[Bug 371663] Re: Stretched thumbnails of small images

2009-10-17 Thread grassdonuts
This is great news! Thank you to everyone involved. -- Stretched thumbnails of small images https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/371663 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 415941] Re: grub legacy as install option

2009-09-01 Thread grassdonuts
I do apologize if I've offended. I would like to however mention three things. 1) Grab-bag bug reports of the form it's all horrible tend not to be so useful I thought I was being helpful by providing details. 2) ... not going to respond in detail ... Does respond in detail mean giving

[Bug 415941] Re: grub legacy as install option

2009-08-29 Thread grassdonuts
So for anyone who wants an OS where the user is in control it has to be; 1) boot grub 2) toggle Ubuntu Karmic (makeactive chainloader +1) 3) boot grub2 4) wait for the 10 sec countdown (because grub2 is uneditable the user can't shorten it to 1 or 0) So much for shorter boot times. -- grub

[Bug 415940] [NEW] grub legacy as install option

2009-08-19 Thread grassdonuts
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 415941 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/415941 Public bug reported: Binary package hint: grub2 not really a bug but a request. since grub2 is (how do I put this diplomatically) sorely immature but going to be the default for karmic anyway, couldn't we

[Bug 415941] [NEW] grub legacy as install option

2009-08-19 Thread grassdonuts
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: grub2 not really a bug but a request. since grub2 is (how do I put this diplomatically) sorely immature but going to be the default for karmic anyway, couldn't we leave grub proper in as an install option like ext4 vs ext3 ? editing grub used to be

[Bug 394636] Re: ugly icons in nautilus

2009-08-17 Thread grassdonuts
Sorry I took so long, when I received the notice I mistakenly sent the screenshot to the email reply address. Yes, I am a noob. Anyway, here's a shot of gutsy without the problem. ** Attachment added: Gutsy.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30416483/Gutsy.png -- ugly icons in nautilus

[Bug 394636] Re: ugly icons in nautilus

2009-08-17 Thread grassdonuts
Both Intrepid and Hardy had the problem but after an update late July half of it was fixed. Icons were not stretched anymore but still had the black border. ** Attachment added: Hardy.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30416530/Hardy.png -- ugly icons in nautilus

[Bug 394636] Re: ugly icons in nautilus

2009-08-17 Thread grassdonuts
Now it seems the problem has returned with Karmic Alpha 4. Hopefully it can be fixed before the final release. ** Attachment added: Karmic.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30416564/Karmic.png ** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = New -- ugly icons in nautilus

[Bug 394636] Re: ugly icons in nautilus

2009-07-09 Thread grassdonuts
** Package changed: ubiquity (Ubuntu) = nautilus (Ubuntu) -- ugly icons in nautilus https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/394636 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 394636] [NEW] ugly icons in nautilus

2009-07-02 Thread grassdonuts
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ubiquity Right now I'm running Hardy. When I open a folder with icon images in it (.png, .svg with transparency) the small ones are all stretched out of proportion. Plus, they also have an ugly black border around them. I tried changing the dafault