[Bug 2065139] Re: nvidia-dkms-545 545.29.06-0ubuntu0.22.04.2: nvidia kernel module failed to build

2024-06-19 Thread kalvdans
nvidia-dkms-550 550.90.07-0ubuntu1 worked on kernel 5.15.0-112-generic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065139 Title: nvidia-dkms-545 545.29.06-0ubuntu0.22.04.2: nvidia kernel module

[Bug 1946556] [NEW] TypeError: device_discovered() takes exactly 4 arguments

2021-10-09 Thread kalvdans
Public bug reported: I started bluewho without arguments; a window flashed by and then this traceback occurred on the terminal. $ bluewho Gtk-Message: 15:36:56.620: Failed to load module "gail" Gtk-Message: 15:36:56.621: Failed to load module "atk-bridge" Traceback (most recent call last):

[Bug 1919314] Re: debconf: delaying package configuration, since apt-utils is not installed

2021-03-16 Thread kalvdans
I suggest printing the message on stdout instead of stderr to emphasize that it is an informal message and not a warning. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1919314 Title: debconf:

[Bug 1919314] Re: debconf: delaying package configuration, since apt-utils is not installed

2021-03-16 Thread kalvdans
Thanks David for the explanation. Would it be possible to silence the message for packages that doesn't need to ask questions? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1919314 Title: debconf:

[Bug 1919314] [NEW] debconf: delaying package configuration, since apt-utils is not installed

2021-03-16 Thread kalvdans
Public bug reported: The warning appears when installing apt-utils, with no way to silence the message. If apt-utils is required in the base image, it should be added there and not be a standalone package. This is a transcript from Ubuntu 20.04.1: $ LANG=C sudo apt install apt-utils Reading

[Bug 1901090] [NEW] run-parts: failed to stat component /etc/network/if-post-down.d/avahi-daemon: No such file or directory

2020-10-22 Thread kalvdans
Public bug reported: avahi-daemon 0.7-4ubuntu7 installs a symlink /etc/network/if-post-down.d /avahi-daemon -> ../if-up.d/avahi-daemon but doesn't install the symlink target /etc/network/if-up.d/avahi-daemon That makes ifdown complain: $ sudo ifdown enp2s0f3 run-parts: failed to stat component

[Bug 1897966] [NEW] systemd unit file should use owserver --foreground

2020-09-30 Thread kalvdans
Public bug reported: After upgrading from Ubuntu 18.04 to 20.04 I started to see errors when restarting owserver.service. They appear approximately every second time without clues from the logs. ``` $ sudo systemctl stop owserver.service; sudo systemctl start owserver.service Job for

[Bug 1873102] Re: svd hangs for larger matrix (focal fossa)

2020-05-06 Thread kalvdans
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1870138 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1870138 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1870138 svd never finishes -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1745463] Re: Disabling systemd-resolved breaks dhclient resolvconf integration

2019-10-15 Thread kalvdans
I agree with the change @GeekSmith suggests as well. I'm running a system without network-manager, without netplan, without resolvconf. Only ifupdown and dhclient. I expect /etc/resolv.conf to be updated by the logic in /sbin/dhclient-script where it (correctly, in my system) assumes it is the

[Bug 1336275] [NEW] Apple SuperDrive USB optical reader needs unlock

2014-07-01 Thread kalvdans
Public bug reported: The SuperDrive USB dvd drive from Apple needs a specific initialization sequence to get started. It can be implemented with sg3-utils and the following udev rule: # Initialise Apple SuperDrive ACTION==add, ATTRS{idProduct}==1500, ATTRS{idVendor}==05ac, DRIVERS==usb,

[Bug 459766] Re: Write errors on ecryptfs

2010-02-17 Thread kalvdans
I still believe it is an error; In my opinion ecryptfs should gracefully handle the ENOSPC error by propagating it to the upper layers, and not write scary log messages. I vote for reopening the bug. -- Write errors on ecryptfs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/459766 You received this bug