[Bug 824111] Re: [Update request] 0.8.2 is out there

2011-08-29 Thread ghantoos
** Changed in: aqemu (Ubuntu) Status: New = In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/824111 Title: [Update request] 0.8.2 is out there To manage notifications about this

[Bug 824111] Re: Sync aqemu 0.8.2-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2011-08-29 Thread ghantoos
Please sync aqemu 0.8.2-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) Changelog entries since current oneiric version 0.8.1-1: aqemu (0.8.2-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release. * debian/control: - Added armhf support. Thank you Konstantinos Margaritis mar...@genesi-usa.com

[Bug 824111] Re: [Update request] 0.8.2 is out there

2011-08-11 Thread ghantoos
I should be packaging this version for Debian very soon. I will asked for a sync to Ubuntu as soon as it is available in Debian/Unstable. Cheers, Ignace M -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 708816] Re: Sync python-scrapy 0.12.0.2528-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2011-01-28 Thread ghantoos
Ooh, great! Thank you for taking the time to take a look at the package though. :) Cheers, Ignace M -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/708816 Title: Sync python-scrapy 0.12.0.2528-1

[Bug 708816] [NEW] Sync python-scrapy 0.12.0.2528-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2011-01-27 Thread ghantoos
Public bug reported: Please sync python-scrapy 0.12.0.2528-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) Explanation of the Ubuntu delta and why it can be dropped: It is a new upstream version. The patches included in the current ubuntu version are deprecated. Ignace M Changelog entries since

[Bug 662423] Re: Recommended packages are excessive

2010-10-18 Thread ghantoos
Hello, python-guppy is recommended by python-scrapy because one of it files tries to import it [1]: / | try: | import guppy | hpy = guppy.hpy() | except ImportError: | hpy = None \ As for the not up-to-date package in Debian/Ubuntu, it is due to the Debian Freeze. I have uploaded

[Bug 628932] Re: Sync gip 1.7.0-1-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2010-09-04 Thread ghantoos
Thank you for uploading my package. Regards, Ignace M -- Sync gip 1.7.0-1-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/628932 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 565187] Re: gip artwork is missing in lucid

2010-09-02 Thread ghantoos
Hello, I maintain the gip package for Debian. This problem is actually more a Debian build problem rather than an upstream one. A new version has just been uploaded on the Debian repository [1] correcting this bug. I have mentioned this LP bug in the changelog: / | gip (1.7.0-1-2)

[Bug 628932] [NEW] Sync gip 1.7.0-1-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2010-09-02 Thread ghantoos
Public bug reported: Please sync gip 1.7.0-1-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) Changelog entries since current maverick version 1.7.0-1-1: gip (1.7.0-1-2) unstable; urgency=low * debian/control: - Bumped Standards-Version to 3.9.1. - Added Vcs-Svn and Vcs-Browser as the

[Bug 565187] Re: gip artwork is missing in lucid

2010-09-02 Thread ghantoos
I have just filed a sync request [1]. Cheers, Ignace M [1] https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gip/+bug/628932 -- gip artwork is missing in lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565187 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 565187] Re: gip artwork is missing in lucid

2010-09-02 Thread ghantoos
Agreed. I will fill-in a sync request later today. Cheers, Ignace M -- gip artwork is missing in lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565187 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 588875] Re: Unable to get USB information

2010-08-11 Thread ghantoos
Hello, I am currently packaging the latest AQMU for Debian (it should be uploaded next week). It should then make its way to Ubuntu (but I can't tell how muh time the synchronization could take). Cheers, Ignace M -- Unable to get USB information https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/588875 You

[Bug 588875] Re: Unable to get USB information

2010-08-11 Thread ghantoos
Hello, I am currently packaging the latest AQMU for Debian (it should be uploaded next week). It should then make its way to Ubuntu (but I can't tell how muh time the synchronization could take). Cheers, Ignace M -- Unable to get USB information https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/588875 You

[Bug 588875] Re: Unable to get USB information

2010-06-06 Thread ghantoos
Hello, I have forwarded your bug report upstream [1]. It has been corrected in upstream's git repository, and will be released in the upcoming version of aqemu. Cheers, Ignace M [1] https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=1078458aid=3011540group_id=229794 ** Bug watch added:

[Bug 588875] Re: Unable to get USB information

2010-06-06 Thread ghantoos
Hello, I have forwarded your bug report upstream [1]. It has been corrected in upstream's git repository, and will be released in the upcoming version of aqemu. Cheers, Ignace M [1] https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=1078458aid=3011540group_id=229794 ** Bug watch added:

[Bug 576440] Re: Sync lshell 0.9.10-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2010-05-06 Thread ghantoos
Hello Luke, A newer version of lshell has just been uploaded to Debian. I should hit the repositories very soon. IMO, the sync should be done with that version as it corrects a security bug present in version 0.9.10. Here is the changelog of this version: lshell (0.9.12-1) unstable; urgency=low

[Bug 226297] Re: show/hide doesn't work, to show the application, I have to undock

2010-05-03 Thread ghantoos
Hello Mike, One of the Debian users encountered a similar bug when using alltray with fluxbox (as WM) and docker (as systray) [1]. I was able to reproduce this. Please find attached the output of alltray -d when the bug appears. Are these bugs related? Could this be fixed in the old-maintenance