[Bug 685643] Re: Vinagre can't tunnel VNC to Windows host

2012-05-07 Thread ddouthitt
The problem still exists in Ubuntu Maverick (10.10) and Vinagre 2.30.2-1ubuntu1 - the same as the poster almost two years ago. The remote site is WinSSHd 5.26 on Windows Server 2008 R2. Will this be fixed in Maverick? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 339913] Re: jwhois does not use WHOIS servers from authoritative IANA list

2012-03-29 Thread ddouthitt
I see that jwhois 4.0-2 is in Natty and Oneiric (and presumably Precise); however, it's not in Lucid or Maverick - and thus not in the LTS distribution (currently at Lucid). Isn't this going to be fixed for Lucid at least? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 339913] Re: jwhois does not use WHOIS servers from authoritative IANA list

2012-03-29 Thread ddouthitt
This problem is Debian Bug 542148: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=542148 The bug has been fixed by Debian and has been available since 23 Nov 2010 and jwhois v4.0-2. When will this get fixed in Ubuntu installs? ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #542148 http://bugs.debi

[Bug 774580] Re: passwd -e does not work for LDAP users

2012-02-08 Thread ddouthitt
Looking at the strace (and ltrace) output from passwd, it looks like it opens /etc/passwd and /etc/shadow directly instead of using PAM or getent or other method. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.n

[Bug 774580] Re: passwd -e does not work for LDAP users

2012-02-08 Thread ddouthitt
This bug remains. Is it possible that the password aging sequence is not using PAM? # passwd -e foo passwd: user 'foo' does not exist in /etc/passwd # passwd foo Password: BAD PASSWORD: it is based on a dictionary word Retype new password: LDAP password information changed for snagoor passwd: pa

[Bug 774580] Re: passwd -e does not work for LDAP users

2012-02-08 Thread ddouthitt
This is behavior present in passwd; the passwd binary is not part of the shadow package. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/774580 Title: passwd -e does not work for LDAP users To manage

[Bug 918836] [NEW] .dcrc file not recognized

2012-01-19 Thread ddouthitt
Public bug reported: When using dc, the man page suggests that the ~/.dcrc file is read at startup. Using strace against dc shows that this is not the case; the ~/.dcrc file is never opened. There was a "bug" reported against Debian dc (Debian Bug 472250) that was reported as fixed in version 1.

[Bug 475864] Re: Unable to kickstart with LVM partition scheme.

2011-04-22 Thread ddouthitt
A year and a quarter, this bug still exists - and in Ubuntu Server 10.04 LTS. This far on and the bug still isn't assigned, and its importance is "Undecided"? Let's move on this! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https:/

[Bug 581312] Re: Unknown key fee[x] pressed with Dell Latitude XT2

2011-04-01 Thread ddouthitt
By the way - I just added a iSCSI volume to the aforementioned system, as well as a first attempt at installing CLVM. Perhaps this has something to do with it? The iSCSI volume was configured with LVM and XFS then mounted and unmounted. The volume was enlarged (using LVM and XFS tools) then dismoun

[Bug 581312] Re: Unknown key fee[x] pressed with Dell Latitude XT2

2011-04-01 Thread ddouthitt
I saw this error from dell-wmi also. The system is a Lattitude e6400 and the "unknown WMI event" happened repeatedly (a dozen times) overnight. Doing a Fn+F8 (which changed the video from two screens to one screen to a duplicate screen back to two screens again) I got these errors: Apr 1 09:30:2

[Bug 21214] Re: package selection section has no packages to select

2011-03-29 Thread ddouthitt
Same problem exists on 10.10 (Maverick). Is a six year old bug normal??? This was reported in 2005, and here it is now 2011. Fix this already! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/21214 Title

[Bug 134222] Re: linux-kernel-header has files with size 0

2011-02-25 Thread ddouthitt
Almost four years later, this bug is STILL unresolved. On Ubuntu 10.04.2 LTS: /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.32-28-generic-pae# find . -type f -size 0 | wc -l 3979 /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.32-28-generic-pae# find include/config -type f -size 0 | wc -l 3979 Could some one resolve this? -- You rec

[Bug 596780] Re: tomcat6 still missing JSTL ("glassfish-javaee")

2010-10-07 Thread ddouthitt
I thought I was clear on the problem. The problem is that when the examples webapp is run, it fails because JSTL is missing - which it was never before. If that is how it upstream, then so be it. Thanks! -- tomcat6 still missing JSTL ("glassfish-javaee") https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/596780 Y

[Bug 596781] Re: JSP examples refer to Tomcat 5 (not 6)

2010-06-22 Thread ddouthitt
I'm using 6.0.20-2ubuntu2.1 from the repositories for Lucid Lynx. -- JSP examples refer to Tomcat 5 (not 6) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/596781 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@l

[Bug 596781] [NEW] JSP examples refer to Tomcat 5 (not 6)

2010-06-21 Thread ddouthitt
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: tomcat6 For example, http://127.0.0.1:8080/examples/jsp/tagplugin/notes.html reports this: Tag Plugins: Introductory Notes Tomcat 5 provides a framework for implementing tag plugins. The plugins instruct Jasper, at translation time, to replace tag handl

[Bug 596780] [NEW] tomcat6 still missing JSTL ("glassfish-javaee")

2010-06-21 Thread ddouthitt
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: tomcat6 When running Tomcat6 from repos, it becomes quickly apparent that JSTL is not present. This problem was discussed here: http://help.lockergnome.com/linux/JSTL-repositories--ftopict514769.html It was fixed by Debian with release 1:2ur2-b04-4: htt

[Bug 300935] Re: missing "/etc/X11/rgb.txt" file and broken link to it

2009-09-22 Thread ddouthitt
I echo the sentiment previously expressed: this should be fixed in previous versions of Ubuntu like Jaunty and Intrepid. It's not hard to do; what's the hold up? -- missing "/etc/X11/rgb.txt" file and broken link to it https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/300935 You received this bug notification bec

[Bug 121231] Re: Extra line feeds on opening OOo document in Word or Abiword

2009-09-03 Thread ddouthitt
More specifics: The problem with gnome-terminal does not show up when using xterm or rxvt. Packages are specifically these: * gnome-terminal (CentOS 5) - 2.16.0-5.3.el5 * rxvt (CentOS 5) - 18:2.7.10-2.el5.rf * xterm (CentOS 5) - 215-8.el5 * xterm (Linux Mint 7 - Jaunty) - 241-1ubuntu1 * gnome-te

[Bug 121231] Re: Extra line feeds on opening OOo document in Word or Abiword

2009-09-03 Thread ddouthitt
Re-opening... ** Changed in: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => New -- Extra line feeds on opening OOo document in Word or Abiword https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/121231 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 121231] Re: Extra line feeds on opening OOo document in Word or Abiword

2009-09-03 Thread ddouthitt
This bug is not present in Gnome Terminal 2.26.0 (in Jaunty) but does exist in Gnome Terminal 2.16.0. Test systems were Linux Mint 7 (Jaunty) with 2.26.0 and CentOS 5.3 (I know...) with 2.16.0 - copies were taken from Gnome Terminal and pasted into Microsoft Outlook on Windows XP using Synergy to

[Bug 334285] Re: Please include keyspan firmware

2009-09-01 Thread ddouthitt
Seven months and no fix?? There are more bug reports being added on this topic: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux- firmware/+bug/357865 When will Jaunty and Intrepid be fixed? -- Please include keyspan firmware https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/334285 You received this bug notificat

[Bug 357865] Re: Firmware Missing

2009-09-01 Thread ddouthitt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 334285 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/334285 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 334285 Please include keyspan firmware -- Firmware Missing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/357865 You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 266951] Re: Buffer I/O error on device sr0 Logical Block XXXXXX in Intrepid Ibex Alpha 5

2009-06-04 Thread ddouthitt
I'm getting this error now with Xubuntu 9.04 Desktop. Kubuntu has been installed to this machine just fine, as has Linux Mint 7. Machine is a Toshiba Portege M100 with 512M RAM. The Xubuntu CDROM was burnt with DeepBurner 1.9.0.228 on Windows XP with a write speed of 16x (the burner seems to be