** Changed in: ubuntu-gnome
Status: Expired = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1200934
Title:
evolution-source-registry crashed with SIGSEGV in
** Changed in: software-properties (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Mike Davis (mdavi86)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1312673
Title:
software-properties-gtk crashed
if
i’m wrong).
and the scopes scope is still opt-out.. and does not appear to address the
EFF’s concerns at all..
Mike Davis
IOA
On Mar 31, 2014, at 9:34 PM, Benjamin Kerensa
1073...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
@mlaverdiere: I agree this announcement addresses any privacy concerns
users should
** Also affects: ubuntu
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1200934
Title:
evolution-source-registry crashed with SIGSEGV in
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: New = Confirmed
** No longer affects: ubuntu
** Also affects: ubuntu
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
FIX:
I have begun advocating alternate distributions after mr shuttleworth's
most recent statements on the direction of the fix.
to date, there has been no public announcement (by ubuntu) on the
dangers presented to users by the addition of the lens which has been
done for many other
While I agree that things must remain civil, your comment implies a
dialogue that just doesn't seem to be happening to get the issue fixed.
So far the EFF has proposed a series of fixes that i think are
reasonable compromises to fix this bug but we have yet to hear a real
response plan from
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1073114 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1073114
This bug has been mislabeled as a dupe of 1074780 which calls out
privacy settings. My bug is an implementation bug in which the lens
fails to protect searches in the way it /attempts/ to by utilizing ssl
Public bug reported:
first i want to say that the default nature of the amazon spam plugin
really is a violation of the community trust, and I highly advocate the
EFF's position on this plugin.. the user should have the choice *before*
their information is reported to some entity on the
