Earlier, someone reported a similar problem in Quantal:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1085684
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1191600
Title:
User namespace is
This latest v3.10 kernel referred to in the previous comment did not
work for me by the same reason: CONFIG_USER_NS was not defined in the
build.
It is possible that the following two links explain the reason behind
the decision not to enable CONFIG_USER_NS in the 13.04 kernel:
Public bug reported:
lxc-checkconfig reports that user namespace is missing in raring 32 bit.
uname -a:
Linux example 3.8.0-25-generic #37-Ubuntu SMP Thu Jun 6 20:47:30 UTC
2013 i686 athlon i686 GNU/Linux
/proc/version_signature:
Ubuntu 3.8.0-25.37-generic 3.8.13
lspci output: N/A (lspci not
This is the strace output recorded when trying to start a container with
lxc.id_map in config, that is, requiring user namespace. See the second
clone() call which fails with EINVAL.
** Attachment added: strace of lxc-start of a container requiring user
namespace
This is the strace output recorded when starting a container without lxc.id_map
in config, that s, not requiring user namespace.
All calls to clone are successful.
** Attachment added: strace of lxc-start of a container not requiring user
namespace
I am unable to run apport on this installation: it is intended to be a
minimal memory-resident Ubuntu base with very limited set of packages,
so apport (and its python counterpart) is not to be installed there.
Besides, by the nature of the issue being reported, the source of the
issue is in the
Unfortunately the issue with locked-out terminal root account still
exists in Hardy.
--
LTSP root account still locked with --prompt-rootpass
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/281361
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Hi,
Same thing, on Ubuntu 8.04, I just got hit by this issue. But for those
who are not packaging purists, it is possible just to go to the Adobe
website, and download/install the plugin. I did that just 15 minutes
ago, works fine. And it is user-level installation, so the package
database is not
drop it
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134037
You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
of the bug.
--
Dimitry Golubovsky
Anywhere on the Web
--
Package too old, please drop it
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134037
You received this bug notification because
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: hsffig
I am Dimitry Golubovsky, developer of HSFFIG. The version 0.1.2-2 you
are packaging was written with GHC 6.2.2 and old versions of packages
required. It will not compile with GHC-6.6.x. Besides, changes in C
preprocessor behavior in gcc 4.x make
10 matches
Mail list logo
