So, after any update a bug simply is marked as invalid? How any bug
should be solved then?
--
gnome-settings-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV in g_main_context_dispatch()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/596367
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscri
After a not so small number of crashes, I noticed that in most cases
gnome-settings-daemon crashed when I tried to close an application which
was residing in the notification area (a.k.a. tray or system tray). Once
or twice it crashed even when I right-clicked on the application icon in
the notific
** Attachment added: "CoreDump.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50839500/CoreDump.gz
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50839501/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "Disassembly.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50839502/Disassembly.txt
** Attachm
** Visibility changed to: Public
--
gnome-settings-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV in g_main_context_dispatch()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/596367
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@l
Apport finally catched the crash during the work (not at startup/login).
Since I'm not sure if those issues are the same, I reported gnome-
settings-daemon crash as a new Bug #596367.
--
Theme not applied on startup
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/521766
You received this bug notification because
Is there any other way to hunt down this issue except with apport
(since, as Zeppe said and I can confirm, it obviously doesn't detect
gnome-settings-daemon crash)?
--
Theme not applied on startup
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/521766
You received this bug notification because you are a member o
This happens to me too, but not only on startup. From time to time,
theme gets broken (gnome-settings-daemon dies) when I close an
application (not certain app, but seems to be random). I also have
modified gdm with 'gksudo -u gdm dbus-launch gnome-appearance-
properties', if that matters. Also, re
Just learned that the cause for this issue was TeXLive 2007/2008's
version of install-info which is in conflict with system's version of
install-info (affect not only Intrepid, but Jaunty and Karmic as well;
see bug #295542). Solving bug #295542 automatically solves this one too.
--
package slib
Hi. Actually, I learned just a couple of days ago, while testing the
same issue with ocrad (Bug #295542), that the cause was TeXLive 2007 and
TeXLive 2008 version of install-info which is in conflict with system's
version of install-info, so solving bug #295542 automatically solves
this one too.
Just learned that the cause for this issue was TeXLive 2007's and
TeXLive 2008's version of install-info which is in conflict with
system's version of install-info (applies to Ibex, Jaunty and Karmic;
see bug #295542). Solving the bug #295542 automatically solves this one
too.
--
gv failed to con
Thanks a lot. Removing TeXLive 2007/2008's install-info solved
post/preremoval script problems with other packages too (gv, gnupg2
etc.).
--
Texlive2008 install-info conflicts with system's version of install-info
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/295542
You received this bug notification because y
No problem. Yes, I do. Actually, I have installed some core packages of
TeXLive 2008 from Ubuntu repos (those that were needed by LaTeX editors
like Kile and Texmaker as dependencies) and have installed full TeXLive
2009 from the DVD into a folder inside my /home directory (and added its
path to ~/
Just to add:
1. When installing ocrad 0.17-4 from Ubuntu repos, i get above mentioned
error. To prevent system always complaining when installing new apps, I
added a line containing "exit 0" just below "set -e" in
/var/lib/dpkg/info/ocrad.postinst. After this, "sudo apt-get install -f"
sorts thing
Actually, it is. I still receive the same error on Ubuntu 9.10, 64bit,
ocrad 0.17.4. I had to add "exit 0" to postinstallation script
(/var/lib/dpkg/info) to prevent error to show up every time I install or
remove anything. But this is not a real solution, just temporary I hope.
--
package ocrad
Just to confirm that this issue is still present in Ubuntu Jaunty 64bit
(Texlive 2008 installed manually).
--
package mjpegtools 1:1.8.0-0.2ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: le
sous-processus post-installation script a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/30507
** Attachment added: "DpkgTerminalLog.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20149390/DpkgTerminalLog.txt
--
package slib 3b1-3 [modified: /var/lib/dpkg/info/slib.list] failed to
install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status
1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/30
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: slib
Just as gv, gnupg2, ocrad... slib's broken too. Ubuntu 8.10, 64-bit.
Installed as dependency for gnucash.
ProblemType: Package
Architecture: amd64
Dependencies:
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.10
ErrorMessage: subprocess post-installation script returned
** Attachment added: "DpkgTerminalLog.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19487710/DpkgTerminalLog.txt
--
package ocrad 0.17-3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation
script returned error exit status 1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/295542
You received this bug notification
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ocrad
Like gv and gnupg2, ocrad package failed to install properly, returning
post-installation script error.
Ubuntu 8.10, 64-bit, ocrad version 0.17-3 from repos.
ProblemType: Package
Architecture: amd64
Dependencies:
libgcc1 1:4.3.2-1ubuntu11
gcc-4.
Public bug reported:
After installation, when trying to configure gv package, post-
installation script returned an error saying that the package failed to
configure, error in package gv. And, it can't be uninstalled too.
The version of gv is 3.6.4-3, from repos, Ubuntu Intrepid Ibex (final)
64bi
Public bug reported:
After installation, when trying to configure, post-installation script
returned an error saying that the package failed to configure, error in
package gnupg2. And, it can't be uninstalled too.
The version of gnupg2 is 2.0.9-3.1, from repos, Ubuntu Intrepid Ibex
(final) 64bit.
Just to note that same problem exists in openSUSE 11's .rpm package
--
texlive-xetex accents bug in Hardy Heron
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/224787
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bu
Thanks for reply. Yes, in Debian unstable texlive-xetex package there's
no problem, only in the current Hardy main repo.
--
texlive-xetex accents bug in Hardy Heron
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/224787
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscrib
Please try without [no-sscript] option in the code or update xltxtra.sty
to v.0.3c (in attachment)
** Attachment added: "xltxtra.sty"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14060593/xltxtra.sty
--
texlive-xetex accents bug in Hardy Heron
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/224787
You received this bug not
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: texlive-xetex
If using "\=" and "\^" commands for accents after which later in the
word comes "-" with "xelatex" run, characters between accents and "-"
are repeated twice, so, e.g., if entered this: "Uj\=unul-eser" one gets
this as a result: "Ujûnul-nul-
25 matches
Mail list logo
