[Bug 748340] Re: btrfsck fails with "unsupported option features", must [ignore] to boot

2017-06-08 Thread masc
in my case the (v2) space cache was preventing a repair, causing this error. after invoking `btrfs check --clear-space-cache v2 `, `--repair` stopped complaining. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.

[Bug 574665] Re: kvm + virtio disk corrupts large volumes (>1TB).

2011-01-28 Thread masc
just out of curiosity, 0.12.5 works well, why not just use it? even dist-upgrade to 10.10 which has 0.12.5 would probably be less painful than having to test/deal with this bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://

[Bug 574665] Re: kvm + virtio disk corrupts large volumes (>1TB).

2010-08-15 Thread masc
Seems more tricky to patch than expected, more things contributing to this defect. There was some regression on gentoo as well, patched/fixed in -r1 and re-introduced in -r2 although the previous patch was in. Most efficient solution will be not to patch. Update to 0.12.5 which fixes the problem

[Bug 574665] Re: kvm + virtio disk corrupts large volumes (>1TB).

2010-06-25 Thread masc
@steven: what you're describing seems to be a different issue though, sounds rather host related. anyway the whole ide guest story is a bit offtopic here, Ill open a new bug for this as soon as I have time to do more tests. -- kvm + virtio disk corrupts large volumes (>1TB). https://bugs.launch

[Bug 574665] Re: kvm + virtio disk corrupts large volumes (>1TB).

2010-06-25 Thread masc
@curt: did you try copying 60gb from one raw ide disk to another within ubuntu guest? -- kvm + virtio disk corrupts large volumes (>1TB). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574665 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-b

[Bug 574665] Re: kvm + virtio disk corrupts large volumes (>1TB).

2010-06-22 Thread masc
try to patch qemu-kvm 0.12.4, seemed to me there were other changes contributing to this fix in 0.12.4. I verified that it works on gentoo http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=321005, at least using 1.5TB disk. ** Bug watch added: Gentoo Bugzilla #321005 http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?

[Bug 574665] Re: kvm + virtio disk corrupts large volumes (>1TB).

2010-05-04 Thread masc
yes, writing is not enough though. try copying 60 GB from one ide disk to another. there's plenty of those ata exception bugs floating around, I just picked the closest example. failures during WRITE_DMA_EXT are most common. -- kvm + virtio disk corrupts large volumes (>1TB). https://bugs.laun

[Bug 574665] Re: kvm + virtio disk corrupts large volumes (>1TB).

2010-05-03 Thread masc
Even though there's no corruption, ide cannot be considered an acceptable workaround with kvm. Ata exceptions will occur mostly when writing large files. (eg. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/279693). Proposed workarounds like putting cd in drive don't work with kvm. All proces

[Bug 335239] Re: Synaptic Quick Search not working

2009-04-11 Thread masc
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 288797 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/288797 ..and yes, everything is selected in search filters and all packages are uptodate. -- Synaptic Quick Search not working https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/335239 You received this bug notification because you a

[Bug 335239] Re: Synaptic Quick Search not working

2009-04-11 Thread masc
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 288797 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/288797 @Chris Coulson: mh oky, wildcard works for "ntfs", however other search terms definitely match substrings (eg. "mount" matches gnome-mount, 9mount etc. even substrings in descriptions), so why does "ntfs" only

[Bug 335239] Re: Synaptic Quick Search not working

2009-04-11 Thread masc
This is not a duplicate. Even after forcing xapian index update, searching for "ntfs" for example will only return 2 results using indexed/quick search, while regular search by name reveals 11. I replicated this on 2 machines running jaunty, a friend of mine using intrepid confirmed the issue as