[Bug 453876] Re: ubuntu 9.10 beta grub loadin stay for more than 30 secondes

2009-10-22 Thread forestpixie
I looked again in my BIOS - I found an option to change the boot order, changed to the drive that grub and /boot are installed to and the delay is gone for me now. -- ubuntu 9.10 beta grub loadin stay for more than 30 secondes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453876 You received this bug

[Bug 448828] Re: Volume mutes when below 22%

2009-10-19 Thread forestpixie
Same here using an Audigy card. ** Changed in: pavucontrol (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- Volume mutes when below 22% https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/448828 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 453876] Re: ubuntu 9.10 beta grub loadin stay for more than 30 secondes

2009-10-19 Thread forestpixie
** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- ubuntu 9.10 beta grub loadin stay for more than 30 secondes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453876 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing

[Bug 453876] Re: ubuntu 9.10 beta grub loadin stay for more than 30 secondes

2009-10-18 Thread forestpixie
I have the same issue - though my Grub loading text lasts for approx 25s I removed the set quiet and quiet splash - nothing appears to be any different in any of the log files. That said I am not really sure which log file would show anything prior to the menu list being there and me being able

[Bug 453876] Re: ubuntu 9.10 beta grub loadin stay for more than 30 secondes

2009-10-18 Thread forestpixie
ok - that's cool - I was just checking that I was not missing something I should have seen. I did wonder originally if it was the bug/issue where grub and boot were on different partitions - since then I reinstalled grub to sdb - same drive as /boot and the rest of the install. Anyway - any

[Bug 445181] Re: mount of nfs fails at boot - Karmic beta

2009-10-12 Thread forestpixie
nfs-common 1:1.2.0-2ubuntu6 I updated yesterday - including this then rebooted to get the mountall log. Attached a new mountall.log ** Attachment added: mountall1.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33478724/mountall1.log -- mount of nfs fails at boot - Karmic beta

[Bug 445181] Re: mount of nfs fails at boot - Karmic beta

2009-10-12 Thread forestpixie
sigh - wish I had checked for updates before all of that nfs-common now nfs-common 1:1.2.0-2ubuntu7 mountall2.log ** Attachment added: mountall2.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33479291/mountall2.log -- mount of nfs fails at boot - Karmic beta https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/445181 You

[Bug 445181] Re: mount of nfs fails at boot - Karmic beta

2009-10-12 Thread forestpixie
thank you :) -- mount of nfs fails at boot - Karmic beta https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/445181 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 445181] Re: mount of nfs fails at boot - Karmic beta

2009-10-11 Thread forestpixie
Attached is the log file. ** Attachment added: mountall.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33446046/mountall.log -- mount of nfs fails at boot - Karmic beta https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/445181 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 445181] Re: mount of nfs fails at boot - Karmic beta

2009-10-11 Thread forestpixie
I've had a couple of reboots since the updates earlier which included mountall and nfs-common and it appears that the partitions are all being mounted now by the time the desktop is up. I still get the error messages during boot however. -- mount of nfs fails at boot - Karmic beta

[Bug 445181] Re: mount of nfs fails at boot - Karmic beta

2009-10-10 Thread forestpixie
some mount - but never all of the, this time the ones mounted are 192.168.0.2:/mnt/12Gb 13G 9.9G 1.6G 87% /mnt/12Gb 192.168.0.2:/mnt/10Gb 11G 8.8G 930M 91% /mnt/10Gb 192.168.0.2:/mnt/data 54G 52G 2.1G 97% /mnt/data

[Bug 445181] Re: mount of nfs fails at boot - Karmic beta

2009-10-07 Thread forestpixie
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33204636/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33204637/XsessionErrors.txt -- mount of nfs fails at boot - Karmic beta https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/445181 You received

[Bug 445181] [NEW] mount of nfs fails at boot - Karmic beta

2009-10-07 Thread forestpixie
Public bug reported: Asked to provide the following with this bug - your /etc/fstab contents (for reference) - any error messages you see at boot time about mounting when booting without the 'splash' option - the results of 'sudo killall -USR1 mountall mount', run on your system after boot

[Bug 441055] Re: package nfs-common 1:1.2.0-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:

2009-10-07 Thread forestpixie
All done - thanks https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-utils/+bug/445181 -- package nfs-common 1:1.2.0-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441055 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 441055] Re: package nfs-common 1:1.2.0-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:

2009-10-06 Thread forestpixie
Another update today - still gettting this as it tries to install Setting up nfs-common (1:1.2.0-2ubuntu4) ... Installing new version of config file /etc/init/rpc_pipefs.conf ... Installing new version of config file /etc/init/gssd.conf ... Installing new version of config file

[Bug 441055] Re: package nfs-common 1:1.2.0-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:

2009-10-06 Thread forestpixie
aah ok then - so at the moment still have to mount them myself after I get to the desktop - I assume that is not expected behaviour though. Thanks for reply :) -- package nfs-common 1:1.2.0-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441055 You received this bug

[Bug 441055] Re: package nfs-common 1:1.2.0-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:

2009-10-06 Thread forestpixie
192.168.0.2:/mnt/data /mnt/data nfs rsize=8192,wsize=8192,noexec,nosuid 192.168.0.2:/mnt/media /mnt/media nfs rsize=8192,wsize=8192,noexec,nosuid 192.168.0.2:/mnt/music /mnt/music nfs rsize=8192,wsize=8192,noexec,nosuid 192.168.0.2:/mnt/10Gb /mnt/10Gb nfs rsize=8192,wsize=8192,noexec,nosuid

[Bug 441055] Re: package nfs-common 1:1.2.0-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:

2009-10-06 Thread forestpixie
Ok I can do all of that tomorrow as I doubt if I will see any change - what would I need to file the bug against - linux, ubuntu? The bug system confuses me at the best of times as to what to file the bug against :) -- package nfs-common 1:1.2.0-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:

[Bug 441055] Re: package nfs-common 1:1.2.0-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:

2009-10-06 Thread forestpixie
ok - I will do that later and add the things you suggested above. Thanks for your help :) -- package nfs-common 1:1.2.0-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441055 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 325973] Re: Starting File Manager windows open uncontrollably

2009-03-18 Thread forestpixie
I have the same issue if I try to show trash on the desktop. -- Starting File Manager windows open uncontrollably https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/325973 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 338501] Re: update-notifier should emit notification when updates are available

2009-03-14 Thread forestpixie
Same here ** Changed in: update-notifier (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- update-notifier should emit notification when updates are available https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/338501 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 342346] Re: notify-osd 0.93-0ubuntu1 not working

2009-03-13 Thread forestpixie
Volume is affecting me too, other notifications are ok here Though I don't have battery/wireless/brightness so can't check them -- notify-osd 0.93-0ubuntu1 not working https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/342346 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 332170] Re: [Jaunty] Error appearing at boot - cpufreq: No nForce2 chipset

2009-03-12 Thread forestpixie
Thank you - all ok here now. -- [Jaunty] Error appearing at boot - cpufreq: No nForce2 chipset https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332170 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 332170] Re: [Jaunty] Error appearing at boot - cpufreq: No nForce2 chipset

2009-03-10 Thread forestpixie
Thank you. -- [Jaunty] Error appearing at boot - cpufreq: No nForce2 chipset https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332170 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 332170] Re: [Jaunty] Error appearing at boot - cpufreq: No nForce2 chipset

2009-03-07 Thread forestpixie
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- [Jaunty] Error appearing at boot - cpufreq: No nForce2 chipset https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332170 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 332170] Re: [Jaunty] Error appearing at boot - cpufreq: No nForce2 chipset

2009-02-27 Thread forestpixie
So can I. Thanks -- [Jaunty] Error appearing at boot - cpufreq: No nForce2 chipset https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332170 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 222613] Re: X apps displayed on wrong screen when started from secondary

2009-02-26 Thread forestpixie
If Kristof can't reproduce it on Jaunty and my addition isn't enough then maybe I can start another bug for the same thing. Seems a bit odd but who am I to know why :) If necessary I assume that I can `ubuntu-bug -p xserver-xorg-video-ati` But without -ati ? -- X apps displayed on wrong

[Bug 332170] [NEW] Error appearing at boot

2009-02-20 Thread forestpixie
Public bug reported: With one of the updates I got 19/2/09 I started to get this error shortly (1.44 secs) after grub starts the boot cpufreq: No nForce2 chipset Rest of dmesg appears to be normal - but is available if necessary after booting, it is ok with the previous kernel With some help

[Bug 332170] Re: Error appearing at boot

2009-02-20 Thread forestpixie
** Attachment added: Unsaved Document 2 http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22916086/Unsaved%20Document%202 ** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22916087/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22916088/CurrentDmesg.txt

[Bug 332170] Re: Error appearing at boot

2009-02-20 Thread forestpixie
Just checked through the files that ubuntu-bug -p linux created - the dmesg text doesn't show the error - that shows when I boot with the newer kernel I have added that as an attachment here ** Attachment added: dmesg http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22916358/dmesg -- [Jaunty] Error appearing

[Bug 332170] Re: [Jaunty] Error appearing at boot - cpufreq: No nForce2 chipset

2009-02-20 Thread forestpixie
Ok so that was a bit of a d'oh moment - if I sudo cpufreq-selector -g performance Then it fairly obviously works ok :) I get current CPU frequency is 2.53 GHz. BUT on reboot it reverts to the ondemand performance Also not sure if this is of importance but grep -i nforce /boot/config-`uname

[Bug 222613] Re: X apps displayed on wrong screen when started from secondary

2009-02-13 Thread forestpixie
Hi - I found this while searching for the same issue - I had it working OK in Intrepid but now I'm running with Jaunty Alpha4 I have this same problem I have attached both files as requested, I am running a Nvidia 6200 ** Attachment added: zrandr --verbose

[Bug 222613] Re: X apps displayed on wrong screen when started from secondary

2009-02-13 Thread forestpixie
Could only attach the xrandr - here is Xorg.0.log ** Attachment added: Xorg.0.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22587018/Xorg.0.log -- X apps displayed on wrong screen when started from secondary https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/222613 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 293107] Re: Offer nvidia driver version 96 again

2008-11-04 Thread forestpixie
This is working fine for me, reports that the 96 driver is enabled. -- Offer nvidia driver version 96 again https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/293107 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 251107] Re: [Intrepid] nvidia_drv.so: undefined symbol: AllocateScreenPrivateIndex

2008-11-04 Thread forestpixie
Hi - just a bit of information really, at the moment I don't actually have any problems with the 96 driver but On a default installation I was able to install the 96.43.09 driver and once I'd edited my xorg.conf started properly. After I'd changed the repos to those for jaunty - nothing was

[Bug 221196] Re: Cannot change keyboard layout on gnome-keyboard-properties

2008-08-11 Thread forestpixie
I have half this problem - I notice that the preview pane does not load, but shows the left-overs from the menu - this I get. However I have no problem actually setting the keyboard to uk for me. -- Cannot change keyboard layout on gnome-keyboard-properties

[Bug 252346] Re: /lib/modules/2.6.24.4-generic/volatile not created

2008-07-29 Thread forestpixie
Thanks for doing that - I did read that page but I didn't think that linux was the right package as it seemed to be too simple - I was expecting a longer package name :) -- /lib/modules/2.6.24.4-generic/volatile not created https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252346 You received this bug

[Bug 252346] [NEW] /lib/modules/2.6.24.4-generic/volatile not created

2008-07-27 Thread forestpixie
Public bug reported: I have a problem where /lib/modules/2.6.24.4-generic/volatile is not created and causes an error on boot. I remedied the situation myself by creating the folder and rebooting. I have had the same problem with the folder being uncreated since alpha1 (obviously with different

[Bug 236619] Re: Openoffice update in proposed

2008-06-02 Thread forestpixie
Yes apport is enabled, just won't work with this it seems. -- Openoffice update in proposed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236619 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 236619] Re: Openoffice update in proposed

2008-06-02 Thread forestpixie
OK - I tried reinstalling and nothing changes. I've attached a shot of what it does. It's a bit of a mess as everything that happens on the desktop get's a 'picture' in the oowriter window. ** Attachment added: Screenshot-Untitled1 - OpenOffice.org Writer .png

[Bug 236619] Re: Openoffice update in proposed

2008-06-02 Thread forestpixie
Ok - if I run soffice from a terminal it opens and I can get to documnets and they open without problem; also opening a .doc from an e-mail causes write to start without any issue. If I make a new launcher for writer or calc etc - they fail to work. -- Openoffice update in proposed

[Bug 236619] Re: Openoffice update in proposed

2008-06-02 Thread forestpixie
Fixed it here - but I'd still like to know what happened if anyone knows. Completley removed all openoffice 2.4 installed packages, renamed hidden openoffice folder in home and then reinstalled. All appears to be ok now. -- Openoffice update in proposed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236619

[Bug 236619] [NEW] Openoffice update in proposed

2008-06-01 Thread forestpixie
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: openoffice.org-base I got an update through the proposed repo today for - Upgraded the following packages: openoffice.org-base-core (1:2.4.0-3ubuntu6) to 1:2.4.1~rc1-1ubuntu1 openoffice.org-calc (1:2.4.0-3ubuntu6) to 1:2.4.1~rc1-1ubuntu1

[Bug 231202] Re: Installed system panel from svn - crash after add to panel

2008-05-16 Thread forestpixie
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 147113 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/147113 Sorry - let the automatic crash report do it's thing - I rebooted and all is fine -- Installed system panel from svn - crash after add to panel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/231202 You received this bug

[Bug 225362] Re: xsensor will not install and run correctly in Hardy final release

2008-05-10 Thread forestpixie
Same here, had to edit launcher to include path to modules config file /usr/bin/xsensors -c /etc/modules -- xsensor will not install and run correctly in Hardy final release https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/225362 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 207335] [NEW] quodlibet.py crashed with AttributeError in plugin_on_song_started()

2008-03-26 Thread forestpixie
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 186323 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/186323 Public bug reported: Binary package hint: quodlibet Hardy Beta - just installed Quod Libet, version quodlibet: Installed: 1.0-2 Candidate: 1.0-2 Version table: *** 1.0-2 0 Had just applied tray icon

[Bug 207335] Re: quodlibet.py crashed with AttributeError in plugin_on_song_started()

2008-03-26 Thread forestpixie
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 186323 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/186323 ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12907615/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12907616/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment

[Bug 157206] Re: Evolution Address Book Error

2007-10-25 Thread forestpixie
I confirm it too - Ubuntu 7.10 up to date and 2.12.0 evolution -- Evolution Address Book Error https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/157206 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 117419] Re: Epiphany crashes on start

2007-06-02 Thread forestpixie
There was a firefox update today. I uninstalled epiphany and epiphany-browser-dbgsym thne reinstalled and now epiphany is working again. -- Epiphany crashes on start https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117419 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the

[Bug 117419] Re: Epiphany crashes on start

2007-05-29 Thread forestpixie
Ok - did that new backtrace attached ** Attachment added: gdb-epiphany.txt http://librarian.launchpad.net/7868426/gdb-epiphany.txt -- Epiphany crashes on start https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117419 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug

[Bug 117419] Re: Epiphany crashes on start

2007-05-29 Thread forestpixie
You'll have to excuse my ignorance - but that means what is going to happen next? -- Epiphany crashes on start https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117419 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 117419] Re: Epiphany crashes on start

2007-05-28 Thread forestpixie
attached gdb-epiphany.txt ** Attachment added: gdb-epiphany.txt http://librarian.launchpad.net/7859936/gdb-epiphany.txt -- Epiphany crashes on start https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117419 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for

[Bug 117419] Epiphany crashes on start

2007-05-28 Thread forestpixie
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: epiphany-browser Version - 2.18.1-0ubuntu1 When I start Epiphany I get a crash box - this is under the impression Epiphnay unexpectedly stopped - recover or don't recover windows and tabs. To the best of my knowledge there was no unexpected stoping of