[Bug 991347] Re: After upgrade to 12.04 name resolution does not work

2012-06-04 Thread getut
I think I am having the same issue. I will start a new bug if needed though. For my fresh install 12.04 64 bit, no domain suffix information is being utilized. In other words, if I configure a static IP address in network manager and configure a search domain of my office domain, then simple host

[Bug 776567] Re: periodically kded4 uses 100% of CPU, KDE desktop stops responding

2011-05-19 Thread getut
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 755608 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/755608 I'm running 64 bit Natty Kubuntu but with KDE 4.6.3 from PPA (ppa :kubuntu-ppa) and still getting the same issue. Also Nvidia video chipset here. My Kubuntu was a fresh install, not upgraded. -- You

[Bug 687366] [NEW] gdm crash when x11vnc used with VMWare Workstation 7.1.3

2010-12-08 Thread getut
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: x11vnc I have 2 64 bit Ubuntu Maverick desktops that have VMWare Workstation 7.1.3 installed. Because these are corporate machine, we also run the x11vnc package (as opposed to the Ubuntu native VNC) so that we can connect to our Ubuntu linux desktops

[Bug 687366] Re: gdm crash when x11vnc used with VMWare Workstation 7.1.3

2010-12-08 Thread getut
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/687366 Title: gdm crash when x11vnc used with VMWare Workstation 7.1.3 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

Re: [Bug 625670] Re: Not all desktop items are themed

2010-11-17 Thread getut
That is nice to hear. That almost positively indicates that it is a race condition. Fast processor + fast hard drive means the systems are getting to the desktop before some process is ready. Hopefully that is enough information to pique the interest of a developer. Robert (Getut) From: Mike

[Bug 625670] Re: Not all desktop items are themed

2010-10-11 Thread getut
If anyone ever works on this issue here is a pure layman observation of my 4 machines that are affected. The fastest of my machines makes it to the desktop the most consistently without everything being themed. It is almost 100% of the time arriving at the desktop without the panels being themed.

[Bug 625670] Re: Not all desktop items are themed

2010-10-07 Thread getut
I am still having this problem as of the latest updates for Oct. 7th. I have 3 laptops and a desktop all installed at various points of Maverick testing and all of them have the same issue. It happens sometimes for the first user of a system, but happens 100% of the time if a second user logs on

[Bug 649026] Re: Fails to install with python_virtkey-0.60.0.egg-info does not exist

2010-09-27 Thread getut
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 648695 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/648695 ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/649026/+attachment/1644537/+files/Dependencies.txt -- Fails to install with python_virtkey-0.60.0.egg-info does not exist

[Bug 649026] [NEW] Fails to install with python_virtkey-0.60.0.egg-info does not exist

2010-09-27 Thread getut
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 648695 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/648695 Public bug reported: This package fails to install with the following error: file does not exist: /usr/lib/python2.6/dist- packages/python_virtkey-0.60.0.egg-info ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu

[Bug 634067] [NEW] Alt-F2 smb://servername/sharename is not working

2010-09-09 Thread getut
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gvfs Alt-F2 then smb:// is not mounting SMB shares. The connection times out. Shares are working from other linux and windows workstations. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: gvfs-backends 1.6.3-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu

[Bug 634067] Re: Alt-F2 smb://servername/sharename is not working

2010-09-09 Thread getut
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/634067/+attachment/1560778/+files/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/634067/+attachment/1560779/+files/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt

[Bug 625670] Re: Not all desktop items are themed

2010-09-07 Thread getut
Problem seemed fixed after the updates that came out on 8/28 but the issue still is not resolved. Themes are still not applied to the panel, icons and firefox but seem to be working for window borders. ** Changed in: gnome-settings-daemon (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released = Incomplete -- Not

[Bug 625670] Re: Not all desktop items are themed

2010-09-07 Thread getut
Versions of most of the involved packages have changed. I am going to try and run another report. -- Not all desktop items are themed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/625670 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 625670] Re: Not all desktop items are themed

2010-08-28 Thread getut
Nightly updates for Aug 27th fixed this problem. ** Changed in: gnome-settings-daemon (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- Not all desktop items are themed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/625670 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 625670] [NEW] Not all desktop items are themed

2010-08-27 Thread getut
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-settings-daemon After every reboot or logoff/logon or even a user switch, the selected themes do not get applied to all desktop components. In my case, window decorations, borders and window buttons are properly themed, but the top and bottom panel

[Bug 625670] Re: Not all desktop items are themed

2010-08-27 Thread getut
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/625670/+attachment/1524296/+files/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/625670/+attachment/1524297/+files/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt

[Bug 481283] Re: xsane and xscanimage crash on 64bit karmic with epson2 driver

2010-01-01 Thread getut
Same crash here with Epson RX500 printer and 64bit Karmic Workstation. I have deleted ~/.sane and tried running as root and still segmentation fault. -- xsane and xscanimage crash on 64bit karmic with epson2 driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/481283 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 341874] Re: xsane: WARNING: setting an adjustment with non-zero page size is deprecated.

2009-11-01 Thread getut
I'm getting this same error on Karmic final 64 bit desktop with an Epson Stylus Photo RX500 all in one device. -- xsane: WARNING: setting an adjustment with non-zero page size is deprecated. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/341874 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

Re: [Bug 332945] Re: [Jaunty] Update Notifier icon would provide useful status information / new update-manager behaviour is annoying

2009-07-05 Thread getut
In what way will the way the pop under change in the way it is presented? It really doesn't matter how it is presented, if it pops up in the users space it is going to be hated by most people. Media center PC's, presentations, people doing real work will always find it a huge annoyance if it uses

Re: [Bug 332945] Re: [Jaunty] Update Notifier icon would provide useful status information

2009-06-16 Thread getut
To use automotive analogies in this... If our check engine light comes on our car taking us in a straight line to the dealership, not following roads, going straight through forest, lakes, streams etc. Its just ludicrous devs hijacking the desktop with unsolicited pop-ups. Update manager is going

Re: [Bug 332945] Re: [Jaunty] Update Notifier icon would provide useful status information

2009-06-12 Thread getut
MPT.. so if I am hearing this right... popup/popunder is here to stay and there is no amount of griping in any fashion, organized or unorganized that can get that virus... erm feature removed going forward? -- [Jaunty] Update Notifier icon would provide useful status information

[Bug 332945] Re: [Jaunty] Update Notifier icon would provide useful status information

2009-06-10 Thread getut
Devs, please provide information on this, what is the current status? Is there any talk whatsoever of getting rid of the popup/popunder? Is there any proper method for us users to request the removal of popups/popunders? Is there any hope at all of getting this fixed? MPT, I think you are

[Bug 332945] Re: [Jaunty] Update Notifier icon would provide useful status information

2009-04-30 Thread getut
The issue of trying to guess when is the best time to interrupt people is a tricky problem for notifications in general. Unfortunately, never is not a viable choice for a mass-market OS on an Internet- connected computer. If you have specific suggestions of heuristics we could use to choose more

[Bug 332945] Re: [Jaunty] Update Notifier icon would provide useful status information

2009-04-29 Thread getut
Plain and simple... linux is always about choice. People are not going to update their system when the almighty and evil popup/popunder opens and says they should do it. It will almost 100% of the time be an unwanted annoyance window that open at unwanted times and aggravates users instead of

[Bug 332945] Re: [Jaunty] Update Notifier icon would provide useful status information

2009-04-29 Thread getut
Plain and simple... linux is always about choice. People are not going to update their system when the almighty and evil popup/popunder opens and says they should do it. It will almost 100% of the time be an unwanted annoyance window that open at unwanted times and aggravates users instead of

[Bug 332945] Re: [Jaunty] Update Notifier icon would provide useful status information

2009-04-29 Thread getut
With logic like John Clemens writes above I can't believe MPT is arguing some of the points that are being argued. I'm beginning to think this is just a really long lasting aprils fools joke. The points MPT is making are so fundamentally flawed it can't be anything but that. Are you really

[Bug 332945] Re: [Jaunty] Update Notifier icon would provide useful status information

2009-04-27 Thread getut
Although I do agree that some of the comments are a bit harsh, I also fear that if enough people do not squawk, and squawk loudly, this will be dropped. Many of the devs have come on here and shrugged this off with the statement, You have a way to get the old functionality back so what is the big

[Bug 332945] Re: [Jaunty] Update Notifier icon would provide useful status information

2009-04-20 Thread getut
Am I totally misunderstanding this issue??? As I understand it / complained / bug reported... I think most people don't care whether the notification comes in the form of the new notify- osd system or the old way with the orange spiked ball or red arrow that show up on the panel. The issue I

[Bug 332945] Re: [Jaunty] Update Notifier icon would provide useful status information

2009-04-16 Thread getut
I run many Ubuntu stations in a production environment and my users are heavily limited in what they can and can't do. Machines sign on automatically and users are NOT given the password for the account. All updates are done via script or manually via SSH from IT. Now with this version I am

[Bug 332945] Re: [Jaunty] Update Notifier icon would provide useful status information

2009-04-16 Thread getut
Matthew and BUGabundo, in our environment since multiple users were not needed, we chose to go with a single user install with automatic signon...so it is the default and only user account on the system. This means it is admin but the users are NOT given the password for the account. I use