superblocks] -- RAID5 partitions disappear after initial reboot [old superblocks]

[Bug 497186] Re: initramfs' init-premount degrades *all* arrays (not just those required to boot)

2010-03-29 Thread ceg
** Summary changed: - initramfs' mdadm degrades all arrays (not just those required to boot) + initramfs' init-premount degrades *all* arrays (not just those required to boot) -- initramfs' init-premount degrades *all* arrays (not just those required to boot)

[Bug 550634] Re: init-premount does mdadm --assemble --scan --run *all* arrays.

2010-03-29 Thread ceg
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 497186 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/497186 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 497186 initramfs' init-premount degrades *all* arrays (not just those required to boot) -- init-premount does mdadm --assemble --scan --run *all* arrays.

[Bug 497186] Re: initramfs' init-premount degrades *all* arrays (not just those required to boot)

2010-03-29 Thread ceg
As long as the proper mdadm --incremental mode command (to start a single array) is not available (Bug #251646) a workaround needs to be used: mdadm --remove incomplete-md-device arbitrary-member-device-of- incomplete-array mdadm --incremental --run arbitrary-member-device-of-incomplete-array

[Bug 371913] Re: jaunty 1st boot: second drive not found [old superblocks]

2010-03-29 Thread ceg
Have a look at dmraid eats mdadm-managed raid in upgrading from 9.04 to 9.10 Bug #442735 ** Summary changed: - jaunty 1st boot: second drive not found + jaunty 1st boot: second drive not found [old superblocks] ** Summary changed: - jaunty 1st boot: second drive not found [old superblocks] +

[Bug 368986] Re: install fails missing obsolete /dev/MAKEDEV

2010-03-29 Thread ceg
** Summary changed: - mdadm 2.6.7.1-1ubuntu8 fails to install (missing obsolete /dev/MAKEDEV) + install fails missing obsolete /dev/MAKEDEV -- install fails missing obsolete /dev/MAKEDEV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/368986 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 491377] Re: mdadm uses one more spare than specified while creating a RAID5 array

2010-03-29 Thread ceg
** Summary changed: - mdadm uses one more spare that specified while creating a RAID5 array + mdadm uses one more spare than specified while creating a RAID5 array -- mdadm uses one more spare than specified while creating a RAID5 array https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491377 You received this

[Bug 497186] Re: initramfs' init-premount degrades *all* arrays (not just those required to boot)

2010-03-29 Thread ceg
** Changed in: mdadm (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- initramfs' init-premount degrades *all* arrays (not just those required to boot) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/497186 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 532960] Re: mdadm, not using uid of the array breaks after a reboot of a new install

2010-03-29 Thread ceg
Wait, you created the arrays by hand, mdadm --create does not put anything in mdadm.conf and you are experiencing: Bug #136252 [-UUIDudev] mdadm.conf w/o ARRAY lines but udev/mdadm not assembling arrays. (boot fails) Bug #550131 initramfs missing /var/run/mdadm dir (loosing state) -- mdadm,

[Bug 541058] Re: [-UUIDudev] mdadm fails to assemble raid during boot

2010-03-29 Thread ceg
Does that workaround help? Bug #469574 [-UUIDudev] new array not assembled correctly after reboot -- [-UUIDudev] mdadm fails to assemble raid during boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541058 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 541058] Re: [-UUIDudev] mdadm fails to assemble raid during boot

2010-03-29 Thread ceg
I meant the workaround in Bug #469574. Does it help without applying Sami's? -- [-UUIDudev] mdadm fails to assemble raid during boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541058 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 491377] Re: no console message when array is not created as specified

2010-03-29 Thread ceg
** Summary changed: - mdadm uses one more spare than specified while creating a RAID5 array + no console message when array is not created as specified -- no console message when array is not created as specified https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491377 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 342777] Re: can not format new partition [old superblocks]

2010-03-29 Thread ceg
** Summary changed: - old raid superblocks can prevent formating a new partition + can not format new partition [old superblocks] -- can not format new partition [old superblocks] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/342777 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 344748] Re: harsh crashes during mdadm rebuild [-Update]

2010-03-29 Thread ceg
** Summary changed: - harsh crashes during mdadm rebuild [SCARING!!!] + harsh crashes during mdadm rebuild [-Update] ** Changed in: mdadm (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- harsh crashes during mdadm rebuild [-Update] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/344748 You received

[Bug 538597] Re: RAID1 partitions created in Jaunty not recognised by Karmic [old superblocks?]

2010-03-29 Thread ceg
** Summary changed: - RAID1 partitions created in Jaunty not recognised by Karmic + RAID1 partitions created in Jaunty not recognised by Karmic [old superblocks?] -- RAID1 partitions created in Jaunty not recognised by Karmic [old superblocks?] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/538597 You

[Bug 488317] Re: installed system fails to boot with degraded raid holding cryptdisk

2010-03-29 Thread ceg
Well the initramfs boot process needs to be (a state machine) capable of assembling the base system from devices appearing in any order and starting necessary raids degraded if they are not complete after some time. Bug #491463 upstart init within initramfs Bug #251164 boot impossible due to

[Bug 252345] Re: raid setups fail due to mdadm.conf with explicit ARRAY statements and HOMEHOST !=any

2010-03-29 Thread ceg
Well the initramfs boot process needs to be (a state machine) capable of assembling the base system from devices appearing in any order and starting necessary raids degraded if they are not complete after some time. Bug #491463 upstart init within initramfs Bug #251164 boot impossible due to

[Bug 252345] Re: raid setups fail due to mdadm.conf with explicit ARRAY statements and HOMEHOST !=any

2010-03-29 Thread ceg
Oh, no. Sorry made last comment #8 in wrong tab. -- raid setups fail due to mdadm.conf with explicit ARRAY statements and HOMEHOST !=any https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252345 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 532960] Re: [-UUIDudev] mdadm, not using uid of the array breaks after a reboot of a new install

2010-03-29 Thread ceg
** Summary changed: - mdadm, not using uid of the array breaks after a reboot of a new install + [-UUIDudev] mdadm, not using uid of the array breaks after a reboot of a new install -- [-UUIDudev] mdadm, not using uid of the array breaks after a reboot of a new install

[Bug 488317] Re: [-Initramfs] boot fails with degraded raid

2010-03-29 Thread ceg
** Summary changed: - installed system fails to boot with degraded raid holding cryptdisk + [-Initramfs] boot fails with degraded raid ** Summary changed: - [-Initramfs] boot fails with degraded raid + [-Initramfs] no degraded boot lvm-luks-raid -- [-Initramfs] no degraded boot lvm-luks-raid

[Bug 368428] Re: [-UUIDudev] 8.109.04 upgrade lost raid1

2010-03-29 Thread ceg
** Summary changed: - [-UUIDudev] 9.04 upgrade lose my Raid1 + [-UUIDudev] 8.109.04 upgrade lost raid1 -- [-UUIDudev] 8.109.04 upgrade lost raid1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/368428 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 538597] Re: RAID1 partitions created in 9.04 not recognised 9.10 [old superblocks?]

2010-03-29 Thread ceg
** Summary changed: - RAID1 partitions created in Jaunty not recognised by Karmic [old superblocks?] + RAID1 partitions created in 9.04 not recognised 9.10 [old superblocks?] -- 9.10 not recognizing 9.04 partitions [old superblocks?] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/538597 You received this bug

[Bug 532960] Re: [-UUIDudev] mdadm.conf without ARRAY definition breaks reboot new arrays

2010-03-29 Thread ceg
** Summary changed: - [-UUIDudev] mdadm, not using uid of the array breaks after a reboot of a new install + [-UUIDudev] mdadm.conf without ARRAY definition breaks reboot new arrays ** Summary changed: - [-UUIDudev] mdadm.conf without ARRAY definition breaks reboot new arrays + [-UUIDudev]

[Bug 538597] Re: 9.10 not recognizing 9.04 partitions [old superblocks?]

2010-03-29 Thread ceg
** Summary changed: - RAID1 partitions created in 9.04 not recognised 9.10 [old superblocks?] + 9.10 not recognizing 9.04 partitions [old superblocks?] -- 9.10 not recognizing 9.04 partitions [old superblocks?] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/538597 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 251646] Re: missing option to start selected arrays in auto-read mode (like --incremental)

2010-03-29 Thread ceg
** Summary changed: - option to start selected arrays in auto-read mode (like --incremental) + missing option to start selected arrays in auto-read mode (like --incremental) ** Summary changed: - missing option to start selected arrays in auto-read mode (like --incremental) + missing command

[Bug 486361] Re: /dev/md_* devices are not created

2010-03-29 Thread ceg
** Summary changed: - /dev/md_* devices are not created in /dev + /dev/md_* devices are not created ** Summary changed: - /dev/md_* devices are not created + [-UUIDudev] /dev/md_* devices are not created -- [-UUIDudev] /dev/md_* devices are not created https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/486361

[Bug 486361] Re: [-UUIDudev] /dev/md_* devices are not created

2010-03-29 Thread ceg
Because md* and md_d* device names aren't uniqe and can collide, if superblocks and mdadm.conf ARRAY lines don't match devices are not created. This should be solved with pure UUID-based raid assembly. Bug #158918 ** Changed in: mdadm (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- [-UUIDudev]

[Bug 344018] Re: mdadm crashed with SIGSEGV in __libc_start_main()

2010-03-29 Thread ceg
assuming this incomplete report its amoung the fixes upstream, to unclutter the buglist ** Changed in: mdadm (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Fix Released -- mdadm crashed with SIGSEGV in __libc_start_main() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/344018 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 67299] Re: mdadm causes boot to hang for 4 minutes

2010-03-29 Thread ceg
no activity for long assuming fix released ** Changed in: mdadm (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- mdadm causes boot to hang for 4 minutes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/67299 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 252365] Re: mdadm does not add spares to arrays on boot

2010-03-29 Thread ceg
Does Bug #550131 initramfs missing /var/run/mdadm dir (loosing state) fix this? -- mdadm does not add spares to arrays on boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252365 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 181888] Re: mdadm problems after suspend

2010-03-29 Thread ceg
Is this still an issue with newer releases? ** Changed in: mdadm (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Incomplete -- mdadm problems after suspend https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/181888 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 259145] Re: degraded NON-root raids never --run on boot

2010-03-29 Thread ceg
** Summary changed: - degraded non-root raids don't appear on boot + degraded NON-root raids never --run on boot -- degraded NON-root raids never --run on boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/259145 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 259145] Re: degraded NON-root raids never --run on boot

2010-03-29 Thread ceg
** Description changed:   Systems with say /home on raid won't come up booting when raid was degraded during downtime. An init script like /etc/init.d/mdadm-degrade - or because of already doing that kind of watchdog functionality - mountall needs to --run particular necessary arrays

[Bug 291488] Re: Ubuntu asks me what I want to do even if I set BOOT_DEGRADED=true in Ubuntu 8.10

2010-03-29 Thread ceg
non working boot is covered in more detail by other reports this may be due to forgotten update-initramfs -u -k all the release note seems to be about a debconf misconfiguration because dpkg-reconfigure fixes it ** Changed in: mdadm (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- Ubuntu

[Bug 302061] Re: Software raid hangs on boot after upgrade to 8.10

2010-03-29 Thread ceg
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 298481 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/298481 ** Tags removed: boot hangs on raid software ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 298481 /dev/disk/by-uuid not set up reliably (sometimes boot is failing) -- Software raid hangs on boot after

[Bug 344748] Re: harsh crashes during mdadm rebuild [SCARING!!!]

2010-03-29 Thread ceg
assuming this is one of the crashes fixed upstream ** Changed in: mdadm (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Fix Committed -- harsh crashes during mdadm rebuild [SCARING!!!] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/344748 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 315721] Re: shipped old mdadm version crashes with SIGSEGV in __libc_start_main() after grow interrupted

2010-03-29 Thread ceg
assuming this is one of the crashes fixed upstream ** Changed in: mdadm (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed -- shipped old mdadm version crashes with SIGSEGV in __libc_start_main() after grow interrupted https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315721 You received this bug notification

[Bug 252485] Re: Mdadm segfault on booting Hardy

2010-03-29 Thread ceg
Assuming segfault is amoung the fixes upstream or even already in more recent releases. ** Changed in: mdadm (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Fix Released -- Mdadm segfault on booting Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252485 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 368986] Re: mdadm 2.6.7.1-1ubuntu8 fails to install (missing obsolete /dev/MAKEDEV)

2010-03-29 Thread ceg
** Summary changed: - package mdadm 2.6.7.1-1ubuntu8 failed to install, with error /dev/MAKEDEV not found + mdadm 2.6.7.1-1ubuntu8 fails to install (missing obsolete /dev/MAKEDEV) -- mdadm 2.6.7.1-1ubuntu8 fails to install (missing obsolete /dev/MAKEDEV) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/368986

[Bug 371913] Re: jaunty 1st boot: second drive not found

2010-03-29 Thread ceg
Is this still an issue with newer releases? Are you sure this is not an issue with sata/pata drivers or bios settings? ** Summary changed: - Jaunty install failure with Software RAID (mdadm) + jaunty 1st boot: second drive not found ** Changed in: mdadm (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete

[Bug 376984] Re: md sw raid5 not detected on boot [jaunty regression]

2010-03-29 Thread ceg
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 136252 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/136252 A quick workaround to apply before rebooting in in Bug #252345 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 136252 [-UUIDudev] mdadm.conf w/o ARRAY lines but udev/mdadm not assembling arrays. (boot

[Bug 379005] Re: monitoring raid0 floods syslog with DeviceDisappeared/Wrong-Level

2010-03-29 Thread ceg
** Summary changed: - DeviceDisappeared/Wrong-Level + monitoring raid0 floods syslog with DeviceDisappeared/Wrong-Level ** Description changed: Binary package hint: mdadm - In the man page it is well documented that monitoring a raid0 device - will result in an error message like this: +

[Bug 550131] [NEW] boot: initramfs missing dir /var/run/mdadm

2010-03-28 Thread ceg
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: mdadm mdadm --incremental will save state in a map file under /var/run/mdadm/map. But in initramfs and early boot this directory does not exist. The state is then saved in /var/run/mdadm.map.new (man page incorrectly says /var/run/mdadm.map) and not

[Bug 136252] Re: [karmic] mdadm.conf w/o ARRAY lines but udev/mdadm not assembling arrays. (boot fails)

2010-03-28 Thread ceg
Thanks for clarifying Sami. I had seen that missing dir before, and now filed the separate Bug #550131, could you add/confirm info there about the error you encountered with /var/run/mdadm missing. -- [karmic] mdadm.conf w/o ARRAY lines but udev/mdadm not assembling arrays. (boot fails)

[Bug 550131] Re: initramfs missing /var/run/mdadm dir (loosing state)

2010-03-28 Thread ceg
** Summary changed: - boot: initramfs missing dir /var/run/mdadm + initramfs missing /var/run/mdadm dir (loosing state) -- initramfs missing /var/run/mdadm dir (loosing state) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/550131 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 136252] Re: [karmic] mdadm.conf w/o ARRAY lines but udev/mdadm not assembling arrays. (boot fails)

2010-03-28 Thread ceg
We are missing pure and secure UUID-only incremental assembly (i.e. allowing DEVICES partititions, ARRAY any and HOMEHOST any). One that would create unique disk/by-uuid nodes and by-label symlinks (the later might get numbered on conflicts). This scheme may not even expose any of the generally

[Bug 532960] Re: mdadm, not using uid of the array breaks after a reboot of a new install

2010-03-28 Thread ceg
What did you use? Here (9.10) the alternate installer created mdadm.conf with lines like these ARRAY /dev/md0 level=raid1 num-devices=2 UUID=... (no member device names) -- mdadm, not using uid of the array breaks after a reboot of a new install https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532960 You

[Bug 38438] Re: boot confused after stopping array

2010-03-28 Thread ceg
setting to fix commited as uuids are used now ** Changed in: mdadm (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed -- boot confused after stopping array https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/38438 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct

[Bug 298906] Re: initrd can't mount root luks partition correctly on raid1

2010-03-28 Thread ceg
setting to dupe/fixed since expired incomplete bugs are cluttering the default bug listing... -- initrd can't mount root luks partition correctly on raid1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/298906 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 298906] Re: initrd can't mount root luks partition correctly on raid1

2010-03-28 Thread ceg
** Changed in: cryptsetup (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Fix Released ** Changed in: mdadm (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Fix Released -- initrd can't mount root luks partition correctly on raid1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/298906 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 38438] Re: boot confused after stopping array

2010-03-28 Thread ceg
err, released ** Changed in: mdadm (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- boot confused after stopping array https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/38438 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing

[Bug 158918] Re: Installing mdadm package breaks bootup.

2010-03-28 Thread ceg
what I don't get is why a broken array (with no mount point specified) would result in an unbootable system. This is again the glorious mdadm thing of setting up arrays according to unreliable superblock information (device minor numbers, labels, hostnames) combined with the idea of fixing the

[Bug 136252] Re: [karmic] mdadm.conf w/o ARRAY lines but udev/mdadm not assembling arrays. (boot fails)

2010-03-28 Thread ceg
** Description changed: Binary package hint: mdadm Hi, I could not boot from my /dev/md1 - /dev/vg01/lv_root partition, because the initrd could not assemble the md0 and md1 devices. After reading mdadm.conf, I added these two lines to my config: # definitions of existing MD

[Bug 49914] Re: initramfs/mdrun doesn't honor preferred minor when starting RAID volumes

2010-03-28 Thread ceg
You can't rely on device numbering and it's a seriously flawed design of mdadm to set up arrays according to unreliable superblock information. (device minor numbers, labels, hostnames) The idea of fixing the unreliability by limiting array assembly with mdadm.conf (PARTITIONS, ARRAY, HOMEHOST

[Bug 158918] Re: Installing mdadm package breaks bootup (with old superblocks around).

2010-03-28 Thread ceg
The solution is a reliable UUID-based raid assembly mechanism. One that does not depend on ARRAY definitions in mdadm.conf. At the same time making sure never to create devices named equal to the legacy 'standard' non-uniqe and non-persistent naming scheme /dev/md0 etc. causing much havoc.

[Bug 158918] Re: Installing mdadm or outdated mdadm.conf breaks bootup

2010-03-28 Thread ceg
** Description changed: Binary package hint: mdadm On a freshly installed ubuntu-7.10-alternate, with latest apt-get update. When the 'mdadm' package is installed, the system fails to boot successfully, and ends up at the initrd '(busybox)' prompt. Hardware: DELL 1950 - 1RU

[Bug 136252] Re: [karmic] mdadm.conf w/o ARRAY lines but udev/mdadm not assembling arrays. (boot fails)

2010-03-28 Thread ceg
Hey, it's also a solution to Bug #158918 (improved there). -- [karmic] mdadm.conf w/o ARRAY lines but udev/mdadm not assembling arrays. (boot fails) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/136252 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 215542] Re: mdadm --create with typo overwrites device file

2010-03-28 Thread ceg
You need to check this with upsteam. -- mdadm --create with typo overwrites device file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215542 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 215542] Re: mdadm --create with typo overwrites device file

2010-03-28 Thread ceg
Wherever that is, found no bug tracker. http://www.linuxfoundation.org/collaborate/workgroups/linux-raid -- mdadm --create with typo overwrites device file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/215542 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 200266] Re: Mdadm.conf deleted during update.

2010-03-28 Thread ceg
** Changed in: mdadm (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- Mdadm.conf deleted during update. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200266 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 126499] Re: No devices listed in conf file were found due to mdadm RAID1 array UUID different from actual UUID reported by vol_id

2010-03-28 Thread ceg
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 120504 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/120504 vol_id has been replaced with blkid by now ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 120504 mdadm : boot failed sometimes, no devices found -- No devices listed in conf file were found due to mdadm

[Bug 116727] Re: mkinitramfs with raid makes an unbootable image

2010-03-28 Thread ceg
UUID-based hotplug raid assembly that does not depend on mdadm.conf maintanance fixes this, too. #158918 -- mkinitramfs with raid makes an unbootable image https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/116727 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 111398] Re: mdadm fails to stop RAID on shutdown

2010-03-28 Thread ceg
Is this still an issue with recent releases? ** Changed in: mdadm (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Incomplete -- mdadm fails to stop RAID on shutdown https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/111398 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 108553] Re: mdadm SEGFAULT

2010-03-28 Thread ceg
setting fix realased ** Changed in: mdadm (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- mdadm SEGFAULT https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/108553 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 82653] Re: initramfs hook script exits prematurely creating bad defaults

2010-03-28 Thread ceg
Is this still an issue with recent releases? ** Changed in: mdadm (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Incomplete -- initramfs hook script exits prematurely creating bad defaults https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/82653 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 57972] Re: mdrun fails if large disk present, thus boot fails.

2010-03-28 Thread ceg
Is this still an issue with recent releases? mdrun isn't around anymore ** Changed in: mdadm (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Invalid -- mdrun fails if large disk present, thus boot fails. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/57972 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 200266] Re: Mdadm.conf deleted during update.

2010-03-28 Thread ceg
Cleaning up old bugs, this did not occur on subsequent updates, right? ** Changed in: mdadm (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Fix Released -- Mdadm.conf deleted during update. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200266 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 200266] Re: Mdadm.conf deleted during update.

2010-03-28 Thread ceg
UUID-based raid assembly makes mdadm.conf ARRAY definitions obsolete anyway. -- Mdadm.conf deleted during update. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200266 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 541058] Re: mdadm fails to assemble raid during boot

2010-03-28 Thread ceg
(In this context I understand your comment, Sami.) With UUID-based raid assembly not depending on mdadm.conf ARRAY definition maintanance this is no issue. Bug #158918 ** Summary changed: - mdadm fails to assemble raid during boot + [-UUIDudev] mdadm fails to assemble raid during boot --

[Bug 158918] Re: [-UUIDudev] installing mdadm (or outdated mdadm.conf) breaks bootup

2010-03-28 Thread ceg
** Summary changed: - Installing mdadm (or outdated mdadm.conf) breaks bootup + [-UUIDudev] installing mdadm (or outdated mdadm.conf) breaks bootup -- [-UUIDudev] installing mdadm (or outdated mdadm.conf) breaks bootup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/158918 You received this bug notification

[Bug 136252] Re: [-UUIDudev] mdadm.conf w/o ARRAY lines but udev/mdadm not assembling arrays. (boot fails)

2010-03-28 Thread ceg
** Summary changed: - [karmic] mdadm.conf w/o ARRAY lines but udev/mdadm not assembling arrays. (boot fails) + [-UUIDudev] mdadm.conf w/o ARRAY lines but udev/mdadm not assembling arrays. (boot fails) ** Description changed: Binary package hint: mdadm Hi, I could not boot from

[Bug 49914] Re: [-UUIDudev] initramfs/mdrun doesn't honor preferred minor when starting RAID volumes

2010-03-28 Thread ceg
** Summary changed: - initramfs/mdrun doesn't honor preferred minor when starting RAID volumes + [-UUIDudev] initramfs/mdrun doesn't honor preferred minor when starting RAID volumes -- [-UUIDudev] initramfs/mdrun doesn't honor preferred minor when starting RAID volumes

[Bug 116727] Re: [-UUIDudev] mkinitramfs with raid makes an unbootable image

2010-03-28 Thread ceg
** Summary changed: - mkinitramfs with raid makes an unbootable image + [-UUIDudev] mkinitramfs with raid makes an unbootable image -- [-UUIDudev] mkinitramfs with raid makes an unbootable image https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/116727 You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 251646] Re: option to start selected arrays in auto-read mode (like --incremental)

2010-03-28 Thread ceg
workaround sequence: mdadm --remove incomplete-md-device arbitrary-member-device-of- incomplete-array mdadm --incremental --run arbitrary-member-device-of-incomplete-array -- option to start selected arrays in auto-read mode (like --incremental) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251646 You

[Bug 244803] Re: Segfault when readding hotplug devices

2010-03-28 Thread ceg
doesn't happen in 9.10 ** Changed in: mdadm (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- Segfault when readding hotplug devices https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/244803 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 251663] Re: --incremental not creating device nodes

2010-03-28 Thread ceg
current releases are using --incremental ** Changed in: mdadm (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- --incremental not creating device nodes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251663 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 252365] Re: mdadm does not add spares to arrays on boot

2010-03-28 Thread ceg
I'd consider the missing modules issue as fix released, right? Christian Reis, does the race still occur in recent releases? Why is initramfs udev killed instead of transitioned to the rootfs? https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReliableRaid ** Changed in: initramfs-tools Status: New = Fix Released

[Bug 252485] Re: Mdadm segfault on booting Hardy

2010-03-28 Thread ceg
Is this still an issue with recent releases using UUIDs in mdadm.conf? ** Changed in: mdadm (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- Mdadm segfault on booting Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252485 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 330298] Re: mdadm software raid breaks on intrepid-jaunty upgrade

2010-03-28 Thread ceg
With UUID-based raid assembly that does not rely on mdadm.conf maintanance this is not an issue. Bug #158918 ** Summary changed: - mdadm software raid breaks on intrepid-jaunty upgrade + [-UUIDudev] mdadm software raid breaks on intrepid-jaunty upgrade -- [-UUIDudev] mdadm software raid

[Bug 256666] Re: mdadm cannot resume array reshape

2010-03-28 Thread ceg
Intrepid Ibex (whatever number that is) has 2.6.7 8.10 has 2.6.3+ ** Changed in: mdadm (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- mdadm cannot resume array reshape https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/25 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 259797] Re: installation of mdadm causes freeze during boot of Hardy

2010-03-28 Thread ceg
ok, marking invalid to unclutter the bug list ** Changed in: mdadm (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- installation of mdadm causes freeze during boot of Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/259797 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 259145] Re: degraded non-root raids are not run on boot

2010-03-28 Thread ceg
** Description changed: - Binary package hint: mdadm - It is said that the intrepid fix to Bug #120375 re-added support to - mdadm and initramfs-tools for configurable booting degraded RAIDs, but a - systems with /home on a degraded array doesn't come up. + Systems with say /home on raid

[Bug 294269] Re: [Jaunty] rm: cannot remove 'apm-bios-'

2010-03-28 Thread ceg
seems or seemed to be an issue with dpkg or something (search bugs with rm: cannot remove) ** Changed in: powermgmt-base (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Incomplete -- [Jaunty] rm: cannot remove 'apm-bios-' https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/294269 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 302380] Re: rm: cannot remove `raw1394-': Read-only file system

2010-03-28 Thread ceg
seems or seemed to be a general issue with dpkg or udev or something (search bugs with rm: cannot remove) ** Changed in: libraw1394 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- rm: cannot remove `raw1394-': Read-only file system https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/302380 You received this bug

[Bug 314875] Re: Update Throws errors but completes

2010-03-28 Thread ceg
seems or seemed to be a general issue with dpkg or udev or something (search bugs with rm: cannot remove) ** Changed in: sane-backends (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- Update Throws errors but completes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314875 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 329792] Re: Read-only file system errors during install

2010-03-28 Thread ceg
seems or seemed to be a general issue with dpkg or udev or something (search bugs with rm: cannot remove) ** Changed in: lm-sensors-3 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- Read-only file system errors during install https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/329792 You received this bug notification

[Bug 329792] Re: Read-only file system errors during install

2010-03-28 Thread ceg
seems or seemed to be a general issue with dpkg or udev or something (search bugs with rm: cannot remove) -- Read-only file system errors during install https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/329792 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >