[Bug 413815] Re: ruby 1.9.1 should be configured with --program-suffix=1.9.1 if installed as ruby1.9.1

2009-08-19 Thread gleeo
No, I don't see why you would do that. The best solution would be to build with ./configure --program-suffix=*extension you tend to build with with, for example, 1.9.1* This is the best solution, let ruby do the work for you, rather then bypass what ruby has setup for you and try to hack on it

[Bug 413815] Re: ruby 1.9.1 should be configured with --program-suffix=1.9.1 if installed as ruby1.9.1

2009-08-19 Thread gleeo
Okay, but there is a serious problem with the current installation. It needs to be fixed, if you want to try to patch rbconfig.rb then that is fine but that is a dirty hack IMO. I don't see why --program-suffix= would not work, but maybe try to address that problem? At the moment, rubygems, mkmf,

[Bug 413815] [NEW] ruby 1.9.1 should be configured with --program-suffix=1.9.1 if installed as ruby1.9.1

2009-08-14 Thread gleeo
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ruby1.9.1 The ruby 1.9.1 package made available in the karmic repository should have been built ruby with --program-suffix=1.9.1 if it is going to install ruby as ruby1.9.1. It doesn't do that however, and if, like me, you have 1.8.7 installed as

[Bug 413815] Re: ruby 1.9.1 should be configured with --program-suffix=1.9.1 if installed as ruby1.9.1

2009-08-14 Thread gleeo
Sorry, I didn't explain myself clearly in the initial bug report. The ruby 1.9.1 package made available in the karmic repository should have been built with --program-suffix=1.9.1 if the binary is going to be installed as '/usr/bin/ruby1.9.1' but it fails to do so. Possible problems could